forum

Average Speed Ability - Profile Feature [invalid]

posted
Total Posts
10
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +0
Topic Starter
Chiburu
It would be interesting to see players' speed ability through a BPM average.

For example, if a player plays a 150 BPM, 175 BPM and 200 BPM beatmap, the BPM average would be 175 BPM. This small feature could boast a player's speed and show how fast they can play. It would be interesting to see pro players' BPM speed especially! This feature could also challenge players to improve their skills by wanting to raise their BPM average to surpass other players' BPM averages.

How does this sound?
VoidnOwO
:)
she_old
420bpm here I come
[CSGA]Ar3sgice
we should change DT to variable 75%-150% then show in profile the average percentage

(suspect 1000pc scenario
Topic Starter
Chiburu
For Double Time mods, the doubled BPM can be taken into consideration. Just like difficulties with names such as Easy+ or Hard+, there can be a way to show that players can play with the Double Time mod enabled.
boat
No. Most people know their own capabilities and limits, so use your profile to flaunt this useless information.
GoldenWolf
And what about map with doubled bpm like Scarlet Rose and such?
And if I play a map with very low bpm like Giniro Hikousen? Will it lower my average BPM just because the map itself is slow? It means I should stop playing slow map if I don't want to lower my average BPM :/
Aqo
BPM isn't speed anyway. Speed is object density. A 200bpm stream map is way "speedier" than a 140bpm alternating map where the mapper picked to call it 280bpm.

Worst feature request ever \ : D /
Players have no fixed speed anyway. We're humans not robots.
blissfulyoshi
Besides what Aqo said, why would you want to know the average? Even after dt is applied, the song has a capped bpm. Meaning that there are always songs that are going to drag down your average.

I agree with denying this.
deadbeat
the people have spoken
Please sign in to reply.

New reply