Me too, lolz.
Ok sounds like a planDakeDekaane wrote:
We can lynch her after you
Some words for your last defense?
You did the same in the beginning of D2 as well, instead of what a real cop would do (trying to tell us he's town).Raging Bull wrote:
DD/Nyquill
I'm really curious on DD's reason on why he has to hammer the person being voted on. It's like he uses that as an excuse to not look scummy when he hammers.
Nyquill looked pretty scummy to me, but I say he's currently on my suspect. He parked his vote on Pizzicato and (I assume) he was probably on (at least once )when Pizzicato started posting to question him on anything.
Also the thing that bothered me from the beginning was you not sheeping to me when I unvoted Pizzicato. You had a chance, you didn't do it.Raging Bull wrote:
You know how I feel about inactive.
Prod Nyquill
I felt like he wanted Pizzicato lynched more than I do despite the fact the whole Rantai and I thing happening. He seemed to have ignored the entire discussion on it.
@RB: You said you checked Nyquill N1, why in the world in the middle of D2 would you say Nyquill is one of your main suspects then?I thought I said it already. I'm not going to risk trying to reveal my role. The more I blend in, the less chance of mafia finding out how I knew he was town.
Raging Bull wrote:
I only stated he was my suspect so I would blend in well and mafia won't suspect I knew Nyquill was town.
Also the thing that bothered me from the beginning was you not sheeping to me when I unvoted Pizzicato. You had a chance, you didn't do it.
I can't trust my theories fully after Kanye got lynched, but I can trust others' thoughts. Please share your opinions THIS TIME, because last time it didn't turn out well without them.
Raging Bull wrote:
Hi
Roleclaim: Cop
And I still wanted to gather more info as fart was rushing to end of the day.Raging Bull wrote:
N1 Nyquill town
N2 DD scum.
Vote: DD
I check Nyquill N1 since he was fairly inactive and just planting the vote on Pizzicato then disappearing forever into D2. I only stated he was my suspect so I would blend in well and mafia won't suspect I knew Nyquill was town. In N2, DD was rather scummy to me.
Willing to vote for someone everyone is suspicious of for easy lynch (understandable but I keep explaining myself on why I did what I did.)
And explained why would be beneficial to ask for cop with a guilty result, I didn't asked randomly, just those who were sure of his votes, like fart with Nyquill and Kanye with you.Raging Bull wrote:
Tried rolefishing in D2 for a cop
Did I hammer? Did I tried to convince you to vote Nyquill? No, this just makes no sense Bull E.Raging Bull wrote:
Sounds like to me he was saying "I'm going to write an excuse to hammer someone so I don't look like scum. Also again with cop rolefish
Your question about the safe lynch? It's here. Why you no read all the thread?Raging Bull wrote:
[url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2361688]I felt like he couldn't answer my own question which is why he brushed it off as "I answered my own question"
[/url]
Nope, he himself labeled as scum based on his own actions. As I put here.Raging Bull wrote:
Using Kanye's WIFOM to place a vote on him at the right time?
As above, he had a big signal of "I'm scum" for me, ofc I'd be very surprised if he wasn't, and magic happened!Raging Bull wrote:
Perhaps I'm reading into this a little too much but it looked like he somehow knew Kanye would be town
I didn't know nothing, Pizzicato's actions was scummy indeed and fart's Nyquill's words convinced me.Raging Bull wrote:
And then a bit in D1
He said we may be correct because he KNEW we were wrong. Using that to softening up his opinion before joining the bandwagon?
Anyway, my bet this day was to vote you, but I'm 100% sure now, thanks for kinda fakeclaim, Mr. Mafia Cop. Well played, until now~Raging Bull wrote:
Commenting on how a lot of us wanted to rush to D2. So he helps the case by voting for the one that's going to get lynched already. Okay.
The original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town, I wasn't able to remove my vote due to some problems irl (my power supply, do you remember?).This is the most inconvenient time ever
When did I tried to convince him? Quote and link please.Raging Bull wrote:
Quote 1
Looks rolefishing to me. Blatantly asking if hes cop. Then you still try to convince him to vote/stay on nyquill .
Repeating myself and bolding what you didn't readRaging Bull wrote:
Quote 2
What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it.
Btw, you enumerated the quotes wrong, I'd recommend you to calm yourself before replying, you hurried too much making this last move and you're losing the game because that, after all that advantage you had *sigh*DakeDekaane wrote:
And explained why would be beneficial to ask for cop with a guilty result, I didn't asked randomly, just those who were sure of his votes, like fart with Nyquill and Kanye with you.
If you look at my posting pattern, i have work at this time. No need to convince people to lynch me when i cant postRaging Bull wrote:
Im sure you are al waiting for me. Sorry. Ill post some now
K.DakeDekaane wrote:
And we have our Mafia cop here :3
You investigated me to look if I was a cop right?
Also there's the possibility you investigated fartownik and confirmed his claim in D1, making you think I'm the cop and trying to make everybody vote at me. But that's very unlikely to happen as there's a 90% of fartownik being your scumbuddy.
Silly move from your part, you should have killed me this night and not Nyquill, thank you.And I still wanted to gather more info as fart was rushing to end of the day.Raging Bull wrote:
N1 Nyquill town
N2 DD scum.
Vote: DD
I check Nyquill N1 since he was fairly inactive and just planting the vote on Pizzicato then disappearing forever into D2. I only stated he was my suspect so I would blend in well and mafia won't suspect I knew Nyquill was town. In N2, DD was rather scummy to me.
Willing to vote for someone everyone is suspicious of for easy lynch (understandable but I keep explaining myself on why I did what I did.)
Answered in previous reply.And explained why would be beneficial to ask for cop with a guilty result, I didn't asked randomly, just those who were sure of his votes, like fart with Nyquill and Kanye with you.Raging Bull wrote:
Tried rolefishing in D2 for a cop
Answered in previous reply.Did I hammer? Did I tried to convince you to vote Nyquill? No, this just makes no sense Bull E.Raging Bull wrote:
Sounds like to me he was saying "I'm going to write an excuse to hammer someone so I don't look like scum. Also again with cop rolefish
No you didn't hammer, yet you did have an intent to hammer him if anyone else could convince you to believe he was mafia, which wouldn't even be much. You didn't convince me. You were trying to convince people that Nyquill was scum. Early vote with a weak reasoning. Why I was prodding Nyquill. Don't want him to defend himself? I just thought it was funny how you said scum doesn't read yet Nyquill already posted what he thought about what happened. Stating you think you know what you are doing. Then past this, you got pretty lucky with fart and having the little argument finding a cop. which is funny since he claimed VT.Your question about the safe lynch? It's here. Why you no read all the thread?Raging Bull wrote:
I felt like he couldn't answer my own question which is why he brushed it off as "I answered my own question"
You forget that you needed a reminder first? Perhaps you forgot my quote is BEFORE your answer? AFTER I reminded you? Silly scum.Nope, he himself labeled as scum based on his own actions. As I put here.Raging Bull wrote:
Using Kanye's WIFOM to place a vote on him at the right time?
Fair enough. He did label himself as scum by tossing WIFOM around everywhere.As above, he had a big signal of "I'm scum" for me, ofc I'd be very surprised if he wasn't, and magic happened!Raging Bull wrote:
Perhaps I'm reading into this a little too much but it looked like he somehow knew Kanye would be town
Magic didn't happen. You already knew. The extra comment was just unnecessary, but felt like adding it in to make you look more town.I didn't know nothing, Pizzicato's actions was scummy indeed and fart's Nyquill's words convinced me.Raging Bull wrote:
And then a bit in D1
He said we may be correct because he KNEW we were wrong. Using that to softening up his opinion before joining the bandwagon?
I had my own reasons for voting him. Inactivity. Mafia tends to lurk a lot. But not only that, you just jump on bandwagon despite the fact you suspected someone else already. Why the hell would you not vote for someone you are suspicious? So sheeping okay.The original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town, I wasn't able to remove my vote due to some problems irl (my power supply, do you remember?).Raging Bull wrote:
Commenting on how a lot of us wanted to rush to D2. So he helps the case by voting for the one that's going to get lynched already. Okay.
Yes, but did you read? I'm not talking about removing your vote or anything. I was asking why vote for him if you just commented on us rushing to D2 by voting him.This is the most inconvenient time ever
Anyway, my bet this day was to vote you, but I'm 100% sure now, thanks for kinda fakeclaim, Mr. Mafia Cop. Well played, until now~
Vote: Raging Bully
Yes. We know you're lying. No one knows except us. Why are you putting it all on me? No thanks.DakeDekaane wrote:
Is that all? will you only reply to the first two sentences? Please, everybody knows scum doesn't read properly. Even your short reply has big flaws.Lol. Okay.Raging Bull wrote:
Im sure you are al waiting for me. Sorry. Ill post some nowWhen did I tried to convince him? Quote and link please.Raging Bull wrote:
Quote 1
Looks rolefishing to me. Blatantly asking if hes cop. Then you still try to convince him to vote/stay on nyquill .
Teehee, you can have this one. I read it as " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"Repeating myself and bolding what you didn't readRaging Bull wrote:
Quote 2
What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it.I'll repeat what I said. What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for itDakeDekaane wrote:
And explained why would be beneficial to ask for cop with a guilty result, I didn't asked randomly, just those who were sure of his votes, like fart with Nyquill and Kanye with you.
And if you actually read, you never did mention AT ALL in that quote about a cop. So I asked for a reason why you keep rolefishing for a cop and you give me an explanation of your reasoning of who is scum WITHOUT a cop in the equation.
Btw, you enumerated the quotes wrong, I'd recommend you to calm yourself before replying, you hurried too much making this last move and you're losing the game because that, after all that advantage you had *sigh**sigh*Raging Bull wrote:
I'll answer DD without quotes at work, but in order. Takes too much time fixing on phone.
Both of us know my alignment, also yours, and we know you're lying, please just give up, we all know you're scum now.
what the fuckSaigonAlice wrote:
do we kill someone yet
Oh, the underlined is quite contradicting of what you're writing in this same post later, gonna mark it for you.Raging Bull wrote:
No you didn't hammer, yet you did have an intent to hammer him if anyone else could convince you to believe he was mafia, which wouldn't even be much. You didn't convince me. You were trying to convince people that Nyquill was scum. Early vote with a weak reasoning. Why I was prodding Nyquill. Don't want him to defend himself? I just thought it was funny how you said scum doesn't read yet Nyquill already posted what he thought about what happened. Stating you think you know what you are doing. Then past this, you got pretty lucky with fart and having the little argument finding a cop. which is funny since he claimed VT.
Because you weren't smart enough to catch the message.Raging Bull wrote:
You forget that you needed a reminder first? Perhaps you forgot my quote is BEFORE your answer? AFTER I reminded you? Silly scum.
Oh, you're giving up?Raging Bull wrote:
Fair enough. He did label himself as scum by tossing WIFOM around everywhere.
I didn't know, it's just that I was too sure about my judging on him, but you know, what is this fluff post you do after me? How convenient that the day ended for you, don't you think? I'll tell you something, everyone that makes active lurking is on my eye.Raging Bull wrote:
Magic didn't happen. You already knew. The extra comment was just unnecessary, but felt like adding it in to make you look more town.
Inactivity? are you sure? You just joined the wagon with a cheap excuse trying to make you look town.Raging Bull wrote:
I had my own reasons for voting him. Inactivity. Mafia tends to lurk a lot. But not only that, you just jump on bandwagon despite the fact you suspected someone else already. Why the hell would you not vote for someone you are suspicious? So sheeping okay.
And I'll repeat again: the original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, but did you read? I'm not talking about removing your vote or anything. I was asking why vote for him if you just commented on us rushing to D2 by voting him.
You say I was convincing Nyquill above and now you accept that I didn't, even that doesn't look like an argument to convince someone to vote NyquillRaging Bull wrote:
Teehee, you can have this one. I read it as " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"
I'll explain you again. If you're totally sure about voting someone for no apparent reason, there are two cases: scum trying to lynch a townie or a cop witha guilty result. Did I link this?Raging Bull wrote:
I'll repeat what I said. What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it
And if you actually read, you never did mention AT ALL in that quote about a cop. So I asked for a reason why you keep rolefishing for a cop and you give me an explanation of your reasoning of who is scum WITHOUT a cop in the equation.
Because I know you're lying and I will prove it.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes. We know you're lying. No one knows except us. Why are you putting it all on me? No thanks.
Because that is your plan, isn't it? You just want your scumbuddy stays hidden.Raging Bull wrote:
Also it took me a while to notice, but I love how you killed almost everyone who isn't suspicious of me. Rantai and Hika still is. Fart is probably reading me more as scum now.
It's fun how fart doesn't suspect from RB and the rest does (Hika stated he suspects RB [url]here[/url], maybe distancing from you). Hika is null for everyone, I think.Rantai wrote:
Me(Rantai):Nyquill- RB - fart
Fart:Nyquill - Kayne- DD
Kayne:Nyquill- RB
Nyquill: fart -Kayne
RB:Nyquill- DD
DD:Nyquill- RB - fart
Hika:Nyquill- ?
Because cop. And I don't know. Ask yourself.DakeDekaane wrote:
Quoting is painful, but well, this is being fun, sad for you because I won't give the game to Bullies :3
Yes, yes, and im not bully.
Oh, the underlined is quite contradicting of what you're writing in this same post later, gonna mark it for you.
I meant in as, you didn't just try to convince me, you tried convincing everyone else.
1. Weak reasoning? Why is aggresively voting someone a weak reason to vote that person?
Sorry, I don't truly agree with aggressiveness when it's the first post of the day and it's a vote. It's more of putting someone in l-2 for me.
2. I want him to defend himself, I said it in the previous post you linked. For who else I'd write "Please explain yourself"?
If you truly agreed, you wouldn't care about the prod.
3. I didn't trust anyone at that moment.
I don't get this. I asked basically asked why did you ask Nyquill to post his thoughts and you say "I didn't trust anyone at that moment"? So you ask him again? Sorry, I really don't get this one at all.
4. Because I know what I were doing. Sadly Kanye didn't help too much.
Yes you did, then you went for Kanye because of how scummy he went since he was even easier lynch.
5. You're very smart don't you? If anybody else says you, "I'm town", would you believe it? Obviously yes, because you know who are town.
I said it time and time again. I don't know he's 100% town.Because you weren't smart enough to catch the message.Raging Bull wrote:
You forget that you needed a reminder first? Perhaps you forgot my quote is BEFORE your answer? AFTER I reminded you? Silly scum.
Or perhaps you didn't know what to say yet and ignored it until I brought it up again.
Oh, you're giving up?Raging Bull wrote:
Fair enough. He did label himself as scum by tossing WIFOM around everywhere.
No, there are nice people over the internet that if one person is correct, they will admit defeat instead of going on and on. Here you are correct and I will no need to extend the discussion about him.I didn't know, it's just that I was too sure about my judging on him, but you know, what is this fluff post you do after me? How convenient that the day ended for you, don't you think? I'll tell you something, everyone that makes active lurking is on my eye.Raging Bull wrote:
Magic didn't happen. You already knew. The extra comment was just unnecessary, but felt like adding it in to make you look more town.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
Now stop using that against me.Inactivity? are you sure? You just joined the wagon with a cheap excuse trying to make you look town.Raging Bull wrote:
I had my own reasons for voting him. Inactivity. Mafia tends to lurk a lot. But not only that, you just jump on bandwagon despite the fact you suspected someone else already. Why the hell would you not vote for someone you are suspicious? So sheeping okay.
And somehow, he magically disappears forever until L-1. Why vote someone who discuss vs someone who doesn't?And I'll repeat again: the original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, but did you read? I'm not talking about removing your vote or anything. I was asking why vote for him if you just commented on us rushing to D2 by voting him.
Yet nothing in this post reads "Tell us something Pizzicato"You say I was convincing Nyquill above and now you accept that I didn't, even that doesn't look like an argument to convince someone to vote NyquillRaging Bull wrote:
Teehee, you can have this one. I read it as " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"![]()
Wait did I? I was saying I was trying to convince me/everyone above?I'll explain you again. If you're totally sure about voting someone for no apparent reason, there are two cases: scum trying to lynch a townie or a cop witha guilty result. Did I link this?Raging Bull wrote:
I'll repeat what I said. What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it
And if you actually read, you never did mention AT ALL in that quote about a cop. So I asked for a reason why you keep rolefishing for a cop and you give me an explanation of your reasoning of who is scum WITHOUT a cop in the equation.
Okay at this point we are on two different pages I think. I'm asking why are you asking someone to claim with guilty result. Then you post something without cop equated into it. Can you at least bold me the quote part? Because all I'm reading is who is scum and who is not based on what you wrote.Because I know you're lying and I will prove it.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes. We know you're lying. No one knows except us. Why are you putting it all on me? No thanks.
But, I'm not.Because that is your plan, isn't it? You just want your scumbuddy stays hidden.Raging Bull wrote:
Also it took me a while to notice, but I love how you killed almost everyone who isn't suspicious of me. Rantai and Hika still is. Fart is probably reading me more as scum now.
I'll quote this for reference, with some notesIt's fun how fart doesn't suspect from RB and the rest does (Hika stated he suspects RB [url]here[/url], maybe distancing from you). Hika is null for everyone, I think.Rantai wrote:
Me(Rantai):Nyquill- RB - fart
Fart:Nyquill - Kayne- DD
Kayne:Nyquill- RB
Nyquill: fart -Kayne
RB:Nyquill- DD
DD:Nyquill- RB - fart
Hika:Nyquill- ?
I told you how fart is probably thinking im scum.
Also I have to ask you something: Why did you decided to say I'm scum, why not Rantai? why not Hika? why not fartownik? Why did you scum kill Nyquill and not me, why not fartownik?
*giggles*Sakura wrote:
Ranta
>Raging BULL.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, yes, and im not bully.
Yes, quotes got messed. Better using color codes next time. And I read, I won't pressure the bully anymore as he will bully me.Raging Bull wrote:
Oh, the underlined is quite contradicting of what you're writing in this same post later, gonna mark it for you.
I meant in as, you didn't just try to convince me, you tried convincing everyone else.
Convince you to vote Nyquill? Where did I do that? Please, read all the sentences, not just those that you want to read.
1. Weak reasoning? Why is aggresively voting someone a weak reason to vote that person?
Sorry, I don't truly agree with aggressiveness when it's the first post of the day and it's a vote. It's more of putting someone in l-2 for me.
L-2, you mean when I unvoted? is really make the day last longer to do a well-based discussion bad for you?
2. I want him to defend himself, I said it in the previous post you linked. For who else I'd write "Please explain yourself"?
If you truly agreed, you wouldn't care about the prod.
You wanted to settle the things as fast as you could.
3. I didn't trust anyone at that moment.
I don't get this. I asked basically asked why did you ask Nyquill to post his thoughts and you say "I didn't trust anyone at that moment"? So you ask him again? Sorry, I really don't get this one at all.
As town, I didn't know who were in the same side as me, and who were scum, it's not easy to trust in some words, not for me, and still wanted to read more from everyone.
4. Because I know what I were doing. Sadly Kanye didn't help too much.
Yes you did, then you went for Kanye because of how scummy he went since he was even easier lynch.
Easier? Kanye just got 3 votes, Rantai's and mine, and before the day ended, fartownik's, I don't think that was an easy lynch as you say.
5. You're very smart don't you? If anybody else says you, "I'm town", would you believe it? Obviously yes, because you know who are town.
I said it time and time again. I don't know he's 100% town.
So if you don't know he's 100% town, why are you bringing I asked him if he was cop?Because you weren't smart enough to catch the message.Raging Bull wrote:
You forget that you needed a reminder first? Perhaps you forgot my quote is BEFORE your answer? AFTER I reminded you? Silly scum.
Or perhaps you didn't know what to say yet and ignored it until I brought it up again.![]()
I didn't ignore it as you can see, just spat a condensed result for you.Oh, you're giving up?Raging Bull wrote:
Fair enough. He did label himself as scum by tossing WIFOM around everywhere.
No, there are nice people over the internet that if one person is correct, they will admit defeat instead of going on and on. Here you are correct and I will no need to extend the discussion about him.
Ok, point for me then.I didn't know, it's just that I was too sure about my judging on him, but you know, what is this fluff post you do after me? How convenient that the day ended for you, don't you think? I'll tell you something, everyone that makes active lurking is on my eye.Raging Bull wrote:
Magic didn't happen. You already knew. The extra comment was just unnecessary, but felt like adding it in to make you look more town.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
Now stop using that against me.
Don't get mad please, I understood, but still is curious for me, can't I be curious?.Inactivity? are you sure? You just joined the wagon with a cheap excuse trying to make you look town.Raging Bull wrote:
I had my own reasons for voting him. Inactivity. Mafia tends to lurk a lot. But not only that, you just jump on bandwagon despite the fact you suspected someone else already. Why the hell would you not vote for someone you are suspicious? So sheeping okay.
And somehow, he magically disappears forever until L-1. Why vote someone who discuss vs someone who doesn't?
Because you saw a nice opportunity of jumping onto him without making you look suspicious, and grabbing some link with fartownik.And I'll repeat again: the original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, but did you read? I'm not talking about removing your vote or anything. I was asking why vote for him if you just commented on us rushing to D2 by voting him.
Yet nothing in this post reads "Tell us something Pizzicato"
What post are you talking about? I voted Pizzicato here: http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2353294You say I was convincing Nyquill above and now you accept that I didn't, even that doesn't look like an argument to convince someone to vote NyquillRaging Bull wrote:
Teehee, you can have this one. I read it as " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"![]()
Wait did I? I was saying I was trying to convince me/everyone above?
That in any moment I didn't try to convince you to vote Nyquill, above you say I did, and here that I didn't.I'll explain you again. If you're totally sure about voting someone for no apparent reason, there are two cases: scum trying to lynch a townie or a cop witha guilty result. Did I link this?Raging Bull wrote:
I'll repeat what I said. What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it
And if you actually read, you never did mention AT ALL in that quote about a cop. So I asked for a reason why you keep rolefishing for a cop and you give me an explanation of your reasoning of who is scum WITHOUT a cop in the equation.
Okay at this point we are on two different pages I think. I'm asking why are you asking someone to claim with guilty result. Then you post something without cop equated into it. Can you at least bold me the quote part? Because all I'm reading is who is scum and who is not based on what you wrote.
My bad, copied the wrong link, I meant this: http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2364159Because I know you're lying and I will prove it.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes. We know you're lying. No one knows except us. Why are you putting it all on me? No thanks.
But, I'm not.
Yes, you are, your acussations lacks of basis.Because that is your plan, isn't it? You just want your scumbuddy stays hidden.Raging Bull wrote:
Also it took me a while to notice, but I love how you killed almost everyone who isn't suspicious of me. Rantai and Hika still is. Fart is probably reading me more as scum now.
I'll quote this for reference, with some notesIt's fun how fart doesn't suspect from RB and the rest does (Hika stated he suspects RB [url]here[/url], maybe distancing from you). Hika is null for everyone, I think.Rantai wrote:
Me(Rantai):Nyquill- RB - fart
Fart:Nyquill - Kayne- DD
Kayne:Nyquill- RB
Nyquill: fart -Kayne
RB:Nyquill- DD
DD:Nyquill- RB - fart
Hika:Nyquill- ?
I told you how fart is probably thinking im scum.
Probably.
Also I have to ask you something: Why did you decided to say I'm scum, why not Rantai? why not Hika? why not fartownik? Why did you scum kill Nyquill and not me, why not fartownik?
Because cop. And I don't know. Ask yourself.
Also
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
I think that's all. Not sure if I missed some.
Also again. That was risky gambit. If DD and I were scum, Rantai sure would be mad.DD was scum in LoL
My playstyle is usually the same. I don't vote for someone unless I'm pretty sure they are scum. Minus 5 man odd role cause that shit was gay. And I think one reason why I haven't been killed yet is because I was suspicious by quite a few people. I don't think mafia would try to target someone who is suspicious. They would rather go for someone else less suspicious by town instead. If you do need more convincing, I'll do it later because
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
incase DD cannot read it.
You're wrong. You are trying to make me look scum due to Kanye's mislynch. You didn't kill me just for the sake of put suspicious on me. You haven't been killed because you're not the cop, not the town cop.Raging Bull wrote:
Because cop. And I don't know. Ask yourself.
DoneDakeDekaane wrote:
@Mod: could you fix that ;n;
Indeed, but I was open to follow that quote exchange until I uncovered RB completely, but it seems it won't happen.Rantai wrote:
For the record, both your giant gibberish quotes aren't convincing me either way.
It's just become a crap fest.
Any time between 20:00-03:00 GMT +0 would be okay for me, unless I get too busy or have to do some heavy stuff at work.Rantai wrote:
Also, I'd like all of us to designate a time where all 5 of us are able to talk at the same time. It'd help things a lot.
fartownik wrote:
RB doesn't seem to find me as scum, which might indicate he's completely sure of DD being scum, or careless/wanting to convince me to vote his opponent by this.
Commonly, it's the latter that applies. But I really don't know at this stage, I'm super paranoid.
DD still believes I might be scum, which I find odd because Hika is NOT NULL, but scummy, and also hadn't contributed here for a long time. However, I can't be sure of how you all read me exactly so his suspicions might be justified.
Unfortunately Hika is null in the strict sense, there are no concrete leads that say you are scum or Hika is scum. Which really sucks.
Yes, quotes got messed. Better using color codes next time. And I read, I won't pressure the bully anymore as he will bully me.DakeDekaane wrote:
*giggles*
Yes, entertain me you Bully.>Raging BULL.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, yes, and im not bully.
Ok. But leaving that aside, we both know you're the bully.
Oh, the underlined is quite contradicting of what you're writing in this same post later, gonna mark it for you.
I meant in as, you didn't just try to convince me, you tried convincing everyone else.
Convince you to vote Nyquill? Where did I do that? Please, read all the sentences, not just those that you want to read.
In that case refer to the below with the little mess up I did by posting two different quote at two different times.
1. Weak reasoning? Why is aggresively voting someone a weak reason to vote that person?
Sorry, I don't truly agree with aggressiveness when it's the first post of the day and it's a vote. It's more of putting someone in l-2 for me.
L-2, you mean when I unvoted? is really make the day last longer to do a well-based discussion bad for you?
No, you misread. I'm saying I don't agree that it's aggressive at all if you are the first post of the second day and putting a vote on someone. Aggressiveness for me is putting actual pressure on them (putting them L-2)
2. I want him to defend himself, I said it in the previous post you linked. For who else I'd write "Please explain yourself"?
If you truly agreed, you wouldn't care about the prod.
You wanted to settle the things as fast as you could.
No, do not assume that. I wanted him to defend himself.
3. I didn't trust anyone at that moment.
I don't get this. I asked basically asked why did you ask Nyquill to post his thoughts and you say "I didn't trust anyone at that moment"? So you ask him again? Sorry, I really don't get this one at all.
As town, I didn't know who were in the same side as me, and who were scum, it's not easy to trust in some words, not for me, and still wanted to read more from everyone.
Then he posted again. And then...you didn't do anything with his reply.
4. Because I know what I were doing. Sadly Kanye didn't help too much.
Yes you did, then you went for Kanye because of how scummy he went since he was even easier lynch.
Easier? Kanye just got 3 votes, Rantai's and mine, and before the day ended, fartownik's, I don't think that was an easy lynch as you say.
Easy
5. You're very smart don't you? If anybody else says you, "I'm town", would you believe it? Obviously yes, because you know who are town.
I said it time and time again. I don't know he's 100% town.
So if you don't know he's 100% town, why are you bringing I asked him if he was cop?
"Roleclaim:cop" "D3 fart dies"Because you weren't smart enough to catch the message.Raging Bull wrote:
You forget that you needed a reminder first? Perhaps you forgot my quote is BEFORE your answer? AFTER I reminded you? Silly scum.
Or perhaps you didn't know what to say yet and ignored it until I brought it up again.![]()
I didn't ignore it as you can see, just spat a condensed result for you.
Or perhaps you didn't know what to say yet and ignored it until I brought it up again.Really, if you had nothing to hide, you might as well answered it earlier.
Oh, you're giving up?Raging Bull wrote:
Fair enough. He did label himself as scum by tossing WIFOM around everywhere.
No, there are nice people over the internet that if one person is correct, they will admit defeat instead of going on and on. Here you are correct and I will no need to extend the discussion about him.
Ok, point for me then.
+1 for me against Rantai for agreeing then? Anyways done with this one.I didn't know, it's just that I was too sure about my judging on him, but you know, what is this fluff post you do after me? How convenient that the day ended for you, don't you think? I'll tell you something, everyone that makes active lurking is on my eye.Raging Bull wrote:
Magic didn't happen. You already knew. The extra comment was just unnecessary, but felt like adding it in to make you look more town.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
God damn, I have work. Jesus. Why can you not understand that.
Now stop using that against me.
Don't get mad please, I understood, but still is curious for me, can't I be curious?.
Answered already.Inactivity? are you sure? You just joined the wagon with a cheap excuse trying to make you look town.Raging Bull wrote:
I had my own reasons for voting him. Inactivity. Mafia tends to lurk a lot. But not only that, you just jump on bandwagon despite the fact you suspected someone else already. Why the hell would you not vote for someone you are suspicious? So sheeping okay.
And somehow, he magically disappears forever until L-1. Why vote someone who discuss vs someone who doesn't?
Because you saw a nice opportunity of jumping onto him without making you look suspicious, and grabbing some link with fartownik.
I've been saying he's inactive since D1. Idk why do you keep making up more excuses about me.And I'll repeat again: the original purpose on this vote was putting pressure on Pizzicato, to see if he said something that could make him look town.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes, but did you read? I'm not talking about removing your vote or anything. I was asking why vote for him if you just commented on us rushing to D2 by voting him.
Yet nothing in this post reads "Tell us something Pizzicato"
What post are you talking about? I voted Pizzicato here: http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2353294
Same post. Nothing in the post says "Tell us something, Pizzicato"You say I was convincing Nyquill above and now you accept that I didn't, even that doesn't look like an argument to convince someone to vote NyquillRaging Bull wrote:
Teehee, you can have this one. I read it as " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"![]()
Wait did I? I was saying I was trying to convince me/everyone above?
That in any moment I didn't try to convince you to vote Nyquill, above you say I did, and here that I didn't.
Here's the mess up. I read " If you're not scum, I can't see another reason for trying to lynch Nyquill as fast as possible" and did not notice "You are making look Nyquill town to me thanks to your scummy actions"I'll explain you again. If you're totally sure about voting someone for no apparent reason, there are two cases: scum trying to lynch a townie or a cop witha guilty result. Did I link this?Raging Bull wrote:
I'll repeat what I said. What are you saying? It was rantai who said to claim with guilty result, not you. You never asked for it
And if you actually read, you never did mention AT ALL in that quote about a cop. So I asked for a reason why you keep rolefishing for a cop and you give me an explanation of your reasoning of who is scum WITHOUT a cop in the equation.
Okay at this point we are on two different pages I think. I'm asking why are you asking someone to claim with guilty result. Then you post something without cop equated into it. Can you at least bold me the quote part? Because all I'm reading is who is scum and who is not based on what you wrote.
My bad, copied the wrong link, I meant this: http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2364159
You role fished so hard really and made it look so scummy. Instead of blatantly ask, go a more subtle way. And I find it funny on why you would reveal your plan. It would have been much nicer to keep it a secret, but since you posted it, you probably convinced the scum cop not to reveal himself.Because I know you're lying and I will prove it.Raging Bull wrote:
Yes. We know you're lying. No one knows except us. Why are you putting it all on me? No thanks.
But, I'm not.
Yes, you are, your acussations lacks of basis.
But they don't.Because that is your plan, isn't it? You just want your scumbuddy stays hidden.Raging Bull wrote:
Also it took me a while to notice, but I love how you killed almost everyone who isn't suspicious of me. Rantai and Hika still is. Fart is probably reading me more as scum now.
I'll quote this for reference, with some notesIt's fun how fart doesn't suspect from RB and the rest does (Hika stated he suspects RB [url]here[/url], maybe distancing from you). Hika is null for everyone, I think.Rantai wrote:
Me(Rantai):Nyquill- RB - fart
Fart:Nyquill - Kayne- DD
Kayne:Nyquill- RB
Nyquill: fart -Kayne
RB:Nyquill- DD
DD:Nyquill- RB - fart
Hika:Nyquill- ?
I told you how fart is probably thinking im scum.
Probably.
You're wrong. You are trying to make me look scum due to Kanye's mislynch. You didn't kill me just for the sake of put suspicious on me. You haven't been killed because you're not the cop, not the town cop.Raging Bull wrote:
Because cop. And I don't know. Ask yourself.
Like the one on page 1?DakeDekaane wrote:
@fartownik: The easiest way to prove you my alignment is pasting my role PM, but as this is LyLo I can't give myself that privilege, so I'll just say I'm town, a regular student.
Uh, probably like 8 till 11 UTC? Using the whole posting time here on the forums.Rantai wrote:
Also, I'd like all of us to designate a time where all 5 of us are able to talk at the same time. It'd help things a lot.
I'm more convinced at this point fart is town. He has done a lot more than Hika, who also magically disappeared after this happened.Rantai wrote:
Hey RB, who of Hika or Fart do you think is scum again?
Sorry, but I don't really get it. How is a setup of 6 VTs and 2 PRs existing at the same time possible?Rantai wrote:
Nah, I jumped the gun.
Kanye West - VT 5/5 VT 2/2 extra
Rantai - VT
Nyquill - VT
Pizzicato - Doc
JInxyjem - VT
Hika - Mafia/VT
DakeDekaane - Mafia
fartownik - VT/Mafia
Raging Bull - Cop
Nice try.