00:14:771 (14771|3) - change ths into 2/4 LN just like previous note, for consistency, the sustained sound is still here in this time

00:17:207 (17207|0) - change this into 2/4 LN same reason as above >_<
00:19:644 (19644|3) - still the same, for consistency
00:22:461 (22461|2) - move this to 4 would be better i think. 1/4 jack at this bpm doesn't look suitable imo >_<
00:23:756 - better to use 3 notes since the emphasis is much stronger here
00:23:603 - you use 3 here, most probably because of the fainter beat + main melody that you're following, in which case the note i mentioned above, is better to be expressed with 3 notes, to also emphasis that there is a change in beat (even if there is no melody anymore at that part)
00:25:583 - add a note to 1, you have been using 3 notes to express this note, its very much preferred if you could keep this in terms of consistency. there is still space to place the note as well so imo there is no reason for you to omit on this particular part :3
00:26:192 - same reason as above
00:26:497 (26497|1,26497|0,26573|3,26649|2,26801|3,26801|1,26954|2,26954|0) - how about rearranging this place, and add LNs to follow that sustained main melody, and placing them from 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 following the ascends of the pitch? i think this would represent the song much better!
00:28:629 - i think 3 notes here is much better because of the much stronger emphasis than previous placing, in which 2 notes are utilised.
00:29:238 - add a note to 2 for the same following reason mentioned above
00:30:456 - add a note to 1, there is an obvious change in the emphasis of the beat. this one here is of the same beat strength with 00:30:152 (30152|3,30152|1,30152|0) - , thus i think there is no reason for you to only place 2 notes here and not utilising 3 instead.
00:31:065 - add a note to 1 would be much better since the beat is of the same strength as well with previous one mentioned above
00:31:979 - add a note to 2 would be better for emphasis imo.
00:33:806 - add a note to 1 is better since the beat is of the same strength with previous placement
00:33:654 (33654|0) - moving this to 3 would be much better in terms of hand balance since at the moment the placing is a bit heavy on the left hand
00:38:984 - i think 3 notes would be better here because of the emphasis, placing it at 2 would be better and it does not obstruct with your current patterning. it also looks neat because by this placing you jack the 2 notes on 2, and then 2 notes on 4, making it also balanced in terms of notes jack even if it's in a higher diffs.
00:39:441 (39441|0,39517|1,39593|2) - i think utilising two notes would be much better here, how about placing it as 13 24 13. to follow your current pattern of 1 2 3. the beat is rather strong here, and in a 4 star rating difficulty i don't think this will obstruct with how the difficult will flow, rather imo this is more suitable for this diff, and also to signify that you indeed express the song based on the emphasis of the note, PR, hand balancing, as well as aesthetic of the map >w<b
00:40:202 - using 2 or 3 notes would be better because of the difference in emphasis. placing it at 1 or 4 would do, or both at 1 and 4

00:40:811 - this would be the same with reasons expounded upon above
00:41:877 (41877|0,41954|1,42030|2,42182|2) - how about using 2 notes as well, because of reasons mentioned above?
00:42:943 (42943|1,42943|0,42943|3,43096|3,43096|2,43096|0,43248|2,43248|0,43248|1,43400|2,43400|0,43400|3,43553|3,43553|1,43553|0,43705|2,43705|3,43781|0,43781|1,43857|3,43857|2,44009|0,44009|3,44009|1,44162|3,44162|2,44162|0) - just like this here, you consistently express the beat strength correctly. keeping this consistency across the whole diffs i think would be important and neat. as well as giving your map an extra aesthetic touch

00:47:512 (47512|1,48121|0) - how about using 2 notes for every white lines in this phase, this fits the song much better and with this you express the song much more accurately because of the difference in beat, you can readjust the patterning as imo it won't destroy your current patterning, rather you'd only need to make a minor revision based on your current placing.
00:48:426 (48426|3,48730|3,48882|2) - i think whether you agree with my point above or not, you should use 2 notes here because of the obvious very loud emphasis. this would improve the readability of your map as well imo thus i think this one is extremely encouraged to be followed
00:49:644 (49644|1,50253|1,50558|1) - this would be the case as the aforementioned reason above
00:52:080 - add a note to 3 would be better for emphasis and to emphasise the change in the phase change
00:59:390 - add a note to 3 as the emphasis is clearly different and highly emphasised on this part
00:59:542 (59542|2,59619|1) - dragging this 1x to the left would be nice to avoid jacking if you agree with my aforementioned recommendations above
01:00:608 - add to 4, aforementioned rationale expounded upon above

01:00:913 - you should use 2 notes here to keep your consistency. there is an audible emphasised beat as well here, 1 note does not make any sense for me and by using 2 notes it makes your map more easily readable and aesthetically pleasing
01:09:441 - 3 notes would be better here because of the difference in emphasis. add to 4 if you agree. this is extremely recommended
01:10:355 - same reason as above, utilisation of 3 notes would be extremely recommended
01:12:182 (72182|0,72182|2,72334|2,72334|1,72487|0,72487|3,72639|3,72639|1,72791|0,72791|2) - utilising 3 notes would be better since this beat is of the same strength with the earlier points in which 3 notes are utilised... see below for reference
00:42:943 (42943|1,42943|0,42943|3,43096|3,43096|2,43096|0,43248|2,43248|0,43248|1,43400|2,43400|0,43400|3,43553|3,43553|1,43553|0,43705|2,43705|3,43781|0,43781|1,43857|3,43857|2,44009|0,44009|3,44009|1,44162|3,44162|2,44162|0) - just like this here
01:15:989 (75989|3,76065|2,76141|1) - dragging this 1x to the left would be better in terms of layering and hand balancing. this would ensure the flow of the note when pressed imo
01:18:426 (78426|0,78502|1,78578|2) - dragging this 1x to the right due to aforementioned rationale above
01:25:735 (85735|0,85811|1,85888|2) - 01:28:172 (88172|3,88248|2,88324|1) - same as aforementioned reason above
01:21:319 (81319|1,81319|2,81471|3,81624|2,81624|1) - i think using 2 notes or 3 notes consistently here would be better to emphasise the part of the song in which the chord is being played at a loud volume setting
01:21:928 (81928|1,81928|3,82080|2,82080|0,82233|3,82233|1) - just like this point here in which 2 notes are consistently utilised
01:23:451 - you forgot to add a note here, add for consistency in layering in this phase
01:29:390 (89390|1) - i think this one should be only 1 note, there is no reason to put 2 notes here, instead put two notes here for emphasis 01:29:542 -
01:29:847 - welps<3 need to add another note here, 2 note just like this emphasis here 01:29:086 (89086|2,89086|1) - and 01:30:304 (90304|3,90304|0) -
01:30:608 (90608|3) - i think this one should also be deleted, this place should be better with being expressed with 1 note, and instead utilise two notes at 01:30:761 -
01:37:309 (97309|2,97461|1,97613|2,97766|1) - adding another note at 2 and 3 would be better, since this is nearing the end of the song and mroe emphasis on the beat on this part would suit the song much better imo!
01:37:994 (97994|3) - move this to 3? just like the reason mentioned before at the beginning of the mod of this diff

01:38:375 (98375|1,98375|0,98527|2,98679|1,98679|3,98832|2,98984|1,98984|3,99060|2,99136|1,99136|3,99289|2,99289|3,99441|1,99593|2,99593|3) - there are several issues with layering here, i would recommend you to revamp this part totally. i will mentioned some examples
01:38:375 - 3 notes should be utilised here because of the clear beat emphasis
01:38:984 (98984|1,98984|3,99060|2,99136|3,99136|1) - 1 note is enough here, no need to use 2, this is because you need to differentiate with the strength of the beat and emphasis here 01:39:289 (99289|2,99289|3) - , in which 2 notes are utilised already.
01:39:593 (99593|3,99745|1,99898|0,99898|2,100050|2,100050|0,100202|1,100202|0,100278|2,100355|0,100355|1,100431|2,100507|1,100507|0,100659|1,100811|0,100811|2) - please implement the following recommendations above to this phase as well due to the same possible issues that i have observed here
01:43:476 (103476|2) - the pitch is actually different here, so move to 2 would be better, and also it looks neater to make a short trill here!