好快...
forum
Konuko - Toumei Elegy
posted
Total Posts
682
gratz!
sionKotori wrote:
-Chata- wrote:
what's that mean in Gonkanau?
I like how you made it even harder
now, it's time for pro players to play
白老板教我做鬼畜图啊
Why is the map not visible in the Qualified beatmaps section?
批示胖，四暗刻
Grats on the re ^^
where are you...
cri evrytim
Edit: OMF GHFMY%RD OMF G
Edit: OMF GHFMY%RD OMF G
such a nice map
cool aim<3 congratz
cool aim<3 congratz
Second Gonkanau difficulty beats Freedom dive (FOUR DIMENSIONS) by 0,01 star :O
The new most difficult ranked map in osu?!
The new most difficult ranked map in osu?!
DeletedUser_4329079
[Second Gonkanau]
01:56:561 (2,3,4,1) - This overlap is god damn disgusting to read. Fix pls.
01:56:561 (2,3,4,1) - This overlap is god damn disgusting to read. Fix pls.
I don't think it's that hard to read, well it can be changed like this:jesus1412 wrote:
[Second Gonkanau]
01:56:561 (2,3,4,1) - This overlap is god damn disgusting to read. Fix pls.
or this:
02:01:266 (2,3,4) - A thing that poked me (it was on the fix when it was unrank i guess? o:), the cursor makes a sharp movement imo, somewhere like this should be good:
just my suggestions though, if it stays like that i don't mind o:
yoloStealth B2 wrote:
why 7.03 -> 7.08?
jumps are hard because AR 9.5 is low for x7.0 jumps at BPM 220; should've used AR 10 imo
AR9.5 is never lowBroccoly wrote:
jumps are hard because AR 9.5 is low for x7.0 jumps at BPM 220; should've used AR 10 imo
Broccoly wrote:
jumps are hard because AR 9.5 is low for x7.0 jumps at BPM 220; should've used AR 10 imo
after playing this for 20~+ tries I found some issues on Another difficulty
00:31:130 (3) - Ghost note? Might be mapping to the vocal but the consistency???? (*take note at 01:21:857)
00:33:857 (1,2) - I don't get why of all places you have to put this 2 there (*really near the message received notification)
meh , hope this gets past qualified lel
00:31:130 (3) - Ghost note? Might be mapping to the vocal but the consistency???? (*take note at 01:21:857)
00:33:857 (1,2) - I don't get why of all places you have to put this 2 there (*really near the message received notification)
meh , hope this gets past qualified lel
i do agree it should have been ar10, this isn't like back when BAT's were so iffy about ranking ar10 that stuff like Rainbow Dash being AR9 had to happen just to make it more likely to be ranked, i think it's perfectly feasible to get away with it on a map like this, i can't imagine ANYONE who can pass a map of this magnitude has any problems at all playing AR10, so why not use it?
That said, it's not worth unranking again over. I think it's healthy to make people put more effort into reading in this day and age of almost every single other map that is worth a lot of pp for top 100 players being ar10+.
That said, it's not worth unranking again over. I think it's healthy to make people put more effort into reading in this day and age of almost every single other map that is worth a lot of pp for top 100 players being ar10+.
Slong150 wrote:
Second Gonkanau difficulty beats Freedom dive (FOUR DIMENSIONS) by 0,01 star :O
The new most difficult ranked map in osu?!
If we´re talking about star rating, Owen wa Kanojo Nanoka is 11+ stars
So I should wait a week before playing this again right?
yes
tag4's are no longer 'ranked'FrcV wrote:
Slong150 wrote:
Second Gonkanau difficulty beats Freedom dive (FOUR DIMENSIONS) by 0,01 star :O
The new most difficult ranked map in osu?!
If we´re talking about star rating, Owen wa Kanojo Nanoka is 11+ stars
that is, they have scoreboard, but exist outside the ranking system.
TAG 4 maps do not count towards PP.FrcV wrote:
Slong150 wrote:
Second Gonkanau difficulty beats Freedom dive (FOUR DIMENSIONS) by 0,01 star :O
The new most difficult ranked map in osu?!
If we´re talking about star rating, Owen wa Kanojo Nanoka is 11+ stars
RogerGumpyyy wrote:
yes
I think you're confusing "ranked" and "give pp".Riince wrote:
tag4's are no longer 'ranked'
that is, they have scoreboard, but exist outside the ranking system.
how is this spacing even allowed anymore lmao
song isnt even that intense, just high pitched
song isnt even that intense, just high pitched
prolly means ranking as in global player rankblahpy wrote:
I think you're confusing "ranked" and "give pp".Riince wrote:
tag4's are no longer 'ranked'
that is, they have scoreboard, but exist outside the ranking system.
i'm almost sure tag4 isnt rankable anymoreblahpy wrote:
I think you're confusing "ranked" and "give pp".Riince wrote:
tag4's are no longer 'ranked'
that is, they have scoreboard, but exist outside the ranking system.
I feel that 00:33:857 (1,2) - (Another diff) is awkwardly quite far to the edge of the map. I think it should be moved in about half a circle's length personally, or perhaps to like this:
Howdy Awaken, after many testplays and discussion, we have reached a consensus that this map must be disqualified over the following reasons:
[Second Gonkanau]
[Second Gonkanau]
- According to many, the AR is just too low for the patterns you implemented. AR9.7 or even AR10 would make the play a lot smoother and inevitably solve issues on some patterns that were awkward
- 02:14:220 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - After internal discussion and various testplays, we have come to the conclusion that this section has not been lowered in difficulty the way we were hoping. Lowering the spacing is still recommended. Also, we believe that the patterns can be made a lot more intuitive. 02:17:493 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - focuses too heavily on the right side of the screen. More movement around the playfield will allow for a more enjoyable pattern.
- 01:56:220 (7,2) - This overlap (as mentioned by jesus1412 and pointed out in various testplays) has been known to cause readability issues. Please try to avoid this.
- 00:10:402 (3,4,5,6) - The back and forth down and up motion is a bit too fast and awkward for the play. Suggestions have said that unstacking 00:10:811 (6) - and moving it to another location would be pretty beneficial
- 00:18:039 (1,2,3,4) - Same issue as above, players have said moving 00:18:448 (4) - to another location for a more oval flow works a lot better
- 00:53:493 (1,2,3,1) - The slider movement is quite fast and also flows downward to 00:54:039 (1) - and back up to 00:53:902 (3) - . The confusion stems from moving to 00:53:902 (3) - and then down to 00:54:039 (1) - , which can be hard to read with the AR
- 01:50:766 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Another pattern that can benefit from an oval flowing triangle, the change in directions seems to cause some issues. Here is an example that works rather well: http://puu.sh/ggXZH/a5fc78f88e.jpg
- 02:04:130 (1,2,3,4,5) - You have a pattern flowing in one direction, then changes rather abruptly from 02:04:675 (5,6) - . This, followed by 02:04:948 (1) - coming downwards made the whole play either confusing or weird to handle appropriately. A more clear, smooth flowing pattern going around would be more beneficial for the play you wish to create here
- 02:09:857 (1,2,3,4) - The angle to the triplet plays out strangely, a less harsh angle of approach would be preferred
I actually disagree. Personally I find the AR fits very well. In general it's a very subjective matter to talk about suitable ARs and I think should be left to the mapper as long as it's not too obviously out of order. Again, just my personal opinion. :pLust wrote:
According to many, the AR is just too low for the patterns you implemented. AR9.7 or even AR10 would make the play a lot smoother and inevitably solve issues on some patterns that were awkward