Setsuen wrote:
Also fact:There are people who don't only post one post per day and you know that A LOT of people would have scum readed me if my activity level was like Sephibro. I like how you're dragging attention away from that when it's the truth.
Yes, you'd be scum for that one fatal wall you'd have written every day, which by your standards, whould have been one entire osu! page long. The lack of time and activity itself isn't problematic if the general player has good arguments and solid ideas/proofs.
Setsuen wrote:
Also all you're doing is just reinforcing the idea that lurking isn't scummy and scum aren't lurking. But they ARE. Evidence aren't even needed for this since ALL THE SCUMMY PEOPLE HERE ARE LURKING.
Lurking on it's own is scummy, but it doesn't make the player scum. YOU see it like that. Not me. Which brings me back to my question that you avoided twice now: Care to explain with solid argument why Sephi/Tn are scums to you, without you referencing past games?
Setsuen wrote:
To make it worst, you're basically diverting attention from lurkers BACK to an argument with me again which is SCUMMY.
I'm not. You're just provocating, and I'm replying. I'm not the sort of person who would bow before you, under your threats.
And in the end... If all lurkers are scums to you...
Then why wasn't sephibro lynched yet? why wasn't tn lynched yet? Why aren't I lynched yet? Flawed logic, but you obviously cannot accept that. Oh yes, I know why.:

And yes, I do see someone replaced. :^)