occam's razor is love, occam's razor is life.
This is fun, why notAurani wrote:
Did you seriously take this seriously?Brian OA wrote:
8
I was expecting you to reply "Did you literally take me literally?"Brian OA wrote:
This is fun, why notAurani wrote:
Did you seriously take this seriously?
I miss mathexpertAutoMedic wrote:
Meth is boring
show your answer thenRailey2 wrote:
again mixing 2 systems. Not how it works. You assume that the numbers on the left side are encoded while the one on the right side of the equation are not.
oh sorry i didnt see your post and thanks chaee for agreeingRailey2 wrote:
but I already did. It's not solvable unless you mix 2 systems, which is not how its done. We miss the link between 2 and 1, in every case.
The 2 equations can be translated to
a + a = b
x + x = y
a + x = ?
theres no way. All your solutions rely on conveniently mixing systems up in one way or another, instead of actually attempting to solve for the variables within the given system.
[ microism ] wrote:
21 you're stupid
ahahahfahhg ah AH Hafu awheeljaw/hgwguoh23qwrudj mawegfuioawefuoaweh bgerafjuowehg8awifuow3 uf8a9f3jo niua3ngoauw4nfuinwi4uognuioaw4ncionwioeuniawg.
You shouldn't be talking.Trash Boat wrote:
[ microism ] wrote:
21 you're stupid
ahahahfahhg ah AH Hafu awheeljaw/hgwguoh23qwrudj mawegfuioawefuoaweh bgerafjuowehg8awifuow3 uf8a9f3jo niua3ngoauw4nfuinwi4uognuioaw4ncionwioeuniawg.***SHITPOSTER DETECTED***
***RESTRICTION 666 RELEASED***
***DIMENSIONAL INTERFERENCE FIELD DEPLOYED INSIDE OF IMAGINARY NUMBER***
***EXTERMINATION PROTOCOL: ENGAGED***