forum

Nekomata Master feat. Shimotsuki Haruka - Element of SPADA [

posted
Total Posts
48
show more
Nanatsu
you should change source as beatmania IIDX 21 SPADA. not just beatmania IIDX.

and you can delete 21 on tag.

try to change 1365x768 BG size to 1366x768. according to this rule '1024x768 pixels for 4:3, 1366x768 pixels for 16:9'



Oni
* the diff has so many unsnapped notes. you can check them from AiMOD.

* 00:09:990 - it has sound. i think you can add here or kind of re-arrange

* 00:12:108 - ^

* 00:28:810 (56) - k

* 00:30:399 (64,65,66) - change them to d to give distinction on song pitch with 00:30:222 (63,67) - those d

* 00:33:928 (79) - d

* 00:36:928 (96) - k

* 00:37:634 - 00:39:752 - you can add 1/4 triplets such as previous pattern

* 00:43:281 - 00:48:222 - ^

* 00:50:869 (161) - d

* 00:52:987 (167) - d

* 01:07:987 (203) - change to k because it goes high pitch

* 01:13:105 (224) - d for consistency

* 01:20:516 (253) - ^

* 01:39:046 - 01:41:163 - try to make pattern such as 01:26:340 - 01:28:458 - this kind of for consistency

* 01:53:869 (70) - k

* 01:44:781 - add d

* 01:58:105 - 01:58:987 - make them all triplets. i believe this would be great to follow music sound

* 02:00:840 - add d

* 02:04:546 - add d

* 02:09:840 - add

* 02:10:546 (168) - i think you dont need 5 notes for here. delete it

* 02:11:163 - 02:16:105 - add some triplets on here too

* 02:32:693 - add d

* 03:01:634 (382) - change to k for pitch

* 03:04:899 - add d

* 03:06:928 - 03:07:810 - try to use some pattern here

* 03:15:840 - add and 03:16:105 (459) - k

* 03:20:252 (485) - k

* 03:33:222 (548,549) - swap dk

* 03:33:752 - 03:36:222 - try to match k sound to vocal sound

* 03:40:987 - 03:41:693 - use some k on here

* 04:05:252 - add

* 04:07:369 - add

* 04:12:663 - add

* 04:20:075 - add

* 04:21:134 - add

* 04:22:546 - add

* 04:30:928 - 04:31:458 - as i said on 02:11:163 - 02:16:105 - here

* 04:33:840 - add

* 04:37:193 - add

* 04:39:134 - add

* 04:42:310 - aadd

* 04:43:634 - 04:48:575 - try to put triplets

* 04:53:958 - add

* 04:56:075 - add

* 04:59:252 - add

* 05:00:222 - 05:02:252 - add some notes on here

* 05:04:546 - 05:05:428 - why didnt you put notes here? try to put more

* 05:07:458 - add k

* 05:10:899 - add

* 05:16:193 - add

* 05:19:634 - 05:23:340 - try to use some tripplets


kind of fast modding because i have working for today sorry T.T I must have many missed parts to suggest and detail things.

and you should use more various patterns if you want to remain it as 'Oni' diff. the basic element on map was good though.

therefore, i believe you can improve this map further :) good luck!
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

Nanatsu wrote:

you should change source as beatmania IIDX 21 SPADA. not just beatmania IIDX.

and you can delete 21 on tag.

try to change 1365x768 BG size to 1366x768. according to this rule '1024x768 pixels for 4:3, 1366x768 pixels for 16:9'



Oni
* the diff has so many unsnapped notes. you can check them from AiMOD.

* 00:09:990 - it has sound. i think you can add here or kind of re-arrange

* 00:12:108 - ^

* 00:28:810 (56) - k

* 00:30:399 (64,65,66) - change them to d to give distinction on song pitch with 00:30:222 (63,67) - those d

* 00:33:928 (79) - d

* 00:36:928 (96) - k

* 00:37:634 - 00:39:752 - you can add 1/4 triplets such as previous pattern

* 00:43:281 - 00:48:222 - ^

* 00:50:869 (161) - d

* 00:52:987 (167) - d

* 01:07:987 (203) - change to k because it goes high pitch

* 01:13:105 (224) - d for consistency

* 01:20:516 (253) - ^

* 01:39:046 - 01:41:163 - try to make pattern such as 01:26:340 - 01:28:458 - this kind of for consistency

* 01:53:869 (70) - k

* 01:44:781 - add d

* 01:58:105 - 01:58:987 - make them all triplets. i believe this would be great to follow music sound

* 02:00:840 - add d

* 02:04:546 - add d

* 02:09:840 - add

* 02:10:546 (168) - i think you dont need 5 notes for here. delete it

* 02:11:163 - 02:16:105 - add some triplets on here too

* 02:32:693 - add d

* 03:01:634 (382) - change to k for pitch

* 03:04:899 - add d

* 03:06:928 - 03:07:810 - try to use some pattern here

* 03:15:840 - add and 03:16:105 (459) - k

* 03:20:252 (485) - k

* 03:33:222 (548,549) - swap dk

* 03:33:752 - 03:36:222 - try to match k sound to vocal sound

* 03:40:987 - 03:41:693 - use some k on here

* 04:05:252 - add

* 04:07:369 - add

* 04:12:663 - add

* 04:20:075 - add

* 04:21:134 - add

* 04:22:546 - add

* 04:30:928 - 04:31:458 - as i said on 02:11:163 - 02:16:105 - here

* 04:33:840 - add

* 04:37:193 - add

* 04:39:134 - add

* 04:42:310 - aadd

* 04:43:634 - 04:48:575 - try to put triplets

* 04:53:958 - add

* 04:56:075 - add

* 04:59:252 - add

* 05:00:222 - 05:02:252 - add some notes on here

* 05:04:546 - 05:05:428 - why didnt you put notes here? try to put more

* 05:07:458 - add k

* 05:10:899 - add

* 05:16:193 - add

* 05:19:634 - 05:23:340 - try to use some tripplets


kind of fast modding because i have working for today sorry T.T I must have many missed parts to suggest and detail things.

and you should use more various patterns if you want to remain it as 'Oni' diff. the basic element on map was good though.

therefore, i believe you can improve this map further :) good luck!
modありがとう!
Kyouren
Dragon hah?
This is BG for you~


I think this picture cover used sword :> (similiar adventure :v)
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

gokugohan12468 wrote:

Dragon hah?
This is BG for you~


I think this picture cover used sword :> (similiar adventure :v)
uh.. fine
gameuse_old
Hello there! I don't have a lot of experience with taiko beatmap modding, but I will do whatever I can to help you!

First I will suggest adding sliders here:
02:35:163 (339) - Add slider that ends 02:36:046
02:38:340 (343) - ^ that ends 02:38:869
02:39:399 (344) - ^ that ends 02:40:281
02:42:575 (350) - ^ that ends 02:43:281
02:43:634 (351) - ^ that ends 02:44:340
03:56:693 (760) - should be a spinner which ends 03:57:840
04:58:281 (170,171,172,173) - delete these and replace with a slider
04:58:987 (174,175,176,177,178) - ^
05:19:458 add a note here?
05:28:105 (13) - replace note with a spinner which ends 05:29:340

General:
03:50:693 (733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,749,750,751) - This part sounds weird. I think you should leave the background music alone and just focus on the lyrics.

Timing:
03:23:869 please end the fourth kiai mode here
04:30:399 5th kiai should end here

I hope this mod will help! Thanks for doing an m4m
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

gameuse wrote:

Hello there! I don't have a lot of experience with taiko beatmap modding, but I will do whatever I can to help you!

First I will suggest adding sliders here:
02:35:163 (339) - Add slider that ends 02:36:046 uhh no
02:38:340 (343) - ^ that ends 02:38:869 no
02:39:399 (344) - ^ that ends 02:40:281no ._.
02:42:575 (350) - ^ that ends 02:43:281
02:43:634 (351) - ^ that ends 02:44:340 ^ slider doesnt make sense at taiko diff
03:56:693 (760) - should be a spinner which ends 03:57:840i will think about it .-.
04:58:281 (170,171,172,173) - delete these and replace with a slider no
04:58:987 (174,175,176,177,178) - ^no
05:19:458 add a note here? sure
05:28:105 (13) - replace note with a spinner which ends 05:29:340 handbreak

General:
03:50:693 (733,734,735,736,737,738,739,740,741,742,743,744,745,746,747,748,749,750,751) - This part sounds weird. I think you should leave the background music alone and just focus on the lyrics. few note if just follow lyric , follow bg music kinda fine

Timing:
03:23:869 please end the fourth kiai mode here .will think about it
04:30:399 5th kiai should end heresame as above , kinda fine i guess

I hope this mod will help! Thanks for doing an m4m
thanks for mod
S a n d

Taiko mod request from: Shiroi Hiroshi
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: Oni
Modding Content: Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*



- I don't think Ono allows custom difficulty name ;w;... I had to change mine from "The Undying Oni" to "Inner Oni"


- 00:10:814 (17,18) - Ctrl + G? The pitch fits more.
- 00:12:932 (23,24) - ^
- 00:22:773 - Miss snapped note. If it should be there, there probably is BPM change.
- 00:35:340 - ddD or kkK is unrankable TwT (I know, I cry too ;w;). But you can make it kkD or ddK
- 01:37:546 - Add k here? Flows better.
- 01:41:340 ~ 01:42:222- Remove spinner and change to this?
- 01:43:105 - No ddD again ;w;
- 02:00:222 - Change to D?
- 02:11:869 ~ 02:12:928 - Change to ? Flows and plays much better.
- 02:21:399 - Add d here? There's a sound here
- 02:21:752 - Change to k? The pitch is real high here.
- 02:24:310 - Remove here and 02:24:840 also 02:25:016 add d? It fits the song much better
- 02:27:752 ~ 02:28:810 - Change to ? It fits the song better
- 02:28:987 - k k k k -> kdk kdk? It fits the song better o.o
- 02:59:516 - kkddD is unrankable ;w;
- 03:06:928 - Change to k? It sounds better.
- 03:23:869 - Finisher here?
- 03:41:163 - Change to d? There is a change in pitch.
- 03:49:634 - d d d d D -> ddd ddd D? Fits the triplet in the background.
- 03:56:693 - Change to K? It's the same sounds as 03:57:752
- 04:32:428 - Add d? Gives a better emphasize to k at 04:32:693
- 04:32:693 - Change to K? It kinda fits better lol
- 04:35:075 - Add d? Sounds better with the kddd before
- 05:15:046 - Kdd is unrankable ;w;.

Nice song, GL ranking :3
Fuel
Hi, from my mod queue.

d = don, red note
k = kat, blue note
D = don finisher, big red note
K = kat finisher, big blue note

mod
General
There are bunch of finishers at the end of 1/4 patterns which I don't think are rankable because they aren't at the end of the pattern or they follow the same note:
e.g. ddD, kdD, Kdd aren't rankable I'm pretty sure.


Verflucht
Just pointing out finisher-related bits first:
00:35:516 (91) - ddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
01:43:281 (8) - ddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
02:59:516 (426) - kkddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
04:49:634 (118) - Ddd, finisher not at the end of 1/4.
05:06:575 (12) - Kdd, finisher not at the end of 1/4.
05:11:869 (47) - kkK, finisher not preceded by different note.
05:15:046 (61) - Kdd, finisher not at the end of 1/4.

Now for the rest... (mostly just pitch)
00:10:814 (17,18) - d k instead of k d fits better with how you're following the pitch in this first part.
00:12:932 (23,24) - ^
00:16:252 (29,30) - Same with the above point, due to pitch I think these two notes should be the same (either k k or d d). Maybe use d k d d for 00:14:873 (27,28,29,30)?
00:17:311 - You could add a short spinner here? Not really necessary though.
00:22:773 (34) - This note is snapped weirdly, I think 00:22:811 is better.
00:24:134 - There is an audible sound here, you could add a k here to make a 1/4 kd double.
00:26:252 - ^
00:53:163 (192,193) - Following the vocal pitch, I think these two should be the same (again either k k or d d). 00:53:163 (192,193,194,195,196,197) could be d d d d k d?
00:55:281 (196,197) - This is fundamentally the same as 01:03:752 (217,218), where I think it fits better as k d as you mapped it the second time.
01:01:634 (213,214,215,216) - Same idea with the above points, though I understand if your aim was to get a bit more variation.
02:06:046 - Add a d?
02:21:399 - ^
02:21:752 (271,272) - Matching the pitch again, this sounds better as k k imo.
02:22:810 (274,275,276) - Ctrl+g so k lands on the higher pitched note. Maybe use k k d too?
02:28:987 (318,319) - ddk instead of k k?
02:30:840 - Add a d to make kdk or use a ddk?
02:31:193 - ^ except it'll just be ddk.
02:32:252 - ^ to make kdd.
02:40:810 (346) - Change to K?
04:34:987 - There is a drum beat here, add a d to make kdddd?

Hope it helps :D
Raiden
Message me when you finish applying these mods.

On a side note: I'd change diff name to Oni to avoid getting slapped by Ono.
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

L1m3s wrote:

Hi, from my mod queue. hi lim3s

d = don, red note
k = kat, blue note
D = don finisher, big red note
K = kat finisher, big blue note

mod
General
There are bunch of finishers at the end of 1/4 patterns which I don't think are rankable because they aren't at the end of the pattern or they follow the same note:
e.g. ddD, kdD, Kdd aren't rankable I'm pretty sure.


Verflucht
Just pointing out finisher-related bits first:
00:35:516 (91) - ddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
01:43:281 (8) - ddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
02:59:516 (426) - kkddD, finisher not preceded by different note.
04:49:634 (118) - Ddd, finisher not at the end of 1/4.
05:06:575 (12) - Kdd, finisher not at the end of 1/4.
05:11:869 (47) - kkK, finisher not preceded by different note.
05:15:046 (61) - Kdd, finisher not at the end of 1/4. delete all finisher

Now for the rest... (mostly just pitch)
00:10:814 (17,18) - d k instead of k d fits better with how you're following the pitch in this first part. ok
00:12:932 (23,24) - ^sure
00:16:252 (29,30) - Same with the above point, due to pitch I think these two notes should be the same (either k k or d d). Maybe use d k d d nice idea for 00:14:873 (27,28,29,30)?
00:17:311 - You could add a short spinner here? Not really necessary though. no
00:22:773 (34) - This note is snapped weirdly, I think 00:22:811 is better. thanks for notice
00:24:134 - There is an audible sound here, you could add a k here to make a 1/4 kd double. sound weird .-.
00:26:252 - ^ ok make sense
00:53:163 (192,193) - Following the vocal pitch, I think these two should be the same (again either k k or d d). 00:53:163 huh?(192,193,194,195,196,197) could be d d d d k d? maybe
00:55:281 (196,197) - This is fundamentally the same as 01:03:752 (217,218), where I think it fits better as k d as you mapped it the second time.ok
01:01:634 (213,214,215,216) - Same idea with the above points, though I understand if your aim was to get a bit more variation. heh ?
02:06:046 - Add a d? add
02:21:399 - ^add
02:21:752 (271,272) - Matching the pitch again, this sounds better as k k imo. fine
02:22:810 (274,275,276) - Ctrl+g so k lands on the higher pitched note. Maybe use k k d too? changed diffrent way
02:28:987 (318,319) - ddk instead of k k? change diffrent way
02:30:840 - Add a d to make kdk or use a ddk? added d
02:31:193 - ^ except it'll just be ddk. kinda weird but ok
02:32:252 - ^ to make kdd. uh.. ok
02:40:810 (346) - Change to K? kay
04:34:987 - There is a drum beat here, add a d to make kdddd? huh ?

Hope it helps :D
too lazy because reply ing at school , agred some part of it thanks forr modding , uhh nevermind fixed when arrived at home tho thanks

Raiden wrote:

Message me when you finish applying these mods.

On a side note: I'd change diff name to Oni to avoid getting slapped by Ono.
changed and please ono dont slap me




S a n d wrote:


Taiko mod request from: Shiroi Hiroshi
Request Type: M4M
Request Diff: Oni
Modding Content: Oni
*Note: I mod map according to my style of mapping, so sorry if it is unpractical >_<*



- I don't think Ono allows custom difficulty name ;w;... I had to change mine from "The Undying Oni" to "Inner Oni" aha ok changed


- 00:10:814 (17,18) - Ctrl + G? The pitch fits more. ok
- 00:12:932 (23,24) - ^
- 00:22:773 - Miss snapped note. If it should be there, there probably is BPM change. i think its fine
- 00:35:340 - ddD or kkK is unrankable TwT (I know, I cry too ;w;). But you can make it kkD or ddK detelete bid don
- 01:37:546 - Add k here? Flows better. nice idea
- 01:41:340 ~ 01:42:222- Remove spinner and change to this? kinda diffrent added
- 01:43:105 - No ddD again ;w; delete finisher
- 02:00:222 - Change to D? ok nice
- 02:11:869 ~ 02:12:928 - Change to ? Flows and plays much better. changed kinda diffrent .-.
- 02:21:399 - Add d here? There's a sound here5 plet rankable ?
- 02:21:752 - Change to k? The pitch is real high here.ok
- 02:24:310 - Remove here and 02:24:840 also 02:25:016 add d? It fits the song much better fine
- 02:27:752 ~ 02:28:810 - Change to ? It fits the song better changed
- 02:28:987 - k k k k -> kdk kdk? It fits the song better o.o a
- 02:59:516 - kkddD is unrankable ;w; delete finisher
- 03:06:928 - Change to k? It sounds better. sure
- 03:23:869 - Finisher here?finish
- 03:41:163 - Change to d? There is a change in pitch. eew
- 03:49:634 - d d d d D -> ddd ddd D? Fits the triplet in the background. hoo sure
- 03:56:693 - Change to K? It's the same sounds as 03:57:752 its already Kat's
- 04:32:428 - Add d? Gives a better emphasize to k at 04:32:693deathstream
- 04:32:693 - Change to K? It kinda fits better lol yeah
- 04:35:075 - Add d? Sounds better with the kddd before yes
- 05:15:046 - Kdd is unrankable ;w;. dont blame me , someone suggest it and i taught is rakable

Nice song, GL ranking :3
Thanks sand
newyams99
Hi from queue~
Sorry I'm late x.x

Oni

00:05:343 (5,6) - Ctrl + G? I think this sounds better.

00:24:222 (39,40) - ^

00:30:399 (68,69,70) - It's possible to make this into a 1/6 rhtyhm.

00:27:399 (54,55,56) - Match to 00:23:163 (35,36,37)? I like to keep it consistent since it sounds very similar, and hits 35-37 sounded the best.

00:31:987 (76) - Change to k, for the same reason as above. You may have had a d d d rhythm here to contrast with the next hit, but I think the sound that you're contrasting to is present at 00:23:869 (38) as well.

00:35:252 - You can add a d here.

00:37:458 - This break moment feels a bit weird imo. Add hits?

00:39:752 (122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132) - This is fine, but I personally wouldn't change from the melody to the background instrumentals in the middle of a section for this long. Just to let you know :P

00:52:987 (192) - Remove. In the rest of this section up to 00:59:869, you have matched to the vocals only.

01:08:516 (230,231,232,233,234,235,236) - In a quiet section, I personally don't like adding hits that aren't already in the instrumentals. maybe remove hits 01:08:516 (230,231) and 01:09:134 (235,236)?

01:10:281 - Add a hit of your choice here. It may be inconsistent with the rest of the rhythms, but there is a sound similar to that of the previous hit that would make it reasonable to have a hit here.

01:12:399 - ^

01:16:634 - ^

01:20:869 - ^

01:22:634 - Add a d to match the rhythms you had before.

01:58:105 (111,112,113,114,115,116) - kkd kdd? It sounds better imo.

02:17:869 (241) - Change to k and add a d to match instrumentals.

02:24:752 (282,283) - You can make a 1/6 rhythm here between these hits. Just an fyi.

02:29:693 - Add a hit of your choice here for flow with the previous hits.

03:12:928 (513) - Change to k? I think it sounds better.

03:23:869 (590) - idk if a finisher on this hit is allowed, but just keep it for now.

03:40:899 - Add a hit of your choice here.

03:41:252 - ^

03:41:605 - ^

04:30:928 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Match these with 01:58:458 (114,115,116,117,118,119). For consistency.

04:40:193 (67) - I don't see the reasoning behind this rhythm. Change?

What's with all these bookmarks at the end lol xD

That's all for this map. Good luck on rank 8-)
Sorry I'm late again x.x
Raiden
orz I was going to mod and I see this mod again haha. PM me when you apply it
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

Raiden wrote:

orz I was going to mod and I see this mod again haha. PM me when you apply it
okay , maybe you busy ._. and yandere too ?

newyams99 wrote:

Hi from queue~
Sorry I'm late x.x

Oni

00:05:343 (5,6) - Ctrl + G? I think this sounds better. haha yep

00:24:222 (39,40) - ^ sure

00:30:399 (68,69,70) - It's possible to make this into a 1/6 rhtyhm. uh.. i want keep it

00:27:399 (54,55,56) - Match to 00:23:163 (35,36,37)? I like to keep it consistent since it sounds very similar, and hits 35-37 sounded the best. ok

00:31:987 (76) - Change to k, for the same reason as above. You may have had a d d d rhythm here to contrast with the next hit, but I think the sound that you're contrasting to is present at 00:23:869 (38) as well. changed a bit diffrent

00:35:252 - You can add a d here. okay

00:37:458 - This break moment feels a bit weird imo. Add hits? h... okay

00:39:752 (122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132) - This is fine, but I personally wouldn't change from the melody to the background instrumentals in the middle of a section for this long. Just to let you know :P my intention was follow bg music all the time ._.

00:52:987 (192) - Remove. In the rest of this section up to 00:59:869, you have matched to the vocals only. huh ?

01:08:516 (230,231,232,233,234,235,236) - In a quiet section, I personally don't like adding hits that aren't already in the instrumentals. maybe remove hits 01:08:516 (230,231) and 01:09:134 (235,236)? i think its fine ... so no

01:10:281 - Add a hit of your choice here. It may be inconsistent with the rest of the rhythms, but there is a sound similar to that of the previous hit that would make it reasonable to have a hit here. ok

01:12:399 - ^ sure

01:16:634 - ^ y

01:20:869 - ^y

01:22:634 - Add a d to match the rhythms you had before. ok desu

01:58:105 (111,112,113,114,115,116) - kkd kdd? It sounds better imo. ok apllied

02:17:869 (241) - Change to k and add a d to match instrumentals. ok

02:24:752 (282,283) - You can make a 1/6 rhythm here between these hits. Just an fyi.
kinda
02:29:693 - Add a hit of your choice here for flow with the previous hits. k

03:12:928 (513) - Change to k? I think it sounds better. yep it tis

03:23:869 (590) - idk if a finisher on this hit is allowed, but just keep it for now. delete finisher

03:40:899 - Add a hit of your choice here. ok add , i didnt understand 3plet tbh

03:41:252 - ^ k

03:41:605 - ^ same as above ^

04:30:928 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Match these with 01:58:458 (114,115,116,117,118,119). For consistency. maybe

04:40:193 (67) - I don't see the reasoning behind this rhythm. Change? uh no

What's with all these bookmarks at the end lol xD bookmark is life , so no reason

That's all for this map. Good luck on rank 8-)
Sorry I'm late again x.x
thanks newsyam ?
Raiden
Hello! M4M as requested

00:30:752 (71) - k? Would give better flow and fits better the melody imo
00:32:516 (79) - According to the melody you're following, it would be nicer to delete this
00:35:516 (94) - This is hard to read the first time someone plays it. I would increase SV gradually from 00:34:810 -
00:39:752 - 00:42:575 - Why suddenly all 1/1s? I think that makes players lose momentum
05:06:575 (12) - Oops, unrankable! Remove the finisher
05:11:869 (47) - ^

Hmmmm. I can't seem to follow your thought process behind many patterns in this map. It would be nonsense for me to suggest stuff without even knowing what was your initial intention.

My thoughts
I liked some parts in which the mapping, even when improvised, seemed to fit the song well.

But mostly, I can't seem to find any base, any consistent structure in which you build the map around. Maybe that's my fault, but nonetheless I have to say it.

Anyway, here's my advice (I don't know if useless?): think about every pattern you make and how it fits the song, have a reason for using any pattern at any time. Have an intention, did you want to emphasize something, like a faster paced part of the song by adding more notes? Did you want to emphasize vocals by mapping just notes to them?

Sadly I can't help you much more without suggesting you a partial remap of this.
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

Raiden wrote:

Hello! M4M as requested
hello ?
00:30:752 (71) - k? Would give better flow and fits better the melody imo ok
00:32:516 (79) - According to the melody you're following, it would be nicer to delete this ok
00:35:516 (94) - This is hard to read the first time someone plays it. I would increase SV gradually from 00:34:810 - ok
00:39:752 - 00:42:575 - Why suddenly all 1/1s? I think that makes players lose momentum add more note
05:06:575 (12) - Oops, unrankable! Remove the finisher ok
05:11:869 (47) - ^ same as above

Hmmmm. I can't seem to follow your thought process behind many patterns in this map. It would be nonsense for me to suggest stuff without even knowing what was your initial intention. okay....

My thoughts
I liked some parts in which the mapping, even when improvised, seemed to fit the song well.

But mostly, I can't seem to find any base, any consistent structure in which you build the map around. Maybe that's my fault, but nonetheless I have to say it.

Anyway, here's my advice (I don't know if useless?): think about every pattern you make and how it fits the song, have a reason for using any pattern at any time. Have an intention, did you want to emphasize something, like a faster paced part of the song by adding more notes? Did you want to emphasize vocals by mapping just notes to them?

Sadly I can't help you much more without suggesting you a partial remap of this.
aha... okay , bad isnt ? why i re map this ? , the intention just follow the rythm , sorry for trouble
-Tenshi-
Hi! Here is your mod ._.

[Oni]
  1. 00:25:458 (45,46) - Ctrl + g? It's the same sound as here 00:27:399 (54,55,56) - for exemple.
  2. 00:26:252 (48) - This is not really necessary, there's a sound here but it plays weird imo.
  3. 00:36:222 (100) - Try to change this to k, there no sound to emphasize here.
  4. 01:31:281 (343) - d here?
  5. 01:51:399 (64) - k here, same sound as 01:51:046 (61,62,63) - and this would make a better flow imo.
  6. 02:02:163 (138,139,140) - 02:02:869 (144,145,146) - 02:03:222 (147,148,149) - k at the end of those 3 triplets, because they have the same sound as this one 02:02:516 (141,142,143) -
  7. 02:51:046 (372) - k because of the higher pitch.
  8. 02:59:516 (434) - For same reason as above ^.
  9. 03:20:340 (576) - k here?
  10. 04:12:663 (873) - Maybe you should move this note here 04:12:840 (874) - to be consistant with your pattern.
  11. 04:25:987 (958,959,960,961,962) - ddkkk sounds better here.
  12. 04:40:281 (68) - Add a d? Why there is no note here?
  13. 05:25:281 (3) - This note should be here 05:25:458 (3) -

Paf! Hope my mod helped you~
Good luck for ranking~
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

-Tenshi- wrote:

Hi! Here is your mod ._.
hi ?
[Oni]
  1. 00:25:458 (45,46) - Ctrl + g? It's the same sound as here 00:27:399 (54,55,56) - for exemple. ok
  2. 00:26:252 (48) - This is not really necessary, there's a sound here but it plays weird imo. delete
  3. 00:36:222 (100) - Try to change this to k, there no sound to emphasize here. ty fornotice
  4. 01:31:281 (343) - d here? no
  5. 01:51:399 (64) - k here, same sound as 01:51:046 (61,62,63) - and this would make a better flow imo.
  6. 02:02:163 (138,139,140) - 02:02:869 (144,145,146) - 02:03:222 (147,148,149) - k at the end of those 3 triplets, because they have the same sound as this one 02:02:516 (141,142,143) - change abit difrent
  7. 02:51:046 (372) - k because of the higher pitch. ok
  8. 02:59:516 (434) - For same reason as above ^. ok
  9. 03:20:340 (576) - k here? ok
  10. 04:12:663 (873) - Maybe you should move this note here 04:12:840 (874) - to be consistant with your pattern. changed difrently
  11. 04:25:987 (958,959,960,961,962) - ddkkk sounds better here. nice desu
  12. 04:40:281 (68) - Add a d? Why there is no note here? dunno
  13. 05:25:281 (3) - This note should be here 05:25:458 (3) -

Paf! Hope my mod helped you~
Good luck for ranking~
paf ? ok thanks
tasuke912
Hello.
すべて日本語で大丈夫とのことでしたのでその通りに書きます。

SPOILER
主な問題点:

一貫性の欠如
非常に細かいパートごとに見れば音取りにあまり問題が無いように感じるかもしれませんが、視野を広げて大きなパートで見ると土台となるリズムや、密度の変化の付け方が一貫していないのがわかります。改善が必要です。
例えば、
01:43:281 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) -
01:45:399 (24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31) -
02:00:222 (124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) -
02:02:340 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148) -
これらのパートでは音楽の音はほぼ似た構成になっているのに対し、譜面の構成はバラバラになっています。

02:21:399 (270,271,272,273) -
03:54:575 (774,775,776,777,778) -
このパターンでは曲の音の量が減っているわけでも無いのに対して、譜面の密度は急激に落ちています。
譜面の密度は音楽に忠実に従うべきです。
逆に急に密度を落としていいのは、02:34:105 (346) - からのような、静かなパートです。音楽自体の音が大きく減っているので、譜面の密度を落とすのは理にかなっています。

音の取捨選択
所々音の拾い方が中途半端で、プレイしていて多々違和感を感じました。
例えば、02:28:987 (321,322) - など。緩急の為に意図的に音を逃すという手法もありますが、それは密度の低いパートで用いる、もしくは他のドラムなどの音をより強調し、纏まりを付けるために用いる、などが適当であり、このような密度の高いパートで、他の特定の音に合わせているわけでも無く音を逃すのはただ曲の特徴を活かせていないだけのように感じざるをえません。もう少しよく音楽の音に耳を傾け、より忠実にノートを置いてみてください。これは上の一貫性の改善にもつながります。

まとめ:
曲の音を大切にし、密度やパターンなどの一貫性を向上させるために譜面をもう一度、一から見直してみてください。
少なくとも一貫性が欠如したままではRankedさせることは出来ないので、少し言いづらいのですがリマップも検討した方が良いかもしれません。
Raidenの言うように部分ごとに見れば良好なところもあるので、その部分を中心に他のパートのパターンを考えると良いと思います。頑張ってください。
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

tasuke912 wrote:

Hello.
すべて日本語で大丈夫とのことでしたのでその通りに書きます。

SPOILER
主な問題点:

一貫性の欠如
非常に細かいパートごとに見れば音取りにあまり問題が無いように感じるかもしれませんが、視野を広げて大きなパートで見ると土台となるリズムや、密度の変化の付け方が一貫していないのがわかります。改善が必要です。
例えば、
01:43:281 (8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15) -
01:45:399 (24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31) -
02:00:222 (124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131) -
02:02:340 (140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148) -
これらのパートでは音楽の音はほぼ似た構成になっているのに対し、譜面の構成はバラバラになっています。

02:21:399 (270,271,272,273) -
03:54:575 (774,775,776,777,778) -
このパターンでは曲の音の量が減っているわけでも無いのに対して、譜面の密度は急激に落ちています。
譜面の密度は音楽に忠実に従うべきです。
逆に急に密度を落としていいのは、02:34:105 (346) - からのような、静かなパートです。音楽自体の音が大きく減っているので、譜面の密度を落とすのは理にかなっています。

音の取捨選択
所々音の拾い方が中途半端で、プレイしていて多々違和感を感じました。
例えば、02:28:987 (321,322) - など。緩急の為に意図的に音を逃すという手法もありますが、それは密度の低いパートで用いる、もしくは他のドラムなどの音をより強調し、纏まりを付けるために用いる、などが適当であり、このような密度の高いパートで、他の特定の音に合わせているわけでも無く音を逃すのはただ曲の特徴を活かせていないだけのように感じざるをえません。もう少しよく音楽の音に耳を傾け、より忠実にノートを置いてみてください。これは上の一貫性の改善にもつながります。

まとめ:
曲の音を大切にし、密度やパターンなどの一貫性を向上させるために譜面をもう一度、一から見直してみてください。
少なくとも一貫性が欠如したままではRankedさせることは出来ないので、少し言いづらいのですがリマップも検討した方が良いかもしれません。
Raidenの言うように部分ごとに見れば良好なところもあるので、その部分を中心に他のパートのパターンを考えると良いと思います。頑張ってください。
あ.....私はそれは大丈夫だと思いますか? .....
私は後で地図を再します
guro
guro's modding queue coming through!

Wow. I have been looking at this map for hours and there is nothing that really needs changing. The only stuff I found was minor and less important.

00:24:752 (42) - I would turn this into d because of lower pitch
00:29:163 (61) - k because of higher pitch?
00:34:458 (86) - ^
03:24:928 (603) - k feels more fitting
04:35:958 (42) - the dkk is kinda awkward there. Turn it into a ddk or kkd maybe
04:43:105 (85,86,87) - kdk maybe?
04:51:752 (145,146,147) - ^
04:52:810 (152,153,154) - kkd?
05:15:046 (61) - d?

Really a very great map Shiroi! Best of luck for getting it ranked :)
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi

guro wrote:

guro's modding queue coming through! hi?

Wow. I have been looking at this map for hours and there is nothing that really needs changing. The only stuff I found was minor and less important.
thanks even 2 bn said need lack of improvement and something i dont undestand (._.)
00:24:752 (42) - I would turn this into d because of lower pitch
00:29:163 (61) - k because of higher pitch?
00:34:458 (86) - ^
03:24:928 (603) - k feels more fitting
04:35:958 (42) - the dkk is kinda awkward there. Turn it into a ddk or kkd maybe
04:43:105 (85,86,87) - kdk maybe?
04:51:752 (145,146,147) - ^
04:52:810 (152,153,154) - kkd?
05:15:046 (61) - d?

Really a very great map Shiroi! Best of luck for getting it ranked :)
yey ? thanks for mod , i will apply/answr it when afther school
Quizmaegi
Hi, Mod from my queue

[Oni]

01:18:752 - d

01:19:810 - ^

01:22:987 - ^

01:23:516 - k

01:23:693 - k

01:25:634 ~ 01:25:987 - ddk

02:23:163 - d

02:32:516 ~ 02:32:693 - ddd

02:32:869 ~ 02:33:046 - ddk

02:33:222 ~ 02:33:399 - ddk

02:33:575 ~ 02:34:105 - ddkdddd

02:45:399 - k

02:46:105 - d

02:46:458 - d

02:58:281 ~ 02:58:458 - ddd

03:01:810 - d

03:33:399 - D

03:41:693 - d

03:41:869 - k

03:45:222 - d

03:50:340 - k or K

04:04:281 - d

04:21:575 - d

04:21:928 - d

04:23:693 ~ 04:24:046 - ddddd

04:26:516 - d

04:40:281 - d

wow good map :D
Topic Starter
Shiroi Hiroshi
quizmaegi mod reply

SPOILER

Quizmaegi wrote:

Hi, Mod from my queue

[Oni]

01:18:752 - d there are such no soud , so no
01:19:810 - ^ ^

01:22:987 - ^ same as above

01:23:516 - k why ?

01:23:693 - k ok fine

01:25:634 ~ 01:25:987 - ddk why?... no please

02:23:163 - d ok nice

02:32:516 ~ 02:32:693 - ddd huh ?

02:32:869 ~ 02:33:046 - ddk ok sure

02:33:222 ~ 02:33:399 - ddk ?

02:33:575 ~ 02:34:105 - ddkdddd ok

02:45:399 - k ok

02:46:105 - d no

02:46:458 - d no

02:58:281 ~ 02:58:458 - ddd sure

03:01:810 - d ok

03:33:399 - D nice

03:41:693 - d ok

03:41:869 - k yes

03:45:222 - d yes

03:50:340 - k or K k yes

04:04:281 - d okay for variate

04:21:575 - d no

04:21:928 - d ok

04:23:693 ~ 04:24:046 - ddddd i think 3 plets its fine

04:26:516 - d ok

04:40:281 - d sure

wow good map :D well thanks , even very imposible aiming for rank
SKSalt
Hi, m4m request from my queue. んじゃいきます

[Oni]
  1. 00:15:547 - 赤線のオプションで"Omit first bar line"にチェックを入れてみましょう。すると白線が隠されて、見栄えがよくなります。参考:
  2. 02:10:634 (197,198,199) - この3連もボーカル音をフォローしてはどうですか?kdkとか
う~ん、基本的に音取りは合っていますが1+3 or 3+1の配置が多く、リズム・音取りがあまりにも単調でどうかな...という感じです。そこでいくつか例を挙げます
  1. 02:25:634 (296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312) - :arrow: k ddd k ddkdk ddk k kdkdk
  2. 02:52:105 (393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401) - :arrow: k d kkd k ddk
  3. 02:55:281 (417,418,419,420,421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433) - :arrow: k d kkd k ddk d kkddk ddk
とかとか。もう少しリズム・配色を豊かにしてみてはどうでしょうか?(このままのリズムでもRankedは可能と言っちゃ可能ですが)
現状のリズムを維持するならばまだ音取りに関するmodが出来ます。どうするかはあなた次第です。

頑張ってください~
Please sign in to reply.

New reply