[Mahua] wrote:

nold你放心 我绝对会在你打死我之前做完sb的 估计现在进度可能会比以前快了

Chloe wrote:

[Mahua] wrote:

nold你放心 我绝对会在你打死我之前做完sb的 估计现在进度可能会比以前快了

妈的我的sb呢

• [Muzukashii]
  
  Consider OD -1 to make a better spread with Oni ?

1. 00:29:435 (7) - consider moving this note to 00:29:778 - for a 2/1 break ? This could follow the vocal since it stops at 00:29:092 (6) -
2. 00:33:207 (1) - you may remove finish here as there is no cymbal sound like 00:30:464 (1) - for emphasis.
3. 00:35:950 (1) - ^
4. 00:38:693 (1) - ^
5. 00:45:550 (1) - ^
6. 00:48:293 (1) - ^
7. 00:49:150 - consider adding d here so that it would be more coherent to 00:51:893 (5) - ?
8. 00:51:035 (1) - same as 00:33:207 (1) -
9. 00:56:521 (1) - ^
10. 00:59:264 (1) - ^
11. 01:00:121 - same as 00:49:150 -
12. 01:02:006 (1) - same as 00:33:207 (1) -
13. 01:04:578 (6) - Similar to ^ , the finish here could be removed as the music is not strong. Also, changing 01:04:407 (5,6) - to K d would maintain a better pattern consistency as the previous 00:41:093 (5,6) -
14. 01:05:607 (10,11,12) - k d k would follow the pitch of the music in a way better.
15. 01:08:350 (23,24,25) - same as ^
16. 01:15:379 (5) - removing this note would probably sound better as the current pattern is repetitive. Moreover, it would be fun to have a greater variety of patterns.
17. 01:20:693 (4,5) - these notes could be deleted to give a 2/1 break since the previous patterns are quite consecutive.
18. From 01:26:693 to 01:31:493 (25) - consider making this part easier by following the pitch of the music like this ? (cursor at 01:29:093 - , only 01:26:693 (7) - is big note)
19. 01:54:807 (1) - , 01:56:179 (1) - , 01:57:550 (1) and 01:58:922 (1) - similar to 00:33:207 (1) - , these finishes could be removed to make the part progressively having more big notes from 01:54:121 to 02:04:750 -
20. 02:04:578 (4,5) - same as 01:20:693 (4,5) -
21. 02:34:749 (13) - maybe k here for pattern consistency as 02:29:263 (5) and 02:32:006 (5) - ?
22. 02:37:492 (4) - move to 02:37:321 - and change it and 02:37:150 (3) - to K for "T-T-Techno" ?
23. 02:43:151 (5) - same as 01:15:379 (5) -
24. 02:48:636 (5) - ^
25. 02:49:664 (1) - , 02:51:036 (1) - 02:52:407 (1) and 02:53:779 (1) - same as the part starting at 01:54:807 (1) -
26. 02:58:065 (2,3,4) - kdd is generally not recommended in Muzukashii. Consider changing it to kkk for simplicity ?
    
    In general, more breaks could be used in this diff to make it easier than Oni further.

• [Oni]

1. 00:33:207 (38,51,64) - same as Muzukashii
2. 00:40:064 (1) - D would be better since the vocal pitch is not high.
3. 00:42:978 (2,3) - delete, add d at 00:43:321 - and change 00:43:493 (6) - to k ? This would result in a smoother flow imo.
4. 00:44:178 (1) - similar to Muzukashii, d would be enough.
5. 00:46:921 (18,19,20,21) - kkd k could fit the vocal in a way better.
6. 00:47:778 (24) - d would result in a better emphasis of the next k at 00:47:950 (25) -
7. 00:48:464 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as 00:42:978 -
8. 00:49:664 (1) - same as 00:44:178 (1) -
9. 00:53:264 (24) - same as 00:47:778 (24) -
10. 00:53:949 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as 00:42:978 -
11. 00:55:149 (1) - same as 00:44:178 (1) -
12. 00:57:892 (18,19,20,21) - same as 00:46:921 (18,19,20,21) -
13. 00:58:750 (24) - same as 00:47:778 (24) -
14. 00:59:435 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as same as 00:42:978 -
15. 01:00:635 (1) - 00:44:178 (1) -
16. 01:04:578 (6,1) - same as Muzukashii, small notes would be enough.
17. 01:11:093 (5) - as the music pitch here is higher than 01:12:465 (6) - , k would work well imo. In addition, k could be added at 01:11:178 - for both complexity and flow.
18. 01:12:978 (1) - consider removing finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo.
19. 01:13:836 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
20. 01:16:579 (5,6) - ^
21. 01:18:464 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
22. 01:19:322 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
23. 01:20:865 (7) - maybe K for the noticeable cymbal sound there ?
24. 01:22:578 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
25. 01:23:350 - adding d here could ensure pattern consistency as the previous part.
26. 01:24:636 (4,5,6,7) - same as 01:11:093 (5) - , d kkd would be better.
27. 01:25:321 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
28. 01:26:178 (5) - maybe k here and delete 01:26:350 (6) - for a break ?
29. 01:27:550 (6) - k as you did at 01:28:921 (6) and 01:30:293 (6) - for consistency ?
30. 01:34:921 (1) - D as you did in Muzukashii ?
31. 01:49:664 (6) - k would be better for pattern consistency as 01:44:178 (6) -
32. 01:51:035 (6) - similar to ^ , d would be better.
33. 01:52:407 (7) - same as 01:49:664 (6) -
34. 02:01:835 - Again, it would be better to add d here as you did at 01:56:350 (24) -
35. 02:17:778 (17,18,19,20,21) - k k d k d could fit the vocal nicely imo.
36. 02:21:378 (35,36,37,38,39) - similar to ^ , d k k k d would be better.
37. 02:23:264 (42,43,44,45,46) - same as 02:17:778 (17,18,19,20,21) -
38. 02:36:635 (1) - same as 00:40:064 (1) -
39. 02:38:865 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
40. 02:40:750 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
41. 02:41:608 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
42. 02:44:351 (5,6) - ^
43. 02:46:235 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
44. 02:47:093 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
45. 02:56:693 - same as 02:01:835 -

Nardoxyribonucleic wrote:

Hi, here comes a taiko mod as requested. Sorry for being a bit late.

[General]

There exist unsnapped objects in both taiko difficulties. Please resnap them.
Also, please uncheck widescreen support for taiko mode.

• [Muzukashii]
  
  Consider OD -1 to make a better spread with Oni ?

1. 00:29:435 (7) - consider moving this note to 00:29:778 - for a 2/1 break ? This could follow the vocal since it stops at 00:29:092 (6) -
2. 00:33:207 (1) - you may remove finish here as there is no cymbal sound like 00:30:464 (1) - for emphasis.
3. 00:35:950 (1) - ^
4. 00:38:693 (1) - ^
5. 00:45:550 (1) - ^
6. 00:48:293 (1) - ^
7. 00:49:150 - consider adding d here so that it would be more coherent to 00:51:893 (5) - ?
8. 00:51:035 (1) - same as 00:33:207 (1) -
9. 00:56:521 (1) - ^
10. 00:59:264 (1) - ^
11. 01:00:121 - same as 00:49:150 -
12. 01:02:006 (1) - same as 00:33:207 (1) -
13. 01:04:578 (6) - Similar to ^ , the finish here could be removed as the music is not strong. Also, changing 01:04:407 (5,6) - to K d would maintain a better pattern consistency as the previous 00:41:093 (5,6) -
14. 01:05:607 (10,11,12) - k d k would follow the pitch of the music in a way better.
15. 01:08:350 (23,24,25) - same as ^
16. 01:15:379 (5) - removing this note would probably sound better as the current pattern is repetitive. Moreover, it would be fun to have a greater variety of patterns.
17. 01:20:693 (4,5) - these notes could be deleted to give a 2/1 break since the previous patterns are quite consecutive.
18. From 01:26:693 to 01:31:493 (25) - consider making this part easier by following the pitch of the music like this ? (cursor at 01:29:093 - , only 01:26:693 (7) - is big note)
19. 01:54:807 (1) - , 01:56:179 (1) - , 01:57:550 (1) and 01:58:922 (1) - similar to 00:33:207 (1) - , these finishes could be removed to make the part progressively having more big notes from 01:54:121 to 02:04:750 -
20. 02:04:578 (4,5) - same as 01:20:693 (4,5) -
21. 02:34:749 (13) - maybe k here for pattern consistency as 02:29:263 (5) and 02:32:006 (5) - ?
22. 02:37:492 (4) - move to 02:37:321 - and change it and 02:37:150 (3) - to K for "T-T-Techno" ?
23. 02:43:151 (5) - same as 01:15:379 (5) -
24. 02:48:636 (5) - ^
25. 02:49:664 (1) - , 02:51:036 (1) - 02:52:407 (1) and 02:53:779 (1) - same as the part starting at 01:54:807 (1) -
26. 02:58:065 (2,3,4) - kdd is generally not recommended in Muzukashii. Consider changing it to kkk for simplicity ?
    
    In general, more breaks could be used in this diff to make it easier than Oni further.

• [Oni]

1. 00:33:207 (38,51,64) - same as Muzukashii
2. 00:40:064 (1) - D would be better since the vocal pitch is not high.
3. 00:42:978 (2,3) - delete, add d at 00:43:321 - and change 00:43:493 (6) - to k ? This would result in a smoother flow imo.
4. 00:44:178 (1) - similar to Muzukashii, d would be enough.
5. 00:46:921 (18,19,20,21) - kkd k could fit the vocal in a way better.
6. 00:47:778 (24) - d would result in a better emphasis of the next k at 00:47:950 (25) -
7. 00:48:464 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as 00:42:978 -
8. 00:49:664 (1) - same as 00:44:178 (1) -
9. 00:53:264 (24) - same as 00:47:778 (24) -
10. 00:53:949 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as 00:42:978 -
11. 00:55:149 (1) - same as 00:44:178 (1) -
12. 00:57:892 (18,19,20,21) - same as 00:46:921 (18,19,20,21) -
13. 00:58:750 (24) - same as 00:47:778 (24) -
14. 00:59:435 (2,3,4,5,6) - same as same as 00:42:978 -
15. 01:00:635 (1) - 00:44:178 (1) -
16. 01:04:578 (6,1) - same as Muzukashii, small notes would be enough.
17. 01:11:093 (5) - as the music pitch here is higher than 01:12:465 (6) - , k would work well imo. In addition, k could be added at 01:11:178 - for both complexity and flow.
18. 01:12:978 (1) - consider removing finish here ? A bit overemphasized imo.
19. 01:13:836 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
20. 01:16:579 (5,6) - ^
21. 01:18:464 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
22. 01:19:322 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
23. 01:20:865 (7) - maybe K for the noticeable cymbal sound there ?
24. 01:22:578 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
25. 01:23:350 - adding d here could ensure pattern consistency as the previous part.
26. 01:24:636 (4,5,6,7) - same as 01:11:093 (5) - , d kkd would be better.
27. 01:25:321 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
28. 01:26:178 (5) - maybe k here and delete 01:26:350 (6) - for a break ?
29. 01:27:550 (6) - k as you did at 01:28:921 (6) and 01:30:293 (6) - for consistency ?
30. 01:34:921 (1) - D as you did in Muzukashii ?
31. 01:49:664 (6) - k would be better for pattern consistency as 01:44:178 (6) -
32. 01:51:035 (6) - similar to ^ , d would be better.
33. 01:52:407 (7) - same as 01:49:664 (6) -
34. 02:01:835 - Again, it would be better to add d here as you did at 01:56:350 (24) -
35. 02:17:778 (17,18,19,20,21) - k k d k d could fit the vocal nicely imo.
36. 02:21:378 (35,36,37,38,39) - similar to ^ , d k k k d would be better.
37. 02:23:264 (42,43,44,45,46) - same as 02:17:778 (17,18,19,20,21) -
38. 02:36:635 (1) - same as 00:40:064 (1) -
39. 02:38:865 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
40. 02:40:750 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
41. 02:41:608 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
42. 02:44:351 (5,6) - ^
43. 02:46:235 (1) - same as 01:12:978 (1) -
44. 02:47:093 (5,6) - same suggestion as 01:11:093 (5) -
45. 02:56:693 - same as 02:01:835 -

That's all and good luck~

qoot8123 wrote:

[ Muzukashii]

1. 00:29:778 (7,8,9,10,11,1) - 1/2+1/4的pattern在muzu盡量避免,建議把00:30:035 (9) - 刪掉
2. 00:41:435 (7,8,9,10,11) - 這裡感覺有點放太多大圓了,建議把00:41:264 (6,8,10) - 刪掉
3. 02:58:921 (7,9) - ^
4. 01:04:578 (6) -這個note其實有一點多餘,刪掉的話節奏會比較清楚
5. 02:37:835 (6) - ^
6. 01:06:807 (15,16,17,18,19,20) - 我覺得這裡用跟01:05:435 (9,10,11,12,13) - 一樣的pattern就夠了,沒必要用其他的pattern
7. 01:34:921 - ~ 01:40:407 - 這一段要簡化一下,note的密度有點高
8. 01:53:950 (8) - 這個note可以刪掉,然後01:53:778 (7) - 改成k跟01:56:178 (1,2,3) - 作對比
9. 01:54:121 - ~ 02:04:407 - 這一段的1/2pattern盡量縮短,因為已經沒有break了,note在長下去會變得很難
10. 02:19:835 - ~02:27:035 - 這裡的note密度有點高,要簡化一下
11. 02:32:950 (3) - 這個note可以刪掉,前面的橋段也沒有出現過
12. 02:57:207 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 這裡也要簡化一下

oni沒問題,不過muzu感覺蠻危險的,有些橋段的note放得有點多,break也很少,1/2的pattern盡量不會放太長,這首很有潛力,加油!

• Nice SB! but please, enable ''widescreen support'' in Muzukashii and Oni, looks lot better ^^
  
  Maybe add a second kiai that starts in 02:48:978 - and ends in 02:58:578 - ?

• 
  01:09:293 (14,16) - well, is the only long stream in the whole map, so i recommend delete these notes, you have already a Inner and i think deleting these notes will improve the spread a bit, if you applied this, change 01:09:035 (11,13) - to k and delete 01:09:721 (17) - ? ddkdk sounds good and kk kd sounds better than kkkkd imo
  01:26:693 - these kd sound a bit empty for me, i suggest to move 01:27:207 (4) - to 01:27:035 - and change to k (k d kdk)
  01:28:578 (4) - same here, move this note to 01:28:407 - and change to k?
  01:29:950 (4) - same here, move this note to 01:29:778 - and change to k?

• 
  01:03:722 (1,2,3) - add finishers in these notes? (K K K) they sound good imo
  01:41:778 (2) - change this note to d? sounds better imo
  02:58:750 - maybe add a k here and add a d in 02:59:435 - ? i feel the end a bit empty and sounds better with these notes imo ;w;
  
  I can't suggest more sorry, good diff :3

Stefan wrote:

qoot brought me here to check the Muzukashii:

Difficulty-wise it seems okay, though the Doubles are quite suspect. But you need more breaks. I will make it short: every time I tell you to remove that note is because to have some breaks here. Unless I write more.

00:23:607 - 00:24:978 - http://puu.sh/fHThb/5b0779d2e0.jpg
00:30:293 (10) - remove to have it consistent with the pattern above.
00:33:550 (2) or 00:34:921 (2) - remove one of them
00:39:035 (2) - remove
00:41:093 - 00:42:464 - http://puu.sh/fHTV5/b89b124e6a.jpg the note on 00:41:264 is really unnecessary for the music flow. As well 00:42:293 is. And on 00:41:778 should be removed to have a short break. The note on 00:41:435 should be changed into K because of the cymbal sound.
00:42:978 (2) - it makes 00:42:807 (1) less stronger due the 1/2 follow which feels like keep continious tapping to the song, remove this note here.
00:47:264 (9) - remove
00:53:950 (2) - ^
00:58:064 (9,10) - ^
01:05:093 (7,13,19) - ^
01:16:064 (2) - ^
01:27:035 (8) - ^
01:35:264 (2) - ^
01:54:464 (2) - ^
01:59:950 (2) - ^
02:03:379 (4,5,6,7) - I'd perfer to have a simple dkd here instead of dk kd.
02:05:093 - 02:08:864 - I've got a cool idea here: http://puu.sh/fI1kB/5b299b69b9.jpg The Doubles here aren't really.. good to be honest. I think they aren't that strong like the previous parts.

And.. the rest is the same like the first half. So follow the suggestions above for the rest.

Hanjamon wrote:

Well i see this map need some mod and ming requested me to mod too

I'll mod only the Oni and the Inner because i see the muzukashii it was modded recently by two BNs xD

[General]

• Nice SB! but please, enable ''widescreen support'' in Muzukashii and Oni, looks lot better ^^ Nardoxyribonucleic said no lol.
  
  Maybe add a second kiai that starts in 02:48:978 - and ends in 02:58:578 - ? no as it is not really an outstanding part to do so.

[Oni]

• 
  01:09:293 (14,16) - well, is the only long stream in the whole map, so i recommend delete these notes, you have already a Inner and i think deleting these notes will improve the spread a bit, if you applied this, change 01:09:035 (11,13) - to k and delete 01:09:721 (17) - ? ddkdk sounds good and kk kd sounds better than kkkkd imo
  01:26:693 - these kd sound a bit empty for me, i suggest to move 01:27:207 (4) - to 01:27:035 - and change to k (k d kdk)
  01:28:578 (4) - same here, move this note to 01:28:407 - and change to k?
  01:29:950 (4) - same here, move this note to 01:29:778 - and change to k?

Hanjamon wrote:

[General]

[list]Nice SB! but please, enable ''widescreen support'' in Muzukashii and Oni, looks lot better ^^ Nardoxyribonucleic said no lol.

1. d is don note
2. k is kat note
3. D is big don note
4. K is big kat note

• 
  
  Good?

• 
  
  01:40:074 - change to d
  
  02:13:835 - add d.
  
  02:36:987 - same as 00:40:413 - (If have need brake time,keep please)
  
  02:56:860 - change to k

_Gezo_ wrote:

do i master 86940980560123 sv changes yet


[Muzukashii]
Modding only this diff as requested by qoot.

SPOILER

00:31:064 (3,4) - You really have a lot of these patterns, I think you can also make it simpler on that whole part with only the first d. The part itself isn't too intense, so you can definitely make them this way.
00:41:093 (5,6,7) - Delete 6, it will put some more emphasis on the crash afterwards.
Kiai needs a bit more notes, since it's the most intense part of the song imo. Right now it feels a bit empty.
00:46:064 - Add a d?
00:46:921 (8,9,10,11,12) - , 00:57:893 (8,9,10,11) - I think you can add few more notes. I think the best way would be to have at least a pretty large 1/2 pattern.
00:49:835 - Add a d ?
{

• 00:48:893 (3) - Move that to 00:48:807 - as it doesn't play well
  00:50:264 (3) - Move that to 00:50:178 - as it doesn't play well, too.
  00:51:635 (3) - 00:51:550 - ^
  00:53:007 (3) - 00:52:921 - ^
  00:59:864 (3) - 00:59:778 - ^
  01:01:235 (3) - 01:01:150 - ^
  01:02:607 (3) - 01:02:521 - ^

} You can also add notes to make ddd, instead.
01:16:064 - Add a don here, you can compensate the intensity with the breaks after the whole part, at 01:20:521 (3,1,2) - . By the way, the whole part could have some variety so the player doesn't get too bored. @1
01:22:235 (4,1) - add a k between these two notes, it's like 01:23:264 (3,4,5,6,1) - .
01:28:407 (12,17) - Perhaps delete them, so you have a longer rest time part and make the decrescendo more emphasized.
{

• 01:43:150 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Add more 1/2 here
  01:45:893 (1,2,3,4,5) - Do that instead. http://i.chiyozel.com/OBY9OaCS
  01:47:264 (1) - Move that to 01:47:093 -
  01:47:778 - Add don here.

} 01:48:635 (1) - to 01:53:778 (7) - should be no different.
01:54:464 - Missing note
01:56:864 (1,2,3,4,5) - Structure is not really different from 01:45:893 (1,2,3,4,5) - so try this as well http://i.chiyozel.com/OBY9OaCS
02:02:350 (1,2,3) - ^
02:07:835 - Add a don here ? It would make a nicer repetition imo.
02:10:578 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - d kd dk d is more than sufficient in that case.
02:12:978 (5,6,1,2,3,4) - I recommend keeping only 5, 1 and 4. Koishi!
02:14:693 (1) - It will be better off as a big don here!
{

• 02:18:978 (2) - Move to 02:18:635 - and make it as a don,
  02:19:835 (2) - 02:20:521 (4) - Delete to have a nice break (appears to be a good point)
  02:21:035 (6) - d here, kat isn't fitting much imo.

}02:21:550 (1) - ~ 02:27:035 (1) - is the exact same thing so apply them as well.
02:38:350 (2) - ~ 02:59:950 - See suggestion marked as @1. This part needs some more changes here; the part is pretty simple and a bit repetitive but yet you can make variety.
02:59:950 - D here? It sounds dumb but you totally missed it. Other diffs do have it, be it from the Taiko diffs or the osu!standard ones.

About SB, however, I recommend you not to have it included in the Taiko diffs. It's a personal suggestion here but since some elements aren't visible at all and others don't give the same experience as in standard it's kind of a shame the SB is barely visible.

1. ~ 00:42:807 (1) - There is a degree of difficulty than the Inner. is better to change a little easier.
   
   
2. 01:31:835 (13) - change spinner ? 35 hits very hard _(:3JL
   
   
3. 01:35:178 (2) - Delete or 01:35:178 (2) - Delete & 01:35:264 (3) - change k ( 01:35:178 -　Here in the Notes do not need.　Hard to take timing. )
   
   
4. 01:36:550 (2,3) - ^
   
   
5. 01:37:921 (2,3) - ^

1. 01:05:778 (1) - move 01:07:150 (1) - ?　01:07:150 (1) - 　And the not in here has felt strange
   
   
2. I thought that's good Inner maps. However, Something I feel thing insufficient

toara_fict wrote:

Mod request from m1ng. No kd :3

[ Oni]

1. ~ 00:42:807 (1) - There is a degree of difficulty than the Inner. is better to change a little easier.
   
   
2. 01:31:835 (13) - change spinner ? 35 hits very hard _(:3JL changed
   
   
3. 01:35:178 (2) - Delete or 01:35:178 (2) - Delete & 01:35:264 (3) - change k ( 01:35:178 -　Here in the Notes do not need.　Hard to take timing. ) I know tose notes are not necessary but the bringing out rhythms sound better/
   
   
4. 01:36:550 (2,3) - ^
   
   
5. 01:37:921 (2,3) - ^

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Balance of difficulty of this map is not good.
I felt like this : Muzu <<<<<<<< Oni <<< m1ng's Inner.

I think is best the Reduce the Notes of Oni. Or increase Notes of Inner.


Good Luck :3

mingmichael wrote:

@nold : you missed a finish and whistle on 02:52:064 (2) - at your Technonationalism diff

Nitrousdragon wrote:

This map definitely needs a ranked status.

1. 00:19:493 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 這裡其實頗安靜的,可是簡化成這樣
2. 00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 同上^
3. 00:31:064 (3) - 和00:32:435 (3) - 對muzu來說都有難度,建議刪掉會比較好
4. 00:33:807 (2,3,4) - 這裡的節奏有點奇怪,把00:33:807 (2) - 移到00:33:893 - 然後00:33:550 - 加個k,聽起來會比較順暢
5. 00:34:921 (2,3) - 這兩個可以刪掉做2/1的break
6. 00:35:950 - ~ 00:41:435 - 跟我上面講得差不多
7. 00:46:064 (4) - 這個note可以刪掉,1/2+1/4的pattern對Muzu來說還是頗難的
8. 00:47:264 (10) - 建議刪掉,後面的段落你有在這裡做2/1的break,我想說一致一點會比較好
9. 00:48:635 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這裡我覺得note放得有點多,其實可以簡化讓節奏更鮮明,可以試試看這個或這個
10. 00:59:607 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 同上^
11. 00:52:921 (3) - 這個note也是可以刪掉的
12. 01:43:150 - ~ 01:54:121 -這一段感覺有點差強人意,我覺得可以再改善,舉例來說01:43:150 - ~ 01:48:635 - 可以試試看這樣,比較有層次感,而且節奏也比較鮮明,01:48:635 - ~01:54:121 - 這裡也一樣
13. 01:54:121 - ~02:03:721 - 我覺得這段就不需要break了,現在的pattern跟前面那段也有點不搭,試試看這個(01:54:121 - ~ 01:59:607 - ) 第二段(01:59:607 - ~02:03:721 - )
14. 02:26:007 (1) - 這個可以刪掉
15. 02:27:035 - ~ 02:38:007 - 跟前面差不多
16. 02:38:350 (2) - 這個note可以刪掉,跟後面那段比起來這一段比較安靜一點
17. 01:34:921 - ~ 01:40:407 - 考慮試著把這裡改簡單一點,因為這一段跟inner oni 幾乎一模一樣,或者你跟ming協調叫他把這段改難一

1. 01:09:635 (16,17) - 感覺這個二連出現的有點刻意,刪掉節奏會比較清楚

1. 01:09:721 (1,2,1) - how about exchange the color? i feel it woulf be more smooth to play
2. 01:48:635 - ~ 01:54:121 - consider using less finish on this part, i feel it is a bit unfit with other part

qoot8123 wrote:

Recheck

[ Muzukashii]

Notes

1. 00:19:493 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 這裡其實頗安靜的,可是簡化成這樣
2. 00:24:978 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 同上^
3. 00:31:064 (3) - 和00:32:435 (3) - 對muzu來說都有難度,建議刪掉會比較好 本身oni跟muzu的難度差都很大了,所以可以不照做嗎QAQ
4. 00:33:807 (2,3,4) - 這裡的節奏有點奇怪,把00:33:807 (2) - 移到00:33:893 - 然後00:33:550 - 加個k,聽起來會比較順暢 加了k,沒移動,因為33807 有一個很明顯的重音, omit了的話很奇怪
5. 00:34:921 (2,3) - 這兩個可以刪掉做2/1的break
6. 00:35:950 - ~ 00:41:435 - 跟我上面講得差不多
7. 00:46:064 (4) - 這個note可以刪掉,1/2+1/4的pattern對Muzu來說還是頗難的
8. 00:47:264 (10) - 建議刪掉,後面的段落你有在這裡做2/1的break,我想說一致一點會比較好
9. 00:48:635 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這裡我覺得note放得有點多,其實可以簡化讓節奏更鮮明,可以試試看這個或這個
10. 00:59:607 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 同上^
11. 00:52:921 (3) - 這個note也是可以刪掉的
12. 01:43:150 - ~ 01:54:121 -這一段感覺有點差強人意,我覺得可以再改善,舉例來說01:43:150 - ~ 01:48:635 - 可以試試看這樣,比較有層次感,而且節奏也比較鮮明,01:48:635 - ~01:54:121 - 這裡也一樣
13. 01:54:121 - ~02:03:721 - 我覺得這段就不需要break了,現在的pattern跟前面那段也有點不搭,試試看這個(01:54:121 - ~ 01:59:607 - ) 第二段(01:59:607 - ~02:03:721 - ) 我修了一下,但是沒修掉3/4那個,那個是GEZO提出的,我覺得不錯QAQ
14. 02:26:007 (1) - 這個可以刪掉
15. 02:27:035 - ~ 02:38:007 - 跟前面差不多
16. 02:38:350 (2) - 這個note可以刪掉,跟後面那段比起來這一段比較安靜一點
17. 01:34:921 - ~ 01:40:407 - 考慮試著把這裡改簡單一點,因為這一段跟inner oni 幾乎一模一樣,或者你跟ming協調叫他把這段改難一

[ Oni]

Notes

1. 01:09:635 (16,17) - 感覺這個二連出現的有點刻意,刪掉節奏會比較清楚

大致上就這些了,已經沒甚麼太大的問題,到時候再叫我recheck
可以斟酌一下給個kd /run :d

1. 01:35:607 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - 這裡改成這樣,跟後面的kkkkd比較搭

Reimoe wrote:

[Technonationalism]
00:19:835 (2) - 00:21:207 (3) - 00:23:607 (2) - 00:25:321 (2) - 关掉音乐听中间的slider钢琴音感觉被硬砍掉一大截

nold_1702 wrote:

Finished Storyboarding, ready now!

1. 00:19:407 - sb load is way too high there, you can merge all the cll images together to fix it
2. 01:45:207 - fade in the dot.png particles or scale them up from 0? they just pop in right now. You could also make them additive.
3. HH.png has pixelated borders
4. BUTTON.jpg doesn't need to be 1366x768, you can crop the black parts around the symbol
5. EYE.jpg and EYE2.jpg are the same image flipped horizontally? you can flip it with a sb command instead of having two of them.
6. some missing files. the cl ones are missing the .png extension in the osb, the others are just wrong?
7. spotlight.png isn't used. there might be more, haven't checked them all.

Damnae wrote:

posting here since you went offline:

1. 00:19:407 - sb load is way too high there, you can merge all the cll images together to fix it it is just 0.01 second of overloading, i think it is fine.
2. 01:45:207 - fade in the dot.png particles or scale them up from 0? they just pop in right now. You could also make them additive. done
3. HH.png has pixelated borders I do not know how to solve this.
4. BUTTON.jpg doesn't need to be 1366x768, you can crop the black parts around the symbol done
5. some missing files. the cl ones are missing the .png extension in the osb, the others are just wrong? done
6. spotlight.png isn't used. there might be more, haven't checked them all. deleted

HabiHolic wrote:

IRC Modding

log

18:49 nold_1702: hi
18:50 HabiHolic: Hi nold!
18:50 nold_1702: DD Can we have a IRC mod now?
18:50 nold_1702: after this, I will find another one to rank
18:50 HabiHolic: sure~
18:50 nold_1702: thank you
18:50 nold_1702: letme uplaod
18:50 HabiHolic: smaill wait you can?
18:50 nold_1702: how long
18:51 HabiHolic: 3 min
18:51 nold_1702: sure!
18:51 HabiHolic: ok!
18:52 nold_1702: okay, uploaded, please redownload before moding
18:53 HabiHolic: ok@
18:53 nold_1702: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/83560 here is the link
18:53 nold_1702: tell me when you are ready !
18:59 HabiHolic: redownroad now!
18:59 nold_1702: ok!
19:02 HabiHolic: start!
19:03 nold_1702: ok!
19:03 HabiHolic: nice SB and hitsound!
19:03 nold_1702: haha I just finished sbing today
19:04 HabiHolic: good~
19:04 nold_1702: thank you
19:05 HabiHolic: tour check Aimod?
19:05 HabiHolic: your*
19:06 nold_1702: yes, aimod is wrong
19:06 nold_1702: damnae agrees with me too
19:06 nold_1702: All the missing files are what I have in my folder
19:06 HabiHolic: yea..
19:09 HabiHolic: http://puu.sh/gCwSg/58af8ec9c1.PNG
19:09 HabiHolic: why.
19:09 HabiHolic: http://puu.sh/gCwT7/fd633191d9.PNG
19:09 nold_1702: I have all the files
19:09 nold_1702: I don know why
19:09 HabiHolic: orz i redownload now..
19:10 HabiHolic: this is new ver map
19:10 nold_1702: no, i have the same problem
19:10 nold_1702: it's aimod's bug
19:10 HabiHolic: ah..
19:10 HabiHolic: ok
19:10 HabiHolic: http://puu.sh/gCwT7/fd633191d9.PNG
19:10 HabiHolic: Fixed this?
19:10 nold_1702: letterbox conflicting with taikos doesnt need fixed
19:10 HabiHolic: k
19:10 nold_1702: as taiko are not supposed to have letterbox
19:11 HabiHolic: hmm.. ok
19:11 nold_1702: and the mapset has one diff which is below 2 stars
19:11 nold_1702: so it is okay
19:11 HabiHolic: nest
19:11 nold_1702: and the filesize is rankable
19:11 HabiHolic: next*
19:11 HabiHolic: Technonationalism diff
19:11 nold_1702: ok
19:12 HabiHolic: all good
19:12 HabiHolic: i naze mod here
19:12 HabiHolic: 01:27:035 (2) -
19:12 nold_1702: lol
19:12 HabiHolic: i think this patten batter imo
19:12 HabiHolic: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895420
19:13 nold_1702: I want to keep this as i want same direction between 1 and 2 like what I do on 01:29:435 (1,2) - 01:28:064 (1,2) -
19:14 HabiHolic: oh..
19:14 HabiHolic: ok~
19:15 HabiHolic: 02:59:607 (2,3) -
19:16 HabiHolic: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895431
19:16 nold_1702: you mean, remove combo colour?
19:17 HabiHolic: no >_>
19:17 HabiHolic: wait
19:17 HabiHolic: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895436
19:17 HabiHolic: understand?
19:18 nold_1702: smoother slider?
19:18 HabiHolic: yea~
19:19 nold_1702: OK
19:19 nold_1702: done!
19:26 HabiHolic: sorry late!
19:26 nold_1702: haha no problem
19:26 nold_1702: you are helping me !
19:27 HabiHolic: 02:46:578 (3,4) - here is my suggust
19:27 HabiHolic: Ctrl+G?
19:27 HabiHolic: maybe change flow Best.
19:27 HabiHolic: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895453
19:28 HabiHolic: 02:47:950 (3,4) - same~
19:28 HabiHolic: 02:48:978 (1) -
19:29 HabiHolic: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895456
19:30 nold_1702: awww..sorry to say no again
19:30 HabiHolic: ok Easy diff
19:30 HabiHolic: 00:18:121 (1) - i think don't need note
19:30 HabiHolic: so delete note here
19:30 HabiHolic: 00:28:750 - why no note
19:31 nold_1702: 00:18:121 (1) - this note is the starting point of every difficulties on this mapset
19:31 nold_1702: due to consistency, I put note there
19:31 HabiHolic: hmm ok
19:32 nold_1702: okay, added object there
19:32 HabiHolic: 00:48:978 (3) -
19:32 HabiHolic: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895464
19:33 HabiHolic: 00:51:035 (1) -
19:33 HabiHolic: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895465
19:34 HabiHolic: 00:56:521 (1) - blanket missing
19:34 nold_1702: fixed the blanket
19:34 HabiHolic: ok~
19:35 nold_1702: 48978 and 51035 no due to the outlook are the same orx
19:36 HabiHolic: 02:45:893 - note?
19:37 nold_1702: ok\
19:37 HabiHolic: :3
19:38 HabiHolic: Normal
19:38 HabiHolic: 00:30:464 (3) -
19:38 HabiHolic: this patten not sure imo
19:38 HabiHolic: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895476
19:38 HabiHolic: this one?
19:40 nold_1702: wait
19:40 nold_1702: letme consider
19:40 HabiHolic: sure
19:41 HabiHolic: 01:21:207 (1) - Best Normal diff slider 2015
19:41 nold_1702: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895482 I fixed in this way
19:41 nold_1702: as I want [3] to be the 00:31:493 (2,3,3) -
19:42 HabiHolic: ok!
19:42 HabiHolic: nice patten!
19:42 nold_1702: lol are you ironic or really praising me
19:42 HabiHolic: 01:44:521 (5,1) - swap NC?
19:42 HabiHolic: 01:47:264 (5,1) - same
19:42 HabiHolic: 01:50:007 (6,1) - same
19:43 HabiHolic: 02:04:578 - this use green line?
19:44 nold_1702: what green line?
19:44 HabiHolic: 02:04:578 -
19:44 HabiHolic: this
19:44 HabiHolic: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895487
19:44 nold_1702: do you mean that this is a useless greenline?
19:45 HabiHolic: yes
19:45 HabiHolic: your this useful?
19:46 nold_1702: this is not useful
19:46 HabiHolic: delete here
19:47 nold_1702: ok
19:47 HabiHolic: 02:59:264 (3,4) - patten suggust
19:47 HabiHolic: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2895490
19:48 HabiHolic: that all!
19:49 nold_1702: no, I want players to click the last heavy beat at 02:59:950
19:49 nold_1702: a holding slider doenst bring out the same feeling
19:49 HabiHolic: ok
19:49 HabiHolic: that all!
19:49 nold_1702: that's all?
19:49 nold_1702: no mod on hard and insane?
19:49 HabiHolic: yes your diff
19:49 HabiHolic: oh GD is IRC modding?
19:49 nold_1702: yea
19:50 nold_1702: I applys mod for them lol
19:50 nold_1702: I got their permission
19:50 HabiHolic: ok!
19:50 HabiHolic: Hard
19:50 nold_1702: ok
19:51 nold_1702: some ppl tell me the hard is bad
19:51 nold_1702: what do you think?
19:51 HabiHolic: ppl?
19:51 nold_1702: I think the hard is repeative though however aesthetic
19:51 nold_1702: ?
19:51 HabiHolic: ?
19:52 nold_1702: what do you mean
19:52 HabiHolic: wwwwwwww your asking me "some ppl" < this don't understand.
19:52 HabiHolic: bad English
19:52 HabiHolic: orz
19:52 nold_1702: ppl means people
19:52 nold_1702: haha
19:52 nold_1702: no problem
19:52 HabiHolic: ah
19:52 HabiHolic: okok
19:52 HabiHolic: wait
19:52 HabiHolic: I Hard diff checking
19:52 nold_1702: yea,sure
19:54 HabiHolic: 02:04:635 (1) -
19:55 HabiHolic: why
19:55 HabiHolic: what's this rhythm???
19:55 nold_1702: sorry, i have to restart osu
19:55 nold_1702: wait for a second
19:55 HabiHolic: lol
19:55 nold_1702: osu crashes
19:55 HabiHolic: 02:04:635 (1) -
19:56 HabiHolic: what's this rhythm
19:56 nold_1702: sorry
19:56 nold_1702: I am back
19:56 HabiHolic: >_>
19:56 HabiHolic: 02:04:635 (1) -
19:56 HabiHolic: again
19:56 nold_1702: listen carefully with 25 slowdown
19:56 nold_1702: and you will find the rhythm
19:56 nold_1702: the gulitar sound is on 1/6
19:57 nold_1702: at*
19:57 nold_1702: so putting 1/6 here is rhythmically correct
19:57 HabiHolic: ah.. understand..
19:57 HabiHolic: sure
19:57 nold_1702: just like what i did on my technonationalism diff
19:57 nold_1702: I put 1/6 there as well
19:57 HabiHolic: ah really???
19:58 HabiHolic: omg forgot >_>
19:58 nold_1702: haha
19:58 HabiHolic: ok
19:58 HabiHolic: imo
19:58 HabiHolic: Hard diff fine
19:59 HabiHolic: cuz your diff Harder (Very)
19:59 HabiHolic: so Hard diff is not gap (?)
19:59 HabiHolic: good job
20:00 nold_1702: ok
20:01 HabiHolic: 01:09:550 (5) - start stream here NC
20:02 nold_1702: hard?
20:02 HabiHolic: Insane
20:02 nold_1702: ok
20:02 HabiHolic: wkyik's Insane
20:04 HabiHolic: ok last
20:04 HabiHolic: 02:59:778 -
20:04 HabiHolic: add note!
20:05 nold_1702: there is no any sound
20:05 HabiHolic: ok
20:05 HabiHolic: update plz
20:06 HabiHolic: :3
20:06 nold_1702: how about fanzhen's extra?
20:06 HabiHolic: >_> sorry..
20:06 HabiHolic: forgot..
20:07 HabiHolic: >_>
20:07 nold_1702: haha
20:07 nold_1702: no problem
20:07 nold_1702: this is a massive mapset
20:07 nold_1702: you are helpful!
20:11 HabiHolic: OMG
20:11 HabiHolic: No pick
20:11 HabiHolic: ;w;
20:12 nold_1702: never mind D
20:12 nold_1702: haha
20:12 nold_1702: let me recheck the combo colours
20:12 nold_1702: wait
20:12 nold_1702: then I will upload
20:16 HabiHolic: ok:#
20:23 nold_1702: uploading
20:23 HabiHolic: ok!
20:24 nold_1702: ok
20:24 nold_1702: done
20:24 nold_1702: you can update now
20:24 HabiHolic: ok!

Nice hitsounding nold :3

Bubbled

Leader wrote:

01:31:921 (1,1) - Shouldn't there be a 1/2 break between spinner and note? (In Technonationalism diff)

nold_1702 wrote:

Leader wrote:

01:31:921 (1,1) - Shouldn't there be a 1/2 break between spinner and note? (In Technonationalism diff)

This restriction does not apply on extra difficulty but only the rest.

E: at least 4 beats after spinner
N: at least 2 beats after spinner
H: at least a beat after spinner
I: at least 1/2 beat after spinner
E: no restriction.

-Chata- wrote:

？＿？

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

-Chata- wrote:

？＿？

Maybe is a bug

Aldwych wrote:

Also not sure if this will get disqualified, but sometimes, SB load is too high and goes to red on me :

00:19:407 : 16.70x
01:43:193 5.22x
02:16:150 5.01x etc..

Also sometimes it seems you're moving / rotating objects and there's no needs which possible increase the sb load for nothing.
Anyway interesting SB and it's rare to see hardwork SB too.

1. In the section from 02:16:064 to 02:26:693 the hitsounding doesn't give proper feedback. Especially in the higher diffs, it's difficult to keep tapping to the beat due to the hitsounding. While Piano Hitsounds are a good idea here, you need to add a quiet (but still hearbale) Hitnormal.
2. The section from 02:54:464 to 02:58:578 in Technonationalism uses exaggerated, nonsensical SV, rhythm and hitsounding.
   
3. Using a higher SV for this section is acceptable since it is the end of the map. A change of 0.5x is too much though, as the music doesn't change a lot from the section before.

1. There are more notes with Piano Hitsounds that could use the quiet Hitnormal suggested in the Disqualification reason. Please go through all difficulties (with 0% Music Volume) and change it if you find clickable objects that only have a Piano Hitsound. Examples would be 00:22:064 (1) - , 00:22:407 - and so on in Technonationalism.
2. The hitsound used at 01:10:407 (2) and many other places merges a lot with the music, so it doesn't give a lot of feedback to the players either. Please try to avoid using hitsounds that sound exactly like the sound they are following (without a hitnormal), it is no big difference to having no hitsound at all.
3. Please also consider what lolcubes and other people wrote in the previous posts, about SB Load and Background.

1. 00:31:321 (4,1) - The movement between these slider was unintuitive for me. Since 00:30:807 (2,3,4) alternate directions, you would expect 00:31:493 (1) to go from left to right. It's also hard to read since the sliders are all overlapping, so most players (that can still pass and play the map well enough, like me) will have problems here. I'd recommend you to create a more intuitive movement here.
2. 00:46:921 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Heavy NC spam like this pushes the HP very high and it makes the pattern harder to read. What about NCing in pairs, like this? http://puu.sh/gI82T/ad83d7edd8.jpg I know you did that later in the map and it would improve readability for this pattern too. Don't forget to fix the color haxing if you change it.
3. 01:05:435 (1,2,3,4,1) - These jumps are bigger than the 1/2-jumps in your previous section, although the music tones down. Please reduce these a bit. Same applies for 01:06:807 (1,2,3,4) - of course.
4. 01:22:064 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - The jumps are from white to red ticks here instead of from red to white ticks, which is inconsistent to other similar patterns like 01:23:950 (1,2,1,2) for example. It makes much more sense to stress the white ticks by using jumps from red to white.
5. 01:49:321 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Here it's exactly the opposite.. You got the jumps from white to red at 01:43:835 (1,2,3,4,5) and 01:46:064 (2,3,4,5,6,7) which makes sense with the background instrument, but it should be done consistently.
6. 02:52:064 (2,3,4) - The triplet starting at the white tick is unintuitive and random, since you didn't use it before. It would be better to get rid of the blue tick note.
7. 02:54:293 (2,1) - Even though this section should be rearranged / remapped due to the disqualify reason, I should mention that the spacing between these objects is oddly low. (1) is a strong note that should have a higher spacing, and it would also play a lot better since you got bigger spacings directly before: 02:53:778 (1,2,1,2) -
8. 02:58:578 (1,1,1,1) - The music calms down very much here, so the huge spacings between these sliders feel out of place. They should be smaller, more similar to 02:59:092 (1,1,1) those spacings.

1. 00:36:293 (2,3) - ♥
2. 01:09:550 (1,2,3,4) - It's hard to pretend that these sliders use 2.0x SV. They also seem exaggerated, since there are just equal drum sounds in the music that call or a stream rather than fast kick sliders.

1. Good job, I'm just wondering why 01:07:835 (2,3) - are spaced like 1/2? You didn't do that for 01:06:464 (2,3) or 01:05:093 (2,3) so I would try something similar to that.

1. Could use a higher AR though to make complex patterns and spacings better readable. What about simply using AR 8 ?

1. Well done, but the difficulty should be renamed to Advanced. There are so many reasons that make this much more difficult than a common Normal diff.. 01:54:121 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - Huge number of circles in a row combined with 1/2 and 3/2-gaps, small jumps / distance spacing changes, more or less drastical SV-changes, complicated movements, stacks under slidertails etc. It fits the spread well, since Chloe's Hard is also really difficult, but it is not suitable for a Normal difficulty.

1. In relation to the above, this should then be renamed to Normal. It's on the simple side, but it doesn't really matter.
2. 01:08:864 (1,2,1) - Stacking those sliders' tails can easily cause misreads and it's not suitable for the lowest diff.
3. 02:10:578 (1,2,3) - Again, confusing stacking, combined with a really sharp movement. Please find a more straigt-forward solution for both patterns, avoiding stacks and sharp movements.

nold_1702 wrote:

thank you so much

anyways, but please avoid covering up wrong rhythms with hitsounding in the future.

01:22:064 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - The jumps are from white to red ticks here instead of from red to white ticks, which is inconsistent to other similar patterns like 01:23:950 (1,2,1,2) for example. It makes much more sense to stress the white ticks by using jumps from red to white.

but please avoid covering up wrong rhythms with hitsounding in the future.

The hitsound used at 01:10:407 (2) and many other places mergesa lot with the music, so it doesn't give a lot of feedback to the players either. Please try to avoid using hitsounds that sound exactly like the sound they are following (without a hitnormal), it is no big difference to having no hitsound at all.

Please also consider about SB Load

00:31:321 (4,1) - The movement between these slider was unintuitive for me. Since 00:30:807 (2,3,4) alternate directions, you would expect 00:31:493 (1) to go from left to right. It's also hard to read since the sliders are all overlapping, so most players (that can still pass and play the map well enough, like me) will have problems here. I'd recommend you to create a more intuitive movement here.

01:05:435 (1,2,3,4,1) - These jumps are bigger than the 1/2-jumps in your previous section, although the music tones down. Please reduce these a bit. Same applies for 01:06:807 (1,2,3,4) - of course.

01:22:064 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - The jumps are from white to red ticks here instead of from red to white ticks, which is inconsistent to other similar patterns like 01:23:950 (1,2,1,2) for example. It makes much more sense to stress the white ticks by using jumps from red to white.

01:49:321 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Here it's exactly the opposite.. You got the jumps from white to red at 01:43:835 (1,2,3,4,5) and 01:46:064 (2,3,4,5,6,7) which makes sense with the background instrument, but it should be done consistently.

02:52:064 (2,3,4) - The triplet starting at the white tick is unintuitive and random, since you didn't use it before. It would be better to get rid of the blue tick note.

02:58:578 (1,1,1,1) - The music calms down very much here, so the huge spacings between these sliders feel out of place. They should be smaller, more similar to 02:59:092 (1,1,1) those spacings.

00:36:293 (2,3) - ♥

01:09:550 (1,2,3,4) - It's hard to pretend that these sliders use 2.0x SV. They also seem exaggerated, since there are just equal drum sounds in the music that call or a stream rather than fast kick sliders.

I'm just wondering why 01:07:835 (2,3) - are spaced like 1/2? You didn't do that for 01:06:464 (2,3) or 01:05:093 (2,3) so I would try something similar to that.

Well done WOW//, but the difficulty should be renamed to Advanced. There are so many reasons that make this much more difficult than a common Normal diff.. 01:54:121 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - Huge number of circles in a row combined with 1/2 and 3/2-gaps, small jumps / distance spacing changes, more or less drastical SV-changes, complicated movements, stacks under slidertails etc. It fits the spread well, since Chloe's Hard is also really difficult, but it is not suitable for a Normal difficulty.

In relation to the above, this should then be renamed to Normal. It's on the simple side, but it doesn't really matter. 01:08:864 (1,2,1) - Stacking those sliders' tails can easily cause misreads and it's not suitable for the lowest diff.
02:10:578 (1,2,3) - Again, confusing stacking, combined with a really sharp movement. Please find a more straigt-forward solution for both patterns, avoiding stacks and sharp movements.

Good Luck!

1. 02:16:064: This part has really enough hitsounding feedback to players, as I wrote above.
2. The keysounds are already single sounds at every single clicking separate objects, thus they are rankable. Silenced hitnormal with a 90% whistle / finish hitsound has no problem, what if I change the whistle/ finish to hitnormal? They sound the same.
3. A non-silence hitnormal would definitely destroy aesthetic feeling of that part, since if I want the keysound/ piano sounds play a volume of 90%, the hitnormal would sound 90% loud as well.