1. Is it just me or you forgot to add Nemis as a tag? Remember to do that, as Nemis is who made the hard guest diff! Yeah I forgot to add it ._.

1. 00:23:878 (2) - Not a really big deal, though I would tweak this so that it continues properly 00:22:537 (1) - 's oval flow, considering that in the current position that kind of flow is quite broken as of this slider which goes from the right to the left. If you do that you can also rearrange 00:25:219 (1) - using the same slider as 00:26:559 (2) - but flipped horizontally! Here's what I have done: see if you like it! 00:22:537 (1,2) - feels alright to me and I prefer not changing 00:25:219 (1,2) - , so no change here
2. 00:50:023 (5) - I personally think that you have really simplified too much this slider... The one that is being played is isn't actually that bad, but it would be really cool if it followed 00:50:023 (5) - instead of the actual beat, so that every kick/clap there is followed. To sum up, I would personally consider making this slider shorter by 1/1 and adding instead a note at 00:51:364 - to follow all the beats there! ok
3. 00:53:710 (x) - There is another strong beat that could be followed really well here... Not following it actually felt kinda strange considering that you have followed most of these strong beats :U A note here imho would really make sense and could vary a bit the rhythm there with that 1/1 note. ok
4. 01:22:872 (2,3,4,5) - This pattern's flow actually seemed a bit strange and not that great here, compared to the rest of the difficulty. I would have expected instead something that could continue 01:21:531 (1) - in a really good way, and I think that this pattern could be the solution: see if you like it! yeah, changed
5. 01:25:554 (1) - I have to say I can't really understand the reasoning behind this New Combo. While the other ones seemed more than reasonable I would see this New Combo much better moved to 01:24:213 (4) - , as it perfectly follows the new vocal phrase that has started there. The same goes for 01:29:241 (1) - , which I would move instead at 01:27:229 (2) -. that's better... I hate placing combos in easies :p
6. 01:31:587 (4) - Why don't you use instead of just a pair of 1/1 notes a repeated 1/2 slider? I really think it works great there considering how it finishes the whole vocal phrase, and it would make an overall pretty cool ending to the whole pattern as well! I'm not sure what you mean... ok

1. 00:54:716 (1) - I really didn't like here how from a really curved slider you immediately switched to an almost linear one which is placed to the left of the slider before... I really think it broke its oval flow there :\ What about instead using just a linear slider and putting it above 00:54:045 (4) - ? It would continue pretty well the oval flow there imho! Here's what I have done: see if you like it! I like it, changed to this with minor spacing differences.
2. 01:08:794 (2) - Using just a 3/1 slider imho here semplified too much the rhythm there... I would have actually preferred if you made the whole slider 3/2 shorter to add a 1/2 repeated slider just 1/2 after its end. It gives a really good finish to the whole pattern there, and I think it works great here! Here's the outcome: I tried it, but going to a different slider in the middle of these continuous "whistles" feels weird to play imo.
   
3. 01:16:336 (x) - What about adding a note here? I think it would play pretty good with the vocals going there and it would also fit very well with that 1/2 repeated slider you had there! I prefer not following the voice here, I think it makes it clearer that it's (mostly) going to follow drums instead.
4. 01:20:526 (2) - By hearing the bg I can clearly hear a sound resemblable to your clap at 01:20:526 - instead of 01:20:861 - , so I would rather use a clap at the beginning of the slider and just a whistle at the end of it to follow properly the instruments being played there! oh right, fixed.
5. 01:30:917 (3) - As above I have heard that clap sound at 01:31:085 - instead of 01:31:252 - , so I would just suggest you using a clap at the repeat and two whistles at the beginning and ending of the slider fixed too.

1. 00:14:157 (4,5) - Instead of letting these two notes spaced in this way, why don't you place them exactly where 00:12:816 (4,5) - initially were? It feels really good to play the pattern in this way imho, considering that it has almost the same flow as 00:12:816 (4,5,1) - , and the jump with the last note would be also a bit smoother imho. Here's the outcome! I prefer having something a bit different than reusing both notes' positions here.
2. 00:32:258 (2,3,4) - This is a really subjective thing, so feel free to ignore if you don't feel like fixing it: what would you think about changing this pattern a bit? I personally didn't like that much that return back to 00:32:928 (4,1) - , as I think it ruined a bit the oval flow created there. I tried experimenting here a bit and I found this pattern that could work with the next one, even though I don't know if you'll like it... Here's what I have done: I think it plays well, but how weird is my playstyle? http://puu.sh/56WQv.png (hard to draw the exact motion, but it's something like this) Besides that, I think this pattern fits what most of the map follows: "pushing" sliders away and going in the opposite direction.
3. 00:34:939 (1) - As Nemis' diff, why don't you try using a note plus a 1/1 slowed down slider to follow the vocals there? I think they play surprinsingly good there, and they also fit really well with the song's pace! that's much better that what I had, changed
4. 01:08:124 (1,2,3,4) - You know what? I would personally prefer to see this split into two pair of notes, I think they would represent the beats there in a quite better way, other than the fact that they can be arranged to make a pretty good to play jump here... Here's what I have done: see if you like it! I used your suggestion and made some additional changes

-kevincela- wrote:

[Nemis' Hard]

1. 00:17:090 (6) - I really don't see the point on using this note here... This is actually the only triplet that is being used it, and it actually felt really strange because you haven't used it even a bit on the rest of the diff. I think you should remove this note: after all it doesen't even fit that well within the instruments! Riascolta bene quì, c'è una tripla (o 5 1/4) con un suono dolce... l'ho messa appunto per questo
2. 00:24:213 (2) - Instead of using a simple repeated slider I would actually put an emphatizement to that kick that has been playing there. I have two different ideas in mind: the first one would be replacing this slider by just a note, another solution instead could be using a note + a slowed down 1/1 slider stacked with the next slider, as shown here: okii
   [spoilerbox]
   

   444,264,24213,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   432,112,24548,6,0,L|424:48,1,60
   424,52,25219,6,0,L|332:56,1,90.0000034332277,4|8,1:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   If you change to this remember to add a 0.50x inherited section at 00:24:548 - !

332,60,43152,1,0,0:0:0:0:
396,112,43319,2,0,L|440:108,1,45.0000017166138
332,60,43654,2,0,P|292:56|236:56,1,90.0000034332277,8|0,0:0|1:0,0:0:0:0:

[TimingPoints]
68124,-133.333333333333,4,2,4,55,0,0
68459,-121.951219512195,4,2,4,55,0,0
68794,-112.359550561798,4,2,4,55,0,0
69129,-104.166666666667,4,2,4,60,0,0
69800,-133.333333333333,4,2,4,70,0,0

[HitObjects]
24,188,68124,6,0,L|28:244,1,45.0000017166138,2|0,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
96,152,68459,2,0,L|100:224,1,49.2000007507324,2|0,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
168,116,68794,2,0,L|172:184,1,53.400000040741,2|0,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
240,80,69129,2,0,L|244:148,1,57.60000140625,2|0,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:
284,208,69464,5,2,1:2:0:0:
364,216,69632,1,0,1:0:0:0:
444,224,69800,1,8,1:2:0:0: