我喜欢软萌的,不喜欢刻意卖萌搞怪的-v-Zero__wind wrote:
感觉这版本翻唱得不带劲OAQ
以及,都进来了也不顺别点个rank -皿-
我喜欢软萌的,不喜欢刻意卖萌搞怪的-v-Zero__wind wrote:
感觉这版本翻唱得不带劲OAQ
Acane_madder is the composer of the original song. And the singer of this version named it as "Anonymous", I think it would be fine if we keep it.CDFA wrote:
OVERALL:
PREVIEW POINT ISN'T SNAPPED (dammit fycho) fixed
H-H-Hentai??:
Like I think you're gonna need a reason for this diff name.fixed
00:07:799 (5,6) - Would prefer this to be flipped for flow's sake. it would be fine I think
00:19:338 (2) - Not. . . really sure why this is slowed down. because "da me yo" sounds more gentle and basically the BGM of this part is kindly slow
00:22:568 (1) - ^
00:26:261 (1) - ^
00:39:530 (2,3) - Stack is kind of off fixed
01:03:184 (1) - Why this reduced spacing?? same as before.
01:21:415 (6) - Fix this stack owo (Don't worry, it's off in-game too :3) fixed
Other two diffs are fine.
I'll see what I can do about the artist. Woudln't acane_madder technically be the closest thing to an artist, though?
耳机党表示还好吧-。-我是直接下的5singTwice wrote:
难道只有我一个人觉得mp3音量很小吗?
Fixed~~CDFA wrote:
Internal discussion by BAT/QAT, we feel it'd be better if you put the artist as "Unknown Artist" rather than "Anonymous". This is just for consistency among maps where the artist is unknown.
hmu when you fix it. I'll be fine ranking it from my phone even, since the map itself is fine.
We had a similar case on p/2571141Megurine Luka wrote:
Acane_madder is the composer of the original song. And the singer of this version named it as "Anonymous", I think it would be fine if we keep it. Diff name is basically due to the title. But I would change it.
We're a team. Instead of blaming others you better should see that as some constructive feedback to improve the mapset and doing it better next time. Be that as it may, let us just wait for some BATm's or QAT's response and see what they are thinking instead of starting any pointless quarrel here.CDFA wrote:
hahahah wow look at that, everyone who didn't touch this map for 2 months decided to come out and finally get mad about it once it got ranked
hahahah man wouldn't that have been cool the 2 months this sat bubbled with no posts
I was going to ask a BATm about this but nvm then. Anyways, being concerned is absolutely okay here and it's good seeing people willed to clarify things up before it's too late for that. Doesn't really matter if they can be proven wrong or not. And EVEN IF CDFA clarified it with QATs they also can do mistakes, so good that we talked about it.Zero__wind wrote:
I don't think you guys need to be so concerned