No, it was because Caligno has the best role and scummy people are afraid of him.Gumica wrote:
Hi, I just came online. And, wtf is this waggoning already. Did I miss a valid reason (not including best role vote reason)
Nyquill wrote:
implying hopping on a suggested wagon is not helping start discussion
Bad at reacting a wagon? Shit more like analyzing you opportunist. You seem do act before you even think. Now that someone is suspicious of you, you decided to go for them. How nice.Nyquill wrote:
How the fuck do you read intentions this badly?
This. You have never responded Sakura's question, by the way. Why are you not okay with randomly putting people at L-1 at the beginning of the game? These votes will be changed soon enough anyway, and stuff like this generates discussion.Raging Bull wrote:
vote dake
Omgus.
And sakura go be bad somewhere else.
You must think I'm rather shallow to act on a wagon at L-4.Raging Bull wrote:
Bad at reacting a wagon? Shit more like analyzing you opportunist. You seem do act before you even think. Now that someone is suspicious of you, you decided to go for them. How nice.Nyquill wrote:
How the fuck do you read intentions this badly?
Nah i rather discuss thisGumica wrote:
Vote: CalignoBot
discuss
Hmm, his meta where he OMGUS's like heck? that seems to be the basis for his vote, but he doesn't even bother mentioning it, nor aggresively attacks CB, he just votes and says "Discuss!"Nyquill wrote:
more importantly, what do you think about his meta.
I see... then Vote: Gumica. Tips like that will be really usefulTanzklaue wrote:
why would you unvote? now your vote is useless zexion. go vote someone!
Considering if you both are town he has no way of knowing due to your scummy play, why is he a better target for your vote instead of the people that have played with you before?Gumica wrote:
Then go ahead, but beware as you'd be next in lynchorder if you're wrong.
As about Zexion, I've never played him, yes, but is that a reason not to confront him?
That's more OMGUS right? I personally dislike that kind of votes so that's why I joined your wagon, I find that somewhat scummy.Gumica wrote:
"everyone always thinks Gumica is scum anyways." -Sakura
right. my meta is omgus level gameplay. deal with it.
Unvote; Vote: Zexion
Because you're scum and you'd rather avoid direct confrontation with people that have played with you before. Which is something i'm forcing you to engage on like we're doing now.Gumica wrote:
Better question to you is; Why wouldn't he be a better target than anyone else?
Actually you voted CB out of OMGUS, because there was no other reasoning for your vote and he was voting you. The game has quite some info for a while, why did you try to make a vote on CB and shrug it off as RVS instead of playing with said info?Gumica wrote:
There is a fail in your argument. I voted CB out of RVS, not cause of an omgus. But i did a OMGUS on you.
Yep, you didn't vote CB in a OMGUS way, I read that due to Nyquill and Sakura saying it, so I assumed you would do it again.Gumica wrote:
There is a fail in your argument. I voted CB out of RVS, not cause of an omgus. But i did a OMGUS on you.
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... d_You_SuckZexion wrote:
Yep, you didn't vote CB in a OMGUS way, I read that due to Nyquill and Sakura saying it, so I assumed you would do it again.Gumica wrote:
There is a fail in your argument. I voted CB out of RVS, not cause of an omgus. But i did a OMGUS on you.
BTW since I'm still a newbie at this I'm not sure if I am using the terms correctly, please tell me if I do a mistake.
Yeah, and you've been provoked for a while, so why try to cover up your vote on CB as RVS (which also means it's OMGUS to begin with), your playstyle isn't going to make you hide your actions and motives, at least not from me.Gumica wrote:
Lol, but you should've known already that I only write actively like this when i'm provoked. And why such a wild accusation so early?
scum hunting isn't something limited to later stages of day 1 and beyond. at all stages there might be scum showing.Gumica wrote:
Lol, but you should've known already that I only write actively like this when i'm provoked. And why such a wild accusation so early?
god fucking stop being a bitch man.Gumica wrote:
OK, do it. Convice somebody, then I'll commence victory selfhammer (but you'll deal with Tanz afterwads, not me)
I don't really know anything about metas yet, but I'm pretty sure you shouldn't be assuming inexperience as a scummy play.Tanzklaue wrote:
zexion looks scummy due to inexperience really.
gumica might be real scum. he is at L-2 right?
Yeah forgot about that wiki, thanks!Sakura wrote:
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Oh_My_God_You_Suck
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... ng_as_TownGumica wrote:
OK, do it. Convice somebody, then I'll commence victory selfhammer (but you'll deal with Tanz afterwads, not me)
Here's your post here where you threaten to self-hammer:Gumica wrote:
lol ok, fine. watch me. cry when lylo starts now. unless of course, you are a scum as well.
Unvote
Vote: Gumica
===[]
inb4 I point out GiF & Nav scumteam
Then since we aren't falling for your bluff you decide to self vote instead putting yourself at L-1:Gumica wrote:
OK, do it. Convice somebody, then I'll commence victory selfhammer (but you'll deal with Tanz afterwads, not me)
Which not only is quite different from a self hammer it's an obvious attempt at AtE because you're previous bluff wasn't working.Gumica wrote:
btw.. thanks for linking me something I already know. But why did you send it? You tought I was town so I'd be stupid? I doubt so from the posts you wrote moments ago. That would mean I'm scum right?
Gamble it Sakura. It's on you.
Unvote; Vote: Gumica [L-1] If I'm correct.
If he is town then he should learn from his mistakes not repeat them in hopes to be read as town.Tanzklaue wrote:
we're 24 hours into the day, ending it now would be... well shitty.
sakura you're sure that gumica isn't just reall really bad at mafia?
well true, but sometimes bad players will stay bad players no matter what *cough* setsuen *cough cough*Sakura wrote:
If he is town then he should learn from his mistakes not repeat them in hopes to be read as town.Tanzklaue wrote:
we're 24 hours into the day, ending it now would be... well shitty.
sakura you're sure that gumica isn't just reall really bad at mafia?
If you were trying to actually be a good townie I would consider it, but each of your posts make me feel more right about you, so if you're town how about you stop proving me right and start proving me wrong.Gumica wrote:
@Tanz; not bad; just sick of this shitty 1vN players, so I'm generaly oriented anti-town
@Sakura; Gamble it.
But wasn't Tanz rage directed towards you?Gumica wrote:
LOLOLOLOLO. What I meant with "deal with Tanz" is his rage, like he did in that other game I selfhammered.
yes, which is why this is hilarious.Zexion wrote:
But wasn't Tanz rage directed towards you?Gumica wrote:
LOLOLOLOLO. What I meant with "deal with Tanz" is his rage, like he did in that other game I selfhammered.
So? That doesn't change your alignment.Gumica wrote:
@zex; it was, that's why i'm telling sakura to deal with it.
And interesting fact is, i perform AtF irl too on a everyday basis. Maybe you should know that for the future games
And what has such mentaility gotten you?Gumica wrote:
Oho, so that's how it is? Maybe you shouldnt be such pricks. It's from you guys directly that i developed this mentality to be anti-town. Ever since that game when i was mafia onward. With that, I' finishing for today. Cya in 18h "guys"
What question? I generally do not like it because scum can just randomly hammer on something like this. People voting for L-2 L-1 is enough for me to get suspicious.rEdo wrote:
This. You have never responded Sakura's question, by the way. Why are you not okay with randomly putting people at L-1 at the beginning of the game? These votes will be changed soon enough anyway, and stuff like this generates discussion.Raging Bull wrote:
vote dake
Omgus.
And sakura go be bad somewhere else.
He was already voting gumica, im surprised fake hammers still work.Tanzklaue wrote:
so what your're getting at is that you didn't hammer gumica with your vote?