Well, if I were too pick which one makes more sense then that would be a town claiming lovers/siblings. There's just no way a scum would claim lovers/siblings. It's still stupid to claim lovers/siblings as town nonetheless.
YesSakura wrote:
Jess, did your role PM specifically state that you don't know Haneii's alignment or are you just implying it.
More or less yes, it's usually 25% of the playerlist, the other option would be a 3rd party (SK) but that's kinda meh because 7-1-2 would mean that a mislynch would send the game to 4-1-2 the next day which is LyLo, so yeah, im fairly certain it's 2 scum, and if there's a 3rd party it's not a killing role.Frostings wrote:
oh is that how it worksSakura wrote:
Also since you asked
11 x 25% = 2.75.
So probably 2 scum.
I can finally stop asking every game
It's kinda odd if you think about it, she's really worried about how other people will read her now, usually scums are more worried about looking in a certain way.Gumica wrote:
Vote: Sakura
That certinly seems suspicious.
What do you guys think?
Explain.Frostings wrote:
No need for RVS for me
?_?- Magic Bomb - wrote:
Slaini is town.
Unvote
Why did you had to take that risk? You or Haneii didn't have a single vote for a lynch.-[Jess]- wrote:
yah It is not a good claim for town i think,It will cause two player dying.I have to take a risk of that claim
I was afraid If I didn't claim I will end up getting PLed.Zexion wrote:
Why did you had to take that risk? You or Haneii didn't have a single vote for a lynch.
You aren't interested in figuring out my alignment, ergo, you're not scumhunting, you're mislynching.sLaiNi wrote:
I am actually more scumhunting then you were. I call MB out for his strange self vote, you do it after me, after that all your posts are regarding your "meta thing".
ATM I am just searching for a point to pick up, as my main goal was to put pressure on you, before everyone was lowering it.
Are you literally kidding me? WTH should Jess lie about that, or are you trying to give her a signal like "don't reveal this?"Hika wrote:
i can't tell if this is a joke or not tbh
Vote: Jess
I tried it but I used the wrong thing to get started, as people could easily get the pressure off of you (which was rather unintentionally of them I guess).Sakura wrote:
You aren't interested in figuring out my alignment, ergo, you're not scumhunting, you're mislynching.
Have fun and congratulations.Sakura wrote:
Anyway im gonna head to work (i finally have a job again!) cy'all later.
I really would be agaist lynching Jess at least for now. That silbing claim could be really bad for us if it is real IMO, as I said that should resolve itself pretty soon so now there's no reason to put any more attention to it.Hika wrote:
i can't tell if this is a joke or not tbh
Vote: Jess
Stuff like these make me see you're trying to get on her good side or something like that.sLaiNi wrote:
Have fun and congratulations.Sakura wrote:
Anyway im gonna head to work (i finally have a job again!) cy'all later.
I think we both know what's happening here. Just don't be stupid and pretend you don't see what I'm doing.sLaiNi wrote:
Are you literally kidding me? WTH should Jess lie about that, or are you trying to give her a signal like "don't reveal this?"Hika wrote:
i can't tell if this is a joke or not tbh
Vote: Jess
I can see what you mean but I don't think it applies in a situation like this. Just a little off topic conversation; I wouldn't pay any mind to it honestly.Zexion wrote:
Stuff like these make me see you're trying to get on her good side or something like that.
Actually I am kinda embarrased of why I was going nuts above your voteHika wrote:
Actually nevermind, had to reread thread; this isn't going to work.
Unvote
nice try lmaoFrostings wrote:
lynch SlaiNi -> lynch Hika -> applaud Frostings for winning the game
Regardless of Jess' motive, it's pretty clear we're not lynching her today. What do you expect to gain from this question?sLaiNi wrote:
@Jess Your whole "I was afraid of a PL lynch" seems kinda pulled out of air, there's no reason you'd have to be afraid of a PL hammer. You don't have any true reasons behind this or don't you want to share them with us?
Why would it change?Ace Timing wrote:
I didn't say I wouldn't vote her, I said I have no intention of lynching her, but that can change based on your answer.
Why my word over Jess?Ace Timing wrote:
if you say her claim is false, it would indicate very clearly that she is lying
Jess has never lied about her role as town.Haneii wrote:
Why my word over Jess?Ace Timing wrote:
if you say her claim is false, it would indicate very clearly that she is lying
Why can't I be lying scum in that scenario?
Haneii wrote:
Which one?
This one ^Haneii wrote:
Also, while we're still on the subject, why are you reserving yourself the choice to vote her, but discouraging others?
If Jess is lying about her role, something she doesn't do as town, then my stance on whether or not she should be a viable lynch will change.Haneii wrote:
Then why do you want me to confirm her claim?
Ace Timing wrote:
This one ^Haneii wrote:
Also, while we're still on the subject, why are you reserving yourself the choice to vote her, but discouraging others?
Ace Timing wrote:
For all the people talking about how it would be stupid for scum to claim lovers prematurely, just remember that this is Jess. Nevertheless, we shouldn't lynch her today, as many people have also stated.
Ace Timing wrote:
I didn't say I wouldn't vote her, I said I have no intention of lynching her, but that can change based on your answer.
Oh also here i was referring to Haneii and Jess in the "it's likely they aren't both town" when i wrote this, but it's something that doesn't need to be sorted D1.Sakura wrote:
Also I think if there's 2 killing roles in this game it's likely they aren't both town.
Exactly. It leads us/anyone asking nowhere. *looks pointedly at Ace*Sakura wrote:
All i'm saying tho, is that this line of questioning leads nowhere
I'm going to third this since this is obviously why I'm wondering why you don't stop lmao @ AceHaneii wrote:
Exactly. It leads us/anyone asking nowhere. *looks pointedly at Ace*
o_OHika wrote:
I know he's scummy but what else do you guys think?
Dunno what's wrong with that, Scummy doesnt equal scum. Hika's post makes sense.Haneii wrote:
o_OHika wrote:
I know he's scummy but what else do you guys think?
Well, duh.Sakura wrote:
Scummy doesnt equal scum.
Who said it didn't?Sakura wrote:
Hika's post makes sense.
Who said it didn't?[/quote]Sakura wrote:
Hika's post makes sense.
implicature said it didn't.Haneii wrote:
o_OHika wrote:
I know he's scummy but what else do you guys think?
Eh I agree with this...Sakura wrote:
Why is it not the best place to socialize in a game about socialization.
People can be polite for out of game reasons, even I've done it multiple times before, i think you're just stretching reasons there.
You're kinda reaching here Zexion, Sakura mentioned it here, so it makes sense for slaini to reply here. I mean he could've ignored it altogether but tbh it seems a bit rude (At least in my opinion) to do that.Zexion wrote:
@Sakura: Tho this already happened, I believe every post here can be suspected of having other intentions, while I don't have anything agaist being polite and such, this is hardly the best place to socialize, isn't it?
Don’t mind me. I’ve lost all my patience after a long day + Jess. Too many of you post for the sake of posting >.>Zexion wrote:
What's with you Haneii O_o.
What do you mean by "stupid reason"?Hika wrote:
so in a serious sense please don't joke around and tell me a stupid reason why slaini is considered scum
I never said I had a scumread on her >before<. I stated several times that I wanted to pressure her, I use RVS most of the time to put someone on 2 votes, as noone cares about a single RVS vote on himself.Ace Timing wrote:
@slaini, got any reads other than your earlier scum read on Sakura?
Haneii's reaction indicates that they do belong to each other, this meaning that either they are siblings or they are both scum and lying about being siblings. I don't see any reason to claim siblings as scum, it is just too easy to disproof by lynching one (even though they delay a lynch as everyone will be cautious about doing so, so it would be sorted out by the lack of nightkills on them). So I will handle their claim as being true.- Magic Bomb - wrote:
I have 4 townreads, 1 of which I've already stated, based off current discussions. However, Haneii's lack of confirmation is bothering me, there's basically no reason to ignore it. Either it's true, and Haneii should confirm so we don't lynch Jess and kill them too, or it's false, and so we get a lynch from Jess's fakeclaim.
I never said I had a scumread on her >before<. I stated several times that I wanted to pressure her, I use RVS most of the time to put someone on 2 votes, as noone cares about a single RVS vote on himself.Ace Timing wrote:
@slaini, got any reads other than your earlier scum read on Sakura?
Haneii's reaction indicates that they do belong to each other, this meaning that either they are siblings or they are both scum and lying about being siblings. I don't see any reason to claim siblings as scum, it is just too easy to disproof by lynching one (even though they delay a lynch as everyone will be cautious about doing so, so it would be sorted out by the lack of nightkills on them). So I will handle their claim as being true.- Magic Bomb - wrote:
I have 4 townreads, 1 of which I've already stated, based off current discussions. However, Haneii's lack of confirmation is bothering me, there's basically no reason to ignore it. Either it's true, and Haneii should confirm so we don't lynch Jess and kill them too, or it's false, and so we get a lynch from Jess's fakeclaim.
I am neither voting her, nor pushing her in any way. Firstly I expressed that I don't feel like she is playing her scum meta, and after that I just noticed that her reason for claiming is just strange and called her out for it.Zexion wrote:
I am voting Slaini because he still kept pushing the Jess issue calling "hidden intentions" when its quite obvious we won't get anything else from that. He's trying to look like he's doing something to scumhunt when in fact is only posting useless questions, and fake scumhunting is often a scum posting.
Now this is getting ridiculous, you call me out for not being scumhunting and spreading suspicion, while you did not scumhunt the whole game. You are literally just pushing me and saying "i was doing scummy things", while the only thing you accuse me of is not scumhunting.Sakura wrote:
I'm not lynching him because he's scummy, im lynching him because he's not scumhunting and is just spreading suspicion, which is something scum do
Why should we be lynching with me?Navizel wrote:
why are we not lynching Ace
I am neither voting her, nor pushing her in any way. Firstly I expressed that I don't feel like she is playing her scum meta, and after that I just noticed that her reason for claiming is just strange and called her out for it.[/quote]Zexion wrote:
I am voting Slaini because he still kept pushing the Jess issue calling "hidden intentions" when its quite obvious we won't get anything else from that. He's trying to look like he's doing something to scumhunt when in fact is only posting useless questions, and fake scumhunting is often a scum posting.
...Is this serious?Gumica wrote:
#Page 7
Well, Jess & Hannei. Hmm... I would assume Jess is telling the truth, but the problematic question here is how they're aligned.
#Page 8
Now that you mentioned the PM, it would make sense. But it's still so dumb to claim that. so...
@Jess, why did you claim?
@Zexion, if you didn't obviously see, that was RVS
#Page 9
@Hika, what exactly makes you vote Jess?
#Page 10
@Zexion; So, you're trying to kill one of the few players that is actually gathering information? Sure, that kind of play makes him look suspicious, but he has the same playstyle when he's town, so what is your argument?
Vote: Zexion
#Conclusion
Jess and Hannei - town (for now) because of the claim
I don't believe sLaiNi in this case is in the wrong here.
Could you write this again? You're saying your claim was reaction testing or I'm reading this really wrong?-[Jess]- wrote:
@Gumi because I want to explain why I post the forget someone. and i want to see if I claim,what is her reaction on that claim.