Gratz!
AR8 PleaseJenny wrote:
We may be back to old standards, boys :p
the song has a huge contrast on these (as for a majority of the kiaitime guitar solo since it's very distorted), which is why there are new combos put onto them (rather than the usual 4/1 combo length in most other parts of the song/map) - if I mapped them as one smooth motion, this contrast would not be part of the play since a new combo on it's own does not impact gameplay (except for the HP restoration)Rickput wrote:
grid != playfield - until like 5 grids (size 3) out of the grid, you're usually entirely fine to the top/bottom (mind the top left, bottom center and top-very-right because of interface conflicts - not like those were unavoidable these days anyway)Rickput wrote:
also where's the fine line drawn for the "slider outside of map" policy?
making the spacing contrast like this makes it so that the player has to alter their playing style (large spacing + low angle -> small spacing + sharp angle, also into the opposite horizontal direction), which is why I went for that here: it gives a stronger snap and demands more focus - also, it provides additional contrast, both visually and gameplaywise, for the next combo. keeping large spacing for all of these notes without exception would make it feel much more repetitiveRickput wrote:
02:52:849 (3,1) - really close together compared to the directly former notes, consider increasing DS
I do understand the purpose of offesetting the combos, but the spacing and angle of the offsets are incredibly awkward for play, especially when there's not even a 1-note pause between the combos.Jenny wrote:
the song has a huge contrast on these (as for a majority of the kiaitime guitar solo since it's very distorted), which is why there are new combos put onto them (rather than the usual 4/1 combo length in most other parts of the song/map) - if I mapped them as one smooth motion, this contrast would not be part of the play since a new combo on it's own does not impact gameplay (except for the HP restoration)
This actually clears some things up for me - i couldn't find a clear answer to this policy until now.Jenny wrote:
grid != playfield - until like 5 grids (size 3) out of the grid, you're usually entirely fine to the top/bottom (mind the top left, bottom center and top-very-right because of interface conflicts - not like those were unavoidable these days anyway)
I still feel it'd be better with either a larger spacing, or have a couple of the other notes also have a small spacing so there's at least a pattern going. Having just one seemingly random note with a small spacing looks funny - this could go down to personal preference, but I doubt I'm the only one who thinks so. Would be better if the music had any cue to suddenly switch to the small spacing, but there's not much to call for that.Jenny wrote:
making the spacing contrast like this makes it so that the player has to alter their playing style (large spacing + low angle -> small spacing + sharp angle, also into the opposite horizontal direction), which is why I went for that here: it gives a stronger snap and demands more focus - also, it provides additional contrast, both visually and gameplaywise, for the next combo. keeping large spacing for all of these notes without exception would make it feel much more repetitive
2 more days. I doubt that it will get a DQ. Map is well done and I am sure the QATs already checked this one. There isn't really anything wrong with it, but i personally dislike the streams. They just feel odd to play. I cannot tell why, but I'm just not able to FC or even pass them sometimes. The movement feels a bit weird in my opinion.Shian-aaa wrote:
Been waiting some days , this map is lacking in order to get ranked.
Lets see what QAT has to say.
Watch this DQ.DoKito wrote:
2 more days. I doubt that it will get a DQ.
Cheers man. \:D/FrcV wrote:
[ C R O W N S ] wrote:
What did I say.
Damn that was pro
I don't think this should be posted here regardless. Posts in these threads are meant to be helpful/positive remarks towards the map/mapper, not advertising your 'Suggestion' just because it has 1 tiny paragraph referenced to this map.Shian-aaa wrote:
Thought i post this link to a feature request here ,
since its using this map as a roughly overviewed example
Its about mapping
t/338320
handsome wrote:
can i rnak this
i prefer 0.3 sl tho
vhsh shhyu[url]yuhz[/url]Inyuschan wrote:
Wrong icon I guess lol
You shouldn't ever put a circle or slider's edge outside the grid. It just causes unforeseen issues on easy, hard rock, and catch the beat. I haven't downloaded the map, but I guarantee there's some off screen mods based on that one egregious slider which is erroneously placed completely off the grid.Jenny wrote:
grid != playfield - until like 5 grids (size 3) out of the grid, you're usually entirely fine to the top/bottom (mind the top left, bottom center and top-very-right because of interface conflicts - not like those were unavoidable these days anyway)