It's returned.
(I don't wanna ruin these patterns)
90% Nazimodding, 10% Actual big changes
Looking at the map itself, it plays smoothly and has no major flaws (at least i would say so) so I guess skipping to nazimodding works.
[Classic BD Challenge]
00:31:181 (7) - This overlaps 00:30:835 (5) - by a small amount, almost a pixel overlap, and looks bad (well in my eyes it looks bad).
00:33:488 (2,3,4) - Don't make perfect triangle, moving 00:33:835 (4) - to x:317 y:319 seems to work
00:41:104 (2) - I'm guessing this overlap of the last slider was on purpose, and it doesn't look as bad as the first, but its worth it to point out. (if it is 2.00 DS from previous and next note it almost doesn't overlap, which makes slider 5 only need a tiny adjustment to fix if you like)
00:59:796 (1,2) - Looks better if first is shifted to x:37 y:69 and second is x:64 y:196 (this might be the same) as the followpoint is directly in the middle of the middle notes and they are more equally spaced to the two notes next to them each.
01:00:719 (3,4) - Maybe there is an emphasis here, but on the first two notes before them at 01:00:488 (1,2) - . Feels weird to have the jumps before at note 1/2 in relation to the music (perfectly playable though)
01:13:873 (1) - This is DS 1.21 and all the others are 1.2, just had to point that out even though it seems equally spaced.
01:15:258 (5) - Shouldn't this be DS 3.24 away from the last slider? (and with the follow point still covering the last slider top). It would be double the DS and look better imo. x:259 y:135 if you want to try it out.
01:15:604 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This curves nicely but the sliders start doesn't fit the curve. I would continue the curve and make it lower.
01:16:988 (2) - x:161 y:277 for blanket
01:17:104 (3) - Likewise, x:332 y:291 to blanket last slider better.
01:18:950 (3) - Same thing as suggest before about the double DS. I think these may be on purpose now but yeah your choice. x:511 y:165 works.
01:26:335 (3) - Doesn't point directly at note 2. Would move the note to x:242 y:186 but changing the slider angle is fine too.
01:26:681 (4,7) - Not a proper stack!
01:40:181 (2,3) - Are these two 1.9DS apart on purpose? The others are all 1.7 (1.71 actually)
01:43:873 (5) - Not sure exactly how right now, but I would make this blanket the next notes better.
01:44:796 (5) - What's with this jagged, out of place note?
01:48:719 (3,4) - Move to x:137 y:73 for nice cleanliness
01:50:335 (1) - I thought this would be better as a straight note. As a curve it feels like its about to flow into another pattern or something like that.
01:51:373 (5,6,7,1) - Not exactly a great triangle. I know you can fix this easy.
02:04:758 (2) - Blankets nicer around x:388 y:231
02:20:796 (4) - Around x:144 y:224 instead for better triangle (that little spaced made my OCD cry)
02:21:258 (7,8) - Likewise, x:385 y:149
02:23:912 (1,2,3) - Isn't on follow-point, but its parallel. Probably on purpose.
02:33:258 (1,1,1) - I can read this perfectly well. Many are likely gonna try to kill ya for this (likely to see coming)
03:03:027 (2) - Make same DS from previous and next slider please <3
03:11:104 (1,2,3,4) - I would make these curve into that straight stream if possible to flow better.
03:31:181 (5) - better at x:233 y:269 (triangles!)
I swear you could put something from 03:34:412 - to 03:34:527 (1)
03:36:488 (5) - x:83 y:150 for OCD
03:47:912 (5,6,7) - Would make slighttttly more left to flow with last slider better.
04:37:527 (6,1) - I think the NC note is too far down to fit the curve of the last slider. Would make it slightly higher, but also make the last sliders whole combo shift slightly right (it suits imo)
04:57:604 (4) - x:203 y:236 (neater triangle)
05:21:027 (1) - Likewise, x:60 y:210
05:24:373 (6,7) - Could flow from the curve better, make it more left/down?
<3 Loved it, flowed really nice and patterns where awesome. Neat stuff.
(Maybe I should've boxed this mod, its long as hell)
gl getting this ranked!
