ok vig everyone except you then
ohSephibro wrote:
sarcasm
SINCE MY ROLE IS DISABLED, SAKURA OBVIOUSLY TOOK THE SURPRISE LYLO INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DESIGNING THE SETUP. GIF'S DAYVIG SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RESTRICTION AS MINE. SINCE HE DIDN'T CLAIM IT, THIS POST MEANS HE'S TRYING TO SPREAD MIST AND USE THE DAYVIG FOR TOWNCRED.GuyInFreezer wrote:
Scum dayvig saves his shot until LyLo.
Nope. I don't have that restriction.pieguy1372 wrote:
CLAIM: 1-SHOT EXECUTIONER. MY ROLE GETS DISABLED WHEN THERE ARE 5 OR LESS PEOPLE LEFT.SINCE MY ROLE IS DISABLED, SAKURA OBVIOUSLY TOOK THE SURPRISE LYLO INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DESIGNING THE SETUP. GIF'S DAYVIG SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RESTRICTION AS MINE. SINCE HE DIDN'T CLAIM IT, THIS POST MEANS HE'S TRYING TO SPREAD MIST AND USE THE DAYVIG FOR TOWNCRED.GuyInFreezer wrote:
Scum dayvig saves his shot until LyLo.
DIE
VOTE: GUYINFREEZER
Oh yes I do.Sephibro wrote:
gif if you flip red you win the failclaim award you know that right
ROLES WERE ROLLED BEFORE ALIGNMENTS. IF THE PERSON WHO GETS THIS ROLE ROLLS SCUM, TOWN HAS NO WAY TO WIN. THIS ROLE IS IMPOSSIBLE GIVEN THE WAY THE SETUP WAS DESIGNED.GuyInFreezer wrote:
remember this?GuyInFreezer wrote:
wait a minute. I think my eyes are deceiving me...
Let me reread my role PM
HOLY FUCKING SHIT I'M NOT A 1-SHOT DAYVIG I'M A FULL DAYVIG LMAO
(my execute ends day, so if anyone has an objection, speak now or forever hold your peace)So does me shooting within 24 hours of deadline.
they can both force surprise LYLOs if scum gets themTanzklaue wrote:
executioner and dayvig are two different pair of shoes though.
executioner can kill someone as soon as he has halfway to majoritySephibro wrote:
how does execute work
Think.pieguy1372 wrote:
they can both force surprise LYLOs if scum gets themTanzklaue wrote:
executioner and dayvig are two different pair of shoes though.
with my role, they just hold the shot till LYLO, pile a bunch of votes on someone, and use it
Sakura is obviously planning around this and should have given GIF the same restriction as me
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
bakaGuyInFreezer wrote:
Think.
If I am scum, that means scum has a double kill.
Do you think that's balanced?
In fact, the fact that there is no restriction on my kill confirms that I am town.
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
Sakura wrote:
Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.Raging Bull wrote:
@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?
This "mist" can be solved easily if I kill someone tomorrow.pieguy1372 wrote:
bakaGuyInFreezer wrote:
Think.
If I am scum, that means scum has a double kill.
Do you think that's balanced?
In fact, the fact that there is no restriction on my kill confirms that I am town.
this is exactly why your claim is impossible. ROLES WERE ROLLED BEFORE ALIGNMENTS. SAKURA WOULD NEVER PUT A ROLE LIKE THIS IN THIS GAME WHEN IT HAS A CHANCE TO ROLL SCUM AND FUCK EVERYBODY OVER
What would you do if I flip exactly as I claimed?pieguy1372 wrote:
YOU ARE PUSHING AN ANGLE THAT YOUR ROLE CONFIRMS YOU AS TOWN DESPITE THE FACT THAT SAKURA HAS EXPLICITLY SAID THAT'S NOT HOW THE SETUP WAS DESIGNED
you won'tGuyInFreezer wrote:
What would you do if I flip exactly as I claimed?pieguy1372 wrote:
YOU ARE PUSHING AN ANGLE THAT YOUR ROLE CONFIRMS YOU AS TOWN DESPITE THE FACT THAT SAKURA HAS EXPLICITLY SAID THAT'S NOT HOW THE SETUP WAS DESIGNED
nopeTanzklaue wrote:
pieguy, you're tunneling too much.
Ssh. Don't ruin the fun.CalignoBot wrote:
This is town pie.
the flaw is that this is rolemadness and that similiar roles don't have to have the same restrictions.pieguy1372 wrote:
nopeTanzklaue wrote:
pieguy, you're tunneling too much.
tell me what's wrong with my logic. there's nothing changing the fact that GIF slipped about his supposed claim
it is, but i think he is tunneling on the wrong person.CalignoBot wrote:
This is town pie.
This is lame.pieguy1372 wrote:
you won'tGuyInFreezer wrote:
What would you do if I flip exactly as I claimed?
get fucked ~
except Sakura already said roles were rolled before alignments. she can't go back and nerf the role if a full dayvig rolls scumTanzklaue wrote:
the flaw is that this is rolemadness and that similiar roles don't have to have the same restrictions.
i'm sure if gif enrolled scum sakura would've nerfed the role in some way shape or form.
"THIS IS LAME"?GuyInFreezer wrote:
This is lame.
If you're gonna tunnel something, learn to not go back to your word.
Even if it's "impossible" for you, what would you do if I flip as I claimed?
"THIS IS LAME"?Who's scared?
WHO'S THE ONE WHO'S SCARED NOW
OKAY I AGREEGuyInFreezer wrote:
"THIS IS LAME"?Who's scared?
WHO'S THE ONE WHO'S SCARED NOW
You agree with my term and I self-vote. Deal or no?
ok so I'm apparently not supposed to have the 5-or-less-people restrictionlol
So will your 100% correct read on GIF.pieguy1372 wrote:
this is gonna end the day. is everyone ok with that
i'm not even using my tell on you so i'm not worried about thatGuyInFreezer wrote:
So will your 100% correct read on GIF.pieguy1372 wrote:
this is gonna end the day. is everyone ok with that
If I'm wrong on CB, feel free to switch to whoever CB suspects.GuyInFreezer wrote:
Inv/roleblock on one of {CB, Navizel, DD}
Doc on fery
Sephibro wrote:
fferyllt should know something btw
Yes I am.pieguy1372 wrote:
are you actually serious
pseudovote Navi
1. Just because we have a claimed guilty doesn't mean we should end the day immediately.pieguy1372 wrote:
1. why would that change anything? seems like you just forgot to vote your scum partner and had to make up some BS excuse to cover it
2. how'd you go from "this is town pie" on D1 to here? literally the only thing you said during my GIF push was "this is town pie". it was fencesitting at its finest and now you're backpedaling on it for no reason
1. that literally has nothing to do with my actual point. voting someone immediately != ending the day immediatelyCalignoBot wrote:
1. Just because we have a claimed guilty doesn't mean we should end the day immediately.
2. which reads make no sense? and you could have just asked me about my reads if you wanted to know more about them, but instead you claim they make "no sense" without explaining why. nice scumpainting attemptCalignoBot wrote:
2. Your attack on GIF looked really similar to how you attack as town, but look at how you've played D2 so far. Your reads make no sense. Your reason for sephibro being town makes no sense. Hell, your entire plan even makes no sense. The way you attacked GIF is closer to your town play, but when I look back at what you actually said, especially now with him flipping town, it makes a lot more sense from a scum perspective. The reason for attacking GIF is ridiculous, you deathtunneled on getting rid of a very strong town role, and now suddenly you have the game all figured out? It smells like shit.
it was a reaction test to see what Sephi would do in response to my cop "result". he followed along with it which is what I was looking for but at the same time he didn't actually vote bubba. I tried to pursue it a bit after his not-a-real-vote but he had already left so I couldn't get anything more from him.DakeDekaane wrote:
Also pieguy, explain your first pseudovote on bubba
do you really think i wouldn't abuse that if i were scum?DakeDekaane wrote:
btw, all the whining Sephi did D1 had town motivation, he can't be scum.