aabc271 wrote:

Taiko diffs look really nice to me ~
Take this

Good luck on ranking this

AllStar12 wrote:

Hey, mod request here! Lets see:
Note:
• Not sure if the changes I made actually affects the hitsounds, if it does then remember where you placed those hitsounds

[General]

1. Put "Vocaloid" as the source rather than in the tags no it should be in tags
2. Your storyboard seems to be bit messed up from where I see it such as from:
   • 00:54:743 to 01:44:826 meaning that your Black and White.png is still showing along with the 30075535.png
   • 02:41:076 to 02:58:660 your 30075535.png is is still showing along with the Black and White.png.
   • Not sure what the storyboards terms are called but at 02:58:660 should have a fade in for the Black and White.png?
3. Enable epilepsy warning ok
4. Mentioned this in one of the difficulties but for the combo colors, depending on how the mood of the song goes, change the colors such as part 02:58:660 to 03:13:660 have the combo colors set to white and grey only and during kiai times use brighter colors only. ( I know you're going for it like this but I believe in some parts in other difficulties, the combo colors are mix with each other so recheck them) it's just fine to me now
5. I suggest increase the brightness a bit for your combo color 3 if you plan on using it during kiai time not needed

[Easy]

1. 01:07:660 (2) - Missing whistle done
2. 01:11:660 (3) - remove whistle add clap not fitting
3. 01:11:910 (4) - Missing whistle? no need to
4. 01:12:160 (5) - remove finish and add clap because that's how the hitsound is in the rest of your difficulties. k
5. 01:04:410 (4) - better flow to the slider if it's on x: 119 y: 161 don't really think so
6. 01:05:660 (2,3) - Pretty nazi here, re-position circle note 3 to x: 84 y: 368 so it'll have the same y coordinates as the slider later on and isn't to low to the grid. Re-position circle note 3 to x: 226 y: 284 to re-adjust back it's consistent 1.65x distance snap. k
7. 01:07:660 (2) - fix the distance snap a bit? ah, really not a deal
8. 01:12:660 (1) - My opinion but the flow here felt a bit weird from the slider having to start off the kiai time. not a problem
   
   
   
   Suggestions and Ideas
   
9. 00:56:660 to 01:12:660 , have the combo colors change to bright colors? currently just fine
10. 03:48:660 (1,2,1,2,3) - Have this part symmetry like this?
    
    Picture

    
    already pretty neat
    Test play for Easy Difficulty
    
    Result

    

[Normal]

1. 01:19:160 think it's sounds much better with a finish here because it bring out the song much better imo. (If you plan on doing so then place this on other difficulties as well) eh sorry, I think that's too many of tem
2. 01:27:160 (2) - ^
3. 02:15:160 (2) - ^
4. 02:23:160 (2) - ^
5. 03:21:160 (2) - ^
6. 03:29:160 (2) - ^
7. 03:13:660 (1,1) - Switch the combo colors since the teal is brighter than the greenish blue color no you misunderstood, I didn't decide according to the lightness but actuall saturation instaed
8. 00:27:660 (3,4,1) - Not sure if it's an issue but the distance snap is 1.23x here (don't think it is since some other note are also scaling around the number 1.20x) no, these are not even a problem, adjusted a bit for safe, ok
9. 01:12:160 (3) - Next distance snap is 1.28x
10. 01:28:160 (4,5) - Distance snap is 1.30x
11. 02:04:660 (1) - Distance snap is 1.26x
12. 03:16:660 (1,2) - Distance snap between here is 1.32x
13. 03:05:660 (3,4,1) - Believe it's better to have slider 3 and 4 re-positioned to what I show you for better flow
    
    Picture

    
    ok
    
    
    
    Suggestions and Ideas
    
    None
    
    Test play for Normal Difficulty
    
    Result

    

[Hard]

1. The only reason why I didn't do well for an hard is because I believe that the overlaps, slider velocity and quick pressing made me bit confused on certain parts( Pretty sure it's because I'm bad haha). The distance snaps were fine with me.
2. 02:58:660 (1) - Believe it's unnecessary for it to be there since it's a hard difficulty and during my test-plays I break my combo here so use the 1/8 repeated slider to replace it need more opinions
3. 01:02:660 (1) - Remove whistle and add finish since in insane diff. you have a finish there. removed the one in Insane instead
4. 01:09:660 (1) - You have it whistle in insane difficulty but here you have finish, you decide. whistle
5. 02:04:660 (1) - Have the head of the slider a finish instead of the whistle? ng
6. 03:01:410 (2,3,4) - Believe it's a better flow to have the part like this:
   
   Picture

   
   ok
7. 03:12:660 (1,1) - Have the sliders heads to have finish? too early to sound loud
   
   
   
   Suggestions and Ideas
   
   None
   
   Test play for Hard Difficulty
   
   Result

   1st Attempt:
   
   2nd Attempt:
   

[Insane]

1. 01:13:660 (1) - Missing whistle on the tail ok yeah, did them all I think, also for the below, thx for being so careful lol
2. 01:23:660 (1) - ^
3. 02:08:660 (1) - ^
4. 02:20:660 (1) - ^
5. 03:19:160 (3) - ^
6. From 03:19:826 to 03:20:576 I went through Hard and Stress difficulties to see how their hitsounds are for these specific times. Seems like some are included hitsounds and some are not. Wondering if this isn't intentional and see if it can be fixed. Here's the chart:
   
   Chart

   
7. From 03:23:326 to 03:24:326 also has some issues I believe for the hitsounds :
   
   Chart

   
8. My opinion but at 00:50:826 (2,3) - was a bit iffy on that part, felt like that part should be stacked together. not a rpoblem to me, I think I haven't stacked even once at these parts
   
   
   
   Suggestions and Ideas
   
   None
   
   Test play for Insane Difficulty
   
   Result

   1st Attempt:
   
   
   2nd Attempt: Replay for the 2nd attempt
   
   3rd Attempt: Replay for the 3rd attempt
   

Don't really think the distance snaps are an issue for the harder difficulties but for the hitsounds, some difficulties have some where as others don't in specific times so I say recheck those parts. For the combo colors, I say some of the lighter colors are mixed with the darker colors in parts that I don't think should be the case depending on how the music goes so check on those as well. Overall I say this beatmap is very fun indeed and expect it to be ranked from you, did a good job for a 1/3 map! I might do a recheck on the hitsounds for the difficulties if you want me to (Message me if so).I didn't touch whole lot on Insane and Hard because I might end up screwing up the notes if I do so, I just pointed out the part that I believe felt weird for me during my test-play. Here's a star from me! checked out some hitsounding issue

If you have any complaints, questions, comments, etc. or found any errors in my work, ✉ in-game or on the osu website!

(ﾉ´ヮ´)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧❀ Wish you best of luck!~ ❀

AllStar12 wrote:

Your storyboard seems to be bit messed up from where I see it such as from:
• 00:54:743 to 01:44:826 meaning that your Black and White.png is still showing along with the 30075535.png
• 02:41:076 to 02:58:660 your 30075535.png is is still showing along with the Black and White.png.
• Not sure what the storyboards terms are called but at 02:58:660 should have a fade in for the Black and White.png?

Zero__wind wrote:

NR is daed

Asphyxia wrote:

Giving you a mod since you requested one.

General stuff

1. It'd be nice if you could resize your BG into 1024 x 768 (or find a new one and then resize) that's not really need as the current size is related to SB effect an it's also rankable

Easy

1. 00:19:660 (2) - Not really a problem but the slider looks a bit bad because of the red point, there's this small bump that keeps making me crazy. Mind if you could maybe improve it a bit (by removing the redpoint) ? ok did so for all these
2. 00:23:660 (2) - ^
3. 00:35:660 (2) - Giving this slider a small downcurve would fit quite well with your previous slider and 00:37:660 (3) - . I think it's better than a straight one ok
4. 01:22:910 (1,2) - I wish these notes would have some curve on them. It'd make the map appealing, or that's what I think. Here's an example:
   
   Example

   
   done for all this kind
5. 01:24:410 (4,1) - ^
6. 01:36:660 (1,2) - Quite nazi stuff here but oh well, 1's end isn't perfectly lined with 2's start. As you can see (http://puu.sh/8A5lV.jpg), you kind of have to make a movement there backwards so it'd be cool if you could move 2 to x:364 y:264! changed in my own way
7. 01:39:660 (2,1) - ^
8. 01:43:660 (2) - You know what this is
9. 01:51:660 (3,4,1) - This isn't a must do, just a regular suggestion: if you feel like playing with this pattern here, it could be done differently, here's an example!
   
   Example

   
   I don't really like to go a bit backward to the mid
10. 02:16:660 (1) - Could use a small curve too if you want to. not really feel like to, the similar ones are also straight
11. All of my examples and suggestions apply to later patterns and notes, such as 02:20:160 (3,4) - and 02:22:410 (3,1) - so if you applied, apply all for these and so on... yes I did
12. Clean stuff, well done.

Normal

1. 00:28:660 (1) - Unfitting by it's shape, give it more curve so it'd fit better with 00:29:660 (3) - ok
2. 01:20:160 (5,1) - I generally dislike stacks such as these in lower difficulties, I think it just makes a normal way too confusing. Your choice to either remove it or keep it lol I know, but I really wanna keep it. cause I did quite similar stuff for all Hard Insane and Tsuki at these particular points
3. 01:40:160 (4) - I think the small curve makes no sense here, you should go for (imo) a mirror slider from 01:39:660 (3) - OR turn it into a straight slider instead, both of these fit better for sure. copy pasted
4. 02:03:076 (2) - Nice <3 xD
5. 02:16:160 (5,1) - Hi, you know what to do if you applied this earlier.
6. 03:22:410 (5,1) -
7. Clean stufffff

Hard

1. I don't think this Hard difficulty has a problem, everything played quite smoothly for me. Only issue for me is that some of your straight sliders could work, play, and look better if they would be curved. 01:02:660 (1,2) - Is a fine example of this, a mirror from 2 would be really nice (mirror from 2 to replace 1). hmm I don't really that's that bad, I tried to ballance the ammount of straight and curve sliders in this way. I changed a few of sliders though, not much, as I don't really think it's a problem
2. 01:28:660 (1) - Quite an useless NC tbh, your lower diffs didn't have a note like this NC'd so maybe it would be better to keep consistency? actually as I mapped from highest diff to the lower ones, actually they follow how Tsuki and Insane diff work. there's not a NC in E&N is only because the notes are too few in those diffs. I used a NC there "with color" to achieve an impact of emphasize, after the grey combos
3. 01:37:660 (5) - I dislike the sudden ''jump'' that this slider gives, you could rearrange it a bit and add a curve to it for a better placement (imo):
   
   Example

   
   changed in another way
4. 02:24:660 (1) - z also gonna keep this one =.=
5. Cool

Insane

1. Overall played really well, few things I'm a bit considered about. You used 2/3 sliders like all the time, maybe some variation would've been nice. hmm I think I've already tried to make it vary a lot, with different flows, and with some 1/2 sliders and double circles =.= I really tried to do so
   01:28:660 (1) - Also, if you applied the NC, add it to this and next diff too!
2. 01:47:826 (2,3,4) - Since these were so close to each other, I though it's gonna be a 2/3 pattern. How about making a cool pattern? http://puu.sh/8A7Iv.jpg only a cleaner version of mine... hmm actually I don't want that big distance, this part is soft, and I managed to use short distance in this part, so I think they're not really that confusing
3. 02:26:076 (3,1) - I know you introduced something new here which is fine, but this was somewhat Extra level stuff, I mean you did not have anything similar to this so it'd be better if you could avoid such things. IMO to hard for Insane >: yeah I did hesitate a bit when maping this part, but actually, it is just the most appropriate and natural rhythm, I won't ever feel like to start a slider from 02:26:076 - to "play better" because that key sound simply doesn't last. If you think stacking 02:26:076 (3,1) - properly would increase the readability I would make a compromise here. I personaly don't think it means much though
4. 02:56:410 (3,4,5) - I think this part of the stream could flow a bit better, curving it while also moving its direction to upwards instead of straight would be nice, like this! http://puu.sh/8A7Uj.jpg If you apply this, make sure you make it more clean

I tried. Itried yours and tried something myself, but I don't really like how it looks like. I'm bad at placing curved streams, really, so it's currently like this. I don't really think it plays bad as that path is just so short

Tsuki

1. Hmm, this difficulty is so hard and even I can't pass it. That might be a reason I don't like it that much, along with with some patterns that are ridiculously hard, such as 00:23:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - and 00:31:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - . I know this is meant for the top notch players but it'd be nice if you could make it more enjoyable for players like me. 00:23:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - this one isn't that hard OAQ 00:31:576 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - is crazy though...
2. Sometimes the flow wasn't really the best, like 00:20:660 (1,2) - , 00:29:410 (4,1) - and 00:29:660 (1,2) - for example. Here's 3 examples how to improve the flow, first example represents the first example I mention, second for second etc.
   
   Example 1

   
   This way 1-2 will have a much more natural movement that before, which makes the playing way more enjoyable. I changed this one.
   00:29:410 (4,1,2) - Im gonna show this as a one picture.
   
   Example 2

   
   Now just by rotating 1 a bit and moving the curve to the other side it makes the movement so much more better which affects the gameplay A LOT. And since we curved 1, we could blanket 2 to it, basic stuff. Just by doing small changes like this makes the map much more enjoyable to play (yeah, i couldn't pass this so i had to test this in editor xD) I need to consider more about this

Overall a solid mapset, although I wasn't a fan of your ''Tsuka'' difficulty. I'd say it would be really nice if you could get few opinions about it from other players. Well, that's the mod, GL with your mapset Zero! >//<~ I don't know what I should do now... sad

1. 00:31:576 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This is a very cool idea, but spacing at some parts feels quite large which makes some sliders very hard to catch. Try to lower your x1.65 spacing sections to x1.40 (i mean at section like 00:31:576 (5,1) - ) - that wouldn't hurt your patters, but closer spacing would make this section more comfortable to play
2. 00:51:410 (4,5) - Incoming note (5) appears kinda suddenly and feels hard to catch since music doesn't require note here at all - I would suggest leave here just one 1/3 or 1/6 repeat-slider, something like this:
   
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:53:410 (4) - This note feels kinda tricky, but i see that you did that intentionally - how about change snape of 00:53:076 (3) - to reduse spacing a bit & make this section more friendly? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   [img]
   http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1578308[/img]
4. 00:55:410 (7,8) - Same as 00:51:410 (4,5) -
5. 00:56:326 (2,2) - Noticeable stacking issue here
6. 00:59:576 (5) - Blanketing with 00:59:076 (3) - is not a good idea here imo since it made spacing between 00:59:576 (5,1) - kinda too big. Tru to stack 00:59:576 (5) - with head of 00:59:660 (1) - to make it easier to catch instead
7. 01:07:160 (4) - This note feels kinda weird here since all previous section you followed vocals directly. I understand that you wanted to follow this tiny bell sound but imo having rhythm-pattern consistent would work netter in this case.
8. 01:19:160 (3) - A soft-finish with redused volume would fit here quite well.
9. 01:27:160 (1) - And here atoo
10. 01:43:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - I see similiar pattern here, and i must say that 1.60 spacing here works really tricky and makes this part hard to read/catch - lowering spacing to x1.40 would be better idea imo.
11. 02:00:660 - 02:08:576 - This is the only one section where you used such stacks, and i must say that they doesn't looks nice here - probably re-spacing it with low spacing (but without overlapping) would looks better at this part)
12. 02:15:160 (2) - A soft-finish would fit here quite well.
13. 02:23:160 (3) - Same here
14. 02:26:160 - I really was expecting a lote here - try to add it, that would made this section less tricky
15. 02:28:160 - And here too, there are strong beat at music and ignoring it feels quite weird especially considering that tricky pattern what you using here
16. 02:34:660 (1,2) - Imo this part doesn't flows well, and this part may case lots of combobreaks - but probably best what i can suggest instead is just replace this repeat-slider with 3 notes
17. 02:35:660 (1,2) - Kind of weird stacking. Try to stack 02:36:076 (2) - with 02:36:326 (3) - imo, that would be more interesting & samely to play
18. 02:39:076 (4,1,2,3,4) - I guess consistent spacing would work more nicely here since all this is 1/3, and same spacing would be more intuitive to play
19. 02:40:160 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Spacing at this streams feels really too big and would case lots of misses, especially if players will decide to use HR on. I guess lowering it a bit to at least x1.1 would be more friendly - you still won't have any overlap with such spacing anyway.
20. 03:09:576 - Add note - there are strong beat in music at this part
21. 03:21:160 (2) - A soft-finish would fit here quite well.
22. 03:29:160 (1) - And same here
23. 03:37:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Pretty strange that this is only one linear section at the whole map. Rotate it by 15-30° degree perhaps?
24. 03:45:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - <3
25. 03:48:326 (1,2,3,4,1) - <333

Kodora wrote:

Irie told me that you got connection problems, so i'll post my suggestions here

[Tsuki]

*Would be nice to lower HP Drain by 1 tick to make this diff more friendly for less-skilled players - whole diff is challenging enough itself already. did so with no hesitation. I thought it was already 6 but it was 7...

1. 00:31:576 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This is a very cool idea, but spacing at some parts feels quite large which makes some sliders very hard to catch. Try to lower your x1.65 spacing sections to x1.40 (i mean at section like 00:31:576 (5,1) - ) - that wouldn't hurt your patters, but closer spacing would make this section more comfortable to play ok, that would be a noticable way of compromise
2. 00:51:410 (4,5) - Incoming note (5) appears kinda suddenly and feels hard to catch since music doesn't require note here at all - I would suggest leave here just one 1/3 or 1/6 repeat-slider, something like this:
   
   
   SPOILER

   
   I only reduced distance usage, I like this rhythm quite well
3. 00:53:410 (4) - This note feels kinda tricky, but i see that you did that intentionally - how about change snape of 00:53:076 (3) - to reduse spacing a bit & make this section more friendly? Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   [img]
   http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1578308[/img]
   that would look worse to me. actually the distance is already consistent, when I map this part, referring to 00:52:660 (1,2) -
4. 00:55:410 (7,8) - Same as 00:51:410 (4,5) - also only made them closer
5. 00:56:326 (2,2) - Noticeable stacking issue here fixed
6. 00:59:576 (5) - Blanketing with 00:59:076 (3) - is not a good idea here imo since it made spacing between 00:59:576 (5,1) - kinda too big. Tru to stack 00:59:576 (5) - with head of 00:59:660 (1) - to make it easier to catch instead tried to lower the distance instead
7. 01:07:160 (4) - This note feels kinda weird here since all previous section you followed vocals directly. I understand that you wanted to follow this tiny bell sound but imo having rhythm-pattern consistent would work netter in this case. some previous mods have mentioned this one, but I don't raelly think it's such a bad thing to have something different, variety is all this music has
8. 01:19:160 (3) - A soft-finish with redused volume would fit here quite well. I once had one on these points, but somehow I decided to remove them, feeling that the finish on 01:19:660 (1) - would be better protruded in this way
9. 01:27:160 (1) - And here atoo
10. 01:43:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - I see similiar pattern here, and i must say that 1.60 spacing here works really tricky and makes this part hard to read/catch - lowering spacing to x1.40 would be better idea imo. this one isn't really that hard, may because the overall distance is not big, only turning 'round and round. even I could sometimes properly clear these. I'd like to keep them as current
11. 02:00:660 - 02:08:576 - This is the only one section where you used such stacks, and i must say that they doesn't looks nice here - probably re-spacing it with low spacing (but without overlapping) would looks better at this part) no I don't feel like a change here. the vocalist at this part really makes me feel like to be slow and lazy like how the current spacing works. I want to hold on to what I originaly thought when mapping this
12. 02:15:160 (2) - A soft-finish would fit here quite well.
13. 02:23:160 (3) - Same here
14. 02:26:160 - I really was expecting a lote here - try to add it, that would made this section less tricky I don't really get a beat there tbh, and I kinda like that stop, it makes the rhythm interesting, also a nice way to achieve flow-changing
15. 02:28:160 - And here too, there are strong beat at music and ignoring it feels quite weird especially considering that tricky pattern what you using here I'll see if others say so, as there is a beat this time. I tried to make it match with the previous phrase when mapping, so I left it blank. that's what I originaly thought
16. 02:34:660 (1,2) - Imo this part doesn't flows well, and this part may case lots of combobreaks - but probably best what i can suggest instead is just replace this repeat-slider with 3 notes not at all to me. all you need is going straight forward along with the curve
17. 02:35:660 (1,2) - Kind of weird stacking. Try to stack 02:36:076 (2) - with 02:36:326 (3) - imo, that would be more interesting & samely to play interesting idea, will consider more about this. but actually I'm already really satisfied with the current arrangement. a slowdown before the highest orgasm is what the music showed me
18. 02:39:076 (4,1,2,3,4) - I guess consistent spacing would work more nicely here since all this is 1/3, and same spacing would be more intuitive to play only changed 02:39:410 (4) - as some former mods also mentioend that and I feel reasonable. the spacing wouldn't be confusing at all as it's corresponding with the rhythm so well, with three beats in a group. people couldn't mistaken them
19. 02:40:160 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Spacing at this streams feels really too big and would case lots of misses, especially if players will decide to use HR on. I guess lowering it a bit to at least x1.1 would be more friendly - you still won't have any overlap with such spacing anyway. the current is just so satisfying imo, and not even that hard to play for me, comparing with some other jumpy patterns
20. 03:09:576 - Add note - there are strong beat in music at this part worth considering, will need more opinions, it's current consistent with the former phrase so...
21. 03:21:160 (2) - A soft-finish would fit here quite well.
22. 03:29:160 (1) - And same here
23. 03:37:660 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Pretty strange that this is only one linear section at the whole map. Rotate it by 15-30° degree perhaps? good idea
24. 03:45:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - <3
25. 03:48:326 (1,2,3,4,1) - <333

Very fun & challenging, just some suggestions from my side.

Star & best of luck for rank!

1. Clear.

1. 00:31:576 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Hard to read this part. Please changing NC like a 03:45:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - here.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 02:38:660 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - hmm, really hard to read this streams... try like this.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:40:160 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - too difficlut this flow. You should keep roundness here for 02:39:660 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - this stream flow.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 02:58:159 (1,2,3) - 1/6 start 02:58:160 - here. so remove 02:58:159 (1) - this note and move to 1/6 slider 02:58:160 - here and add two slider repeats.
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 02:38:076 (3,1) - hidden note by slider. It is the placement that is not kind to players. so can you move to this notes?
   
   SPOILER

   
2. Well done.

1. 00:52:160 (7) - flow is a little bad, so try to use this slider.
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:19:910 (2) - You can put this slider more clean. 1gird left and up. don't forget change distance after sliders.
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 01:28:160 (1,2,3,4,1) - no, difficult this stream for hard diff. change slider?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 02:24:160 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^
5. 02:55:910 (2,3,4,5) - ^
6. 02:57:576 (5) - this stream follow the 02:57:660 (1,2,3,4,5) - piano sounds. so it is weird that note for me. like this?
   
   
7. 03:22:160 (1,2,3,4) - almost same above 01:28:160 (1,2,3,4,1) -
8. 03:30:160 (3,4,5,6) - ^
9. 03:48:326 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^
   
   
   a little difficult to play for Hard diff.

1. fine.

1. fine.

Guy wrote:

Hi~

Red : Unrankable issue / must fix.
Blue : Should be fixed / highly suggested.
Black : Just suggestion.


[General]

1. Clear.

[Tsuki]

1. 00:31:576 (5,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Hard to read this part. Please changing NC like a 03:45:576 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - here.
   
   SPOILER

   
   fixed
2. 02:38:660 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - hmm, really hard to read this streams... try like this.
   
   SPOILER

   
   changed to similar one
3. 02:40:160 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - too difficlut this flow. You should keep roundness here for 02:39:660 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - this stream flow.
   
   SPOILER

   
   changed the slider instead
4. 02:58:159 (1,2,3) - 1/6 start 02:58:160 - here. so remove 02:58:159 (1) - this note and move to 1/6 slider 02:58:160 - here and add two slider repeats.
   
   SPOILER

   
   ok

[Insane]

1. 02:38:076 (3,1) - hidden note by slider. It is the placement that is not kind to players. so can you move to this notes?
   
   SPOILER

   
   done
2. Well done.

[Hard]

1. 00:52:160 (7) - flow is a little bad, so try to use this slider.
   
   SPOILER

   
   ok
2. 01:19:910 (2) - You can put this slider more clean. 1gird left and up. don't forget change distance after sliders.
   
   SPOILER

   
   fixed
3. 01:28:160 (1,2,3,4,1) - no, difficult this stream for hard diff. change slider?
   
   SPOILER

   
   hmm I kinda prefer to keep it, because it's at the end of the kiai, the strongest point in this whole part, so I prefer to let the players actually "tap" the drumbeats instead of "hold" them. it's just like 180BPM tripples, not really hard for a Hard diff I think. Many Hard diffs with even higher BPM (like 200 or so) have stream of 3 or 5 and they're also acceptable.
4. 02:24:160 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^ same as above
5. 02:55:910 (2,3,4,5) - ^ ^
6. 02:57:576 (5) - this stream follow the 02:57:660 (1,2,3,4,5) - piano sounds. so it is weird that note for me. like this?
   
   I changed 123 into a repeat slider but kept 5. Because there's a obvious drumbeat at 02:57:576 - and after changing the following to a slider, it's just a double tap which appearde many times in other parts of this diff. I replaced this stream into slider because they're piano sounds, not drum sounds. After some consideration, I decided to use repeat sliders for all the piano streams in this diff, and keep using circles for the drum streams. I think this is quite consistent and reasonable
7. 03:22:160 (1,2,3,4) - almost same above 01:28:160 (1,2,3,4,1) - as these are all drum streams, and really at strongest beats, so I kept these and the below
8. 03:30:160 (3,4,5,6) - ^
9. 03:48:326 (1,2,3,4,1) - ^
   
   
   a little difficult to play for Hard diff.

[Normal]

1. fine.

[Easy]

1. fine.

Call me back.

1. 02:41:118 (2) - should be snap to 02:41:076 - like a 02:41:826 (1) - here.

Guy wrote:

sorry for late x.x i found an issue.

[Tsuki]

1. 02:41:118 (2) - should be snap to 02:41:076 - like a 02:41:826 (1) - here.

Please call me once again after you fix it.

1. 00:24:826 (2) - I'd remove this, the doubles get a bit difficult in this intro section since there's so many of them
2. 00:26:826 (2) - same here
3. 02:48:326 (3,4) - this looks good in pattern but I feel the stack will make this hard to read as two clicks instead of just one