Hi
[Endstep]This diff plays well but still contains some problems on spacing,sightreading.Luv this diff,hope you can keep on working on this map and get this ranked as soon as possible.
00:06:999~00:41:071 >> Various spacing between 1/2 and 1/4 are way too similar,cause bad sightreading and misleading players.You have to fix them.I am going to point them out.
Such as 00:06:999 (1,2) -

This is a 1/4 spacing
00:07:428 (2,3) -

And this is a 1/2 spacing.
Get the problem?Your spacing between 1/2 1/4 are too similar,even 1/4 spacing > 1/2 spacing.
00:08:285 (1,2) - and 00:08:714 (2,3) -
make them like these.
Also,00:08:285 is unsnapped,snap it on 00:08:284 by moveing it on the timeline zoom.
00:10:428 (1,2) - and 00:10:857 (2,3) -
Make them like these.I think it can be shown the click time obiviously.
00:11:714 (1,2) - You did it right,no change here but I just mentioned it since you did the correct spacing.
00:13:857 (1,2) - here too.Make them like these.
I used two notes instead of your slider.
About improvement on rhythm in this part:
You put some strong hit on slider ends oftenly such as :
00:15:356 >>This is a strong drum hit but you use a slider end on this timing so it gives a weird feeling to

players.
To solve this problem,if I were you,I would use 2 notes instead of this slider.
00:16:857 (8) - This slider is end on a heavy drum too.Do it like this?

00:19:320 -There's a heavy drum too but you blank this.Not a problem but I think you may add a note here.
That's all for slow part.
00:54:999 ~ 01:07:857 >>Transition stage
Nothing here.
01:08:714 ~ 01:34:214 >>KIAI
Same problem as I noticed in slow part.1/2 and 1/4 are too similar.
01:12:571 (2,1) - Since there's a new combo between these two sliders so I think it's okay;w;
01:21:571 (1,2) - However,these two are not okay for me,you know what I want to say.Maybe do it like this
01:33:571 (1,2,3) - LKs mentioned it before,let me give my own opinion ;w;.I think it's decent enough as a pattern even it's just 3 different sliders 120 anti-clock and puting there.It's just not creative but not a non-pattern haha.
01:39:571 (1) - Put it downward to blanket the pervious slider please?
01:42:999 (1,2) - Same,1/2 ? 1/4? dunno.
here?
01:48:142 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Why no any whistle here ;w;.Forgoten or lazy or intentional?
01:51:571 (1,2) - Spacing.
02:00:999 (1,2,3) - It's bad this time because their unnatural slider cruve don't fit each others.Do it same as 01:33:571 (1,2,3) and I think it will be better.
02:30:998 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Rhythm sound bad but not wrong.Since you suddenly changed what you used to follow.You used to follow instrumental before this part but you suddenly changed to follow drum here.If I were you I would put them like this:

lol you forgot to add whistle I thought:
02:59:606 (3) -
02:59:928 (4) -
03:00:142 (1,2,3,1,2) -
03:01:857 (1) -
03:02:928 (2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) -
And the whole part.
03:24:464 (3) - NC this making it more readable.Since its end stacking on the pervious note making it hard to read

03:28:000 (2) - Same,spacing
03:28:857 (3) - ^
03:34:857 (2) - ^
03:39:677 (1) - Use gradually volume(漸退音量) make it more natural.
That's all.