http://puu.sh/fKKpj/6b98b4f87a.jpg fced the harder 1/3rd bit that was in the pending map, missed on this one.
topkek
topkek
forum
40mP feat.yuikonnu - Ame to Asphalt
posted
Total Posts
167
this map steals my play count, nuked
jk
oh can I store a nuke icon
gratz o;o
jk
oh can I store a nuke icon
gratz o;o
nice mapset and song
Gratz
Gratz
Congratz! Awesome mapset!
01:08:843 (3) - on raose ;-;
Topic Starter
rip in peace
So close, yet so far
first
first
pishifat wrote:
01:08:843 (3) - on raose ;-;
Topic Starter
should be fixed now, talked to mao ingame and he said he'll give it a check soon
Topic Starter
oh, so it is. i wasn't even aware of there being an album that included it, I pulled mine from nnd
thanks for looking into that!
edit: also added a few more tags (new artist doesn't let yuikonnu alone find the mapset on the site) and bumped OD in lfj's diff from his suggestion
thanks for looking into that!
edit: also added a few more tags (new artist doesn't let yuikonnu alone find the mapset on the site) and bumped OD in lfj's diff from his suggestion
D:
Dx
well since it's unranked, a quick note on some bgs
BG3 is originally 1200x825, so instead of cropping and resizing it to 4:3 1024x768, it is better for all users if it's just cropped to 1200x768 and not resized. this resolution is closer to 16:10 instead of 4:3, meaning it wont have to upscale for 16:9 768p+ as much. 4:3 players still won't have any upscaling, so the only real difference is 4:3 players have a slightly closer framing.this next thing is somewhat subjective, but here it is anyway. BG1 looked a big gross from the texturing imo (especially on the browns of the ground), so I smoothed it slightly and I feel that it was an improvement. I understand if I'm alone in thinking that, but here it is nonetheless:that's about all I can nitpick on the bgs
no kds
BG3 is originally 1200x825, so instead of cropping and resizing it to 4:3 1024x768, it is better for all users if it's just cropped to 1200x768 and not resized. this resolution is closer to 16:10 instead of 4:3, meaning it wont have to upscale for 16:9 768p+ as much. 4:3 players still won't have any upscaling, so the only real difference is 4:3 players have a slightly closer framing.this next thing is somewhat subjective, but here it is anyway. BG1 looked a big gross from the texturing imo (especially on the browns of the ground), so I smoothed it slightly and I feel that it was an improvement. I understand if I'm alone in thinking that, but here it is nonetheless:that's about all I can nitpick on the bgs
no kds
because a slider wasn't snapped on red tick and the map was DQ . It should be snapped to be rankedSh0keR wrote:
it was ranked, and now it's unranked again?
Is it resnapped yet ?
if yes call me back for the bubble I guess
if yes call me back for the bubble I guess
Topic Starter
mao told me he was going to check again for anything else, but if he's not going to then I'll just get it requalified after i get home and update ringating's bgs
edit: updated
edit: updated
rip this got dq for objective matters rather than extra?
i thought was unsnap stuff D: ?
Topic Starter
yes it was one unsnapped note, then we fixed the metadata, a couple bgs, and one setting in jonny's diff. that's it, idk what you guys are making a fuss about
Shouldn't this be requalified soon as it was only a resnap? :3
Requalified soon™ ?
Ok. A couple things for the newly edited Normal. One section I'd like to see beefed up a little bit more is listed below.
[Normal]
[Normal]
- 01:03:790 (1,2) - 1.1 DS here. I believe this is the only time you use 1.1 in this diff? I actually noticed this from test playing.
- 01:39:789 (1) - and related notes In this section. Try to use two 1/1 sliders and a circle for a few patterns here to help the density even more. Apply it to a few at least if possible. http://puu.sh/gbOV8.jpg
- 01:49:895 (1) - Same with the above. But even more in this section. It's one of the densest parts in the map when you look at the rest of the diffs. This section being a little denser would be amazing.
- 04:01:421 (1,2) - These two notes, because they don't have any vocals to back them up, are extremely awkward to play. It might be better to follow the instruments at this point, or make these notes the end of a slider. While you're at it. 04:02:842 (5) - is a bit close to the upcoming slider. Maybe try putting a little more upwards.
Topic Starter
uppppdateeeee
bubbbbbleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ... not
01:45:789 (3,4) - RIP DS.
03:51:000 (1,2) - as well.
Oops. I accidentally set the bubble icon anyways. my bad. >_<
01:45:789 (3,4) - RIP DS.
03:51:000 (1,2) - as well.
Oops. I accidentally set the bubble icon anyways. my bad. >_<
Alright, now I can really set the bubble icon lol.
Bubbled!
Bubbled!
Topic Starter
\o/
checked overall diff with captin , qualified~
actual grats
yeaaa
sweet. Regrats!
whooooooooooo