Posting in a blessed thread
forum
Discuss peppy, pippi and osu in general Conspiracy theories
posted
Total Posts
64
Topic Starter
No one posting quality theories huh
JEUES DYED FOR UR SYNTHS
Even women can be mongrels? RudeAurani wrote:
Stop turning into a shitposter you mongrel and be my grillfriend already.
Stop drinking beer godammitNotEvenDoomMusic wrote:
JEUES DYED FOR UR SYNTHS
>implying anybody cares about itIppE wrote:
Play Count: 130
HA, CHECKMATE ATHEISTS
Checkmate, you fin.
Only Aurani can call us mongrels.
Yes they can.Trash Boat wrote:
Even women can be mongrels? RudeAurani wrote:
Stop turning into a shitposter you mongrel and be my grillfriend already.
Alice should feel honoured at that proposition. I direly need a new mongrel to entertain me.
peppy doesn't have a genderbent alter ego because he's already been confirmed to be homophobic and transphobic
i don't think he has the actual mental capacity needed to formulate a conspiracy against the site
i don't think he has the actual mental capacity needed to formulate a conspiracy against the site
Nice, degrade people who say stuff you don't like. That'll teach 'em how morally superior and tolerant you are!
I'd add something but I don't know if he's being ironic or not.
probably not, I'm sensing a strong normie vibe coming from him. He seems a bit out of place here tbh.
implying shitposters on an anime music game off topic subforum have a sense of norm
eat poopydoopy nerd
eat poopydoopy nerd
every post i have ever made on osu is unironically ironicBrian OA wrote:
I'd add something but I don't know if he's being ironic or not.
welcome to post-post-irony
So, basically, you don't have anything to say and everyone here should never treat you like you're serious despite not being clever, insightful, or funny in any measure.
So, basically meBrian OA wrote:
So, basically, you don't have anything to say and everyone here should never treat you like you're serious despite not being clever, insightful, or funny in any measure.
But you're not ironic all the time. Or were you kidding when you asked me for help?
I wouldn't have a reason to kid about something that i'm genuinely interested in. So no, unless you thought differently about how i approached it, then i must apologize.Brian OA wrote:
But you're not ironic all the time. Or were you kidding when you asked me for help?
Besides, since you've agreed to offer me help, i wouldn't dare to drag you across the table with such a measly thing.
Even i have my boundaries.
Not ironic, but sarcastic.Brian OA wrote:
But you're not ironic all the time. Or were you kidding when you asked me for help?
Yes, I'm being a Nazi, because the German part of me says so.
Isn't sarcasm just a form of using irony?Aurani wrote:
Not ironic, but sarcastic.
Yes, I'm being a Nazi, because the German part of me says so.
I know, but I've been trying to avoid my OCD from bringing too many terms for the same thing in a single discussion.Aurani wrote:
Not ironic, but sarcastic.Brian OA wrote:
But you're not ironic all the time. Or were you kidding when you asked me for help?
Yes, I'm being a Nazi, because the German part of me says so.
Yeah, and that's why I can respect you more than... a good deal of the people here.NotEvenDoomMusic wrote:
I wouldn't have a reason to kid about something that i'm genuinely interested in. So no, unless you thought differently about how i approached it, then i must apologize.Brian OA wrote:
But you're not ironic all the time. Or were you kidding when you asked me for help?
Besides, since you've agreed to offer me help, i wouldn't dare to drag you across the table with such a measly thing.
Even i have my boundaries.
Now you're just being lazy.Brian OA wrote:
I know, but I've been trying to avoid my OCD from bringing too many terms for the same thing in a single discussion.
So, is there any tl;dr on this discussion you've been having with the others? I can't seem to bother to read both pages for some reason.
tl;dr i'm a piece of shit and a big dumb idiot 24/7Brian OA wrote:
So, basically, you don't have anything to say and everyone here should never treat you like you're serious despite not being clever, insightful, or funny in any measure.
That's not really lazy... It does spare me effort, yes, but there isn't much to gain from going over more terms when there's no actual need.Aurani wrote:
Now you're just being lazy.Brian OA wrote:
I know, but I've been trying to avoid my OCD from bringing too many terms for the same thing in a single discussion.
So, is there any tl;dr on this discussion you've been having with the others? I can't seem to bother to read both pages for some reason.
TL;DR choofers is a confirmed imbecile
i think its more that i dont rly want to try hard to validate myself on osu since im only here to play mania but whatever floats U're boat
So, you're saying that a simpler vocabulary is better? I strongly disagree with that.Brian OA wrote:
That's not really lazy... It does spare me effort, yes, but there isn't much to gain from going over more terms when there's no actual need.
TL;DR choofers is a confirmed imbecile
Well, it can only be reconfirmed.
I think simple vocabulary should go with simple conversations. More than that, though, I believe it's crucial to stick to our terms during a discussion, otherwise we may end up losing our common ground and just end up talking past each other because I'm thinking one thing with one term, and you're thinking the other. Then we'd have to waste time either redefining our terms or walking away unsatisfied—all the result of rather poor communication. And that ought to be the goal of a wide vocabulary: facilitate communication.Aurani wrote:
So, you're saying that a simpler vocabulary is better? I strongly disagree with that.Brian OA wrote:
That's not really lazy... It does spare me effort, yes, but there isn't much to gain from going over more terms when there's no actual need.
TL;DR choofers is a confirmed imbecile
Well, it can only be reconfirmed.
I mean, it's already implied I'm referring to sarcasm with "irony" in this case, and I don't think the situation demands the distinction be made.
Topic Starter
Well, I agree with Choofers. If you're transphobic and/or homophobic, you're inherently being a nasty person. Why the fuck am I obliged to talk to you nicely? lol. I kinda wrote the 'pippi is genderbent peppy' on purpose, btw.
The internet trans community are generally insufferable pieces of shit hth
Whatever Choofers was saying doesn't really line up with what you're saying.SaigonAlice wrote:
Well, I agree with Choofers. If you're transphobic and/or homophobic, you're inherently being a nasty person. Why the fuck am I obliged to talk to you nicely? lol. I kinda wrote the 'pippi is genderbent peppy' on purpose, btw.
But if you're following up on what B1rd said, I believe there's a pretty big difference between not liking someone and going out of your way to undermine them. Tbh that kind of attitude just scares people; not accept or at the very least tolerate them.
I definitely see your point, yes, but what exactly makes you think that we "may end up losing our common ground" during a conversation? Unless you know the other party well enough to directly ameliorate the conversation by using a modest vocabulary, you're just betting with them. What I mean is that some people (especially in the professional business world) might get either offended by you trying to dumb down the very membrane of the conversation (words), or they might just judge you by your display of a simplistic vocabulary and get the wrong idea about your intellectual skills, as, believe it or not, conveying the message matters as much as giving birth to it in your mind and is unshakably tied to it.Brian OA wrote:
I think simple vocabulary should go with simple conversations. More than that, though, I believe it's crucial to stick to our terms during a discussion, otherwise we may end up losing our common ground and just end up talking past each other because I'm thinking one thing with one term, and you're thinking the other. Then we'd have to waste time either redefining our terms or walking away unsatisfied—all the result of rather poor communication. And that ought to be the goal of a wide vocabulary: facilitate communication.
I mean, it's already implied I'm referring to sarcasm with "irony" in this case, and I don't think the situation demands the distinction be made.
Of course I'm not sticking to the confines of Osu in the abovesaid, but you get the idea. If you're specifically going to refer to this forum when talking about that, then I most definitely agree with you. What's more, I'm certain that having a simplistic vocabulary here might even be better than having a wide and complex one. Most people will either hold you for an arrogant prick who is trying too hard at impressing other people, or they'll just drop out of the conversation immediately, since they didn't get what the heck you were talking about (like you said up above).
Topic Starter
I wasn't really interested in the conversation beyond that, yeah.Brian OA wrote:
Whatever Choofers was saying doesn't really line up with what you're saying.
But if you're following up on what B1rd said, I believe there's a pretty big difference between not liking someone and going out of your way to undermine them. Tbh that kind of attitude just scares people; not accept or at the very least tolerate them.
Anyway I'm genuinely curious of the claims that minority communities are overly hostile. I mean sure, they're angry because of the lack of rights or representation I guess.
Said the osu elitist scumKheldragar wrote:
The internet trans community are generally insufferable pieces of shit hth
It's not really the minority communities, it's the feminist and SJW that are hateful. And minorities certainly have no lack of representation, it's the opposite in fact, there needs to be more advocacy for the rights of whites and men. You will get lynched if you do anything mildly offensive to minorities (or women), yet people can openly spout hatred for straight white men.
do you understand the concept of "face"Kheldragar wrote:
The internet trans community are generally insufferable pieces of shit hth
You will get lynched if you do anything mildly offensive to minorities (or women), yet people can openly spout hatred for straight white men.here's what you do as a straight white male: don't take the "hatred" seriously, it's coming from a disillusioned sense of oppression and bigotry
the instant someone involves race as a means to justify hate, that person should no longer be taken seriously
A thing you have on your head?Choofers wrote:
do you understand the concept of "face"Kheldragar wrote:
The internet trans community are generally insufferable pieces of shit hth
face being the "front" or the visible portion of a community that makes the entire community seem like they're full of shitKheldragar wrote:
A thing you have on your head?
If that's the visible portion of the community then that's all that matters because it's that portion that affects things outside of its community.Choofers wrote:
face being the "front" or the visible portion of a community that makes the entire community seem like they're full of shitKheldragar wrote:
A thing you have on your head?
I guess we agree on this, then. Basically, it's just context-dependent. You'd need simpler stuff more often than not here, yeah.Aurani wrote:
Well, there's stuff like this http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/27/technol ... wdfunding/SaigonAlice wrote:
I wasn't really interested in the conversation beyond that, yeah.
Anyway I'm genuinely curious of the claims that minority communities are overly hostile. I mean sure, they're angry because of the lack of rights or representation I guess.
And this http://toprightnews.com/thugs-ask-man-a ... uis-train/
And that https://youtube.com/watch?v=GO_X4DkwA_Q
Though I admit there's a habit of downplaying "their own" side's hostility with many a thing, truth is that anytime I talk about minorities with someone outside of my usual spots, I have people exploding on me over how they've endured 400 years of oppression or something.