because there are not nearly enough people with the map in their top list to be included.
It's in the list for top1000 and top100 players.Sailexk wrote:
How does https://osu.ppy.sh/s/172013 not on the list?
Kheldragar wrote:
How is delis insane > insane
Insane is fucking easy.
its actually not easiER which is the whole point. but you can keep calling it easy all you want, all i see is this:Kheldragar wrote:
Insane is easy -> gives more pp -> I expect more people to play it and it to go above delis
e: Nice ninja edit Riince
xxdeathx wrote:
top 50000, 40000, 30000, 20000, 15000, 10000 pls
I only have the scores for the top 5000 players stored right now. I will gather some more scores when I have access to my server again in a few days.xxdeathx wrote:
xxdeathx wrote:
top 50000, 40000, 30000, 20000, 15000, 10000 pls
It's easy but not easy enough to get a good accuracy it seemsKheldragar wrote:
How is delis insane > insane
Insane is fucking easy.
I have updated the chart for top 50000 players now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... iA/pubhtmlxxdeathx wrote:
Thank you, I'm really interested in seeing what maps are popular at each range of players.
Really? Maybe top 20k or 25k would be more in between. Or the data would represent players a lot better if you found a way to split groups up, say 50000 to 25000, 25000 to 10000, 10000 to 5000, etc. I think that would make it better since the top 1000 for example have far different best plays from the top 10000, so they shouldn't be included in the top 10000's calculations.Ziggo wrote:
I have updated the chart for top 50000 players now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... iA/pubhtmlxxdeathx wrote:
Thank you, I'm really interested in seeing what maps are popular at each range of players.
There is no sure-fire way to get the top 50000 players, so the data is I used is not 100% correct. However the error should be pretty small considering the huge amount of data being evaluated.
Btw I didn't upload top 10000 players because it looked nearly identical to the top 5000 one.
no this is only for standardShiroi Hiroshi wrote:
work for ctb ?