hope will happen o3o
forum
[invalid] Raise max amount of qualified maps allowed per day
posted
Total Posts
78
good point lust.
i think differentiate each specific mode is better. its not fun for other mode player to only rank 1 map per day while std mode has 7.
because autoconvert suck to core
i think differentiate each specific mode is better. its not fun for other mode player to only rank 1 map per day while std mode has 7.
nice...
I support this, but this would be contingent on the schedule of those who actually have to go through every beatmap and check it for quality. We don't want to overwork the guys who volunteer to go through all of the maps - they got their own lives to handle too.
There is 17 QATs raising the rank limit up a bit won't hurt and tbh if the rank limit does get raised I would assume that more QATs will be addedminhtam1638 wrote:
I support this, but this would be contingent on the schedule of those who actually have to go through every beatmap and check it for quality. We don't want to overwork the guys who volunteer to go through all of the maps - they got their own lives to handle too.
haha someone did made a post xD
More BNs -> More Qualified maps -> More mappers -> More BNs
More BNs -> More Qualified maps -> More mappers -> More BNs
I wonder if it'd be maximum 15 due so many TV Size maps getting qualified and going to damage my monitor
Six maps qualified in 5 minutes.
uuuh guys
...And yeah, as everyone can see, maps are getting qualified faster lately, so...
uuuh guys
...And yeah, as everyone can see, maps are getting qualified faster lately, so...
People now have to wait for the limit reset each day, this is going to lead to a snowball effect and the amount of maps waiting for qualification is just going to keep increasing. This imo isn't going to healthy.
Looking at those recently qualified maps, maybe the solution is not to increase the limit, but to slow the fuck down. Either that or remove half the BN.
Wow, what a waste guys. I'll change my mind to redo it maximum 20 maps being qualified each day.
But thats what i saidLach wrote:
Looking at those recently qualified maps, maybe the solution is not to increase the limit, but to slow the fuck down. Either that or remove half the BN.
Why are you guys doing thisStarry- wrote:
Please
Having to wait for Qualification is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard
But... Removing the half of the BN so the cap isn't reached earlier is like 1000x worse
Why on earth should you punish BN for doing their job?
Having to wait for Qualification is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard
But... Removing the half of the BN so the cap isn't reached earlier is like 1000x worse
Why on earth should you punish BN for doing their job?
What the hell?
Lach you know all too well that isn't going to fly in the new system. We are simulating modding v2, where anyone can nominate a beatmap once they reach a certain modder score. It would be unfair to those who hit the score requirement to be demoted. Sure slowing down is always good, but you can't expect 100+ people to slow down/not do anything at the same time.
Was gonna link a puush, but already something was here lol and lol again haha
I guess i'll just get my monthly icons via bubbling instead
Sakura wrote:
I guess i'll just get my monthly icons via bubbling instead
For me is better to raise max amount of qualified maps 
agree....Lust wrote:
Lach you know all too well that isn't going to fly in the new system. We are simulating modding v2, where anyone can nominate a beatmap once they reach a certain modder score. It would be unfair to those who hit the score requirement to be demoted. Sure slowing down is always good, but you can't expect 100+ people to slow down/not do anything at the same time.
especially what will happen to other mode?
BN here just doing their job...
if what they qualify is really bad, QAT can DQ it and the BN got some punishment, simple and fair isn't it?
so i really agree on raising the cap especially give some other mode a different cap or whatever
To be completely honest, I don't specifically think raising the cap will solve our issue because there will be a point where it'll be the exact same, provided we have more mappers and BNs in the future. I believe there has to be a new dynamic in terms of ranking a beatmap and quality control.
Perhaps raising the cap slightly will give us a temporary fix until a new modding system arrives. There definitely needs to be some sort of change, though.
Perhaps raising the cap slightly will give us a temporary fix until a new modding system arrives. There definitely needs to be some sort of change, though.
More BNs per map to get it qualified?
3 nominates for a qualify will be the best alternative for now imo, and will need a discuss in the RC forum then o.oSakura wrote:
More BNs per map to get it qualified?
3 nominations for qualify is how things are actually supposed to be in moddingv2 iirc
If this is already supposed to be a simulation, and that is intended to be part of the new system why isn't this already happening? What we have now is something like running large scale theoretical simulations on your dads old desktop pc, as none of the actual framework for the system is in place (aside from adding a lot of people to the old bat group)Lust wrote:
3 nominations for qualify is how things are actually supposed to be in moddingv2 iirc
Either cut the size of the team, or raise the map limit and the QAT head count.
Also, is this much of an issue on week days? As I recall, weekends almost always hit the limit.
A lot of how things are now still linger on old legacy ideas in order for things to transition smoother. I'd agree though, we should be simulating modding v2 more than how we are doing things currently.
If it'll become 3 for qualify, how will it be for approved? 4?
Lust, please reply to my pm
Lust, please reply to my pm
Something mode-specific needs to be done. Else, that what Starry- wrote:
Starry- wrote:
To be completely honest, I don't specifically think raising the cap will solve our issue because there will be a point where it'll be the exact same, provided we have more mappers and BNs in the future. I believe there has to be a new dynamic in terms of ranking a beatmap and quality control.
Perhaps raising the cap slightly will give us a temporary fix until a new modding system arrives. There definitely needs to be some sort of change, though.
first to vote fuck yea
its too late to go back now lol. also that would be retardedSea_Food wrote:
But thats what i saidLach wrote:
Looking at those recently qualified maps, maybe the solution is not to increase the limit, but to slow the fuck down. Either that or remove half the BN.
also this
neonat wrote:
People now have to wait for the limit reset each day, this is going to lead to a snowball effect and the amount of maps waiting for qualification is just going to keep increasing. This imo isn't going to healthy.
/off-topic
I have the feeling all stars here are from BN, right?
I'm on phone, so I can't tell
/me runs
I have the feeling all stars here are from BN, right?
I'm on phone, so I can't tell
/me runs
I lol'dStarry- wrote:
How about this: Limit the amount of Nominations an individual BN can use per week/month.
This will make the Nominations worth more and prevent spamming ranks due to punishment if disqualified.
This will make the Nominations worth more and prevent spamming ranks due to punishment if disqualified.
Just quoting this,
Yes, I support the idea!
Idk will be raise up to 10 or 15 slots, but in my opinion 8 slots in a day is kinda too small due too many of BNs now
Yes, I support the idea!
Idk will be raise up to 10 or 15 slots, but in my opinion 8 slots in a day is kinda too small due too many of BNs now
Project Railgun wrote:
How about this: Limit the amount of Nominations an individual BN can use per week/month.
This will make the Nominations worth more and prevent spamming ranks due to punishment if disqualified.
This limits the BN once again, which shouldn't be the case in the future. If he feels 6 maps deserves nomination and he has a limit of 5, why prevent him, it's his decision. That is akin to limiting the amount of mods a person does.Project Railgun wrote:
How about this: Limit the amount of Nominations an individual BN can use per week/month.
This will make the Nominations worth more and prevent spamming ranks due to punishment if disqualified.
What's wrong with someone like Sonnyc? He's contributed incredibly to the amount of ranked maps.Project Railgun wrote:
How about this: Limit the amount of Nominations an individual BN can use per week/month.
This will make the Nominations worth more and prevent spamming ranks due to punishment if disqualified.
A limitation like that would just make the BNG Point System redundant, and such a limitation is definitely not the way to go about things anyways.
I'm still keeping to what I said in my previous post, though. p/3842369 Perhaps the new system being 3 nominations for qualify might actually be good, I'm not sure how it will turn out in regard to the situation we have right now.
I'm still keeping to what I said in my previous post, though. p/3842369 Perhaps the new system being 3 nominations for qualify might actually be good, I'm not sure how it will turn out in regard to the situation we have right now.
Apparently as I've been told, the new ModdingV2 will require 3 nominations, why not start now?
If we're trying to imitate this new system, we should already be trying to do 3 nominations for a rank, or at least with this current system, 2 bubbles 1 heart. I don't see the harm in it and it Will help prevent DQs. The only question remains is if the BNs can keep up with the influx of maps we get daily to mod/nominate, but with the new application system coming in march and 100+ BNs already, I don't see this as being a problem.
I'm all for raising the requirements for nomination (2->3 / 3->4/5 (for approval) before raising the max amount of qualified maps. Either or does work for me, but I think the former is the better approach at this stage, considerring what we have in store for us in the future.
we could also apply both even if wanted.
tl;dr I basically just agreed and repeated with what Lust was saying. lol
If we're trying to imitate this new system, we should already be trying to do 3 nominations for a rank, or at least with this current system, 2 bubbles 1 heart. I don't see the harm in it and it Will help prevent DQs. The only question remains is if the BNs can keep up with the influx of maps we get daily to mod/nominate, but with the new application system coming in march and 100+ BNs already, I don't see this as being a problem.
I'm all for raising the requirements for nomination (2->3 / 3->4/5 (for approval) before raising the max amount of qualified maps. Either or does work for me, but I think the former is the better approach at this stage, considerring what we have in store for us in the future.
we could also apply both even if wanted.
tl;dr I basically just agreed and repeated with what Lust was saying. lol
baraatje123 wrote:
/off-topic
I have the feeling all stars here are from BN, right?
I'm on phone, so I can't tell
/me runs
not really,fully supporting Starrys idea aswell
if in the case would be 3 you'll go like :
wich would be really nice,but more BNs are needed since the mapper community is huge and trying to do tripple job is hard imo too,but if you see in multiple mapsets you already need more BNs so is already started a little bit the modding v2
What the FUCK is a BN?
The 8 map limit is not changing anytime soon. If individuals are spamming ranks then I will limit it to one-per-user-per-day.
The 8 map limit is not changing anytime soon. If individuals are spamming ranks then I will limit it to one-per-user-per-day.
Good idea, ppy! One-per-user-per-day sounds best.
The fact that you don't know what the BAT has become is cause for concern.peppy wrote:
What the FUCK is a BN?
The 8 map limit is not changing anytime soon. If individuals are spamming ranks then I will limit it to one-per-user-per-day.
ai...ai...ai.... *sigh*Lach wrote:
The fact that you don't know what the BAT has become is cause for concern.peppy wrote:
What the FUCK is a BN?
The 8 map limit is not changing anytime soon. If individuals are spamming ranks then I will limit it to one-per-user-per-day.
lolLach wrote:
The fact that you don't know what the BAT has become is cause for concern.peppy wrote:
What the FUCK is a BN?
The 8 map limit is not changing anytime soon. If individuals are spamming ranks then I will limit it to one-per-user-per-day.
well see how this goes for now.
yes i think the best option for now untill we increase the max is make it 3 BN's per ranked map.
other wise stop adding BNs. because the # of ranked maps will just snowball
no, it's not one person spamming ranks, it's the fact that the team has expanded massively.
I can see that.
The limit is still not changing. This limit is one placed and managed by me and is on a separate level of logic to the approval process. Figure out how you will deal with this, but it is not changing for the forseeable future.
The limit is still not changing. This limit is one placed and managed by me and is on a separate level of logic to the approval process. Figure out how you will deal with this, but it is not changing for the forseeable future.
Guess we better start brainstorming how to deal with this, then.