byfar wrote:

selling bubble guns 1 $$€€££¥¥ each

1. 00:09:822 (2,3) - Try Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm since there's a vocal on 00:09:955 - that's held, but the beat on 00:10:087 (3) - . is quite feint in comparison. It would fit better as a slider-end better imo.
2. 00:34:645 (6) - You could extend this slider to 3/4. Also imo, you should emphasize this slider with a larger jump than from 4>5, since 5>6 has the addition of vocals, making it stronger.
   
   Maybe you could try something like this.

   
3. 00:36:769 (4,5,1) - Larger jump from 5>1?
4. 01:21:636 (1) - You use some nice linear patterns here so how about moving this to 308||306 So it makes a nice linear pattern with 01:20:972 (3,5) - .
5. 01:40:884 (1,2) - At this difficulty, you usually associate this kind of pattern with circles that are coming 1/4th after the slider...I mean, of course this works, but try putting the circle on 249||61 so the player has to play through the whole slider without pausing.

1. 00:11:149 (4,5,6) - Try a sharper angle? 00:11:282 (5) - 360||134 would create a nice linear pattern with 00:11:149 (4,5,1) -
2. 00:13:539 (6,1) - Make this jump bigger too? 00:11:282 (5,6,1) - Felt better to play lol.
3. 01:23:760 (1) - Idk about this slider honestly... I think breaking it into 1 circle and 1 1/2 slider would be better so you can map 01:23:893 - .
4. 01:33:715 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - Is there a reason the DS keeps decreasing with this particular jump sequence? It just felt a bit out of place for me...
5. 02:17:256 (2,3) - This last section is supposed to be intense, no? Since you mapped streams here. You don't need to overlap these sliders imo.
   
   You can try something like this.

   

1. 00:12:211 (3,4) - Ctrl+G this for multiple reasons. Emphasizes 3 better, flows better (imo), also makes it slightly easier to read since there will be more time in between the overlap with slider1's tail.
2. 00:51:503 (3,4) - Cltr+G this and then bring 4 to 00:51:769 - ? I think this plays better.
3. 01:08:760 (5) - 310||173 looks nicer, but up to you~.

1. 00:15:795 (1,2) - Man this angle into 2 is really sharp... Try rotating 2 like 90 degrees from selection center.
2. 01:04:645 (1,2,3,4) - I find it odd that you first map the bass with slider 1, and then proceed to follow the drums after. I mean, you do this for higher diffs which is fine since most players can identify this change, but I can definitely see this being confusing for newbies. Try shortening slider 1 to a simple 1/1 slider and moving all the repeats onto red ticks. That way there also isn't any polarity shift from white > red > white > red through this short section.
   
   This rhythm makes more sense honestly.

   

1. 00:13:672 (1,2) - 0.9x DS?
2. 00:37:034 (1,2) - Any way you can move 1 and 2 down a bit so you can blanket them better without covering too much of the hp bar?
3. 01:04:645 (1,2,1,2,3) - Same as in Normal, sticking to red-tick polarity for this section would be more beginner-friendly.
   
   Try this rhythm instead?

   [img]http://puu.sh/hTwSB.jpg
   [/img]
4. 01:07:433 (2,3) - Wouldn't hurt to reduce the DS here to 1.40. It's right before the break anyways lol.

1. You sure there's nothing to tag? Maybe some keywords relating to the song?

1. HP3 seems too high for this map. Easy should be passable for beginners, and this is not. I recommend lowering to at most HP2.5.
2. 00:39:822 (2,3,1) - Consecutive 1/1 at such high speed is too hard for Easy.
3. 01:57:875 (3) - Maybe the hitsound should be the same as 00:58:406 (3) These parts sound the same to me, so it might make sense to use the same hitsounds. Same suggestion for all diffs.

1. 00:34:247 (3,4) - Clap + Clap + Drum finish.
2. 00:59:999 (4,1) - The 1/2 beat spacing between these comes quite unexpected. It's likely the players would miss it, since they've gotten into a 1/1 groove with the whole section preceding this and don't expect this syncopation. This would help to make it easier to read: http://puu.sh/i5UQL/80818dddf8.jpg or make the rhythm of clicking straight like this: http://puu.sh/i5UUS/bebe6ba803.jpg
3. See hitsound suggestion in Easy.

1. 00:27:610 (4) - Seems like you're doing 4 beat combos, so you should probably start a new combo here.
2. 01:54:689 (1) - I don't think it's necessary to start a new combo here.

1. 1/4 triple was only used in two places in the map, causing spikes in difficulty. This could be frustrating for players who can play all the rest of the map easily, but can't tap the triple. I recommend removing them so that the difficulty within the map is more consistent throughout.
2. 00:16:725 (4,1) - lol why manual stack? It's like... one pixel difference from the automatic stack. Well, it doesn't matter, just kind of meaningless.
3. 01:22:831 (1,2,3) - Opportunity to make a pattern of gradual rotation and gradual curve reduction: http://puu.sh/i5W43/bc77098326.jpg
4. 02:17:256 (2,3,4) - Could you reduce the hitsound volume just a little? The overlapping of the hitsounds makes a wall of sound that's kind of overwhelming. Same for the other diffs that use 1/4 here.

1. 02:18:318 (2) - What are you clicking here? Doesn't seem like anything worth clicking. Same for the higher diffs.
2. There's not much difference in rhythmic complexity between Hard and Hyper. Maybe you can add some more complex rhythms here, like more 1/4 and stuff.

1. 00:12:211 (3,4) - Maybe just difference in style, but I think it would play nicer to swap their positions. I just feel like the current jump is awkward because it cuts very sharply into the curve.
2. 00:21:503 - I think it's worth considering to put something to click here, for the snare. For example: http://puu.sh/i5XYr/6a4258072b.jpg Just try it.

1. Use of CS6 is iffy. It really pops out from the spread. It definitely looks like it was designed around CS6, but I'd recommend using a lower circle size, because the diffs directly above and below it are both using CS4. I'd understand if you gradually increased the circle size over each threshold of difficulty, but this jump up and back down just isn't really appropriate. No other maps in the set have circle size that even come close to it, not even any of the Xs.

1. 01:08:627 (6) - I just thought it'd be better as two circles.
2. 01:46:459 (2) - Might feel better spaced out a bit by moving it up? and if you do that, probably angle them inward: http://puu.sh/i7rcn/56e1eba17e.jpg

1. 01:53:096 (3,4,5,1) - When I played this, the impact at (1) felt a bit weird. I guess it's because the parts where you used this rhythm before tended to have 01:53:362 (4,5) move away from the head of (1), and this one is different.

Priti wrote:

You can still mod, I'll rebubble