Mao wrote:

I come here to help my brother (Desperate-kun) to deal with some of his mod requests since I have nothing to do! :c
Hope that doesn't bother you that much.

Sure~ Thank you Mao and Desperate-kun

1. Unrankable Issue
2. Highly Suggested
3. Suggestion
4. Just my own opinion (feel free to ignore)

General

1. Fine!

Shore's Insane

1. 00:15:983 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This stream feels kinda out of place to me since you used these other
   curved streams. A stream with that angle doesn't really fit the map imo. Consider changing it to
   something similiar as you did with the other streams for consistency. In fact I think here is really hard to fix and lkx may have his own thought..
   
2. 00:27:233 - This note is pretty strong. Consider mapping it since it should be mapped if you ask me. Ah.. Maybe you mean here need a note? i think here is a note...
   
3. 00:31:412 (1,2,3,4,5) - Maybe it's just me but it looked a bit messy since the heads of 1 and 5 are so
   near together. Just move 5 a bit upwards to make it better. Nothing you have to change though. Yeah you are right~
   
4. 00:42:126 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Consider changing the curve to make it better in terms of look and flow as
   seen in the Screenshot below. Fixed
   
   Screenshot

   
5. 00:59:912 (1,2,3,4) - That wasn't readable that easy. Missed all the time. Maybe doing it as Atrue did
   it in his Insane? I found them way better readable there. Same for all the others of these. Sorry.. The music is 1/6 and I think is not-that-unreadable... Maybe..
   
6. 01:19:197 (4,1,2) - You can do a triangle with 3 same sides here and rearrange the following curve of
   circles. Sure~
   
   Screenshot

   [imghttp://puu.sh/7LxqI.jpg][/img]
7. 01:21:555 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Use create polygon circles or rotate each circle 144° for a perfect
   pentagon. Yeah better for now~
   
8. 01:46:305 (4) - Space with 0,70 DS for better flow and consistency with 01:45:019 (7,1) - Sorry I think the structure is just made it this.. Really hard to fix here.
   
9. 02:24:983 (2) - The gap is so big. Flows pretty weird to me. Consider spacing it with 0,70 too.Then the squere would be broken.. So I want to keep this..
   
10. Cool. Good job! :3 Thank you!

Insane

1. 00:01:840 (4) - Change the curve so that 00:02:269 (1) - follows it. (See Screenshot below) Yes, you are right~
   
   Screenshot

   
2. 00:18:876 (4,5) - I don't really know but the jump here didn't flow good to me espacially since it's
   1/4. Consider making it closer it's just so hard to react so fast espacially since it's not really often
   in the map. When I played I just felt like "dafuq that was 1/4 x.x" Oh.. that is a mistake.. Yeah the previous slider should be 1/4~ Fixed.
   If you don't change fix atleast the stack with 00:17:269 (2) -
   
3. 00:30:340 (3,4) - Triplets could fit here way better since the beat at 00:30:555 - and 00:30:983 -
   should be clicked for a better emphasis on the strong sound of the vocals. Hmm.. I think reverse sliders is also fit here.. Not so bad huh~
   
4. 00:40:733 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The angle here flows and looks kinda weird to me. Consider chaning it
   into a curve. Similar reason as above~ In fact I found lkx made something similar with me... But not so necessary to change the stream.. After all it's a hard work..
   
5. 00:59:912 (1,1,1,1) - The curve isn't a real curve. Consider using convert slider to stream for these.
   (Same goes for the others curved like this) Yeah you found it.. But not so important here.. When playing the curve is hard to found not a true curve..
   
6. 01:13:626 (1,1,1,1) - It's actually pretty hard to read this 1/6 stuff even with a curve. So please
   don't do stuff like this since I was like wtf is this. Always missed the last note on these. Consider
   changing them into a line or a curve for better readabilty. It just read weird for me. Yeah, I got it.. I stacked them..
   
7. 01:41:697 (1) - Lower the curve a bit for better flow. Fixed, better for now.
   
8. 02:08:697 (4) - Move this down for a bit for better flow and to avoid the overlap with 02:07:840 (2) - Fixed, better for now.
   
9. 02:12:126 (5) - Add a note here since the vocals are so strong here. That should be mapped. Hmm..I think I have a note here?
   
10. 02:17:055 (1,1,1,1) - How about replacing with a CTRL+H;+J;+G version for better flow? Would also fit
    the structure of your map way better You are right, fixed. Though I remember I made this on purpose...
11. Nice diff! Thank you!

Mao wrote:

Hard

• 
  Well, I don't know. The hard has way too much 1/4 for my taste and some even for me hard readable things.
  Going to point some of the major flow issues I noticed out. Hmm... Maybe... lol

1. 00:02:912 (3,4) - The transition from the slider to the circle curve feels weird. That may be the
   fault of the 1/4 slider which doesn't really fit here since the blue tick should be emphasized. I'd
   suggest to change 00:02:912 (3,4) - to a triplet for better flow. No.. Sorry, I don't want too many triplets in Hard diff.. And I think the slider and flow is fine here~
   
2. 00:10:412 (5) - CTRL+G for some cool flow? Sorry.. I can't fine the reason here to change the flow...
   
3. 00:15:126 (3,4) - That felt so weird to me since you have to click on a blue tick which was pretty
   confusing. It's the fault of 00:14:697 (2) - since the whole transition in this part is so weird.
   Consider rearranging everything and change the timeline as seen in the Screenshot below. Sorry.. I think here the hit on the blue tick is from the music and I just followed it.. A double-hit here would be a little hard for the diff.. And I don't like chaning the reverse slider into a normal slider.
   
   Screenshot

   
   This would increase the flow by a lot!
   
4. 00:21:555 (2,3,4) - Same here. 00:21:555 (2) - isn't really needed and breaks the flow for me. Sorry.. Same reason as above...
   
5. 00:25:412 (4,5,6) - That rhythm doesn't fit. Consider changing it as I did in the screenshot. Yes, fixed.
   
   Screenshot

   
6. 01:22:197 (4,5) - I don't know if that is actually a good idea in a hard diff x-x Consider replacing
   it with a triplet. Just my opinion though. Yes, fixed.
   
7. 01:22:412 (5) - Split into 1/2 slider and circle for a better emphasis on the big white tick. Fixed, though I made it on purpose when mapping....
   
   Screenshot

   
8. 01:42:983 (4) - Reduce distances here for better flow. Sorry, the blanket needs the distance and I think is ok~
   
9. 02:02:269 (1) - Rhythm could be better here, take a look at the Screenshot below! Sorry.. I want to keep the symmetry...
   
   Screenshot

   
10. 02:14:269 (1,2,3) - These feel out of place to me. You didn't use sliders like this once over the rest
    of your map. Why do you use them now? Inconsistency is bad :c I'm so sorry.. but changing here needs more work and that's not that bad....
    
11. 02:18:769 (3) - Same as I said for the previous one. Still just my opinion~ Fixed.

Normal is perfect. Good luck! :3 Thank you!

Mao wrote:

Rolantics' Easy

1. 00:48:555 (1) - Make this slider symmetrical. Better maybe .. But hard to get it better..
2. 01:40:840 (3) - Distance to the next object is too low. May confuse newbies. Hmm? Still 1.20x
3. 01:41:697 (1) - Symmetry :c Sorry.. Maybe better for now
4. 01:58:840 (1) - ^ Better for now I guess.. but hard to totally make a symmetry slider.
5. Just some small Symmetry Issues here and there c: I see..

Hinsvar wrote:

Hello; modding here! Hi~!

*Bolded = Unrankable or very, very strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.

>Rolantics' Easy

1. Uh wait, two spaces between the two words of the diff's name? lol Fixed
2. 00:02:269 (2,2) - The circle is overlapped by the slider, making it look kinda weird. Try to move the circle so it won't touch the slider? fixed
3. 00:09:126 (2,2) - ^ fixed
4. 00:21:126 (1) - Add a finish? I'm sure there is a heavy instrument sound that fits with the finish here. fixed
5. 00:34:840 (1) - ^ fixed
6. 00:47:697 (3,1) - These notes are touching each other a little, making this pattern look a bit messed up. Not a big deal, though; just thought that it might be good to say it. fixed
7. 00:56:269 (1) - I believe that making this slider curved like this can improve the flow from 00:57:126 (1). fixed
8. 01:13:412 (4) - What about adding a whistle to follow that instrument sound in the background? The instrument here is similar to 01:20:269 which has a whistle, anyway. fixed
9. 01:38:269 (1,2) - Same as 00:02:269 (2,2). fixed
10. 01:40:840 (3,1) - ^ fixed

>Hard

1. 00:03:983 (1,2) - The 1/1 beat gap between them feels unnatural due to the instrument sound at 00:04:197. Maybe add a circle there, stacked between the aforementioned objects, to solve this? Hmm.. I'd prefer leaving it blank..
2. 00:09:126 (1,2) - ^ ^
3. 00:14:483 (1,2,3,4) - Use 1.8x spacing between them (with (4) still on its current place)? The rhythm becomes pretty weird here, and a bigger spacing would really help in reading and playing this pattern. Try something like this?
   And maybe use a 1/4 slider to replace (4), to follow the instrument sound at 00:15:555, so it'll be consistent with 00:15:126 (3)'s rhythm?[/color] But here I don't think so..
4. 00:18:555 (3,4) - Ctrl+G for the rhythm? I think the instrument at 00:18:662 is more notable than 00:18:769, so why map the latter tick than the former? Yes, fixed
5. 00:21:126 (1,2,3,4) - Same as 00:14:483 (1,2,3,4). Yes, fixed
6. 00:25:412 (4,5,6) - Same as 00:18:555 (3,4,5). Fixed in previous mod
7. 00:40:840 (3) - Move the node on the tail to (408,212)? The tail of this slider will point 00:41:697 (1)'s head more straightly, and that looks neater, IMO. Yes, fixed
8. 01:03:126 (1) - I personally think this NC is unnecessary because 01:03:126 (1,2) is still a part of the 01:02:269 (1,2) pattern. Sorry but I like the NC
9. 01:16:840 (1) - ^ ^
10. 01:45:555 (2) - What about making the rhythm look like this? You skipped a very noticeable vocal at 01:45:769, and it just feels weird to hit 01:46:305 (3) with a 3/4 beats of gap between this and the slider. Yes, fixed
11. 01:51:126 (3) - Move the node on the tail to (240,96), for the same reason as 00:40:843 (3)? Yes, fixed
12. 01:54:555 (3) - Make it curved like this for a better flow? Sorry I don't like the flow..
13. 01:59:697 (3,4,5,6) - Uhm, I think these notes are a little too crowded. Make them spaced as big as 01:59:483 (2,3), at least? But the space is already bigger than usual..
14. 02:11:483 (2) - Move to (476,28) to, again, make the flow better? Yes, fixed
15. 02:17:269 (5,1) - I somehow feel that the combo pattern will follow the music's rhythm better if you're swapping the NC here... Yes, fixed
16. 02:33:983 (5) - Move the node on the tail to (312,68) so this slider will follow the flow of 02:33:126 (1,2,3,4) and it'll look neater combined with the other visible objects here? Yes, fixed

>Insane

1. I just realized something: This song has a lot of instrument sounds and vocals on the red ticks, so why not using slider tick rate 2 to support that (also for all the other diffs)? It'd also really help in differentiating 3/4 and 1/1 sliders in this diff, as they're somewhat hard to distinguish without any tick on the sliders as a hint.
2. 00:12:555 (1,2,3) - Since there's still an instrument being played at 00:12:769, how about this rhythm? It feels far more natural and comfortable while playing, and it just feels weird to skip 00:12:983, which has a quite noticeable instrument voice. Don't worry about players being confused of 1/6 and 1/4 stacked streams; the difference is pretty noticeable. Hmm.. I support your idea
3. 00:15:126 (3) - Not really sure if I'm right, but I think it's supposed to end at 00:15:269 (a 1/3 tick)... Maybe..not..?
4. 00:17:269 (2) - ^ ^
5. 00:24:126 (10) - ^^
6. 00:27:447 - Since the instrument here is still relatively noticeable, how about adding a circle here to connect the 00:26:912 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) stream? That would be too hard...
7. 00:31:412 (1,2,3) - This is very tricky since their spacing is visually the same, but due to the high AR, it's very hard to know that they are spaced differently rhythm/timeline-wise. You may want to consider to do some rearrangement. Yes, fixed
8. 00:32:483 - Same as 00:27:447. Yes, fixed
9. 00:39:555 - Add a finish here since the instrument is pretty heavy? Sorry I think I have added finish on previous notes and that fits more.
10. 00:59:912 (1,1,1,1) - I think it's still too hard to read them as circles snapped on 1/6 ticks even with all the NCs due to the spacing. Make the spacing even lower (0.6x), maybe? I find it far easier to read this short stream like that. Yes, fixed(Applies to similar cases.)
11. 01:21:554 (1,2) - What about reversing (Ctrl+G) them, then move (2) to (234,264) to form a triangle between 01:21:554 (1,2,3)? This will make (1) stacked below 01:21:126 (3), and I just feel... that this is more comfortable than the current pattern. Sorry I think here the pattern is not so bad..
12. 01:48:983 - Since the instrument is strong here, what about using a finish to emphasize that? Same reason as above said..
13. 01:49:840 - ^ ^
14. 02:11:912 (4) - Add one more repeat to follow the vocal? Plays far, FAR better, IMO. Skipping the vocal at 02:12:126 just doesn't feel right at all. Yes, fixed,that's a mistake.. Thank you!
15. 02:20:590 (9) - Eh, I'm not sure why, but removing this makes me hit the circles here better. Probably because the instrument here is not too noticeable compared to the other instrument sounds... Sorry I don't think so...
16. 02:34:305 (9) - ^ ^

>Shore's Insane

1. Use slider tick rate 2 for the same reason that I gave in Atrue's Insane diff? It'd also really help when reading sliders such as 00:51:983 (1,4), since it's very hard to read them as 1/1 sliders due to them slowing down. Yes, fixed
2. 00:06:983 (5,6) - Move them to (164,120) for a better flow? I personally feel kinda awkward when playing this because the cursor movement needed to move at 00:06:555 (4,5,6) is too strictly straight. Not a big deal, though, admittedly. That's not a big deal and I think lkx has his own flow.
3. 00:24:126 (3) - Unstack this from 00:23:697 (1) so the spacing between 00:23:590 (8,1) will stay the same, unaffected by the stacking? Not like to change it.. After all Stacking is a way to make the map more clear..
4. 00:27:126 - The instrument here is very noticeable, so it feels weird to just skip mapping it. Maybe remove 00:27:233 (3) and make a 1/4 slider at 00:27:126 - 00:27:233? Hmm... I think the beats is lkx's own?
5. 00:34:840 - I think a Normal sampleset with a finish is too outstanding here. Just use the Auto sampleset (which means reverting to Soft)? It blends nicely with the instrument here, better than when using Normal. Yes, fixed
6. 00:37:412 (4,5) - Since you have a lot of 1/4 stacks, it might be tricky to read this 1/2 stack... Just saying. Hmm.. I don't think so.. Here is not so hard to read.
7. 01:45:126 - Same as 00:34:840. Yes, fixed
8. 01:47:697 (4,1) - The slight overlap between the two sliders doesn't look appealing, IMO. Try to move them out from each other? But kinda hard to move them I think..
9. 02:25:197 (3,4) - Try reversing (Ctrl+G) them? It plays better for me, for some reason. Probably because the current flow at 02:24:555 (1,2,3) is a little too rigid/straight... Ctrl+G is also not so good in my opinion, but lkx may has his own flow..
10. 02:36:792 (1,2,1,2) - You may want to play with the spacing here, because the spacing here is visually equal, but the time gap between these notes are very different. It's very confusing to play right now. Maybe you intended to create a trap here or something, but I'd say that it's not really recommended. But I don't know how to fix it...

Well, that's it. The map's pretty good, and both Insane diffs are fun, too! Thank you!

Good luck on the way :D

Thanks for the mod and star!

EmingK wrote:

At让我试图，我随便说了一嘴结果建议我来骗kd，我觉得这样不太好，送个mod好了。 因为你说了一句话让我好久没有解决的问题有了缓解，一句话能顶十句

This post is generated by EK's osu modpost generator. 这么高霸上

Red=unrankable issue
Purple=Emphasis suggestion
Black=Suggestion
Gray=Feel free to ignore

[Insane]
全是原地或者小间距串，柑橘是要送DT啊 good~
kiai的1/6略坑，建议先放上一到两个折返让玩家读一下节奏 就是这句话
00:02:912 (3) - 不1/6吗 好
00:18:126 (2) - 自己开25%听，一共是三个音，是1/4…… 再看看，我知道这里是三个音，但是你确定中间那个音在1/4线上么？另外这个我觉得还是保持连续性的感觉比较好
00:24:983 (2) - ^ ^
01:01:626 (4) - ^ 洗老嗷嗷一~ 我是这么感觉的，所以再看
00:20:269 (9,10) - 建议改成单点空1/4加1/2滑条，因为后面的音拖长音，折返到末尾的清脆音效不适合歌曲。 嗯。。你说的有一定道理，但是我的理解是这两组音是相互对应的，如果要map到一起不能说错，我个人感觉不喜欢。音效我觉得还好吧……吧……
01:41:162 (6) - overmap 额。。节奏的对称的感觉吧，况且我觉得没有因为这个note而让梗变难了很多，反而要是1/2单点会觉得做成跳
01:47:269 (2) - 我觉得还是这个01:40:412 (2,3) - 节奏好 嗯。。很难说我这里用的节奏比前边好还是不好，我觉得不怎么想弄成完全一样的节奏。。
01:47:269 (2) - ^ ^
00:27:983 (1) - 尾部1/6 snap大丈夫？ yeah~
01:00:555 (1,2) - 我菊得这flow好 E嗯。。会不会感觉像是割开了那个三角形啊。。

图

01:18:126 (2) - 怎么感觉像上面没地方摆了一样，不顺啊 fixed
01:20:697 (4,1) - 歪了吧hhh 差不多惹
01:57:126 (1,2,3,4) - 对称对称 好
00:37:412 (3) - 尾巴音效拿掉啊 好
01:45:983 (3) - ^ 这里之所以没有用S:C3是因为跟前边那段对应，这里的歌词假名是一个延长的音
00:55:840 (4,6,8,11) - 建议换地鼓，通鼓声音太闷
02:06:126 (4,6,8,11) - ^ 这两个地方是后边三个note改了，第一个通鼓没有改，我觉得这样可能比全是地鼓好



[Easy]
这diff建议扔了= = 饶了gder吧，毕竟也是同学
00:44:269 (3) - Ctrl+G再移移位 g了，位置好像不怎么用动啊
01:19:412 (3) - +EZ出界了 改了，虽然其实不用考虑加mod的说
02:34:412 (1) - 转盘结尾跟其他diff不一样 问题不大，我觉得好像其他diff都不一样。。再看

GL 谢E神mod~~

Andrea wrote:

I remember this mapset had 5 difficulties but now by looking I only see 4.

Did you remove 1 difficulty or it's a mistake? Please tell me, so I will mod this.

Andrea wrote:

Hmm okay, I see.

I'll check this tomorrow then, stay tuned!

1. Your current background have really weird dimensions, please resize it properly.
2. Use same colours on all of the difficulties if possible.
3. Disable the Widescreen Support on all of the difficulties, it's not necessary.

1. Settings are kinda too high for the easiest difficulty of the mapset, reduce everything by 1 tick please. Circle Size is fine already, I mean only OD HP and AR.

1. 00:05:697 (2,3) - Snapping went wrong here I guess, end these sliders on white tick please.
2. 00:57:126 (1) - This circle is too soon after spinner for a Normal, do something about it.
3. 02:07:412 (1) - Same as above, better if you just extend the spinner until here and remove both circles.

1. 00:15:983 (1) - Not a big fan of this anti-jump to be honest, I would do something else here.
2. 00:22:840 (1) - Same as above.
3. 02:12:555 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This pattern feels kinda too tricky for a Hard difficulty imo, I'd change it.
4. 02:36:792 (1) - This spinner sounds better if it ends at 02:38:597.

1. Increase HP Drain by 1 tick to balance with the difficulty settings.

1. 02:25:840 (5,1) - This spacing here feels too close to me, I'd move them a bit.
2. 02:36:792 (1) - Same spinner comment like Hard difficulty.

Andrea wrote:

~General~

1. Your current background have really weird dimensions, please resize it properly. Fixed~
2. Use same colours on all of the difficulties if possible. Yea XD
3. Disable the Widescreen Support on all of the difficulties, it's not necessary. Ok~

~ZZH & KwaN's Normal~

1. Settings are kinda too high for the easiest difficulty of the mapset, reduce everything by 1 tick please. Circle Size is fine already, I mean only OD HP and AR. Ok.

1. 00:05:697 (2,3) - Snapping went wrong here I guess, end these sliders on white tick please. Yeah.. Maybe a mistake XD
2. 00:57:126 (1) - This circle is too soon after spinner for a Normal, do something about it Fixed both spinners..
3. 02:07:412 (1) - Same as above, better if you just extend the spinner until here and remove both circles.

~Hard~

1. 00:15:983 (1) - Not a big fan of this anti-jump to be honest, I would do something else here. Stacked with the note 4
2. 00:22:840 (1) - Same as above. Stacked with the note 4
3. 02:12:555 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - This pattern feels kinda too tricky for a Hard difficulty imo, I'd change it. Changed for a new easier pattern.
4. 02:36:792 (1) - This spinner sounds better if it ends at 02:38:597. Sure~

~Shore's Insane~

1. Increase HP Drain by 1 tick to balance with the difficulty settings. Yes, fixed

~Insane~

1. 02:25:840 (5,1) - This spacing here feels too close to me, I'd move them a bit. Yep~ I moved 4,5 a bit away and it should be better now~ XD
2. 02:36:792 (1) - Same spinner comment like Hard difficulty. Yes~ Got it~

Really cool map, call me back!

1. 00:57:983 (2) - Consider adding a NC here, since this note follows a spinner.
2. 02:08:269 (2) - Same as above.

1. I forgot to mention this before but increase HP Drain by 1 tick on this difficulty as well to balance the difficulty settings.

Andrea wrote:

~ZZH & KwaN's Normal~

1. 00:57:983 (2) - Consider adding a NC here, since this note follows a spinner.
2. 02:08:269 (2) - Same as above.

~Insane~

1. I forgot to mention this before but increase HP Drain by 1 tick on this difficulty as well to balance the difficulty settings.

Let me know ^^

Andrea wrote:

Everything seems good to me now :3

Bubbled~

IamKwaN wrote:

為毛不讓我們改 老實說我討厭這樣sad

1. 00:12:662 (1) - It's pretty weird that end a slider on blue tick here
2. 00:12:662 (1) - Start this from red tick but not blue
3. 00:49:412 (2,3) - heard weird here : 00:50:483 (3) - should be stopped on red tick if you choose to follow vocal, or started from white tick if you follow drum
4. 00:53:697 (3,4,5) - two 1/1 sliders is better than current i think
5. 01:14:269 (2) - move NC to here?
6. 02:22:840 (3,4) - i think a 1/1 repeat slider is enough

Tsukuyomi wrote:

01:16:197 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这个地方太违和了，我之前不是跟你说过改成和前面一样吗01:02:269 (1,2,3,4) -
明明听着是一长串1/4却有空的节奏感觉很不好