holy sheet she actually said it
PROVE IT, VOTE ME TWICE
PROVE IT, VOTE ME TWICE
But you're not explicitly claiming Town Doublevoter, are you?-[Jess]- wrote:
roleclaim: Doublevoter.
i just say,no.Static Noise Bird wrote:
But you're not explicitly claiming Town Doublevoter, are you?
i am planning to vote now,since it is 1-shot.Drezi wrote:
why aren't you using your doublevote? are you saying you're not a town doublevoter, or not a doublevoter at all?
Kek.Drezi wrote:
No problem, I'd rather have it gone.
Scum doublevoter.Drezi wrote:
what else would she claim jeez?
I can try using my superduper scumhunting method on you too, if you'd like.Tess wrote:
She claimed to be town earlier.
wot-[Jess]- wrote:
50/50,honesty.Drezi wrote:
Jess I see you're here, please answer with full honesty - are you completely sure you're town, or is there a chance you're scum this game?
why do you even have to check?-[Jess]- wrote:
let me check....yes it said Town.Drezi wrote:
But you recieved a role PM from Navi. Doesn't it say you're a pokemon from the Town faction? We don't know it but you do
because your posts don't make any sense if you're town. I don't know how you could have had a split read between Amianki and Sniverre if they were both doing the same thing. Seems like a softpush to get an early town lynched you know?Tess wrote:
Frostings, why are you so persistent on my meager read on Sniverre? I never even took it seriously, and I've said so the entire time. You have a way with misinterpreting what I said.
and you decided that SNB is scum for sure again, right after this.- Magic Bomb - wrote:
one of either SNB or Tess is probably scum.
I said I saw SNB say something towny for once, not that I didn't think he was scum anymore. One towny post doesn't make someone not-scum.Drezi wrote:
so sum it in a case for us then? last thing you mentioned was seeing a towny post by SNB, so wtf are you even doing just coming here to say you're convinced he's scum now?
Tess wrote:
I think that lynching SNB would result in an equal amount of confusion as lynching me would, so, for now
Unvote
And then you drop by to say that you'l EAT YOUR HAT IF SNB IS TOWN.Tess wrote:
I think "this is a pretty town-y post by SNB" and you go and unvote me, pretty much making it impossible for me to mention that without ]seeming like I only consider people town when they're not voting me.
Drezi wrote:
Tess wrote:
I think that lynching SNB would result in an equal amount of confusion as lynching me would, so, for now
UnvoteAnd then you drop by to say that you'l EAT YOUR HAT IF SNB IS TOWN.Tess wrote:
I think "this is a pretty town-y post by SNB" and you go and unvote me, pretty much making it impossible for me to mention that without seeming like I only consider people town when they're not voting me.
If you're thinking SNB is definitely scum as you said, then lynching him would result in a celebration as we lynch scum, not confusion.... And the second quote doesn't even make sense to bring up at all then, plus the red part doesn't really look like you being convinced he's scum.
You'd better explain your whole thought process thoroughly here. I mean at this point you aren't really in a position to leverage withholding some thoughts and such..
Tess wrote:
I think "this is a pretty town-y post by SNB"
What about this do you not understand? I heavily suspect SNB of being scum, and he makes a town-y post. ANY SCUM can do that, that means nothing, that didn't change my opinion of him. I don't have him voted right now because I'm not sure if I missed something in the thread. But based on WHAT I KNOW NOW, SNB is still my #1 suspect and if he turns out to be town that'll pretty much fuck over all my other suspicions. That's why I still want to RE-READ THE THREAD so that I can make sure that I'm headed in the right direction, and him making a towny post doesn't have to change my suspicions of him at all. It'd be weird if my suspicions DID change.Tess wrote:
I think this is a pretty town-y post by SNB