forum

If 2+2=5 and 1+1=11 what's 2+1?

posted
Total Posts
55
Topic Starter
MiruHong
I'm bad a math someone help, I have to hand in this assignment to my grade 2 teacher tomorrow.

EDIT: I got it wrong and got detention, you guys suck.
Mahogany
2+1=4 silly

Now go do the equation yourself before I tell on you
dung eater
2+1 can be anything but 3
Bweh
8
Aurani

Brian OA wrote:

8
Did you seriously take this seriously?
Railey2
unless this has some sort of geometrical catch, your question is not solvable, because we don't know how 2 and 1 relate to each other within your system. And even if we knew, the solution would probably too be arbitrarily redefined by you.
silmarilen
definitely 8
Intelli
so 2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798. If 1^2 is 11, then the same principle applies, making 1 equal to 11^(1/2), or 3.31662479036. If we add these two, we get 5.55269277036.

tl;dr 2 + 1 = 5.55269277036
Friendan
Numbers don't exist.
Railey2

IntelliTroodon wrote:

so 2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798. If 1^2 is 11, then the same principle applies, making 1 equal to 11^(1/2), or 3.31662479036. If we add these two, we get 5.55269277036.

tl;dr 2 + 1 = 5.55269277036
so 2 = 2.23606798 ?

why would you even bother going though with that procedure after you got something like that. You can't just apply the commonly accepted system to his. It's like trying to binary code in hexadecimal, throwing letters at my computer to see what he makes with them.
silmarilen

IntelliTroodon wrote:

so 2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798. If 1^2 is 11, then the same principle applies, making 1 equal to 11^(1/2), or 3.31662479036. If we add these two, we get 5.55269277036.

tl;dr 2 + 1 = 5.55269277036
you're going completely wrong here, 2+2=/=2^2 and 1+1=/=1^2 so your whole calculation is useless.
Intelli

Railey2 wrote:

IntelliTroodon wrote:

so 2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798. If 1^2 is 11, then the same principle applies, making 1 equal to 11^(1/2), or 3.31662479036. If we add these two, we get 5.55269277036.

tl;dr 2 + 1 = 5.55269277036
so 2 = 2.23606798 ?

why would you even bother going though with that procedure after you got something like that. You can't just apply the commonly accepted system to his. It's like trying to binary code in hexadecimal, throwing letters at my computer to see what he makes with them.
yes, 2=2.23606798, that was the entire point of the equations
Railey2

silmarilen wrote:

IntelliTroodon wrote:

so 2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798. If 1^2 is 11, then the same principle applies, making 1 equal to 11^(1/2), or 3.31662479036. If we add these two, we get 5.55269277036.

tl;dr 2 + 1 = 5.55269277036
you're going completely wrong here, 2+2=/=2^2 and 1+1=/=1^2 so your whole calculation is useless.
you mean x^x ≠ x+x

because 2+2 kinda is the same as 2^2 and 1+1 also kinda is the same as 1^2


IntelliTroodon wrote:

yes, 2=2.23606798, that was the entire point of the equations
thats fine, but you got to that conclusion applying the standard system to his, which is not possible.
silmarilen

Railey2 wrote:

silmarilen wrote:

you're going completely wrong here, 2+2=/=2^2 and 1+1=/=1^2 so your whole calculation is useless.
you mean x^x ≠ x+x

because 2+2 kinda is the same as 2^2 and 1+1 also kinda is the same as 1^2
well 2+2 happens to be the same as 2^2 in our normal field, but 1+1 is definitely not the same as 1^2
also if 2^2=5 then 5^(1/2) would be 2 and not 2.2something.
Railey2
oh lol 1+1 is 2

*sound of glass shattering*

if theres something like an arch-mistake, then I just made it.

you are guilty too though, with saying that 2+2 ≠ 2^2
:p
silmarilen
yeah true, i was thinking too much so i missed that obvious part :P
Railey2
ok, to make this clear,

this is our normal decimal system

this is OP's system



If 2+2=5 and 1+1=11 what's 2+1

"2+2=5" and "1+1=11" is absolutely not our normal decimal system, because
2+2≠5 and 1+1≠11
thats why I use the different color.




what you suggest, is
2^2 is 5, 2=5^(1/2), which is 2.23606798 ... and so on.
This is not possible, its a mixup.


silmarilen wrote:

yeah true, i was thinking too much so i missed that obvious part :P
I feel your pain. This is why I will never be a good chess player, lol.
-sev
EneT
Wtf is this shit?!!
Railey2
@silmarilen, I thought of a better riddle, try to solve this:

4+4 = 7
4^4 = 7
4/4 = 3
3*3 = 3
3/3 = 3
3+3 = ?
EneT

Railey2 wrote:

4+4 = 7
4^4 = 7
4/4 = 3
3*3 = 3
3/3 = 3
3+3 = ?
x = 4
y = 3
x+x = x^x = 7
x/x = y*y = y/y = 3
y+y = ?

y*y = y/y this logic suggests that * and / are one and the same operation
x+x = x^x also suggests that + and ^ are the same operations

x^x = 7, 7^0.25 = 1.6265765617
so x = 1.6265765617
the only way for 1.6265765617 to become 7 is 1.6265765617^4 and considering x+x = x^x the real identity of + is ^.

Now I'm gonna go by the ruling that when + or ^ is used the second operand becomes seperate from the value of x or y cus' fuck it.
e.g. the real expression for 4+4 = 7 is x^4 = 7 but for x/x = 3 it is still x/x.
Now:
x/x = y*y = y/y = 3
1.6265765617*1.6265765617 = 2.6457513111 but we can just round that to 3.
so / is actually *.
y*y = 3 is the same as y^2 = 3
3^0.5 = 1.7320508076
y = 1.7320508076
y+y = y^3
y^3 = 1.7320508076^3 = 5.1961524227
Since I appear to have made it a rule previously that all answers must be rounded to integers the answer must therefore be 5.
TLDR 3+3 = 5
silmarilen

Railey2 wrote:

@silmarilen, I thought of a better riddle, try to solve this:

4+4 = 7
4^4 = 7
4/4 = 3
3*3 = 3
3/3 = 3
3+3 = ?
3+3=4
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply