Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested in my queue.
[General]
Consider adding timing points at 01:29:856 and 01:31:302 - with volume of 40% and 10% respectively for all diffs ? It would be better to have a softer spinner to accompany the fading out of music.
[General]
Consider adding timing points at 01:29:856 and 01:31:302 - with volume of 40% and 10% respectively for all diffs ? It would be better to have a softer spinner to accompany the fading out of music.
- [Kantan]
- 00:36:904 (20) - consider removing this note to give a 3/2 break ? In fact, 3/4 notes are quite hard for Kantan.
- 00:49:194 (40) - same as ^ , a 3/2 break could work better since there are long 1/1 patterns in this part.
- 00:55:700 (52) - move to 00:55:880 - and change to d for the vocal ? Similar reason as above.
- 00:57:326 (55) - k here would be better since the vocal pitch is the same as 00:56:603 (54) - and snare sound is present.
- 01:15:398 (17) - consider removing finish here ? I think it is a bit overemphasized since there is no cymbal sound like 01:13:953 (15,16,20) -
- 01:17:567 (21,22,23,24) - k d d k would be better if you want to follow the high-pitched vocal at 01:17:567 (21,24) -
- 01:20:459 (26) - maybe k here for the prominent snare ?
- [Futsuu]
- 00:13:230 (31,32,33,34,35) - k k d d k would fit the changes in the pitch of the piano in a way better.
- 00:17:567 (40,42) - swapping these notes to k d could follow the decreasing vocal pitch nicely.
- 00:20:459 (47) - consider changing this note to k for the high-pitched background sound ?
- 00:26:242 (60) - same as ^
- 00:42:507 (100,102) - these notes could be deleted as they lack vocal support. As the pattern constellation in this part is quite consecutive, more breaks could be used to make the map more fun.
- 00:48:290 (116,118) - same as ^
- 00:51:543 (125) - maybe d as you did at 00:54:435 (133) - for the similar vocal pattern ?
- 00:58:410 (143,145) - d would result in a smoother flow imo.
- 01:09:254 (172) - same suggestion as 00:42:507 (100,102) -
- 01:12:507 (181) - d would be better since the vocal pitch is low compared to 01:12:507 (181,182,183,184) -
- 01:15:398 (187) - same as Kantan
- 01:18:290 (195) - same as 01:12:507 (181) -
- 01:20:820 (202,203) - swap these notes to d k to follow the pitch increase there ?
- 01:21:543 (204) - same suggestion as 00:42:507 (100,102) -
- 01:21:904 (205,206) - k d could fit both the snare and the vocal nicely.
- 01:24:435 (212,214) - d here would result in a smoother flow imo.
- [Muzukashii]
- 00:13:230 (47,48,49,50,51) - same as Futsuu
- 00:17:206 (55,56,57,58) - try d k k d here ? This could fit the vocal in a way better.
- 00:29:495 (90,91) - similar to ^ , swapping these notes to d k would sound better.
- 00:31:302 (94,95,96,97) - d k d k would result in a smoother flow as both the high-pitched sound at 00:32:025 (97) - and the vocal could be accompanied well.
- 00:33:109 (99) - d would be better if you change ^
- 00:35:639 (106) - consider moving this note to 00:35:459 - to follow the vocal ?
- 00:39:796 (122) - this note could be deleted as it lacks vocal support.
- 00:44:495 (140,141) - swapping these notes to k d could maintain a better snare consistency.
- 00:45:579 (145) - same as 00:39:796 (122) -
- 00:47:567 (152) - k would be better as the vocal is high-pitched.
- 00:55:519 (185) - d would be better because of the absence of high-pitched sound.
- 00:56:061 (187,188) - same as 00:44:495 (140,141) -
- 00:58:230 (197,198) - ^
- 00:59:133 (200,201) - similar to ^ , d k would be better.
- 01:04:555 (221,222) - consider removing finish here as you did in lower diffs ? A bit overemphasized since the music is muted.
- 01:06:724 (229,230,231,232,233,234) - try dkd kdk to fit the vocal more ?
- 01:09:796 (241,242) - same as 00:44:495 (140,141) -
- 01:10:519 (244) - move to 01:10:700 - to follow the vocal ?
- 01:15:398 (260) - same as Kantan
- 01:16:302 (263) - k here to maintain a better snare consistency ?
- 01:18:290 (271) - d would be better since the vocal there is lower-pitched than 01:17:929 (270,272) -
- 01:20:820 (280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288) - try ddkkddkkd for a smoother flow ?
- 01:22:627 (289) - K would be better for the high-pitched vocal if you change ^
- 01:24:254 (296,297) - same as 00:44:495 (140,141) -
- 01:27:145 (305,307) - ^
- [Oni]
- 00:14:676 (75) - d would be better since the piano pitch is lower than the previous 00:14:314 (74) -
- 00:15:760 (78) - consider adding finish here for consistency with Muzukashii ?
- 00:17:929 (84,85,86,87) - k d k d could follow the drop in vocal pitch nicely imo.
- 00:31:663 (131) - k would be better as the vocal is relatively high-pitched.
- 00:33:109 (136) - d would be better if you change ^
- 00:39:254 (163) - consider removing finish here ? It is risky to use big note at the end of a 1/6 stream.
- 00:39:435 (164) - this note could be deleted as it lacks vocal support.
- 00:44:314 (192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - you may try kdkkddkdk to fit the snares in a way better.
- 00:45:218 (201) - same as 00:39:435 (164) -
- 00:46:302 (208,209,210) - try kdk here ? It sounds cooler to play imo.
- 00:58:230 (279,280) - swapping these notes to k d could maintain a better snare consistency.
- 00:59:133 (284,285) - similar to ^ , d k would be better.
- 01:06:543 (324,325) - swapping these notes to k d could follow the vocal in a way better.
- 01:07:085 (327) - d would be better if you change ^
- 01:07:989 (333,334) - same as 01:06:543 (324,325) -
- 01:15:398 (381) - same as Kantan
- 01:15:760 (384) - d here would result in a smoother flow imo.
- 01:17:929 (401,402) - maybe k for the high-pitched vocal ?