Insane
General Remarks
00:24:217 (2,3) - The combo ending on note 3 and spacing between notes 1, 2, and 3 imply a longer break between note 3 and note 1 of the next combo. Consider revising spacing for these 2 sequences.
00:36:873 (2) - Move head of slider 2 closer to the tail of slider 1 to reflect the fast rhythm.
00:51:873 (2) - Consider using smaller spacing for this eighth note (a quarter note spacing is used).
00:55:623 (2) - Same as above.
01:02:889 (1) - Consider spacing this slider farther from previous note.
01:16:482 (2) - Consider using smaller spacing for this eighth note (a quarter note spacing is used).
01:23:982 (2) - Same as above, though instances of this aren't particularly bad if there are no similarly spaced notes nearby with different timings.
01:31:482 (2) - Same as above.
01:43:435 (3) - Same as above, but with slider.
01:44:607 (2) - Ditto.
01:49:412 (6,7) - The last 2 notes in this stream are slightly crooked.
01:54:334 (3) - Not sure about using quarter note spacing in the middle of a triple.
02:07:576 - Are you sure about having no notes on this downbeat?
02:56:092 (4,5) - Sliders not parallel.
03:12:967 (3,4,5) - Spacing not consistent.
03:30:545 (6,7) - Intentional jump?
03:45:076 (4,5) - Spacing is a tad large here.
03:50:935 (2,3,4,5,1) - The new combo on the last note might mislead the player into thinking that a note is omitted in this stack.
04:44:139 (1) - This triple seems a little forced.
04:49:529 (1,2) - Ugly stack
Upon playing this map through a few times, the strange spacing doesn't seem too bad. I would leave it up to your discretion. Otherwise, pretty smooth map!
General Remarks
- A lot of inconsistent spacing throughout the map. The typical quarter note spacing is used for different situations. This may throw players that are paying less attention off.
00:24:217 (2,3) - The combo ending on note 3 and spacing between notes 1, 2, and 3 imply a longer break between note 3 and note 1 of the next combo. Consider revising spacing for these 2 sequences.
00:36:873 (2) - Move head of slider 2 closer to the tail of slider 1 to reflect the fast rhythm.
00:51:873 (2) - Consider using smaller spacing for this eighth note (a quarter note spacing is used).
00:55:623 (2) - Same as above.
01:02:889 (1) - Consider spacing this slider farther from previous note.
01:16:482 (2) - Consider using smaller spacing for this eighth note (a quarter note spacing is used).
01:23:982 (2) - Same as above, though instances of this aren't particularly bad if there are no similarly spaced notes nearby with different timings.
01:31:482 (2) - Same as above.
01:43:435 (3) - Same as above, but with slider.
01:44:607 (2) - Ditto.
01:49:412 (6,7) - The last 2 notes in this stream are slightly crooked.
01:54:334 (3) - Not sure about using quarter note spacing in the middle of a triple.
02:07:576 - Are you sure about having no notes on this downbeat?
02:56:092 (4,5) - Sliders not parallel.
03:12:967 (3,4,5) - Spacing not consistent.
03:30:545 (6,7) - Intentional jump?
03:45:076 (4,5) - Spacing is a tad large here.
03:50:935 (2,3,4,5,1) - The new combo on the last note might mislead the player into thinking that a note is omitted in this stack.
04:44:139 (1) - This triple seems a little forced.
04:49:529 (1,2) - Ugly stack
Upon playing this map through a few times, the strange spacing doesn't seem too bad. I would leave it up to your discretion. Otherwise, pretty smooth map!