1. 00:12:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 把这一段的sampleset改成drum怎么样 addition别改
2. 00:14:480 (1) - add combo
3. 00:28:339 - 这里空着不舒服, 建议http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/701435
4. 00:31:926 (3) - ball ball
5. 00:40:730 (1,2,3,4) - 用滑条多好, 然后note叠在slider开头的下面 233 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/701463
6. 00:56:382 (1) - 这里空着比较好 穿越那个长音
7. 00:59:154 (1) - 感觉是人
8. 01:24:915 (4) - 做个转圈slider怎么样ww

1. 01:21:165 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 好难看hh 红色那里用短滑条梗是不是好玩点 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702212

1. 00:19:045 (2) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702231
2. 00:37:469 (1,2,3) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702236
3. 01:24:752 (6) - remove reverse

1. 我感觉你这间距改成circle 3正好
2. 00:42:361 (2) - 不好

1. 啪啪啪
2. 01:23:774 (2) - 吉安帕

1. 感觉Hard和Gu's Insane间的跨度有点大，后者难了些

1. 听说所有难度的Break必须一致？
2. 00:36:328 (3,4) - 总觉得不好看啊orz建议不重叠
3. 00:43:339 (1,2) - 个人不喜欢这种重叠，可以试试把第一个slider的末端圆圈刚好放到第二个slider上
4. 00:49:861 (3,4) - 太近
5. 00:53:774 (1,2) - 第二个slider往上放一点，仔细看，没有平
6. 01:00:948 (1) - 这个slider放在这感觉有点怪，如果从01:01:437开始感觉好一点
7. 01:09:426 (1,2) - 个人不喜欢这种重叠，可以试试把第一个slider的末端圆圈刚好放到第二个slider上
8. 01:21:165 (2) - 可以顺时针转一点，看起来和后面的slider处于一个圆弧上

1. 01:21:165 (2) - CircleSize要不要 + 1
2. 00:15:948 (1) - 这个弧度略猎奇
3. 00:21:165 (1) - 这个弧度略猎奇
4. 00:33:556 (4,1) - 别重叠
5. 01:00:132 (3,5) - 别重叠
6. 01:04:209 (1,3) - 建议把3的结尾和1的开头重叠

1. 00:07:632 (5,1) - 重叠好
2. 00:18:556 (1,2) - 柑橘这个地方不该跳啊
3. 00:32:252 (2,4) - 重叠好
4. 00:41:219 (2,4) - 没有重叠好
5. 00:41:709 (3,5) - 首先没重叠好，其次这样好像不能RANK？
6. 01:03:393 (6,1) - 没有重叠好
7. 01:04:209 (1,3) - 没有重叠好
8. 01:06:817 (1,4) - 没有重叠好
9. 01:22:959 (2,3) - 这个重叠有点蛋疼

1. 前面说了跨度有点大，建议AR - 1或2
2. 00:23:937 (2,1) - 这个距离是什么情况，弱逼没看懂
3. 00:42:198 (1,2) - 跳得有点大

1. 00:05:187 (4,1) - 不好看啊orz
2. 00:19:535 (3,4) - 不建议重叠
3. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - 貌似不能RANK？后面那个也是
4. 00:43:828 (2,4) - 没有重叠好
5. 01:23:774 (1,2) - 建议往下移到不重叠，或者完全重叠

1. 01:25:160 (1) - 和IMPACT一样加上那个whistle吗？

1. 00:15:948 (1) - 或许是想追求艺术感吧不过实在感觉像是普通的三点slider画歪了orz 可能我有必要提升一下艺术感
2. 00:25:730 (3) - 实在是加一个repeat会比较合曲吧……
3. 00:42:361 (2) - 对normal来说可能有点难
4. 00:57:524 (2,4) - ^
5. 01:25:078 (6) - ^
6. 01:25:160 (1) - 同Easy

1. 00:17:089 - 这段00:17:089 (3,4) - 00:18:556 (1,2) - 00:19:861 (4,5) - 之类这样的构造，有时跳有时按spacing来，也感觉不到有固定的跟的音轨，有点混乱，可以的话或许可以统一一下？
2. 00:34:372 (1,2,3) - 突然跟vocal有点奇怪，你后面也是跟的电吉他的话，感觉这换成跟电吉他会好点
3. 01:13:828 (5) - 这个whistle……感觉下错了，本来是想下那个kick的whistle吧？
4. 01:14:480 (1) - ^
5. 01:25:160 (1) - 同Easy

1. 诶为啥显示Not submitted？改标题了……？
2. 00:11:056 (3,4) - 反转？
3. 00:25:078 (1,2,3,4) - 因为离上一个超过了stack latency所以看起来比较诡异 建议右下移造成stack的样子或者调高latency
4. 00:36:002 (3) - 减速……？
5. 01:25:160 (1) - IMPACT!的这里是whistle而这个难度是clap，考虑换成一样的？

1. ……富有冲击力
2. 00:19:045 (2,3) - 感觉这两个都反转，00:19:861 (4,5) - 这两个在时间线上调换位置可能会比较好？
3. 00:21:654 (2) - whistle
4. 00:24:426 (6) - head-clap
5. 00:28:828 (1) - 将head-clap换成head-whistle
6. 00:43:094 - 最好在这和00:43:257加上clap不过按照你的排列手法后者应该是不太可能的 备考

Strawberry wrote:

make sure you have looked through the previous mods.I swear that I have. And most issues have been fixed. Sorry I haven't mention that.

No_gu
OD8 is more suitable imo.No. I think we should try to avoid this diff to be a "nothing but hard" one. Imo it's kinda meaningless.
01:23:774 (6) - look like the new combo should be on the next circle for a stack warning.Absolutely.

Normal
00:53:122 (2) - the whistle here sounds really needless. consider to remove it?I've changed the next note's hitsound (whistle->finish), so now the whistle here may be needed.

Easy
WHY STR2 in this diff? keeping rate 1 is totally enough for hitsounds of sliderticks and other things since i didn't find any other reason about that.Now it's 1.

NoeL-CIFER wrote:

general
好图！但是insane和impact难度与之前的难度感觉无法衔接，跨度太大impact完全对称闹那样= =
easy
感觉良好，没有问题
normal
个人倾向于把cs改到3
00:06:817(2,3,4)间距小一点
00:15:948 这个slider拆开来怎么样，两个折回感觉有点偷懒
00:21:165 同上
00:42:361这个有意遮掉一部分的么，感觉不是很好看
01:16:926这里感觉有点怪，去掉？
hard
00:57:850(1,2,3,4)说实话，打hard唯一断的地方就是这里，刚断的时候有点莫名，总是抢拍，改slider？
insane
敢不敢再难一点
ar-1
00:37:632这里一个三连和之前的二连感觉有些吃力，距离拉近一点怎么样
01:21:165这个串形状诡异。。
如果不看之前的难度，单独看这个insane的话，啪啪啪起来最舒服~~
impact
00:57:687(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)换成串行不行，这种超短的slider很不习惯。。

• 
  Why don't you map after the first spinner?

1. 00:21:165 (1) - Snapped wrongly.
2. 00:22:469 (3) - ^
3. 00:23:774 (1) - ^

1. 01:06:817 (1) - Should start at 01:06:654 to follow the song.

• 
  I recommend OD8 for this diff.

1. 00:14:480 (5) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing between (2,4,5) and (5,6).
2. 00:15:785 (6) - I think this note doesn't match the song because there's no sound in back here.
3. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - I felt weird these placements when playing. Is it better to place (2) above the end of slider? They are a circle -> a circle -> a slider so what (2) is being below the end of slider looks weird.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:32:904 (1,2,3) - Same reason as above, (2) should be below the end of slider or (1) should be above the start of it.
5. 00:35:513 (4) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing.
6. 00:47:415 (5) - ^
7. 00:51:165 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I guess you followed the vocal here but I don't feel they match well. Should they start at 00:51:002?
   
8. 00:53:774 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Your pattern is very good and following the music. How about using wider spacings for them? The song is excited here, so I guess wider ones match very well.
9. 01:17:089 (8,1,2,3) - Also I felt they don't match the song.
   

Suzully wrote:

Hello.

[Easy]

• 
  Why don't you map after the first spinner?I think a break is kinda necessary for an easy diff. Also I was too lazy can't move.

1. 00:21:165 (1) - Snapped wrongly.
2. 00:22:469 (3) - ^
3. 00:23:774 (1) - ^

[Hard]

1. 01:06:817 (1) - Should start at 01:06:654 to follow the song.

[IMPACT!!]

• 
  I recommend OD8 for this diff.

1. 00:14:480 (5) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing between (2,4,5) and (5,6).
2. 00:15:785 (6) - I think this note doesn't match the song because there's no sound in back here.
3. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - I felt weird these placements when playing. Is it better to place (2) above the end of slider? They are a circle -> a circle -> a slider so what (2) is being below the end of slider looks weird.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:32:904 (1,2,3) - Same reason as above, (2) should be below the end of slider or (1) should be above the start of it.
5. 00:35:513 (4) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing.
6. 00:47:415 (5) - ^
7. 00:51:165 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I guess you followed the vocal here but I don't feel they match well. Should they start at 00:51:002?
   
8. 00:53:774 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Your pattern is very good and following the music. How about using wider spacings for them? The song is excited here, so I guess wider ones match very well.
9. 01:17:089 (8,1,2,3) - Also I felt they don't match the song.
   I still insist my way here. Sorry.

Popped for wrongly-snapped notes in Easy.
I'll repair a bubble after your fixing :3