forum

OUKT3 (osu! UK Tournament 3) [Finished - Doomsday #1]

posted
Total Posts
205
Topic Starter
Lapis-


Offical hype music for the Tournament - Blue Stahil - Anti You




Welcome to the 3rd UK national osu!standard tournament, hosted by PortalLife.



STATUS: Thank you to all that watched, tournnament has ended with these results!

#1 Doomsday
#2 jesus1412
#3 iLikeMudkipz


DEFENDING CHAMPION: iLikeMudkipz


Brackets

Match Schedule



  • August 9th, Saturday

    Cozzy vs iLikeMudkipz 3PM

    THE GRAND FINALS - AUGUST 10TH SUNDAY

    jesus1412 vs Doomsday - 5PM
Player List
Big List
Doomsday
R a h a r u
Jeromelol
Jameslike
Raiku
Could This Be
iLikeMudkipz
dreeeaam
bahamete
chanch512
Udon
Snookie
Desired
Neroh
EatYourMattress
Swaayy
vidya
-Vulcan-
Syrus
sullyjhf
Cozzzy
Scootawoo
EzLyn
SamC
Crai
Kardet
NatashaGG
casmith789
DatPenguinTho
Just Miku
Justify
Awesomefacrox
Slvin
lovu
PortalLife
Limit_Break
[AOTN]
Ommetaphobia
kyou
kozuka
-MoeYandere-
gadrin
Kraiz
cooki3zz
navi
vaidax5
Kry
SgtSitdown
Zarfots
3lliot
Rime
Chungygiri
Kakiage
jesus1412
Elephant_king
kenlei2009
Misti
spaminabox
YunoWhoItIs
Viremon
ChicagoTed7172
Run-Cat
starblazes
djsettle

Staff

Host: PortalLife
Map Selectors: PortalLife, RLC, Frostmourne
Referees: PortalLife, Udon
Streamer: Mahiro Yasaka
The Draw Master: Mollerz

Map Pools
Rules
READ THESE. THEY ARE IMPORTANT.








  • General Tournament Rules
  1. Players that are under rank #50,000 are not allowed to sign up.
  2. UK staff are allowed to play.
  3. This tournament is a single elimination 1v1 tournament. Lose once, you are out. Brackets will be determined by the Draw Master, Mollerz who has provided his method of seeding: t/212521/start=75
  4. The tournaments shall have a map pool for each phase of the tournament. The next map pool in the tournament shall be announced following the end of the preceding round.
  5. Each map pool will have 5-9 no mod picks, 2 mod picks, a freemod bracket and 1 tiebreaker The mod brackets shall be Hidden/Double Time/Hard Rock/Freemod. Two maps for each.
  6. Each player may only pick 1 map from each mod pool to try and encourage variety in the match. For example: P1 picks a HD map, he cant pick from the HD pool again. P2 may however pick a HD map.
  7. In the Freemod bracket, you are allowed to either pick no mods, or HD/HR (either individually or combined)
  8. Before the official start of the match using the map pools, each player may pick 1 warm up map of their choice - This can be any submitted map, as long as its playable (no trapce) this does not count towards match score.
  9. If one of the players fails to show, they get a additional 10 minutes or otherwise forfeit. If neither show, the match shall be re-arranged.
  10. If a player disconnects from the game, a regame will be offered. Ragequitters/quits will forfeit that map. This is relating to genuine internet disconnects/cuts/failures.
  11. RO64/RO32 will be best of 5. RO16 will be best of 7. Quarterfinals/Semifinals will be best of 9. Finals/3rd Place will be best of 11.
  12. Any unexpected happenings or events not covered by the rules shall be handled by the organizer at their discretion.

    Match Rules
  13. The referee shall make the game and give it a appropriate title. First pick shall be decided by !roll, highest roll wins. The pick order then will alternate back and forth between both players until one player wins.
  14. The game mode will be set to Team Vs.
  15. The referee is not to participate in the actual playing of the beatmaps.
  16. Players PM the referee with the beatmap they are picking from the map pool.
  17. After the end of the match, the referee will post the title of the match and a link to the MP history of that lobby and the final match score.
  18. Matches will be locked and invite only.
  19. If you fail the map, it is considered as a loss.

    Scheduling Rules/Info

  20. Matches will be played on the weekend.
  21. If you cannot play at the time posted for you, contact the organizer for a re arrangement.
  22. Not showing to the match is subject to the rules outlined in Tournament Rules.
  23. Each round schedule shall be released a week before the actual matches take place.
  24. We are looking to complete each round on the weekends.
  25. In special cases, with the agreement of both players; matches can also be played before this during the week. This is only if advance notice is given.
Suggestions are welcome. GL HF guys! - PortalLife - Special thanks to Toonzz for our graphics for the tournament!
dreeeaam
hype
Desired
hype
Kyou
THIS TIME i wont drop my pen ;w;
Doomsday is Bad
\o/ stream hype

also tei tei tei warm up every round
Could This Be
hype as fuck! I wont be in germany this time >:)
Summer Solstice
i haz powers

sign me up ^.^
Ventus
Im up for it
jesse1412
Time to destroy everyone until effort is required again.

Topic Starter
Lapis-

Mahiro Yasaka wrote:

also tei tei tei warm up every round
Tei tei tei best map all time
Justify
HYPE




I'm in.
Edd
Bloop.
spook
Time to get destroyed again
Kardet
yes
SoraHaxas01
No more Dr.Pepper for me this time Le Trol3 ; ^^^ )
Syrus
So much hype o3o
CPTW

Desired wrote:

hype

dreeeaam wrote:

hype
CRAYU
.
MoeYandere
I will do this xD This time I will play good
charlotteawoo
time to die first match ecause I am awful at this game
Jerome
deleted
Doomsday is Bad
Like how people are saying I'm in, yet signup isn't even open yet

:^)
Shimatora
Not sure I agree with randomized seeds. Wouldn't it make more sense to seed via pp rank? That way the top two favourites wont meet in Round 1, for instance.
Doomsday is Bad

Shimatora wrote:

Not sure I agree with randomized seeds. Wouldn't it make more sense to seed via pp rank? That way the top two favourites wont meet in Round 1, for instance.
Last time this happened people complained

Then we randomized it.

More people complained, so we are sticking to our guns on this one to be honest.

We more than likely will livestream the matches being picked out using a randomizer.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
People will complain about it no matter what method is used. Seeding a tournament this big didn't work from my experience. We randomized it and what happened? #2 UK and #1 UK met. If it was seeded, this wouldn't of been the outcome.
Navi
Yup
Doomsday is Bad
Shimatora

PortalLife wrote:

People will complain about it no matter what method is used. Seeding a tournament this big didn't work from my experience. We randomized it and what happened? #2 UK and #1 UK met. If it was seeded, this wouldn't of been the outcome.
If people don't like regular seeded tournaments they clearly have no idea what a tournament is about. It's there for the best to do well in and the people who aren't quite as good to get knocked out. It makes no sense if the #1 and #2 UK meet early than the finals. Otherwise, randomised seeds mean that one side of the bracket could get heavily stacked with the top 10 players, all of whom start knocking each other out leaving (probably) #1 for the finals. Then, on the other, lesser stacked side of the bracket you have the bottom 10 players. Essentially, if PP meant everything, you'd be getting #1 and #10 for the finals. Which makes very little sense!
Sonny B
Get hype, o/ but I'm still too sucky Gl to all though
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Nah, you should sign up when the time comes!
Doomsday is Bad

Shimatora wrote:

PortalLife wrote:

People will complain about it no matter what method is used. Seeding a tournament this big didn't work from my experience. We randomized it and what happened? #2 UK and #1 UK met. If it was seeded, this wouldn't of been the outcome.
If people don't like regular seeded tournaments they clearly have no idea what a tournament is about. It's there for the best to do well in and the people who aren't quite as good to get knocked out. It makes no sense if the #1 and #2 UK meet early than the finals. Otherwise, randomised seeds mean that one side of the bracket could get heavily stacked with the top 10 players, all of whom start knocking each other out leaving (probably) #1 for the finals. Then, on the other, lesser stacked side of the bracket you have the bottom 10 players. Essentially, if PP meant everything, you'd be getting #1 and #10 for the finals. Which makes very little sense!
People complain about everything. :S.

But either way we will stick to random. (If it turns out to be crap, theres always OUKT4 to change our minds)
Raiku
hype and count me in for brittania
jesse1412
I agree that seeding by pp would be/was way better.
Mafham
Hypeee ;o Sounds really fun, even though I will probably be knocked out early haha :)

jk ima rek u cheeky litl blighters u aint got nuffin on me look at u all scrd dats wot i fort m8 2cool6skool
Doomsday is Bad

jesus1412 wrote:

I agree that seeding by pp would be/was way better.
Yeah. We will see. I'll get a poll or some crap and see if people want PP seeding ect.
Jerome
deleted
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Does no one remember the last tournament? I seeded it and the bracket came down to all the good players knocking each other out and all the lower players knocking each other out. The finals would be awful. Randomization is in the best interest of a "epic" tournament.
Shimatora

PortalLife wrote:

Does no one remember the last tournament? I seeded it and the bracket came down to all the good players knocking each other out and all the lower players knocking each other out. The finals would be awful. Randomization is in the best interest of a "epic" tournament.
That is not how seeding works.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
That was the result of PPV2 seeding, when I did the brackets last time. As a result I dropped seeding and went for randomization and the tournament turned out to be a success.
Shimatora

PortalLife wrote:

That was the result of PPV2 seeding, when I did the brackets last time. As a result I dropped seeding and went for randomization and the tournament turned out to be a success.
Seeding means that it is IMPOSSIBLE for the highest seeded people to meet until the end. Are you sure you did it right? Besides, relying on RNG for seeding means that you could get a far worse bracket than you're implying you had with "proper" seeding. I'd advise you read this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_%28sports%29

In addition to that, how exactly did you seed? Did you use a website to help? I always use Challonge for the tournaments I run and I've not once had any issue with seeding placing high seeds against each other.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
I use that website as well. If I could show you how it looked back then, I would. But I saw it with my own two eyes. I'm confident with using randomization. The bracket generation will be live streamed on our official twitch channel for the event - http://www.twitch.tv/oukt3

I have confidence randomization will be fine. Trust me, seeding a 64 player tournament isn't as simple as you think it is.
Shimatora

PortalLife wrote:

I use that website as well. If I could show you how it looked back then, I would. But I saw it with my own two eyes. I'm confident with using randomization. The bracket generation will be live streamed on our official twitch channel for the event - http://www.twitch.tv/oukt3

I have confidence randomization will be fine. Trust me, seeding a 64 player tournament isn't as simple as you think it is.
It is as simple as I think it is. You seed players based on rank and then the site deals with the rest. Can I take a look at the bad seeding bracket? If you could enable seeding numbers to be shown too, that'd be great. Either you:
1. Seeded people incorrectly.
2. Accidentally randomised the seeds.
3. You're telling the truth and seeding sometimes messes up. (which makes absolutely no sense considering it's 100% more likely the first two happened.)

I'll take a look and show you exactly what went wrong.

I do have to question your competence as a tournament organiser, however, if you can't even let Challonge seed your tournaments properly. It is literally the simplest thing in the world to do.

I'm willing to actually do the seeding myself too, if you want. I'm not trying to make your tournament worse - in fact, I'm trying to make it far more exciting. Random seeding is not exciting in the least and actually allows you to seed people however you want and call it "random." What happens when the top people have extremely hard matchups throughout and someone like yourself has it easy all the way up to the finals? You forget that seeding also stops any posibility of foul play happening from the organiser(s) end.

EDIT: Auto correct sucks.
gadrin
lessgo
vidya
hype
Shimatora
Looking back, it seems I have reason to have my worries.

I'd have to call for someone else seeding the tournament, not PortalLife. If other people care enough, that is.

Edit: His stubbornness over this even when showing clear evidence that seeding should not work the way he's said worries me, and should worry others too.
Lusor-
XD
Riari
"Players that are under rank #50,000 are not allowed to sign up."

Welp, time to farm maps I don't like.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Like I said, the bracket generation will be livestreamed. There will be no foul play involved. I have ran two successful tournaments to date, I think I can make a competent one.
Shimatora
No wish to show me the botched brackets then?

Also, if you're so stubborn, I'll go ahead and host my own set of UK tournaments with proper seeding.

I'll just give up on the persuasion side, if people really want to play in such a botched tournament as this, I wont bother fighting for a better one.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
You know, the North American osu! tournament uses random brackets, no complains, so why is it when I do it people wanna fucking cry about it all day?

Heres what happens if you use seeding for 64 players

Top players vs bads
Decent players vs bads

This means that the top players get easy wins inn the final rounds of the tournaments.

Calling this tournament 'botched' is really screwed up.

Seriously, you don't have to sign up, but I'll still make this a successful tournament like I have twice before
Doomsday is Bad
Seriously just drop this argument.


I have explained.

WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.

If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.


We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints

So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still

I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.

I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.

Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.

Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
Shimatora

PortalLife wrote:

You know, the North American osu! tournament uses random brackets, no complains, so why is it when I do it people wanna fucking cry about it all day?

Heres what happens if you use seeding for 64 players

Top players vs bads
Decent players vs bads

This means that the top players get easy wins inn the final rounds of the tournaments.

Calling this tournament 'botched' is really screwed up.

Seriously, you don't have to sign up, but I'll still make this a successful tournament like I have twice before
Did you read the Wiki page? Seeding means that it wont be top players vs worse players in the final round of the tournament. If you don't have the capacity to understand this then that's fine, I'll leave you to it. And heck, it should be fun regardless but I was trying to improve your tournament for your players, who I actually feel sorry have to put up with a tournament organiser like yourself.

Just to clarify, you don't have to worry about my tournament, I'll be hosting it sometime after yours, just in case people want a proper tournament, not one that's heavily reliant on RNG to make the tournament exciting.

Hope your lack of knowledge running proper tournaments pulls you through. :)
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Its almost like you didn't read the posts and are just trying to get under my skin.

Seriously, stop it.
Shimatora

Mahiro Yasaka wrote:

Seriously just drop this argument.


I have explained.

WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.

If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.


We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints

So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still

I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.

I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.

Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.

Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
I was merely giving feedback on the setup. The frustration stems from PortalLife's lack of understanding. I tried explaining, he still does not understand. Not much else to it really.
ap33_old
sure its complaining but its pointing out flaws to make it a better event, not just empty baseless complaints to annoy you
Toran
Le hypeuu

i wont fail every map to navi this time :^3
Topic Starter
Lapis-
I tried to explain why seeding was ineffective based off the previous tournament, Shimatora took NO notice to that and then tried to set me up as a "incompetent" and a person not to be trusted. Thats where I draw the line. Just drop this topic already.
ibecolours

Mahiro Yasaka wrote:

Seriously just drop this argument.


I have explained.

WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.

If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.


We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints

So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still

I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.

I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.

Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.

Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding

If you do it random its just going to be bad and pointless a little like last time.
Doomsday is Bad

Shimatora wrote:

Mahiro Yasaka wrote:

Seriously just drop this argument.


I have explained.

WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.

If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.


We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints

So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still

I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.

I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.

Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.

Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
I was merely giving feedback on the setup. The frustration stems from PortalLife's lack of understanding. I tried explaining, he still does not understand. Not much else to it really.
We understand, but us doing this seeding, is us listening to feedback.

As I've said. If this fails, we can always change it next time. But it worked ok last time.
Doomsday is Bad

ibecolours wrote:

Mahiro Yasaka wrote:

Seriously just drop this argument.


I have explained.

WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.

If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.


We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints

So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still

I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.

I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.

Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.

Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding

If you do it random its just going to be bad and pointless a little like last time.
Your the second person to say it was bad to me.

Still sticking to my guns here.
Shimatora
No worries. I just hope PortalLife can understand why I don't trust his "evidence" for bad seeding especially when it literally can't be how he said it is. As I've said before, seeding just doesn't work that way. Best of luck with your tournament regardless, Mahiro Yasaka. \o
Toran
yo shibutora just let the organisers choose their own methods and stop complaining / giving negative feedback

if you dont like it then dont play, pretty simple. If the majority of people were complaining then yeah sure maybe it would be taken into consideration but if the majority is OK with either method then just let the organisers decide.

Unless you want to run a rival tournament and somehow get sponsership from osu! as well 8-)
Seungli_old

PortalLife wrote:

Seriously, you don't have to sign up, but I'll still make this a successful tournament like I have twice before

PortalLife wrote:

successful tournament

PortalLife wrote:

successful
8-)
ibecolours

Snookie wrote:

yo shibutora just let the organisers choose their own methods and stop complaining / giving negative feedback

if you dont like it then dont play, pretty simple. If the majority of people were complaining then yeah sure maybe it would be taken into consideration but if the majority is OK with either method then just let the organisers decide.

Unless you want to run a rival tournament and somehow get sponsership from osu! as well 8-)

if people don't give feedback things do not improve if the seeding stays the same I won't participate not that anyone cares and I don't expect you too but just saying. Shima makes a good point and her way of seeding makes actual sense
wanony
I think Shimatora's arguments should be taken into account here, she has previous experience with organising tournaments, far more than I believe the OUKT staff.

I also feel that referring to people as 'bads' isn't helping you here either and telling her to 'stop tryharding' is also going to show that this isn't being taken very seriously.

I also think that the rate that the tournaments are being put out is pretty high which for myself is off-putting but that's a whole different argument and really it's not for me to comment on as I'm not organising it, I just don't feel like participating every month or two.


Shimatora is trying to improve the quality of this tournament, she wasn't trying to have a go at you for what you are doing, don't get mad over it
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Yeah well this is the last tournament until winter, because OWC will be Autumn time so, who's to complain.

Also, heres my compromise. Once signups have ended, i'll run a seeding method and see how the brackets look. If they are good, we can keep them. If not, I will randomize them.

Fair game?
jesse1412
The NA tournament is overruled because the OWC uses pp seeding. The OWC is far more important and if we're going on an example basis, wins. Let's be fair, the least competent players are the least competent players and SHOULD be knocked out first, that's what seeding does and if you disagree with it then you don't believe in this fact.

Also here is the 1st OUKT seeding. http://challonge.com/UKosu
OUKT 2 seeding: http://challonge.com/osuukST

ALSO I don't see a SINLGE complaint in the first OUKT thread: t/165077

Even though we've reached a compromise I'm going to keep on slamming nails into this coffin just to remind the staff that they have made the correct choice. In the first tournament, bar the first set of matches ALL of them seemed like interesting matches and none of them were really free wins. In the second tournament we can see that doomsday had clear passage up to the semifinals. From this we can see that obvious outcome matches were FAR more prevalent in the 2nd tournament. To finish, we're completely relying on chance with random seeds, while it could be great; the top 8 players could all have played each other by round 2 which means the winner is most probably already decided by round 2. Not worth the risk.

PortalLife wrote:

Yeah well this is the last tournament until winter, because OWC will be Autumn time so, who's to complain.

Also, heres my compromise. Once signups have ended, i'll run a seeding method and see how the brackets look. If they are good, we can keep them. If not, I will randomize them.

Fair game?
Fair game.
ibecolours

jesus1412 wrote:

The NA tournament is overruled because the OWC uses pp seeding. The OWC is far more important and if we're going on an example basis, wins. Let's be fair, the least competent players are the least competent players and SHOULD be knocked out first, that's what seeding does and if you disagree with it then you don't believe in this fact.

Also here is the 1st OUKT seeding. http://challonge.com/UKosu

ALSO I don't see a SINLGE complaint in the first OUKT thread: t/165077

Fair game.
I think Jesse hit the nail on the head with a huge arse hammer
ibecolours

PortalLife wrote:

Yeah well this is the last tournament until winter, because OWC will be Autumn time so, who's to complain.

Also, heres my compromise. Once signups have ended, i'll run a seeding method and see how the brackets look. If they are good, we can keep them. If not, I will randomize them.

Fair game?

yeah but then you should not be a competitor as you could be biased...
I have the best compromise Lets use shimatoras seeding idea the one that works and makes sense
Topic Starter
Lapis-


This has been a rule since OUKT1.

I fail to see how staff playing the tournament can affect it.

I am currently seeking out more referees.
Iain
I wanna be placed vs. Jesus, need revenge.
Seungli_old
I still fail to see how it's fair that you, PortalLife as a competitor can choose the maps in the map pool. Who's to say you wont just choose maps that you personally have experience on, not that I'm saying you will, but it's still something to take into account as a possible risk of unfair play.
Topic Starter
Lapis-
Because I'm not biased and theres two other map selectors. I just act as a moderator over the map selection process, a place where I think OWC lacks from what i've seen.
ibecolours

PortalLife wrote:



This has been a rule since OUKT1.

I fail to see how staff playing the tournament can affect it.

I am currently seeking out more referees.
You made that rule....
so saying that is the rule is kind of pointless, because you made it
jesse1412

PortalLife wrote:

Because I'm not biased and theres two other map selectors. I just act as a moderator over the map selection process, a place where I think OWC lacks from what i've seen.
Which can be confirmed by the other selectors. This isn't a problem guys don't worry.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

/