eh same yet different and more characterized
forum
What personality type are you?
posted
Total Posts
501
ISTJ
50% introverted
16% observant
35% thinking
14% judging
33% turbulent
50% introverted
16% observant
35% thinking
14% judging
33% turbulent
I took three different tests, got INTP all three times~
98% Introveted... I literally have no friends at ALL.
98% Introveted... I literally have no friends at ALL.
i am kuudere
Apparently I got INFJ 6 months ago. I know I've changed quite a bit (probably for the better) so I'm not surprised that I got a different answer this time.
chaee
ENFJ
From ESFJ to
Pretty much accurate..
ENTREPRENEUR
- MIND -
?ExtravertedIntroverted
18%
?
- ENERGY -
?IntuitiveObservant
17%
?
- NATURE -
?ThinkingFeeling
27%
?
- TACTICS -
JudgingProspecting
35%
?
- IDENTITY -
AssertiveTurbulent
50%
- MIND -
?ExtravertedIntroverted
18%
?
- ENERGY -
?IntuitiveObservant
17%
?
- NATURE -
?ThinkingFeeling
27%
?
- TACTICS -
JudgingProspecting
35%
?
- IDENTITY -
AssertiveTurbulent
50%
It's rare to find extroverts here. o/Fezzes wrote:
Pretty much accurate..
[deleted]
SameButteredPotato wrote:
INTP - A. Took an official test at my school a while before this as well and got the same results.
Dang ! i also got introvert type.... mine is INTJ though...piruchan wrote:
I believe a large number of people here are introverts
Just read the description, this thing is very accurate (for me, at least).
Ok, I'm actually gonna do this
Seems legit
Why is there so many introverted ppl in these forums?
Seems legit
Why is there so many introverted ppl in these forums?
First test this year still INTJ while my first few ones are INTJ last year. Glad to be still sticking to this.
Got pretty mild results aside from being introverted...is this a sign?
Hippy in da house
Hippy in da house
this is the prime example as for why online tests have their current image.
First off, this is not MBTI. It's not. It's "our theory".
http://www.16personalities.com/articles/our-theory
The description makes me wonder if the people who designed this actually understood Jungs original theories, which they supposedly took as foundation, and mixed them up with a mockery of one of the Big5-factors (neuroticism).
They also seem to exploit the Barnum-effect to lure people into buying a premium version, very much like a a variety of other psychological scams. (I mean.. look at this: https://www.16personalities.com/premium-profiles)
If you look at the type-descriptions, you have to wonder if this is an actual scientific evaluation of someones personality, or just an online-tool for ego-stroking.
In short: Don't take this test seriously. Don't post "your" results online or identify with them. If you want to know your personality, try lots of introspection and self-honesty, or take a real test. Not this one. Without delving in too deep (I did read most of the website), this seems to be a real clusterfuck , a mixture of half-applied and altered original theories. Their scales are inconsistent, they use psychological trickery to scam people into buying their product without fulfilling any sort of scientific standard.
Don't support this please.
First off, this is not MBTI. It's not. It's "our theory".
http://www.16personalities.com/articles/our-theory
The description makes me wonder if the people who designed this actually understood Jungs original theories, which they supposedly took as foundation, and mixed them up with a mockery of one of the Big5-factors (neuroticism).
They also seem to exploit the Barnum-effect to lure people into buying a premium version, very much like a a variety of other psychological scams. (I mean.. look at this: https://www.16personalities.com/premium-profiles)
If you look at the type-descriptions, you have to wonder if this is an actual scientific evaluation of someones personality, or just an online-tool for ego-stroking.
In short: Don't take this test seriously. Don't post "your" results online or identify with them. If you want to know your personality, try lots of introspection and self-honesty, or take a real test. Not this one. Without delving in too deep (I did read most of the website), this seems to be a real clusterfuck , a mixture of half-applied and altered original theories. Their scales are inconsistent, they use psychological trickery to scam people into buying their product without fulfilling any sort of scientific standard.
Don't support this please.
sottovoce
Even MBTI takes quite some liberty with Jung's theory. But you're correct, this particular test is completely awful. If you are really interested in Jungian typology I recommend doing your own research until you feel more confident in typing yourself. Most internet tests are going to be very inaccurate. Your type does not change so if you are getting different results that's the first big sign something is wrong. Questions in these tests are often very leading - for example, they often have things such as 'I try to act logically' as in indicator for a 'Thinking' type. Well who is going to say they act illogically? Not to mention if you understand the Thinking/Feeling axis you'd realise it has nothing to do with being logical. People also come with preconceptions that the test is ill equipped to deal with - for example, men may be predisposed to answer a certain way, due to societal expectations of how a man should think and act. You get the idea.Railey2 wrote:
this is the prime example as for why online tests have their current image.
First off, this is not MBTI. It's not. It's "our theory".
http://www.16personalities.com/articles/our-theory
The description makes me wonder if the people who designed this actually understood Jungs original theories, which they supposedly took as foundation, and mixed them up with a mockery of one of the Big5-factors (neuroticism).
They also seem to exploit the Barnum-effect to lure people into buying a premium version, very much like a a variety of other psychological scams. (I mean.. look at this: https://www.16personalities.com/premium-profiles)
If you look at the type-descriptions, you have to wonder if this is an actual scientific evaluation of someones personality, or just an online-tool for ego-stroking.
In short: Don't take this test seriously. Don't post "your" results online or identify with them. If you want to know your personality, try lots of introspection and self-honesty, or take a real test. Not this one. Without delving in too deep (I did read most of the website), this seems to be a real clusterfuck , a mixture of half-applied and altered original theories. Their scales are inconsistent, they use psychological trickery to scam people into buying their product without fulfilling any sort of scientific standard.
Don't support this please.
If anyone does have an interest in learning more I can recommend this YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmDcT_ ... Q/featured
My type is ENFP.