XOlifreX wrote:

Damn, if this map gets ranked,then it will be probably #1 on the Most Played Beatmaps for weeks xd

1. 02:17:485 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - This highlighted area feels really big and weird compared to the rest of the jumps you had. Might be due to their angle they have, but reducing them a little or trying to find a better place for them could be an option!
2. 03:00:031 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - All of these extensions could be toned down a little, especially when some, if not most don't really follow the vocals as well as they could. If you want to, you could consider changing the rhythm up a little.
   
   Example

   
3. 03:00:849 (4) - Unsnapped, please snap it back to 1/4 instead of 1/8.
4. 03:02:212 (3,5,6) - Here too, I honestly don't think you need all of these extensions when it could play better as 1/2. Do consider 03:03:576 (5,6) - strongly though, as the vocals kind of stop being strong at 03:03:712 - , so ending the slider there would make a lot of sense, and 03:03:985 - has a clear beat to it, so I don't think it's wise to skip over it.
5. 03:04:394 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same here as the first one, despite it being consistent here. As the final kiai, you could use more 1/2 sliders and notes to boost up the intensivity a bit.
6. 03:08:758 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Same would apply here too!
7. 03:23:758 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I do like a little variation, but the fact that I can't hear ANYTHING that would justify this stream. I even played the part with 25% playback rate. The others fall under this case too, so you could consider fixing 03:27:712 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - stuff like this too.

Asphyxia wrote:

Nice map, but the usage of 3/4 sliders in the later parts of the map on Final Reverberant Gonkanau feel rather excessive, forced and inconsistent instead of fun. Personally speaking, changing the rhythm to mainly 1/2 like you have on your first and second kiai would feel much more ''on-going'' and more fun, especially when the song doesn't necessarily support every extension you have.

[Final Reverberant Gonkanau]

1. 02:17:485 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - This highlighted area feels really big and weird compared to the rest of the jumps you had. Might be due to their angle they have, but reducing them a little or trying to find a better place for them could be an option! I reduce a little distance, though looks not that different? hah
2. 03:00:031 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - All of these extensions could be toned down a little, especially when some, if not most don't really follow the vocals as well as they could. If you want to, you could consider changing the rhythm up a little. symmetry rhythm here looks cooler imo lol
   
   Example

   
3. 03:00:849 (4) - Unsnapped, please snap it back to 1/4 instead of 1/8.
4. 03:02:212 (3,5,6) - Here too, I honestly don't think you need all of these extensions when it could play better as 1/2. Do consider 03:03:576 (5,6) - strongly though, as the vocals kind of stop being strong at 03:03:712 - , so ending the slider there would make a lot of sense, and 03:03:985 - has a clear beat to it, so I don't think it's wise to skip over it.
5. 03:04:394 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same here as the first one, despite it being consistent here. As the final kiai, you could use more 1/2 sliders and notes to boost up the intensivity a bit.
6. 03:08:758 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Same would apply here too!
7. 03:23:758 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I do like a little variation, but the fact that I can't hear ANYTHING that would justify this stream. I even played the part with 25% playback rate. The others fall under this case too, so you could consider fixing 03:27:712 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - stuff like this too.

That's about it. I decided to pop the bubble for now so no one can sneak rank it with ignoring this post, especially when there's a wrongly snapped slider. The ''overmapped'' parts are rather consistent throughout the map, but especially those two stood out the most. Please consider these suggestions, and if you want to, you could ask more opinions about the extended sliders. Anyhow, let's hope we find an agreement here and afterwards I'll rebubble!

ghm12 wrote:

Are these lines okay, since they have different samples at the same time?

Kalindraz wrote:

rip again.

ghm12 wrote:

Are these lines okay, since they have different samples at the same time?

Loctav wrote:

ghm12 wrote:

Are these lines okay, since they have different samples at the same time?

do C2 and C1 use different hitsound files?

Lust wrote:

[Final Reverberant Gonkanau]

1. 03:00:031 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - These extended 3/4 sliders do not always follow the vocals quite as well as they should. It leads to some awkward rhythm accentuations while playing and listening. Asphyxia and others pointed this out before, and not enough adequate reasoning was provided. If you care to elaborate as to why you decided to keep them, that would be great! Same goes for all other instances where this occurs.

ghm12 wrote:

Are these lines okay, since they have different samples at the same time?

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

Is this the fastest dq recorded? If not, fml

Jeder wrote:

ranked maybe in next 2 years lol

Default wrote:

Jeder wrote:

ranked maybe in next 2 years lol

Or 3

hent2222 wrote:

Default wrote:

Or 3

Or 4

buny wrote:

it's so sad to see how great the map was when it was first rank, and then you compare to this now...

Fridolin wrote:

i agree, hardest diff is so overmapped and unplayable

Karen wrote:

03:01:667 - 你玩脱了？

[Taiga] wrote:

Rename last diff into "QAT DQ Collab" jk guys

#Believe in you Awaken

Lust wrote:

Howdy!

Just have a few points that can be discussed/elaborated on further:

[Final Reverberant Gonkanau]

1. 03:00:031 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - These extended 3/4 sliders do not always follow the vocals quite as well as they should. It leads to some awkward rhythm accentuations while playing and listening. Asphyxia and others pointed this out before, and not enough adequate reasoning was provided. If you care to elaborate as to why you decided to keep them, that would be great! Same goes for all other instances where this occurs.

Sognux wrote:

''kawaiwkyik'' is that still supposed to be in the tags? :L

IntelliTroodon wrote:

1. Just a question, but did you try to colorhax? Sometimes it has red, then it doesn't, well, I was confused. Maybe you want to take a look at it again.
2. 01:51:985 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Completely overmapped.
3. 01:56:212 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ^
4. 01:58:940 (1) - I guess there is a NC mistake.
5. 03:04:122 (1,2,3,4) - Overmapped.
6. As for the rest of the triplets, they are completely fine in my opinion because they support the strength of the song. But these 5-8 notes streams, that's just too much.

Kalindraz wrote:

rip again.

StarrStyx wrote:

I misread that as UMR