CalignoBot wrote:

Bubba's response to the wagon on him shows town motivation more than scum motivation

CalignoBot wrote:

, and he focused more on progressing discussion over trying to remove the wagon from himself.

CalignoBot wrote:

You acted like a spoiled child and actively played against your win condition. You ruined the game for basically everyone.

pieguy1372 wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Because he is a newbie is part of the reason why I think he's scum.

why do you think this reaction is indicative of newb-scum when you yourself offered yourself up for a PL after doing it?

Sephibro wrote:

sakura is it majority or plurality

pieguy1372 wrote:

it's not about the offer it's about the fact that you yourself think what you did is PL'able. so why are you so skeptical that a newb-town would pick up on it?

pieguy1372 wrote:

CalignoBot wrote:

Bubba's response to the wagon on him shows town motivation more than scum motivation

how?

CalignoBot wrote:

, and he focused more on progressing discussion over trying to remove the wagon from himself.

do you srsly think this is a towntell? scum wanna move the game out of RVS just as much as town does. and if you think he's trying to progress discussion, what do you make of him practically disappearing since then?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Scum dayvig saves his shot until LyLo.

Sephibro wrote:

only that?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

wait a minute. I think my eyes are deceiving me...
Let me reread my role PM

Sephibro wrote:

sarcasm

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Scum dayvig saves his shot until LyLo.

pieguy1372 wrote:

CLAIM: 1-SHOT EXECUTIONER. MY ROLE GETS DISABLED WHEN THERE ARE 5 OR LESS PEOPLE LEFT.

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Scum dayvig saves his shot until LyLo.

SINCE MY ROLE IS DISABLED, SAKURA OBVIOUSLY TOOK THE SURPRISE LYLO INTO ACCOUNT WHEN DESIGNING THE SETUP. GIF'S DAYVIG SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RESTRICTION AS MINE. SINCE HE DIDN'T CLAIM IT, THIS POST MEANS HE'S TRYING TO SPREAD MIST AND USE THE DAYVIG FOR TOWNCRED.

DIE

VOTE: GUYINFREEZER

Sephibro wrote:

gif if you flip red you win the failclaim award you know that right

GuyInFreezer wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

wait a minute. I think my eyes are deceiving me...
Let me reread my role PM

remember this?

HOLY FUCKING SHIT I'M NOT A 1-SHOT DAYVIG I'M A FULL DAYVIG LMAO

(my execute ends day, so if anyone has an objection, speak now or forever hold your peace)

Tanzklaue wrote:

executioner and dayvig are two different pair of shoes though.

Sephibro wrote:

how does execute work

pieguy1372 wrote:

Tanzklaue wrote:

executioner and dayvig are two different pair of shoes though.

they can both force surprise LYLOs if scum gets them

with my role, they just hold the shot till LYLO, pile a bunch of votes on someone, and use it

Sakura is obviously planning around this and should have given GIF the same restriction as me

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Think.
If I am scum, that means scum has a double kill.
Do you think that's balanced?

In fact, the fact that there is no restriction on my kill confirms that I am town.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

Sakura wrote:

Raging Bull wrote:

@mod Roles are non alignment indicative are they?

Roles were rolled before Alignment, neither role nor flavor can be used to determine alignment.

pieguy1372 wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Think.
If I am scum, that means scum has a double kill.
Do you think that's balanced?

In fact, the fact that there is no restriction on my kill confirms that I am town.

baka
this is exactly why your claim is impossible. ROLES WERE ROLLED BEFORE ALIGNMENTS. SAKURA WOULD NEVER PUT A ROLE LIKE THIS IN THIS GAME WHEN IT HAS A CHANCE TO ROLL SCUM AND FUCK EVERYBODY OVER

pieguy1372 wrote:

YOU ARE PUSHING AN ANGLE THAT YOUR ROLE CONFIRMS YOU AS TOWN DESPITE THE FACT THAT SAKURA HAS EXPLICITLY SAID THAT'S NOT HOW THE SETUP WAS DESIGNED

GuyInFreezer wrote:

pieguy1372 wrote:

YOU ARE PUSHING AN ANGLE THAT YOUR ROLE CONFIRMS YOU AS TOWN DESPITE THE FACT THAT SAKURA HAS EXPLICITLY SAID THAT'S NOT HOW THE SETUP WAS DESIGNED

What would you do if I flip exactly as I claimed?

Tanzklaue wrote:

pieguy, you're tunneling too much.

CalignoBot wrote:

This is town pie.

pieguy1372 wrote:

Tanzklaue wrote:

pieguy, you're tunneling too much.

nope

tell me what's wrong with my logic. there's nothing changing the fact that GIF slipped about his supposed claim

CalignoBot wrote:

This is town pie.

pieguy1372 wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

What would you do if I flip exactly as I claimed?

you won't

get fucked ~

Tanzklaue wrote:

the flaw is that this is rolemadness and that similiar roles don't have to have the same restrictions.

i'm sure if gif enrolled scum sakura would've nerfed the role in some way shape or form.

GuyInFreezer wrote:

This is lame.
If you're gonna tunnel something, learn to not go back to your word.

Even if it's "impossible" for you, what would you do if I flip as I claimed?

"THIS IS LAME"?
WHO'S THE ONE WHO'S SCARED NOW

GuyInFreezer wrote:

"THIS IS LAME"?
WHO'S THE ONE WHO'S SCARED NOW

Who's scared?
You agree with my term and I self-vote. Deal or no?

ok so I'm apparently not supposed to have the 5-or-less-people restriction

pieguy1372 wrote:

this is gonna end the day. is everyone ok with that

GuyInFreezer wrote:

pieguy1372 wrote:

this is gonna end the day. is everyone ok with that

So will your 100% correct read on GIF.