@tsukasa and NH:
did you target yourself with your nightactions?
I'm a pink marshmallow~
did you target yourself with your nightactions?
I'm a pink marshmallow~
I think this is a good course of action, since unless I read wrong the BP should last until today ends.NoHitter wrote:
I'm willing to test this out with my ability.Tanzklaue wrote:
I can give you my night action no problem.
I gave myself bulletproof.
I'm a pink marshmallow~
Tanzklaue -So I'll likely be going for Rantai or pie for my lynch vote, unless something else comes up.
Hit by: Pink Marshmallow
Dreamed: Bulletproof - Self
pieguy -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: Remilia
Tsukasa -
Hit by: Gained a Power?
Dreamed: ???
Lilac -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: Random player RP restriction.
Raging Bull -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: "Had fun with action"???
NoHitter -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: Gave gun to self?
Rantai -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: ???
CalignoBot -
Hit by: Nothing?
Dreamed: ???
BRBP -
Hit by: Nightkill
Dreamed: Unknown
LadySuburu -
Hit by: NK -> Redirected to BRBP?
Dreamed: Redirected all actions on self to BRBP
Nyquill -
Hit by: Lily's RP restrict?
Dreamed: ???
fartownik -
Hit by: Trap during day.
Dreamed: ???
I'm guessing you're the one who gave me Vig :pfartownik wrote:
So it's obvious you're both Day Vigilante with pieguy.Tsukasa wrote:
I agree about the "24 hours before".
That was actually my plan from the start. Though I really need to know who gave me stuff.
If this is true then we can simply do 3 days in 1. Everytime we're about to lynch, you or pieguy kill the person with the most amount of votes. We don't let night to happen - we don't let nightkill to happen, unless scum is also Day Vigilante, or one of you is.
Also you can't agree with me as you're prohibited to say what your role is - don't do it then. I know I'm right.
The FoS list is the people who know me, have played with me before, and would have reason to target me with the NK.CalignoBot wrote:
Vote: LadySubaru
That post reeks.
1. That FoS list doesn't make any sense. The reasoning in that post looks alignment-neutral to CalignoBot.
2. Testing the waters.
Oh, while I was posting.Tsukasa wrote:
WAIT SHIT
Shoot: Nyquill
What the fuck? Why would you shoot someone without reasoning? Just like another BRBP again.Tsukasa wrote:
WAIT SHIT
Shoot: Nyquill
Both parts could have been clarified a lot better.LadySuburu wrote:
The FoS list is the people who know me, have played with me before, and would have reason to target me with the NK.CalignoBot wrote:
Vote: LadySubaru
That post reeks.
1. That FoS list doesn't make any sense. The reasoning in that post looks alignment-neutral to CalignoBot.
2. Testing the waters.
Also, in what way does "That post reeks" = "Reasoning looks alignment-neutral"? Mind clarifying a bit there?
Ah, I see now.NoHitter wrote:
You guys misunderstand. He broke the condition which was not to mention what the role was specifically...
So yeah, let's vote on who I will use my role on before I make a mistake like that...
That's the impression I get from rule 5, yes.Raging Bull wrote:
I think all roles will revert at the end of day
Raging Bull wrote:
I just had fun with my dream choice really. Although I did not set a trap for anyone at all.
Lilac wrote:
Lily yawns for a bit. "I'm actually not forced to do this. I just thought it would be fun."
She stretches for a bit before sitting down. "All I said was to give a random person the restriction that was like this, that's it. So Nyquill was probably the lucky person who got it."
He did mention the words though and subsequently died. That's what has me worried.Raging Bull wrote:
All I said was give everyone a fake -paranoia- message. They aren't allowed to say they are a -paranoia- until they shoot.
fart did not mention he was a -paranoia- at all.
he affected himself aswell so it was allowed.Lilac wrote:
"To be honest, speaking like this is really tiring on me." Lily yawns. "Yeah, not really bound by this but I'll do it anyway to show that it can be done. I also wondered what happen to Game Specific Rule 3 and that traps only usually activate once."
The only restriction I made was they cannot say they are a day vig. Fart never said he was. He mentioned the words day vig. I also did not set a penalty. Unless the mod somehow read me saying as "they cannot mention they are a day vig until they shoot" as "If they mention day vig, they will die" then it seems like somebody set us up the trap and fart triggered it.Rantai wrote:
He did mention the words though and subsequently died. That's what has me worried.
Sakura wrote:
Realizing their hatred for marshmallows, especially the pink variety, Lily and RB both aimed their water guns at Tanz, the pink marshmallow. They both attacked Tanz and emptied their water guns with such great haste. After few seconds later, the scene clears up. "I'm a pink marshmallow~" , a voice says in the distant. "Damnit, I thought we had him for sure this time!" says Lily. The combined pressure of the water guns were still not enough to take him down. "I'm a pink marshmallow~" Tanz exclaims. It looks like the pink marshmallow menace lives on another day.
Yes but they cannot have a killing dream at the same time.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: Does the player who is doing the factional kill get to dream up an action as well?
1) I would really not care if nyquill died because he's no where to be seen.Raging Bull wrote:
Also little suspicious of Tsukasa for shooting Nyquill then claiming its reaction test. If I were to give a real dayvig to you, then you really just killed someone without thinking.
I think V/LA? Whatever the hell that is.Tsukasa wrote:
1) I would really not care if nyquill died because he's no where to be seen.Raging Bull wrote:
Also little suspicious of Tsukasa for shooting Nyquill then claiming its reaction test. If I were to give a real dayvig to you, then you really just killed someone without thinking.
2) I just really don't care if nyquill died because WHERE IS HE?!
V/LA = Vacation / Limited Access.Raging Bull wrote:
V/LA? Whatever the hell that is.
Wasn't his V/LA over like... a week ago? 1 day AFTER you guys NL'd :/Raging Bull wrote:
I think V/LA? Whatever the hell that is.
Lilac's posts were more fluffy than productive, even when the post restriction is taken out of the equation.Tsukasa wrote:
Caligno:
Why not lady subaru? It would have been way better
Sakura wrote:
Yes but they cannot have a killing dream at the same time.NoHitter wrote:
Mod: Does the player who is doing the factional kill get to dream up an action as well?
@Mod, can scum dream anything that relates to killing at all?Yes, as long as they didnt perform the mafiakill.
Tsukasa wrote:
GOD RB NO
Vote: LadySubaruI explained the first point, and the second point is pretty much how I always operate every game, regardless of alignment.
That post reeks.
1. That FoS list doesn't make any sense. The reasoning in that post looks alignment-neutral to CalignoBot.
2. Testing the waters.
His shooting post was the scummiest of all of the.mThis about Lilac's shooting post. Which was posted after it was already known everyone had a fake dayvig. Your second posted reason at least makes a little sense, but come on. These shots don't benefit town at all, since we don't get a reliable alignment confirmation out of them and we're just weeding down the number of players. There's also a much higher chance we're hitting town than scum, but we don't even know. Besides, if a scum member is lost they'll likely be revived, unless we make it a point to not revive players. Even that plan has flaws, as scum could revive town to try to make us waste a lynch. I don't think vigshots are useful in this setup, due to lack of reveal. (excluding special cases.)
Plus LadySubaru didn't take part in that mess of fake dayvigs.I wouldn't have even if I could have.
Tanzklaue wrote:
I'm interested why RB would give everyone fake day vig with restrictions to it that could possibly kill us. I really don't see that much townmotivation behind it.
I am a pink marshmallow~
I did not set a damn trap or anything.Raging Bull wrote:
The only restriction I made was they cannot say they are a day vig. Fart never said he was. He mentioned the words day vig. I also did not set a penalty. Unless the mod somehow read me saying as "they cannot mention they are a day vig until they shoot" as "If they mention day vig, they will die" then it seems like somebody set us up the trap and fart triggered it.
"He did actually mention 'vig' but not specifically day vig before shooting me. Also, the trap may very well have been one-use, so fartownik would have been the only victim... though to be safe I shot just in case".Raging Bull wrote:
After you said it
Self-meta is even less convincing than regular meta. If someone acts like they're testing the waters, I'm not going to give them a pass on it if I do not have enough personal experience with it.LadySuburu wrote:
@CalignoVote: LadySubaruI explained the first point, and the second point is pretty much how I always operate every game, regardless of alignment.
That post reeks.
1. That FoS list doesn't make any sense. The reasoning in that post looks alignment-neutral to CalignoBot.
2. Testing the waters.
Does this still warrent a vote?
That entire mess (which is still going on?) was heavily anti-town. That shot was partially used as a way of saying stop, since it's pretty clear words weren't enough. Now it's clear actions weren't enough, either.LadySuburu wrote:
His shooting post was the scummiest of all of the.mThis about Lilac's shooting post. Which was posted after it was already known everyone had a fake dayvig. Your second posted reason at least makes a little sense, but come on. These shots don't benefit town at all, since we don't get a reliable alignment confirmation out of them and we're just weeding down the number of players. There's also a much higher chance we're hitting town than scum, but we don't even know. Besides, if a scum member is lost they'll likely be revived, unless we make it a point to not revive players. Even that plan has flaws, as scum could revive town to try to make us waste a lynch. I don't think vigshots are useful in this setup, due to lack of reveal. (excluding special cases.)
You're taking this out of context.LadySuburu wrote:
Plus LadySubaru didn't take part in that mess of fake dayvigs.I wouldn't have even if I could have.
1. It's not productive at all, and I wouldn't find fake-shooting fun.
2. I redirected all actions from me to BRBP, as I said. I didn't recieve a fake dayvig.
Scumslip.Tanzklaue wrote:
well, then why did farto explode?
what kind of trap could've been set by scum that would be activated by fart?
does anyone who didn't shoot have the balls to test what RB just claimed? that it isn't deadly to claim day vig without shooting?
also please everyone, claim your actions. it would be most helpful if you did. no secrets anymore, we need information now. we are already down by 3, and the way this game swings, we could go down to only 8 at any moment. we also need to configure a plan on how to catch scum. let's assume the worst case scenario of alll three scum still living (assuming that we fight 3 scum). then we are basically at semi-MyLo just now. it may be smart to at least protect some of us with BP or doctors. or better yet, jailkeeping a bunch. we could reduce the number of kills to 0 (from 3) if we get the right countermeasures.
do I need to add that please no townie shoots from this point on except for getting rid of the joke day vig now? we can't risk any more towndeaths at this point.
I am done for today, I hope that i will see a bunch of useful stuff tomorrow.
I am a pink marshmallow~