1. Advanced (3.03 stars, 328 notes)
2. Basic (2.02 stars, 145 notes)
3. Beginner (1.38 stars, 105 notes)
4. Extra (6.55 stars, 876 notes)
5. Extreme (4.79 stars, 551 notes)

Vainslay wrote:

Replied from #ModReqs

Basic My first thoughts was it was Easy, but it turned out to be normal ( I would think because of the ocassional sliders with 2 reverses, which caught me off guard)..
00:04:079 (1) - was this intentionally suppose to be a soft default hitsound? if you mean 00:07:192 - , then yeah.

Advance
00:24:313 (1) - this, I would a circle on the red tick instead of repeating slider, Thought it would be nice to > 00:25:445 (1,2) - cool

Extreme I liked Extreme the most actually, so I was a little bit more into it
00:14:692 (2) - I think it would be better if this was stack below 1, imo. It would emphasize the stop, space may seem really short to 00:15:116 (1) - though But you'll only have to move it slightly to make 2.0x distance space well I just would like to keep DS on 1/4's. so nope ;p
00:41:717 (1,2) - same here if you agree to ^
00:50:773 (1,2) - ^ all the same

00:34:218 (5,1,2) - I don't like this... The spacing.., move 3 or 4 Or...
00:34:360 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - then here you went to 1.0x spacing from 1.3x-ish from before, I don't think I minded if you change it to 1.3 for those notes cool.. I chose the latter, a bit easier to place
( I know here 00:29:832 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - is the same thing which was good because your sliders before hand didn't jump unlike at 00:33:794 (3,4,5) So perhaps you'll fix 3,4,and 5 if you want to keep the other notes after it on 1.0x)

01:40:721 (4) - imo, ctrl+g and pulling it up a little would be a bit better, not too much though Idk okay

Extra god streams like this are really scary I can't have too much say on this , because I can only follow it, not play it
00:06:343 (2) - putting this on the head of 3 would make a bit more sense I like what it is now ,and the same, the same
00:49:358 (2) - Ctrl+g this Please!, this is heavily my opinion though but it would be similar like this 00:48:509 (3,4) -
01:47:655 (4) - ^

Oh well, I thought I could help you more, but that's all I can see

Good luck!

Awaken wrote:

纸张mod来M4M

[Beginner]
00:44:547 (1) - 尾巴clap漏了？ 我想是
00:46:245 恩还有这里 应该和后面一样所以不加

[Basic]
00:44:547 (1) - 感觉可以做的扭曲一点233 然后滑条延伸到00:45:396 有意空开来的，这里加的话要很麻烦，看看别人怎么说
01:36:618 可以加note 也不容易误判 有意做个梗，滑条有DS也不是很难，看BAT怎么说
01:38:882 ^

[Advanced]
00:45:113 (2,3) - 分别ctrl+g flow我不是很喜欢
00:50:207 (4,5) - 建议离3远一点 打起来有点不爽啊.w. 能读 我觉得这也是个梗 如果bat不认为这个unrankable我就不改
01:09:026 (1,2) - 这么放是不是更好点 http://puu.sh/4Hkdl.jpg 丑
01:39:589 (1) - 这里用normalwhistle？ 和其他diff一致，不改
01:48:645 (2) - ^
01:52:324 (5) - 左移一点做正三角？ 好
02:02:229 (3) - 建议减少一个折返 然后叠一个note在后面的1上面 好
02:03:361 (3) - 建议减少一个折返 然后叠一个note在3的头 改了，但是没有stack，我倾向于善良

[Extreme]
感觉这diff名还有游戏里的diff顺序会误导难度 建议改成another
00:23:606 (1) - 和00:21:625 (4)的头stack？ 好……实际上也没啥意义了早就看不见了
00:25:870 (3,4,5,6) - 感觉像这样的都可以搞成四方跳._. 我知道惹你原来在为EX做准备 我觉得这四方跳反而简单吧……如果不超过1.5个note间距的话

[Extra]
鬼畜

00:39:736 (6) - ctrl+g 故意为之

卧槽 写完才发现只有这么点

• 没啥问题……？

1. 01:23:034 (1) - 01:26:430 (1) slider加个速？
2. 01:37:184 (3) - 01:46:240 (5) 一个是哔、哔另一个是哔哔哔，是不是统一一下比较好？

1. 00:02:129 (1) - 左移5格上移3格？
2. 00:07:607 (5) - 上移1格
3. 01:00:678 (3) - 下移1格右移1格
4. 01:00:691 (1) - ^
5. 01:29:826 (1) - 这边用note表示1/8音是否合理些？

• 
  这排法好玄学@_@

1. 00:31:813 (4) - slider尾巴要不要考虑黏上去？
2. 00:47:872 (5) - ……o_O

Technico wrote:

凑数mod吃我grid mod啦no kds plz.
那我就留个kd下次射咯(´・ω・`)

Beginner/Basic

• 没啥问题……？

Advanced

1. 01:23:034 (1) - 01:26:430 (1) slider加个速？ 不喜加速
2. 01:37:184 (3) - 01:46:240 (5) 一个是哔、哔另一个是哔哔哔，是不是统一一下比较好？ 好，都改成逼逼逼

Extreme

1. 00:02:129 (1) - 左移5格上移3格？ 不好，我更喜欢叠在一起
2. 00:07:607 (5) - 上移1格 同上
3. 01:00:678 (3) - 下移1格右移1格 我懂了
4. 01:00:691 (1) - ^
5. 01:29:826 (1) - 这边用note表示1/8音是否合理些？我觉得大差不差，而且形状也可以

EX

• 
  这排法好玄学@_@

1. 00:31:813 (4) - slider尾巴要不要考虑黏上去？ 有意分开的
2. 00:47:872 (5) - ……o_O 这个我都能300 先不说这个 比起锯齿连打这个可要简单多了

TKSalt wrote:

please change the Artist and Source.
first appearance of this song is GITADORA (it is ok if this is the original version.)
and goodcool is wrong. he is good-cool proof

Artist : dj TAKA meets DJ YOSHITAKA ft.guit.good-cool
Source : GITADORA


no kds. goodluck ╭( ･ㅂ･)و

10crystalmask01 wrote:

Ello o3o random mod

[Beginner]
00:08:890 (1) - Remove whistle, so it corresponds with 00:10:022 (3) - not having a whistle as well. I added whistle to the latter one, which sounds better imo.
00:25:304 (2) - Add whistle? I don't like it. it's kinda too abrupt.
01:04:923 (3) - Try putting under 01:02:659 (1) - for a better effect? Nope. I think following 2's flow should be better.
01:13:978 (1) - Add whistle on the head? Also, try ending its tail at 01:15:959. Not only does it sound better,but also it gives time for new players to catch the next slider. Any effect sounds too noisy to me. Also I's like to keep current length, because I think it's more coherent.
01:16:525 (1) - ^ Same as above. Shrink tail to 01:18:223
01:34:354 (1) - Remove clap on the tail, only finish sounds good here. Nope. I think this pattern sounds better.
01:43:410 (3) - ^
01:51:333 (1,2) - Add soft-finish on these notes, and a whistle on the head of 01:52:465 (3) - Creates a good sound with those objects. Nah, it spoils the pattern, imo.

[Basic]
00:53:603 (1) - Add finish on both ends of the sliders to match the cymbal crashes heard in the music. yeah
00:53:603 (1) - Add finish or whistle on the head :S
01:50:767 (4) - Remove clap on the head. changed

[Advanced]
01:13:978 (1) - Add finish or whistle on the head :S same as previous diffs :<
01:18:223 (3) - Add finish on the head?
01:20:770 (1) - ^
01:34:354 (3) - You can remove the NC on this object, since its not necessary. consistent as 00:08:324 (1,2,1) -

..Sorry I can't mod anything beyond this diff

Wow, really like how smooth the flow is made in this map ^^ Awesome job!
Hope this helps~!

wcx19911123 wrote:

这图我下了解压不了啊，你update下

[General]
明天我看看offset，第二根红线莫名

[Beginner]
02:03:785 - spinner考虑停这里？感觉带感点 好

[Advanced]
HD可以加一点啊
00:38:463 (3) - 这个可以往左挪一点，现在前后的spacing不太平衡 改了
00:56:857 - 00:57:140 - 这里是两个重音，如果能处理成用slider头压就好了，现在都是slider尾压，缺乏打击感 一个是要改的话就得remap又要jb 一个是我觉得现在的已经不错了 一般人认为滑条转弯处是最弱的但是我觉得反而有一种转折的感觉，下同
00:59:121 - 这里还有后面几个都有点这种问题

[Extreme]
00:12:286 (3,4) - 像这种地方我觉得可以试试加速下，更带感 加速了没啥区别我觉得 而且又有大爷们要挑了
00:21:342 (3,4) - ^，要改的话后面都要改了0.0..
00:31:530 - 这里也有点怪怪的，重音压在slider尾上了 我觉得这里嘟嘟两声是一体的，所以slider就不变

[Extra]
你大爷的小圈
01:09:309 (3,4) - ctrl+g? no, thanks

真鸡巴

Sabaidee wrote:

Free random mod:
Extreme
Overall I think streams are more necessary for this diff like @ 00:09:456 (1,2,3,4) and 00:17:380 (1,2,1,2,3,4)
00:14:550 (1,2) - I think there should be a 2x or atleast a 1.5x jump between these nope, because the guitar is very coherent, so jump is unnecessary
00:50:773 (1,2) - ^
00:19:078 (3,4,5) - and 00:19:361 (6,7,8) - change to slider 1/4 beat long and repeat 2 times don't want to make this section messy. 2 triples should have done everything
00:20:705 (6) - remove it emphasises the pitch.
00:22:403 (4) - ^
00:28:700 (1) - move this down-left a bit to align with other notes
00:38:817 (6) - ^
00:20:351 (4,5) - the jump is too far it is not, because the distance from a slider to a triple is basically the starting point to the triple, with 1/1 beat of time distance.
Make the pattern to alternate like 00:34:501 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), change 00:29:973 (2,3,4) - to a slider
00:30:822 (9) - change to 2 notes and a half beat slider @ 00:30:964 this does not make sense...
00:36:765 (2) - Suggestion to change that into a 1/2 beat slider for more effect nope, because the feeling of sudden stop is emphasised here
00:37:614 (6) - remove and change 00:37:473 (5) - to a half slider it's interesting to make a 3 notes overlap, isn't it?
00:41:859 (2) - Whistle hit sounds don't go along with music it follows the pitch
01:09:026 (1,2) - remove nope
02:02:229 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - further jump
02:02:229 (4,5,6,1) - try not making these squares, no one likes squares. first, the square is fun to play, and if you can't play squares, try to practice on sharp moves. second, I don't want to make a last kill.
02:03:361 (4,5,6,7) - ^

Look forward to this getting ranked

少打音游多读书

少打音游多读书

少打音游多读书

JappyBabes wrote:

Extra AR is cancerous. Honestly, after the decimal map settings update I can't understand why I keep seeing some mappers insist on sticking to set integers where it's just entirely inappropriate. The decimals are there, use them. You can still have a map which gets some of its difficulty from reading (even though I don't think this should be the case ever) without it being terrible and potentially ruining what would be an otherwise acceptable map.

unrank and kd please

Flower wrote:

Thank you for concerning. Indeed, higher AR helps reading of the map. However, with test play of several other top players, it is confirmed under this AR the map is readable. Also, the difficulty of the map is the extreme stream, which does not conflict with current BPM either. Like https://osu.ppy.sh/s/96103, I think AR 9 is OK in this beatmap. In other words, the problem does not violate any ranking rule, and should not be unranked.

However, since you have the words here, I'll take care of my future mapping and use more satisfying AR. Thanks again!