Mao wrote:

Yo,

unfortunately we had to disqualify this beatmap after some internal discussion for the following reason:

[Easy]

1. 00:45:646 (2) - This object is slightly offscreen as you can see here.
2. We understand that you didn't fully stick to the DS and based your overall patterns rather on symmetry than on distance snap. However some of those are not properly executed making them appear rather confusing and unpolished.
   Examples
   1. 00:19:284 (2,1) -
   2. 00:21:427 (1) -
   3. 01:13:075 (4,1) -

[Hard]

1. You have got some really big jumps in this difficulty without any significant emphasis within the music which makes them feel quite unpolished. Therefore we recommend you to nerf them.
   Examples
   1. 00:47:361 (6,1) -
   2. 01:01:075 (6,1) -

----

Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.

We are sorry for the very late disqualification here and apologize for the inconveniences this causes to you.

IamKwaN wrote:

Greetings, your map has to be taken away from the Qualified section.

Click to expand

Mao wrote:

[Easy]

1. We understand that you didn't fully stick to the DS and based your overall patterns rather on symmetry than on distance snap. However some of those are not properly executed making them appear rather confusing and unpolished.
   Examples
   1. 00:19:284 (2,1) -
   2. 00:21:427 (1) -
   3. 01:13:075 (4,1) -

[Hard]

1. You have got some really big jumps in this difficulty without any significant emphasis within the music which makes them feel quite unpolished. Therefore we recommend you to nerf them.
   Examples
   1. 00:47:361 (6,1) -
   2. 01:01:075 (6,1) -

----

Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.

We are sorry for the very late disqualification here and apologize for the inconveniences this causes to you.

These aren't fixed, please be reminded that these are the reasons for disqualification. To get passed qualification, fixing these are compulsory.
More elaboration below,
[General]

1. Inconsistent Preview Time.

[Hard]

1. These jumps are too harsh for the current spread:
   
   1. 00:37:289 (4,1) -
   2. 01:01:075 (6,1) -
   3. 01:02:789 (6,1) -
   4. 01:06:218 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - 01:06:646 (1,2,3) - are more suitable for jumps as the music shows.
   5. 01:12:218 (1,2,3) - These are too exaggerating as a Hard.
   6. The issue repeats in the latter part of the kiai.

[Normal]

1. 00:15:855 (3,1) - DS is way too high in a Normal.

[Easy]

1. 00:19:284 (2,1) - Doubled the regular spacing is not acceptable here, it looks very similar to a 2/1-gap.
2. 00:20:998 (2,1) - Less extreme, but same as above. Generally it's very untidy to have something like 00:19:712 (1,2,1) - two different spacing before and after a circle.
3. 01:12:646 (3,4,1) - Spacing is way too high.

Good luck.
###0

1. 00:24:427 (3,1) - 1.50x, in my view ingame, is too big
2. 00:26:141 (3,1,2) - 1.30x, ^ same
3. 00:46:075 (1,2,3) - the spacing is very weird, is 1.50x but the (1) isn't same place as (3) I feel you need improve this part gameplay
4. 00:57:218 (2,1) - 1.80x, no pleasse
5. 01:11:789 (1,2,3,4,1) - inconsistency spacing, there random spacing, 1.30x then 1.40x then 1.50x

1. 00:15:855 (3,1) - never make jump 1.90 on this level
2. 00:24:212 (3,1) - ^ same
3. 00:25:927 (3,1) - ^ same
4. 00:38:789 (4,1) - 2.00x pls no
5. 00:59:361 (4,1) - ^ same
6. 01:07:718 (3,1) - ^ same
7. 01:12:646 (3,1) - ^ same
8. 01:21:432 (3,1) - ^ same

Pereira006 wrote:

[Easy]

Gameplay:

1. 00:24:427 (3,1) - 1.50x, in my view ingame, is too big
2. 00:26:141 (3,1,2) - 1.30x, ^ same
3. 00:46:075 (1,2,3) - the spacing is very weird, is 1.50x but the (1) isn't same place as (3) I feel you need improve this part gameplay
4. 00:57:218 (2,1) - 1.80x, no pleasse
5. 01:11:789 (1,2,3,4,1) - inconsistency spacing, there random spacing, 1.30x then 1.40x then 1.50x

look fine, the spacing 1.30 is okay expect 1.40, 1.50x and over, this is only I find inconsistency spacing

[Norma]

Gameplay:

1. 00:15:855 (3,1) - never make jump 1.90 on this level
2. 00:24:212 (3,1) - ^ same
3. 00:25:927 (3,1) - ^ same
4. 00:38:789 (4,1) - 2.00x pls no
5. 00:59:361 (4,1) - ^ same
6. 01:07:718 (3,1) - ^ same
7. 01:12:646 (3,1) - ^ same
8. 01:21:432 (3,1) - ^ same

same explain in easy, in view and play is too big, the jump never work in Normal as level
[]
need question or something ask me
Call me after you done this also no need kd

ztrot wrote:

I went ahead with the changes to the easy well most of them but I don't agree with looking at spacing values as reasoning for calling something unintuitive I feel like the patterns are playable and fun, please don't just look at the maps spacing values and point out changes play the map and look if those changes feel good or bad thanks for looking it over again tho.

1. 00:02:570 (1,2,3) - I find this very very lazy. The (3) could be blanketed better and it shows in gameplay. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3339415 | The low point of (3) could also be adjusted since it gets close to the (1) | http://puu.sh/iMmkv.jpg for example. It keeps DS, and imo, combos should be using a consistent DS, or it just gets too confusing for newer players.
2. 00:07:712 (3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - First off. It'd be great if you could balance this more. and keep it more centralized. Try moving the 00:07:284 (2,3) - to the right a bit more so it lets 00:10:284 (1) - along with (2,3) selected with 1.20 DS be somewhere roughly around x456 to 464 and y120. After that just take 00:11:998 (1,2,3) - and do a horizontal flip from the previous. It pretty much puts you in the proper DS range, and looks a lot cleaner.
3. 00:13:712 (1,2,3) - Why 1.0? (actually why 1.2 on everything else but.. whatever) There's no change in the songs rhythm to warrant a DS change. I mean it really doesn't matter too much in the end, but I'd love to see more consistency in the map because as a whole, the little bits and pieces make it feel very unpolished.
4. 00:19:284 (2,3) - (2) at x184 y48 and (3) a horizontal flip of the new (2).
5. 00:28:712 (2,3,4,5) - Select all of these and move the (2) to x256 y208 so the DS on these notes are all even.
6. 00:32:361 (1) - Copy and paste (2) over (1) and rotate it twice. Try placing it at about x384 y44. | http://puu.sh/iMnbB.jpg
7. 00:45:218 (1,2,1,2,3) - you could nudge all of these down a few more y so 00:43:503 (1,1) - doesn't feel as overlapped.
8. 01:01:503 (1) - Try moving this to x52 y200, and then 01:01:932 (2) - to x112 y72. Flip 01:03:646 (2,3) - respectively, and adjust 01:04:503 (1,2) - as needed. This should somewhat help balance the notes out. If you want to. Move 01:00:646 (2) - to x220 y340 as well.
9. 01:13:075 (4) - I wouldn't allow this at all. The gap is way too big here. The map would definitely get DQ'd again from this as it creates a random increase in DS where there shouldn't be one. One thing you could try to do. Try flipping 01:11:789 (1,3) - (readjusting afterwards) and place (4) around the left side of the map | Maybe something like this can work? http://puu.sh/iMnXh.jpg
10. 01:15:218 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - same thing as 1:01.
11. 01:23:789 (1) - http://puu.sh/iMog1.jpg | Having the reverse go into the center is just making it more crowded than it needs to be.