M4M whee
[Easy Collab]
[Vass-RJ's Hard]fsdafsad i'll finish my mod by tomorrow asdf good luck!
[Easy Collab]
- 00:25:744 (3,4) - using 1/2 beats on Easy diff isn't recommended, maybe changing them like this would be better
- 00:39:933 (5) - same as above, what about changing it to a note?
seems like you prefer following the song lol, alright then i'm going to skip 1/2 beats - 02:33:852 (1,2) - are the sliders without clap intended? then what about adding it? feels really nice
- 03:48:852 (2,3) - it would be better if this rhythm was reversed. most of parts fit with the vocal nicely while this part doesn't
- 03:53:311 (1) - same opinion as Normal, this isn't really necessary
- 04:19:257 (1) - ^
- 00:12:365 (4) - why don't you set the slider head's sampleset as soft or auto? oh and adding finish would be nice as well
- 01:03:041 (1) - dividing it into a 1/1 slider and a note feels better
- 01:26:960 (2) - same opinion as above, current one feels a bit weird
- 01:29:798 (2,3,4) - since this doesn't have nice flow but it has larger distance compared with other objects, what about stacking them with 01:28:176 (3) - this slider's tail? you also have to adjust distance among 01:30:203 (4,1,2) - these
- 02:15:203 (2,3) - reversing this rhythm by using ctrl g fits with the vocal better
- 02:39:325 (7) - well ignoring the awesome vocal sound isn't really good idea. try changing the rhythm like this
- 03:53:311 (1) - what about removing NC? it doesn't really necessary. it seems like you added NC to emphasize this part but i'm not sure if this deserves to have it while breaking consistency. i know that you already used some kind of this NC pattern but most of them are placed nicely and they are quite reasoanble
- 04:19:257 (1) - ^
to be honest, i don't enjoy some kind of 00:39:528 (5,6,7,1) - this pattern on low diffs, they are just random and unpredictable. maybe that's just because of the difference of standard of low diffs. let's see how they work. i also found some hitsounds errors which may be caued because it's collab (they are quite annoying), for example like 02:17:028 (6,7) - this, what about arranging those mispalced hitsounds so that this diff could have consistency
[Vass-RJ's Hard]
- tick rate 2 fits this song best
- 00:50:069 (3) - try removing whistle on slier's tail, it doesn't fit with the song well
- 00:52:907 (4) - consider removing clap on slider's head since it's quite out of place imo
- 00:50:069 (3) - perhaps you forgot to add clap on this slider's tail?
- 02:26:961 (9) - this slider's head neads clap according to your hitsound pattern
- 02:49:258 (1) - is there special reason that you add NC here? well it seems unnecessary
- 03:34:865 - i think suddenly emptying this section isn't really good idea, feels quite weird. what about adding some objects?examples
[img]http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2683363[/img[ - 03:40:947 (1,2) - how about reversing NC to fit with the song well
- Tick rate 2 fits this song best
higarven - 00:01:420 (1) - what about using 5 notes stream instead of a note? i think more notes are needed due to the song. after adding more notes, consider changing last 4 notes' (00:01:521 (2,3,4,5) - ) sampleset to soft to fit with the song
- 01:18:852 (1) - according to the song, it would be nice if the finish on this note is moved to next note
- 01:26:554 (3,4,5,6) - i think current pattern feels a bit uncomfortable? for play. well this may because of difference of preference about using jump pattern, but i think using more neat square or different pattern seems a bit better. or just reducing distance between 01:27:162 (6,7) - these would be nice as wellexamples
etc. - 01:32:027 (5) - since there isn't proper sound for placing a note here, how about removing this note and changing the pattern a bit?
- 01:44:595 (5) - try adding NC for consistency and as indicator
- 01:56:554 (5) - ^
- 01:51:487 (14) - remove clap for consistency? or add it on 01:48:243 (7) - here or 01:49:865 - here etc. i prefer latter one lol
- 02:20:473 (17) - maybe you forgot to add whistle on slider's head
- 02:23:716 (1) - missed whsitle? also, consider removing its NC, it isn't really necessary and to keep consistency with next part 02:33:446 (16) -
- 02:28:582 (4) - using 1/2 slider seems better than 1/4 slider with a repeat because of the vocal sound
- 02:36:487 (3) - actually i expected different placement on this note. it's just my feeling (can't explain exactly lol) but i think this note should be stacked with 02:35:473 (1) - this according to the song. this feels a bit better
- 02:42:771 (7) - hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm i think giving jump distance feels a bit better than current one due to the vocal sound. for better flow, try adjusting this slider a bit. using 3/4 slider by following the sound (i don't know the instrument's name exactly lol) would be nice. oh and since you didn't use large distance suddenly, you'd better adjust distance between 02:42:771 (7,1) - these as well for better playing.
- 02:46:622 (7) - whistle is really nice to hear
- 02:49:054 (5) - ^
- 03:23:311 (8) - is this slider's head intended to have soft sampleset? if it is, what about changing it to Auto? this feels better imo
- 03:41:554 (5,6) - same opinion as 01:18:852 (1) -
- 03:56:960 (1) - i think reversing this by using ctrl g has better flow with both previous and next slider
- 04:00:608 (1) - this NC seems unnecessary, what about removing it?