Because I obviously don't want mislynches and I'm still rather sure that you are scum.Drezi wrote:
To be honest I don't really think SNB is scum, why would they make the risky play of going all out on trying to get me lynched, when all they need is one more mislynch on anyone?
Sure, I guess I have nothing to lose.Drezi wrote:
maybe SNB should claim?
Static Noise Bird wrote:
Voting Drezi immediately because I can change my vote if needed. If.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
I know what you [CB, RE: staged accusation] mean, but it seems very "well" planned by Drezi and his possible scummate.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
It may look staged, unfortunately, but all I wanted to say was "I told you guys".
Static Noise Bird wrote:
I'm just strictly scumreading you, and I'm aware that I was pretty much the only one townreading him.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
I'm (still) counting on Drezi-CB or Drezi-DD scumteams.
All are referencing Drezi in some way, whether directly or by how Gumica dying affects his [SNB's] read on him [Drezi].Static Noise Bird wrote:
I'm still rather sure that you [Drezi] are scum.
CalignoBot wrote:
Vote: Static Noise Bird
I'll explain in a bit more detail later, but the opening post looks incredibly staged with what's in Gumica's ISO.
Gumica's dying didn't affect my read on Drezi. I just went from scumread to more strict scumread.CalignoBot wrote:
All are referencing Drezi in some way, whether directly or by how Gumica dying affects his [SNB's] read on him [Drezi].
I don't understand this a single bit, but I can only assume that this is a highly scumpainting sentence by the accusing tone of it.CalignoBot wrote:
He admits twice that his Gumica-dying case isn't as strong as he made it out to be
...and still hasn't elaborated it. Unless rEdo flips scum at some point, I'm strongly accusing Drezi of a random unjustified mislynch attempt, while trying to stay out of the wagon.CalignoBot wrote:
the only real reason he ever gave in day one for why Drezi is scum came from a single point where Drezi changed a vote
Right. People apparently want to focus on accusing other people at the moment, which I'm sure you and Drezi would be fine with. That being said, not sure why are you defending Drezi even more at this point, because the link between you two is becoming stronger by every post of yours.CalignoBot wrote:
He's not trying to convince anyone that he is right. On the contrary, he even stated that he shouldn't even have to... despite the wagon never gaining any steam.
If there is any mistake please inform meSetsuen wrote:
Vote Count 2.3
With 7Alive it takes 4 to lynch.
StaticNoiseBird[1]-CalignoBot
CalignoBot[]
BRBP[]
rEdo[]
fartownik[]
DakeDekaane[]
Drezi[1]-StaticNoiseBird
NoLynch[1]-BRBP
Not Voting:rEdo,fartownik,DakeDekaane,Drezi
This seems more of a newbie town behaviour rather than a scummy one. Not to mention that you were nullreading him a few posts before as well.Static Noise Bird wrote:
Vote: Drezi
TL;DR from that one post - quickly voting a previous null-read, and then saying that voting their scum-read wouldn't achieve anything, while not elaborating it at all, and then trying to push that subject away from the chat when asked about it and giving "scumpoints" when asked about it.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
Voting Drezi immediately because I can change my vote if needed. If.
The first sentence implies that you aren't that sure of Drezi being scum, while the latter one indicates the otherwise. Now that's interesting.Static Noise Bird wrote:
Because I obviously don't want mislynches and I'm still rather sure that you are scum. (that was directed to Drezi in that post)
No. It's just that if someone else starts behaving scummy and a wagon emerges, I may jump on that, if it's a probable enough scum.rEdo wrote:
The first sentence implies that you aren't that sure of Drezi being scum.
The unjustified vote, like explained in the previous post of mine.rEdo wrote:
SNB, do you have any other reasons to suspect Drezi than the Gumica association? I can't really find anything else while rereading your ISO several times, unless I'm completely retarded.
This doesn't even make sense. How does something changing a scumread to a more 'strict' scumread mean it wasn't affected by that something?Static Noise Bird wrote:
Gumica's dying didn't affect my read on Drezi. I just went from scumread to more strict scumread.CalignoBot wrote:
All are referencing Drezi in some way, whether directly or by how Gumica dying affects his [SNB's] read on him [Drezi].
Here are the two quotes I was referring to:Static Noise Bird wrote:
I don't understand this a single bit, but I can only assume that this is a highly scumpainting sentence by the accusing tone of it.CalignoBot wrote:
He admits twice that his Gumica-dying case isn't as strong as he made it out to be
Static Noise Bird wrote:
It may look staged, unfortunately, but all I wanted to say was "I told you guys".
It's your job to make people believe that it wasn't staged. That statement you add right after admitting that it can look that way doesn't do that. Stating that you're aware you were the only one that line of logic applied to only drives that point home. You're trying to push a wagon without giving anyone a reason to believe that you're genuine.Static Noise Bird wrote:
I'm just strictly scumreading you, and I'm aware that I was pretty much the only one townreading him.
...What? Trying to stay out of the wagon?Static Noise Bird wrote:
...and still hasn't elaborated it. Unless rEdo flips scum at some point, I'm strongly accusing Drezi of a random unjustified mislynch attempt, while trying to stay out of the wagon.CalignoBot wrote:
the only real reason he ever gave in day one for why Drezi is scum came from a single point where Drezi changed a vote
I don't recall giving any sort of read or really addressing Drezi in any way that would justify this claim. Pretty much my entire case on you is about how you're attacking rather than the actual attack itself. You went out of the gate with a full suite of pressure on one person, then actively avoided trying to convince anyone that you're correct for the vast majority of this debate. Meanwhile, you're trying to discredit the attacks on you with strawman arguments and unfounded assumptions.Static Noise Bird wrote:
Right. People apparently want to focus on accusing other people at the moment, which I'm sure you and Drezi would be fine with. That being said, not sure why are you defending Drezi even more at this point, because the link between you two is becoming stronger by every post of yours.CalignoBot wrote:
He's not trying to convince anyone that he is right. On the contrary, he even stated that he shouldn't even have to... despite the wagon never gaining any steam.
Holy shit, don't make yourself sound stupid now, will you.CalignoBot wrote:
It's your job to make people believe that it wasn't staged.
I only now realized that he actually did unvote rEdo later on just to hammer NH. Shouldn't I take this as a third reason to suspect him? Because I probably will.CalignoBot wrote:
...What? Trying to stay out of the wagon?
BRBP wrote:
no lynch best lynch
Static Noise Bird wrote:
Alright, there's just a bunch of accusations and other crap in there, so I'll respond shortly to the 2 things that mostly caught my attention.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
Holy shit, don't make yourself sound stupid now, will you.CalignoBot wrote:
It's your job to make people believe that it wasn't staged.
[/quote]Static Noise Bird wrote:
I only now realized that he actually did unvote rEdo later on just to hammer NH. Shouldn't I take this as a third reason to suspect him? Because I probably will.CalignoBot wrote:
...What? Trying to stay out of the wagon?
Not sure if just an emoticon or an act of questioning.CalignoBot wrote:
?_?
rEdo wrote:
@mod: Prod... everyone. >_>"
If there is any mistake please inform meSetsuen wrote:
Vote Count 2.4
With 7Alive it takes 4 to lynch.
StaticNoiseBird[1]-CalignoBot
CalignoBot[]
BRBP[]
rEdo[]
fartownik[]
DakeDekaane[]
Drezi[1]-StaticNoiseBird
NoLynch[1]-BRBP
Not Voting:rEdo,fartownik,DakeDekaane,Drezi
searching for replacement now.fartownik wrote:
asking for a replacement
the worst.DakeDekaane wrote:
Hi Tanz, please say this town is being bad as fuck, ty.
because your vote could do something of actual use, instead of stalling the game and bringing it to a halt.BRBP wrote:
why not?rEdo wrote:
Actually... why, BRBP?
if you mis-lynch it would be 4-2 and then 3-2 D3.Tanzklaue wrote:
thing is, thanks to the retarded set up we can't mislynch today. which, mind you, is no reason to sit back, jerk off and do absolutely nothing.
Yes, there is a reason for the real VT not to counterclaim. It would mean that no matter who the mafia shoot, they will always hit a PR.Drezi wrote:
alright, I'll make use of my vote aswell.
Vote: CB
Had some initial suspicions and this continued tunneling of SNB (and your vote on him) doesn't seem to be too productive since it looks like he's confirmed town now.. Or would there be a reason for our real VT not to counterclaim him?
If there is any mistake please inform meSetsuen wrote:
Vote Count 2.5
With 6Alive it takes 4 to lynch.
StaticNoiseBird[1]-CalignoBot
CalignoBot[2]-Drezi,DakeDekaane
BRBP[]
rEdo[]
DakeDekaane[]
Drezi[0]
Not Voting:rEdo,StaticNoiseBird,BRBP
So... that's it? You're giving up?Static Noise Bird wrote:
Yeah, think about this.
farto fakeclaimed - Tanz got shot because scums like to live on the edge.
I fakeclaimed - I get lynched because I'm an obvious scum now.
Was a good game, you guys.
<3Static Noise Bird wrote:
I knew/hoped BRBP was the cop from the moment he went from the null-scum read on me to null-town.
People have voted for No lynch.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 2.6
With 6Alive it takes 4 to lynch.
StaticNoiseBird[1]-CalignoBot
CalignoBot[1]-Drezi
BRBP[]
rEdo[]
DakeDekaane[]
Drezi[0]
NoLynch[3]-BRBP,DakeDekaane,StaticNoiseBird
Not Voting:rEdo
Mostly following IRC mafia where 3votes out of 6 would have caused a NL.BRBP wrote:
Why did no lynch happen with 3 votes, I thought we need 4.
I didn't even know there's a roleblocker, should've read the first post :^)
