1. I would rename the diff to Marathon or something like this. So, people will understand what to expect from the map!
2. I would disable letterboxes and the countdown. It's not like they fit with this song or needed here, anyway!
3. Since that a collab, put Collab and Collaboration to the tags.
4. Try to replace SoundCloud with something song related. I don't think that we should put name of this service to the tags.
   Note: why don't you add something like dubstep/broken beat o the tags instead? It might be much more helpful, imo.

1. Do you really want AR9 with 128 BPM song? It's pretty DTable, so I'd go with AR8. Anyway, you're better player than I am (much better ;_;), so it's up to you.
2. 00:27:033 (3,4) - personally, I think you should've mapped the beat on 00:27:267 - a triplet would make your patterns more consistent + it really fits with the piano.
3. 00:36:408 (3,4) - nazi - I would nazi your blankets, but it's a really minor thing and it doesn't matter because the whole map is amazing and this little thing is too hard to notice.
4. 00:55:861 (5) - it sounds TOTALLY different from the previos notes, so I would emphasize it with a new combo!
5. 01:22:814 - feel kinda sad about vocals and drums which are being ignored here.
   Note: and about the piano 01:32:892 - here. Same happens a few more time, for so awesome appers like you guys, it shouldn't take too much time to check your parts for similar mistakes.
6. 01:56:798 - do you know what's polarity? Well, it's an awesome thing + it'd work here, so, please, add a circle at 01:56:798 - to sync with vocals/piano!
7. 02:47:775 (3,5) - the DS looks tricky here, I'm sure that NCs on (3) and (5) would help players to go through this part easily.
8. 02:56:915 (4) - 04:04:298 (5) - there's no such thing as too many NCs! How about another new combo here to point out that transition between the stream and jumpy 1/4 sliders? Players might need it.
   Note: 03:50:705 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - uguu, pretty much the same. Stream with reduced spacing and 1/4 jump are in the same combo, which doesn't look so logical, huh? How about a new combo on (5)?
9. 04:28:908 (2,3,4) - kinda raging on you for using different DS in THE SAME combo for notes with THE SAME sound. Makes me sad, sorry.
10. 05:23:986 (6) - earlier that sound was mapped with a slider. Would like to see a slider here, as well. Sounds like a slider fits here better, try it!
    
    Everything is really well-mapped, except for a few very minor improvements which could be done, from my point of view!

Gabe wrote:

"Not this song again?!?"

1. 3000 ms Audio Lead-In feels kinda long - i'd reduse to 1500-1000.
2. Maybe mentiore at least in Creator's Words who made which part? Thought a little storyboard with mapper's names would be perfect here - i believe you can do it!

1. 00:03:136 (6,7,8) - Last 2 notes would be problem to catch since they starts at blue tick after quite fast 1/8 slider - this can be really big problem with double time or hidden, even with such low OD. I'd recommend to re-arrange rhythm a bit by adding note at 00:03:371 - to make it more intuitive to play - so, try this: (will sounds exactly same but will be much easier to catch)
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:06:945 (4,5,6) - Same goes here. Well, since this section was repeated several times i believe you can check & fix all of them by your own.
3. 00:06:965 (4) - This slider is wrongly snapped - it should be 1/6 instead (you may notice this later, at 04:31:271 (6) - starting this part sliders used correct beat snap division). There are lots of wrongly snapped sliders at this part, please resnap them properly
4. 00:15:558 (4) - Make it a bit more curmed for more smooth flow - something like this:
   
   
   SPOILER

   
5. 00:30:090 (1) - Try soft finish instead of whistle? Fits quite nice as for me since new part of song starts here.
6. 00:49:425 (2,3) - Both sliders feels quite unnatural to play. I'd replace them with circles instead
7. 01:13:215 (1) - Try soft finish instead of whistle? Fits quite nice as for me since new part of song starts here.
8. 01:20:363 (7) - Same, on tail
9. 01:28:215 (1) - Same, on head
10. 01:48:840 (1) - This llinear slider feels kinda random and doesn't fit previous pattern. Try to make it smoother, something like this:
    
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 01:54:465 (1,2,3,4) - This short 1/4 slider (2) makes next two notes very hard to catch. I would recommend continiue this section with notes, but if you really want to keep this, try to end this stream with slider instead - like this:
    
    SPOILER

    [img]
    http://puu.sh/88nw7.jpg[/img]
12. 02:20:715 - 02:26:340 - I think placing whistles here at this section directly following piano would be better than placing them only to white ticks - following piano would sounds more natural here.
13. 02:37:121 (7) - This 1/4 slider in the middle of the stream plays bad and doesn't fit the music at all. I'd recommend to replace with 2 notes instead
14. 02:56:925 (1,2,3,4,5) - This 1/4 sliderjump section plays kinda bad and does not feels right here. I would recommend keep consistent spacing here but slighty re-arrange placement, maybe something like this?
    
    
    SPOILER

    
15. 03:36:183 (3,4,5) - Noticeable stacking issue here (it also breaks osu! stacking and may confuse players, please fix that)
16. 03:50:011 (8) - Missing claps on repeats
17. 03:53:761 (5) - ^
18. 03:57:570 (6) - Missing claps again.
19. 04:14:621 (6) - This short 1/4 repeat does not flows nice and may confuse people this part (it is very easy to get 100 here) - i would recommend to simple replace it with notes.
20. 04:19:191 (4) - This slider should starts at 04:19:308 - to follow drums properly, linke this: (also having it on white tick instead of blue will made it much easier to catch)
    
    
    SPOILER

    
21. 04:22:121 (6) - Replacing with 2 notes would improve playability of this part
22. 04:48:381 (6) - Try to re-arrange it a bit for better flow - something like this:
    
    SPOILER

    [img]
    http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1511891[/img]
23. 05:41:350 (1) - Add finish to emphazire this part and remove whistle
24. 05:48:850 (1) - ^
25. 05:56:350 (1) - ^
26. 06:18:860 - Add fadeout spinner perhaps?

P A N wrote:

master of ebb and flow

1. 00:03:493 (7) - The beat in the music actually lands on 00:03:532 as in 1/6 beat spacing. Maybe you can try this sequence of objects to better represent the rhythm in the music: http://puu.sh/8d705.jpg It also plays more intuitively, as the clicks land on 1/2 ticks. Same thing at 00:10:993 (5)
2. 00:25:876 (7,8) - Should be 1/6 rhythm according to the music.
3. 00:27:048 (4,5) - Personally, I think it would be better to shorten (5) by a 1/4 tick and add a circle where the slider originally ended. This would match better with the rhythm of the song since it's similar to the parts where two 1/4 sliders were used, like 03:06:423 (3,4) to cover the same ticks. http://puu.sh/8da6p.jpg (It's also like the inverse of 00:27:751 (7,8,1) circle-slider-circle opposed to slider-circle-slider... which makes it cool xD) Same thing at 04:55:178 (4,5)
4. 00:44:274 (3,4) - I think it would look much better for these to be aligned straight with (2). I presume that these were placed this way to stack with 00:42:399 (5) which doesn't really seem important to me, since that note is long gone, so the stack is kind of meaningless. I'd much rather see (3,4) straight with (2) as it is better aesthetically at this particular moment.
5. 00:44:860 (7,1) - Just my opinion.. It may be nice to use larger spacing for strong emphasis on (1). This could be achieved by reversing (5,6,7).
6. 00:58:454 (1) - x:488|y:52 looks and flow better imo.
7. 02:53:180 (6,7,8) - Spacing between (7,8) should be smaller because the beat spacing is smaller. You should probably overlap (7,8) like this to prevent confusion, because with the current spacing, (6,7) is almost the same distance as (7,8).
8. 03:44:977 (1) - I feel that the player may be tempted to hit this early because of its small spacing in comparison to 03:43:688 (4,5) and because the sliders are in the same direction, which is often used in jumpy 1/4 slider patterns, which is not the case here. Therefore, I suggest reversing (6) for a direction change to clearly show the time spacing between the sliders.
9. 05:01:271 (6,7,8,9,1) - This really confused me the first time I played it, since the drums in the music are very clearly playing 1/6 beats, but you've mapped 1/4s. Consider changing it to 1/6 beats (it matches much better with the song, and it's not hard to read, since the player will easily be able to see that the note density is higher)

• 
  Cant see names without widescreen TwT hater =3=

1. 00:12:985 (1) - personally I'd prefer not to have a major beat like this on the tail like this, how about switching the emphasize like this?
   with a pattern like this o3o;
   Box

   
   Try it really plays better imo o3o
2. 00:24:235 (1) - Remove the NC here pls, by looking at your previous patterns it should be here o3o 00:24:470 (3) -
3. 01:00:798 (2) - Why you skip the nice piano beat TwT, maybe consider changing the rythm to this?:
   
   imo compliments the music better OAO
4. 01:15:329 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - How about this kind of symmetry:
   Box

   
   imo it flows alot better than the current owo and it also flows nicely into the next one o3o, tho you have to move 01:13:220 (1) - around 59|214 so that this note 01:14:626 (4) - can be centered for a nice stack with the pattern I gave you above.
5. 02:53:825 (8) - Maybe move this a bit closer to the previous slider, It might be a bit suprising as this is a 1/8 note and it has visually the same spacing as the 1/4 just before this right here 02:53:180 (6,7) - so it might be better to move it a bit closer o3o
6. 03:07:126 (5) - How about ctrl+G o-o? fits more with the pattern and there is no worries with the spacing cuz of the leniency this practically is a circle.
7. 04:36:428 (2,3) - Ctrl+G flows a lot more naturally cuz of the curve of (1) afterwards 04:36:779 (4,5) - CTRL+G this or not both are fine imo
8. 05:30:803 (2) - a bit uncomfortable cuz of the countering curve how about this:
   
   Box

   
9. 05:34:318 (3,4) - How about a blanket =w=? looks visually better imo o3o:
   
   Box

   
   Well yeah short mod cuz map is very cool =w=b

1. Very Clean

1. 00:31:032 (6,2) - Nazi* Can you stack both better please? (Move this slider 00:31:970 (2) - to X:395 Y:192.
2. 00:31:970 (2,1) - same here.
3. 01:32:790 (6,7) - ^
4. 02:57:165 (2,1) - ^
5. 00:54:821 (2,3) - the first time I played it I caused a bit of confusión since didn't some similar pattern previously, imo is better if you move this circle 00:54:821 (2) - to X:288 Y:128 looks quite ideal.
6. 01:06:071 (2) - delete this circle is unnecesary since in this part doesn't sound something in the background.
7. 05:34:201 (2) - ^
8. 02:09:001 (7,1) - I think a triple here flows much better, maybe just me.
9. 03:14:391 - missing clap here, sounds nice if you add one.
10. 03:16:266 (5) - ^ is much better clap than whistle.
11. 03:19:548 (3) - ^ 03:21:891 - ^ 03:23:766 (4) - ^ 03:25:290 - ^ 03:25:641 - ^ 03:27:516 (7) - ^
12. 05:08:303 (4) - the rhythm of this slider is a bit strange to me, it doesn't follow the music, the best solution would be to shorten the same to the previous tick and so therefore add a note here 05:08:654 - and 05:08:771 -
13. 05:21:545 (3) - ^ same reason about the rhythm, try something like this:
    
    Example

    

Gero wrote:

Approve this now :<