qoot8123 wrote:

[ onidominator]

General

07:33:332 - i think you can try to increase the sv on this part. because the song is much powerful than former part. okay
08:01:219 - move this green line a bit earlier to make the note match the bar line precisely,09:41:359 - ,08:35:022 - ,08:36:712 - and 08:38:402 - as well. okay
08:28:684 - there is overlap, try to revise it i didn't know if it's overlap ;w;
09:02:064 - change this to red line with 5/4 rhythm , then add a red line on 09:04:176 - with 4/4 rhythm, finally, add a red line on 09:42:628 - with 4/4 rhythm. okay
09:02:064 - ~ 09:29:529 - this part actually is 1/6 rhythm,and that rhythm is every clear, so don't ignore it, try to map 1/6 pattern on this part, there is some example : ex1(09:02:064 - ~09:04:177 - ) ,ex2(09:04:177 - ~09:05:867 - ) no, since i think 1/4 would be fun than 1/6 and still match to using 1/4 rhythm.

Notes

1. 09:01:501 (1) - highly suggest remove this note, because it is really not comfortable to play, only big kat would have more power to me. although it's kinda weird for me, but sounds good. removed

sorry, I have to pop it, because there are some timing issue which is very important that might be fixed. and the last kiai i am not really sure, you may be more careful about this part. call me back to restore the bubble when you are ready

qoot8123 wrote:

just few things

04:41:361 - this sv change makes the 1/4 ddddk broken. try to fix it

07:33:332 - ~07:34:177 - change the sv on green line from 0.77to 0.85 (0.77>0.78>0.79>0.80>0.81>0.82>0.83>0.85) to make the 1/4 pattern more smooth.

08:31:642 - ,08:33:332 - ,08:35:022 - ,08:36:712 - and 08:38:402 - move this green line a bit(1/4) earlier to make the note match the bar line precisely.

09:02:064 - ~09:04:176 - because the rhythm is a bit different with 09:04:176 - ~09:05:866 - ,so try to make this would be better . changed some pattern

qoot8123 wrote:

okay.

#1

• [onidominator]

1. 00:47:910 (29) - maybe k as you did at 00:41:995 (5) - for consistency ?
2. 01:01:431 (31) - same as ^
3. 01:50:234 - try 0.9x SV here, then use 0.93x to 1.1x from 01:53:615 to 01:55:305 - (each note +0.01x) ? Such a SV change would look smoother imo.
4. 02:09:461 (120,121,122,123,124,125,126) - consider changing this pattern to kkddkdk ? This could fit the instrument at 02:09:461 (120,126) - well as the sound is similar to 02:08:827 (116) -
5. 02:47:699 - gradual SV decrease does not fit well imo. I think one timing point at 02:50:234 - with 0.7x SV would be better. (This should be considered together with the suggestion at 02:49:812 (366,368) - )
6. 02:48:123 (359,360) - swapping these notes to k d would sound better since the music is very similar to 02:48:968 (363,364) -
7. 02:49:812 (366,368) - consider deleting these notes ? They are a bit unnecessary since violin is absent.
8. 02:56:572 (385) - , 02:59:954 (393) and 03:02:489 (400) - same as ^
9. 03:03:334 (402,404) - same as 02:49:812 (366,368) -
10. 03:10:094 (421) - ^
11. 03:17:171 (6) - moving this note to 03:17:277 - would be more consistent with 03:16:643 (2) -
12. 03:59:848 (286) - maybe move to 03:59:636 - for the beat there ? You may change the triplet to dkd for a smoother flow as well.
13. 04:03:123 (306,307) - swapping these notes to d k would emphasize the higher-pitched music at 04:03:333 - . Then, you may add k at 04:03:650 - and change 04:03:756 (310) - to d to follow the pitch drop.
14. 04:05:447 (320) - consider removing finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo since it is not stressed.
15. 04:10:516 (348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355) - try k d k k d d k d ? It would sound cooler and fit the music in a way better.
16. 04:13:897 (358,359) - serious overlapping of notes occur here, which should be fixed by refining the SV change here. I would recommend deleting the timing point at 04:14:108 - to improve the view.
17. 04:39:249 (475) - you may change this note to d since its pitch is the same as 04:39:672 (477) -
18. 05:21:079 (57) - k would be better as it has the same pitch as 05:21:502 (59) -
19. 05:27:840 (94) - same as ^
20. 05:37:347 - , 05:37:769 and 05:38:192 - try to add more timing points in between so that the SV decrease would be smoother.
21. 06:07:980 - I think it is a bit pointless to lower the volume and slider velocity here. Consider removing this timing point since the pace of music is constant ?
22. 06:54:671 (60) - It would be nicer to change this note to d and change 06:56:150 (66) - to k since the music is intensified gradually.
23. 07:20:446 (39) - As the pitch is low here, d would be more appropriate.
24. 07:57:628 (68) - maybe d to make it consistent with 07:44:107 (29) - ?
25. 08:03:966 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - consider revising this pattern to dkd d d k d k d d k ? It would sound much more coherent with the previous pattern.
26. 08:10:727 (45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) - similar to ^ , try kdk d d k d k d d k ?
27. 08:13:262 (58,59,60,61,62,63) - k d d kkd would be better if you change ^
28. 08:22:980 (109,110,111) - maybe k d k to match the pitch changes there ?
29. From 08:27:628 to 08:28:050 - the SV changes look weird here. It would be better to remove these timing points as well as the ones at 08:28:684 and 08:29:952 - for the sake of a better view. After that, add one timing point with 0.9x SV at 08:27:628 and change the one at 08:31:536 - to 0.95x.
30. 09:03:542 - we have two notes at this point. Please delete the don hidden behind the kat.
31. 09:41:783 - move this uninherited timing point to 09:42:628 - for the main beat there.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested.

[General]

Check AIMod to fix the unsnapped objects.my poor mistake

• [onidominator]

1. 00:47:910 (29) - maybe k as you did at 00:41:995 (5) - for consistency ? hmm sounds good, changed
2. 01:01:431 (31) - same as ^ same as ^
3. 01:50:234 - try 0.9x SV here, then use 0.93x to 1.1x from 01:53:615 to 01:55:305 - (each note +0.01x) ? Such a SV change would look smoother imo. changed, but i change 1.15x at 01:55:305 - because i feel it's kinda slowly
4. 02:09:461 (120,121,122,123,124,125,126) - consider changing this pattern to kkddkdk ? This could fit the instrument at 02:09:461 (120,126) - well as the sound is similar to 02:08:827 (116) - no, since this part is more match if start with don
5. 02:47:699 - gradual SV decrease does not fit well imo. I think one timing point at 02:50:234 - with 0.7x SV would be better. (This should be considered together with the suggestion at 02:49:812 (366,368) - ) fixed
6. 02:48:123 (359,360) - swapping these notes to k d would sound better since the music is very similar to 02:48:968 (363,364) - okay
7. 02:49:812 (366,368) - consider deleting these notes ? They are a bit unnecessary since violin is absent.
8. 02:56:572 (385) - , 02:59:954 (393) and 03:02:489 (400) - same as ^
9. 03:03:334 (402,404) - same as 02:49:812 (366,368) -
10. 03:10:094 (421) - ^ no change all, because i think the all of violin sound is sustainable
11. 03:17:171 (6) - moving this note to 03:17:277 - would be more consistent with 03:16:643 (2) - i don't want to make this consistent, i think it would be bored if always hit triplet. also it's still match with the music.
12. 03:59:848 (286) - maybe move to 03:59:636 - for the beat there ? You may change the triplet to dkd for a smoother flow as well. no, it's looks weird imo
13. 04:03:123 (306,307) - swapping these notes to d k would emphasize the higher-pitched music at 04:03:333 - . Then, you may add k at 04:03:650 - and change 04:03:756 (310) - to d to follow the pitch drop. i think 04:03:033 - sound low pitch. change to k dddkk
14. 04:05:447 (320) - consider removing finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo since it is not stressed.uh as i guessed, okay
15. 04:10:516 (348,349,350,351,352,353,354,355) - try k d k k d d k d ? It would sound cooler and fit the music in a way better.nice catch ! best <3
16. 04:13:897 (358,359) - serious overlapping of notes occur here, which should be fixed by refining the SV change here. I would recommend deleting the timing point at 04:14:108 - to improve the view. fixed by myself
17. 04:39:249 (475) - you may change this note to d since its pitch is the same as 04:39:672 (477) - no, since this pitch is same as 04:39:037
18. 05:21:079 (57) - k would be better as it has the same pitch as 05:21:502 (59) - okay
19. 05:27:840 (94) - same as ^
20. 05:37:347 - , 05:37:769 and 05:38:192 - try to add more timing points in between so that the SV decrease would be smoother. okay
21. 06:07:980 - I think it is a bit pointless to lower the volume and slider velocity here. Consider removing this timing point since the pace of music is constant ? increase a bit volume. about the timing section i won't delete it, since this is time for rest, so i give a slow SV.
22. 06:54:671 (60) - It would be nicer to change this note to d and change 06:56:150 (66) - to k since the music is intensified gradually.okay
23. 07:20:446 (39) - As the pitch is low here, d would be more appropriate. yes
24. 07:57:628 (68) - maybe d to make it consistent with 07:44:107 (29) - ? yeah
25. 08:03:966 (14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - consider revising this pattern to dkd d d k d k d d k ? It would sound much more coherent with the previous pattern. it obvious different the previous music, so i make the different pattern. especially (24)
26. 08:10:727 (45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55) - similar to ^ , try kdk d d k d k d d k ? no, this music is similar as previous.
27. 08:13:262 (58,59,60,61,62,63) - k d d kkd would be better if you change ^ no
28. 08:22:980 (109,110,111) - maybe k d k to match the pitch changes there ? change to k k d instead
29. From 08:27:628 to 08:28:050 - the SV changes look weird here. It would be better to remove these timing points as well as the ones at 08:28:684 and 08:29:952 - for the sake of a better view. After that, add one timing point with 0.9x SV at 08:27:628 and change the one at 08:31:536 - to 0.95x. i think these sv change are okay..
30. 09:03:542 - we have two notes at this point. Please delete the don hidden behind the kat. oops, deleted kat
31. 09:41:783 - move this uninherited timing point to 09:42:628 - for the main beat there. okay

Try to review the volume changes after that. You may call me back after fixing these~

• [onidominator]

1. 04:02:911 (305,307,311) - The violin at these points are low-high-medium actually. That's why I would suggest using d kdkkd to match them. It would be more consistent with your pitch mapping too.
2. 04:39:248 - The SV here is a bit strange since it is even lower than the previous 0.8x part. Removing it would look better. In addition, the pitch here is in fact the same as 04:38:827 (474) - but not 04:39:038 (475) - . That's why I would suggest changing it to d.
3. 08:28:578 - The SV change needs a revision here. Currently, a significant overlap occurs at 08:28:473 (2,3) - which hinders readability a lot. Consider removing the timing point at 08:28:578 - and moving the one at 08:30:057 to 08:29:846 - to improve the view ?

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

A quick recheck here. (no kd)

[General]

There are still some unsnapped notes. Please resnap them as well. oops, snapped

• [onidominator]

1. 04:02:911 (305,307,311) - The violin at these points are low-high-medium actually. That's why I would suggest using d kdkkd to match them. It would be more consistent with your pitch mapping too. no, i think (311) is higher than (307), so dddkk is better imo
2. 04:39:248 - The SV here is a bit strange since it is even lower than the previous 0.8x part. Removing it would look better. In addition, the pitch here is in fact the same as 04:38:827 (474) - but not 04:39:038 (475) - . That's why I would suggest changing it to d. only deleted svchange, it's my stupid mistake. but i won't change it to d.
3. 08:28:578 - The SV change needs a revision here. Currently, a significant overlap occurs at 08:28:473 (2,3) - which hinders readability a lot. Consider removing the timing point at 08:28:578 - and moving the one at 08:30:057 to 08:29:846 - to improve the view ? changed sv to 0,75x (i don't know it's still overlap or not. hopefully it won't be overlap again ;w;) also moved the timing section

That would be all.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

The SV changes throughout the difficulty look smoother and more natural now. Patterns are quite nice and consistent in general.

Bubble #2~

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Marked, I will check.

JUDYDANNY wrote:

:!: >> I guess you need to change .
>>big question.

[Timing]

• 
  misregistrtion a double bar line.

1. 09:42:628 - change to Green line.
2. 09:53:190 - add a red line (7/4).
3. 09:56:149 - add a red (4/4).
   
   Instrumental needs a double bar line, and Played with Night Core mods. Dat additional (effect) cymbals sounds misregistration.
4. 03:18:122 - add a red line?
5. 04:13:896 - ^
6. 04:44:319 - ^
7. 09:02:064 - ~~ 09:04:176 –
   
   1. 09:02:064 – unneed 5/4 , remove
   2. 09:04:176 – move to 09:02:486 – and check the box "Omit first bar line"
   fixed all
   -

[Notes]

1. 03:06:718 (412,413,414) - dkd>> kdk sounds better ? if followed to violins pitch variation fantasic.no, since (413) is similar as (415) and pitch of (414) is lower than around. so i think current is better.
   
   From 03:24:460 -, there’re 4 times stream put on 1/4 5notes, felt a bit over power without the Instrumental or fantasic.
   
   1. 03:24:777 - suggest to remove. - For consistency with next kkddk. deleted 03:24:565 - for consistency with next pattern that similar as this
   2. 03:26:467 - sugges to remove or move to 03:27:528 -. ^deleted 03:26:255 - same as above
2. 04:33:227 - add d? dat snare roll little followed , sounds and plays well. hmm i'm not sure with this, but it sounds good
   
3. 06:46:642 - change to k, any sounds differents followed well.( 06:45:586 - (1,2,3,4,5) – backsounds , 06:46:853 - – low-tone bass sounds)
   
   1. if you don’t prefer to make against kkdddk, I suggest 06:45:163 - (21,22,23) – to change d-d-k.
   both are changed.
   
4. 07:02:698 - remove? bit a to long imo.i think it's okay, since in this part the music is a bit stronger than previous
   
5. 07:46:853 - put 1/4 stream dkkkdkk ? same as before 2parts.i know, but i think this part is different than previous part. and also i want this part is just for rest. so i think i don't want to make it a bit harder in this part
   
6. 08:14:529 - k? percussion sounds up , try to reconsider again. this pitch is sounds low, same as next pattern that similar as this (08:17:909 - , 08:21:290 - , 08:24:670 - , 08:28:050 -)
7. 08:24:670 (118,119) – dk>>>kd? ^ only changed (119) - to d
   
   Since 08:28:262 - , plays not bad to me, but I don’t think too that All of the players are not necessarily good for plays. Seeing on deeply, I couldn’t understand how to put “Random don”, tell me your theory. But I think this part would be improved to follow the main melody. The expression Low-tone bass sounds is already attained by acceleration.
   
   1. 08:31:219 - move to 08:29:529 -
   2. 08:33:332 - move to 08:32:909 -
   3. 08:34:177 - remove.
   4. 08:34:600 - change to don
   5. 08:36:712 - move to 08:36:290 -
   6. 08:37:557 - move to 08:37:980 - . *violin doesn’t sound but, It followed to before rhythm (08:34:610 -) that avoid to confuse.
   7. 08:39:248 - move to 08:39:670 -
   8. 08:41:360 - change to k? there’re no low-tone bass sounds around. It works well. i guess your suggest is following the violin sound, right ? this isn't random don, i think from 08:28:262 - until 08:41:677 - d k d k d k d k d is fittest, that's why i put sv to 1.50 to player definitely know that pattern only d k d k d k d except 08:33:966 - , i just want to make it a bit varies pattern there
      
      if you agree these, we have to move the green line.
   9. 08:31:536 - move to 08:32:064 -.
   
   09:04:915 - why sudden stream rising the level on this timing.. and there’re only once from here to 2~3streams that plays harder this comparing with others.
   
   1. 09:04:915 - change to d. i think it would be boring pattern...since 09:16:430 - have kdddk and kdkdddk too, therefore i make it a bit different
   2. Either
      A. 09:04:809 - change to k followed after sounds splash a little . yes but just a little, i feel don is better
      B. 09:05:337 - change to k followed since 09:05:232 - low-tone bass sounds up, it works well to me. i feel (28) is lower than (27)
      
   3. 09:12:098 (84,85,86) – ddk>>>kdd?
   4. 09:25:197 (192,193,194,195) – ddkk>>>kdkd ?
   i think those pattern are easier than current
   
8. 09:26:359 - change to d? , avoid to same 1/2 pattens (09:27:842 (1,2,3) - ) dat sounds difference.the sound is same as around
9. 09:41:570 - , 09:42:204 - remove? bit a long 1/2, this can remove for playing stress. i think it's okay, since it just "a bit" and BPM isn't high. so it wouldn't make it difficult
10. 09:53:402 - remove and 09:54:247 (53) – remove. rhythm is confused cuz of beat is reversed. i think it's okay if i put a bit longer than before since it's a little more going towards the different part
    
    Since last part, there’re very confused kat rhythm. I readlly dont agree these awrkard colors. Consider again,please.
    
    1. 09:59:106 – k? any sounds can follow and plays good at kat rhythms. okay
    2. 10:04:177 - k, percussion sounds up. okay
    3. 10:10:937 (138,139) – kd? changed
    4. 10:12:416 - k?okay
    5. 10:14:318 (156) – k?changed
    6. 10:14:318 (156,157) - kd?
    changed
    
11. 10:37:557 – add d? same as 10:39:670 – sounds. i know there is same, like 10:37:133 - , 10:37:978 - , 10:38:401 -, 10:38:824 - 10:39:246 - but i deliberate to not put it, the sound isn't obvious as 10:39:669 -
12. 10:46:430 (33,34) – kd 10:46:430 – low-tone bass sounds up, on 10:46:430 – put k plays and sounds the best. i know, but i put k in the middle pattern to consistency as before (kat in the middle too)

ahh, tired to check 10min map at the 1st time. lol ):
guess needs more check orz. orz

PatZar wrote:

anjing

OzzyOzrock wrote:

I'm happy the DQ was fast.

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Unsnapped note

• 
  03:13:155 - Please snap properly.

Broken Slider Velocity changes.

• 
  There are several inherited timing points used for Slider Velocity changes that aren't set correctly (unsnapped by 1ms with the notes), breaking said changes. These must be fixed.

1. 04:39:459 -
2. 05:36:712 -
3. 07:34:177 -

JUDYDANNY wrote:

Quality Assurance Team wrote:

Unsnapped note

• 
  03:13:155 - Please snap properly.

Broken Slider Velocity changes.

• 
  There are several inherited timing points used for Slider Velocity changes that aren't set correctly (unsnapped by 1ms with the notes), breaking said changes. These must be fixed.

1. 04:39:459 -
2. 05:36:712 -
3. 07:34:177 -

/me baka...

Checked again.

tasuke912 wrote:

(´；ω；`)
GL for rerank

PatZar wrote:

tasuke912 wrote:

(´；ω；`)
GL for rerank

• [onidominator]

1. 04:39:670 - resnap the timing point to here.
2. 04:39:881 - 04:40:304 - 04:40:515 - 04:40:726 - 04:40:938 - 04:41:043 - 04:41:149 - 04:41:360 - 04:41:783 - 04:41:994 - 04:42:205 - 04:42:628 - 04:42:839 - 04:43:156 and 04:43:473 - same as ^
3. 01:50:129 - 01:55:305 - ^
4. 05:37:135 - 05:37:346 - 05:37:557 - 05:37:980 - 05:38:191 - ^
5. 09:01:958 - this timing point seems to be useless as there are no notes within the session. Consider removing it ?
6. 09:41:782 - same as 04:39:670 -

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

• [onidominator]

1. 04:39:670 - resnap the timing point to here.
2. 04:39:881 - 04:40:304 - 04:40:515 - 04:40:726 - 04:40:938 - 04:41:043 - 04:41:149 - 04:41:360 - 04:41:783 - 04:41:994 - 04:42:205 - 04:42:628 - 04:42:839 - 04:43:156 and 04:43:473 - same as ^
3. 01:50:129 - 01:55:305 - ^
4. 05:37:135 - 05:37:346 - 05:37:557 - 05:37:980 - 05:38:191 - ^
5. 09:01:958 - this timing point seems to be useless as there are no notes within the session. Consider removing it ? nope. i think if i put it a bit earlier, it would be a bit smoother on sv change
6. 09:41:782 - same as 04:39:670 -

Call me back.

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

All timing points are resnapped. Everything seems to be fine.

Bubble #2~

OzzyOzrock wrote:

Everything looks lovely.

Re-Qualified!

Both bubbles are on this page.