This song is reaaally awesome! Gratz. :3
forum
Trident - Blue Field
posted
Total Posts
54
Greetings,
this map has been considered as not ready for Ranked, yet. Therefore we disqualify this beatmap and put it back to WIP. Please keep in mind that disqualified maps are handled by the Beatmap Appreciation Team and will be sent back to Qualified by them. The Quality Assurance Team is not responsible for sending your beatmap back to Qualified.
We disqualify this beatmap for the following reason(s):
[General]
this map has been considered as not ready for Ranked, yet. Therefore we disqualify this beatmap and put it back to WIP. Please keep in mind that disqualified maps are handled by the Beatmap Appreciation Team and will be sent back to Qualified by them. The Quality Assurance Team is not responsible for sending your beatmap back to Qualified.
We disqualify this beatmap for the following reason(s):
[General]
- The difficulty names are not as we desire them to be suitable. Even if they contain the actual difficulty in the brackets, the actual naming appears arbitrary and unneeded.
- 00:08:696 (1) - This note is too soon after a spinner for an Easy
- 00:08:696 (1) - This note is too soon after a spinner for an Easy
- The 1/2 rhythm usage feels really heavy and should be reconsidered again. Maybe you find some better way to make this work without relying so heavily on that.
Topic Starter
Thank you.
I am okay with changing the difficulty names, but I disagree with the other points.
I will leave this map for now.
Sorry to players/fans,maybe I will get this ranked in the future.
I am okay with changing the difficulty names, but I disagree with the other points.
Time between spinner and following note in each case is reasonably playable, and these time spacings are commonly seen in ranked maps.
Rhythm usage in Normal is appropriate relative to the other difficulties.
Rhythm usage in Normal is appropriate relative to the other difficulties.
I will leave this map for now.
Sorry to players/fans,
While it's playable, it is not suitable for the players you're aiming for, they would be likely looking for their cursors after the spinner.
Also I should mention that the difficulties are a bit harder than they should be imo
Edit: Just read your last sentence, a pity, but well, I hope you push this map in a future.
Also I should mention that the difficulties are a bit harder than they should be imo
- Easy being constant 1/1 doesn't have enough gaps to player have rest between game combos/phrases, it'd benefit of a few 2/1 gaps, for example, you could remove notes in similar spots as in 00:29:584 (5) -, this would also help to represent better the song
- Normal is a bit overloaded with continuous 1/2 rhythm, while 1/2 is not bad to use, you shouldn't also go nuts with it, unless it's a really slow BPM (135 isn't), so I second QAT's opinion here.
Like in 00:10:473 (4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - , this could be simplified a bit: Example
And 00:25:362 (4,5) - could fit nicely as a 1/1 slider along with the hold in vocals. - I felt Hard a bit hard with all these jumpy patterns, reducing some would be enough to help the spread in case you tone down some 1/2 in Normal. Also, I'd suggest to end the first spinner in 00:08:251, this part plays very awkwardly, adding that there's less than 1 beat between the end of this and the next note and 3/4 rhythm is very tricky.
Edit: Just read your last sentence, a pity, but well, I hope you push this map in a future.
What a pity, but ohwell, it's your choice.
Good luck with whatever you're gonna do!
Good luck with whatever you're gonna do!
I got a question when I am doing a GD for the same song.
00:55:140 (2,3) - Are these vocals 1/4 or 1/3 snapped? I hear the first one is 1/3 but second is 1/4 lol Is it just the singer's error or my ears' problem?
00:55:140 (2,3) - Are these vocals 1/4 or 1/3 snapped? I hear the first one is 1/3 but second is 1/4 lol Is it just the singer's error or my ears' problem?
Topic Starter
I'm quite sure they should be 1/4. The singer is a little bit late on 00:55:473 but not so much so that it sounds like 1/3... I think it's just difficult for them to precisely sing consecutive 3/4s like that..?IamKwaN wrote:
I got a question when I am doing a GD for the same song.
00:55:140 (2,3) - Are these vocals 1/4 or 1/3 snapped? I hear the first one is 1/3 but second is 1/4 lol Is it just the singer's error or my ears' problem?
aha, i agree with you!CloudSplash16 wrote:
I'm quite sure they should be 1/4. The singer is a little bit late on 00:55:473 but not so much so that it sounds like 1/3... I think it's just difficult for them to precisely sing consecutive 3/4s like that..?IamKwaN wrote:
I got a question when I am doing a GD for the same song.
00:55:140 (2,3) - Are these vocals 1/4 or 1/3 snapped? I hear the first one is 1/3 but second is 1/4 lol Is it just the singer's error or my ears' problem?
Topic Starter
Okay, it's the future now...
Changed difficulty names and removed spinners.
Removed a couple of circles in Normal.
Now looking for mods again.
Changed difficulty names and removed spinners.
Removed a couple of circles in Normal.
Now looking for mods again.
[Normal]
- 01:21:362 (4,5) - Rhythm is awkward and hitsounds are hollow as it's switching from drum to another instrument at 01:21:362. Maybe you should follow strictly to the drum. As it's near the end of the song, so only a few rearrangements are needed. http://puu.sh/bvvsv/306df52ed2.jpg
Topic Starter
wheeIamKwaN wrote:
[Normal]whee
- 01:21:362 (4,5) - Rhythm is awkward and hitsounds are hollow as it's switching from drum to another instrument at 01:21:362. Maybe you should follow strictly to the drum. As it's near the end of the song, so only a few rearrangements are needed. http://puu.sh/bvvsv/306df52ed2.jpg hmm.. Changed the rhythm a different way.
whee 
Topic Starter
Thanks!
nokdpls
[General]
[General]
- Tag Ars nova & ending if you want
- 01:06:696 (4,5) - Is this suppose to be placed in 1.3x distance? I don't see you do the same thing on 00:52:251 (3,4) -
Topic Starter
ThanksFlask wrote:
nokdpls
[General][Hard]
- Tag Ars nova & ending if you want ??? They are already in tags.
Call me back
- 01:06:696 (4,5) - Is this suppose to be placed in 1.3x distance? I don't see you do the same thing on 00:52:251 (3,4) - Reduced spacing.
(oﾟωﾟo)ノ 
Topic Starter
Thanks Flask! 
congratulations on your re-qualification!
Good that you changed your mind!
Congratulations! I'm really glad to see this qualified again. And sorry for the trouble.. :<
Topic Starter
Thanks again to everyone for your support!
and thanks to Melophobia, Fycho, IamKwaN, and Flask!
and thanks to Melophobia, Fycho, IamKwaN, and Flask!