Hey, from PM request :3
Nice mapset, good luck.
General
The hitsounds feels a little bit loud for me, maybe reduce by about 10% across all sections? This applies to all difficulties.
Also, for all diffs I think it would be better if you don't use D before 00:05:814. These feel like a bit too much, and I think k at 00:00:597 and 00:03:205 would fit better. Suggestions for changes to the part before 00:05:814 below:
Charlotte:
00:00:597 (1,2,3,4) - kdkd?
Nardo
- Maybe move 00:01:738 (2) to 00:01:901 and 00:02:227 (3) to 00:02:553? You could then make 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5) k d ddk which would fit well in my opinion.
- I think it would sound better if you would move 00:04:346 (6) to 00:04:510 and move 00:04:836 (7) to 00:05:162 and make it a d. Fits the instruments better and transitions well to the following dkdk part of 00:05:814 (9,10,11,12) etc.
Toara
Muzukashii:
- 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) k d k dd d k d kdd k? Sound better in my opinion.
Oni:
- 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) k k dkkddk or k d dkdddk? Fits better in my opinion.
Also, for all diffs I think it would be better if you don't use D before 00:05:814. These feel like a bit too much, and I think k at 00:00:597 and 00:03:205 would fit better. Suggestions for changes to the part before 00:05:814 below:
Charlotte:
00:00:597 (1,2,3,4) - kdkd?
Nardo
- Maybe move 00:01:738 (2) to 00:01:901 and 00:02:227 (3) to 00:02:553? You could then make 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5) k d ddk which would fit well in my opinion.
- I think it would sound better if you would move 00:04:346 (6) to 00:04:510 and move 00:04:836 (7) to 00:05:162 and make it a d. Fits the instruments better and transitions well to the following dkdk part of 00:05:814 (9,10,11,12) etc.
Toara
Muzukashii:
- 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) k d k dd d k d kdd k? Sound better in my opinion.
Oni:
- 00:00:597 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) k k dkkddk or k d dkdddk? Fits better in my opinion.
Charlotte's Kantan
- 00:50:162 (72,73,74,75) ddkk? There is a higher sound on the last two notes, so I think it would be good to use k.
- 00:52:770 (76,77,78) dkd or ddk maybe?
You have the same pattern at 01:00:597 (90,91,92,93,94,95,96) and I think it sounds much better. I think it would be good if you use it earlier as well for consistency and because it just fits better than kkdd kkd.
- 01:18:857 (122,123,124,125) kdkd? Similar to the beginning, I think D is too strong here. You could also use Dkkd instead here.
- Maybe make 00:19:183 (23) k and move 00:19:510 (24) to 00:19:836 and use 00:19:836 (24,25) dk? Sounds better in my opinion because you still have the clap at 00:19:183.
- 00:52:770 (76,77,78) dkd or ddk maybe?
You have the same pattern at 01:00:597 (90,91,92,93,94,95,96) and I think it sounds much better. I think it would be good if you use it earlier as well for consistency and because it just fits better than kkdd kkd.
- 01:18:857 (122,123,124,125) kdkd? Similar to the beginning, I think D is too strong here. You could also use Dkkd instead here.
- Maybe make 00:19:183 (23) k and move 00:19:510 (24) to 00:19:836 and use 00:19:836 (24,25) dk? Sounds better in my opinion because you still have the clap at 00:19:183.
Nardo's Futsuu
- See general, also applies to 01:18:857 (205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213). I think using D is too strong here, at least for 01:21:466 (207).
- I think it would be nice to have something mapped to the instruments between 00:51:466 (125,126) and between 01:01:901 (155,156). You could for example:
move 00:51:140 (124) to 00:51:792, make 00:51:466 (125) a k and add d at 00:52:118 and 00:52:444. You could do something similar with 01:01:575 (156,157).
I'm aware that you're following the vocals but I think spacing things a little differently would fit well here to put a little bit of emphasis on the instruments and the buildup of for example 00:52:607 (126,127,128,129,130,131,132).
- I think it would be nice to have something mapped to the instruments between 00:51:466 (125,126) and between 01:01:901 (155,156). You could for example:
move 00:51:140 (124) to 00:51:792, make 00:51:466 (125) a k and add d at 00:52:118 and 00:52:444. You could do something similar with 01:01:575 (156,157).
I'm aware that you're following the vocals but I think spacing things a little differently would fit well here to put a little bit of emphasis on the instruments and the buildup of for example 00:52:607 (126,127,128,129,130,131,132).
Muzukashii & Oni
Muzukashii:
- 01:21:139 (324,325,326,327) dkdk? Fits better in my opinion.
- Maybe move 00:52:933 (196) to 00:51:792 and change to k? Sound better in my opinion with the instruments.
- Maybe add a k at 01:02:227, same reason as above.
Oni:
- 01:20:650 (486,487,488,489,490,491) ddkkdk or dkdddk? Fits better in my opinion.
- I think it sounds and is better to play if you move 00:51:221 (279) to 00:51:058 and add d at 00:51:629.
- Move 01:01:656 (350) to 01:01:493 same reason as above.
- Move 01:12:417 (431) to 01:12:580
- Move 01:12:907 (435) to 01:13:069
I think it's better to play to have the first triplet start on a red tick here.
- 01:21:139 (324,325,326,327) dkdk? Fits better in my opinion.
- Maybe move 00:52:933 (196) to 00:51:792 and change to k? Sound better in my opinion with the instruments.
- Maybe add a k at 01:02:227, same reason as above.
Oni:
- 01:20:650 (486,487,488,489,490,491) ddkkdk or dkdddk? Fits better in my opinion.
- I think it sounds and is better to play if you move 00:51:221 (279) to 00:51:058 and add d at 00:51:629.
- Move 01:01:656 (350) to 01:01:493 same reason as above.
- Move 01:12:417 (431) to 01:12:580
- Move 01:12:907 (435) to 01:13:069
I think it's better to play to have the first triplet start on a red tick here.
Nice mapset, good luck.