Sort by:[b] Map[/b] | User | Date
Map #1 [200 replays watched] [+]
Map #2 [150 replays watched] [+]
Map #3 [75 replays watched] [-]
User 1 [rank #5][+]
User 2 [rank #358][+]
User 3 [rank #2342][-]
//additional details here (like date or something, idk)
Person 4 [rank #23423409284] [+]
Map #4 [5 replays watched] [+]
Sort by: Map | [b]User[/b] | Date
User #1 [rank #6] [+]
User #2 [rank #75] [+]
User#3 [rank #1232] [-]
Map 1 [+]
Map 2 [+]
Map 3 [-]
//additional details here (like date or something, idk)
Person 4 [+]
User #4 [rank #9001] [+]
Sort by: Map | User | [b]Date[/b]
(bold denotes new replayed watched by others since last visiting your profile)
[b]Map #1 viewed by User #1 on Date #1
Map #2 viewed by User #2 on Date #2[/b]
Map #3 viewed by User #3 on Date #3
just don't watch the replay then ...asdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statisticsasdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.reuben2011 wrote:
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statisticsasdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
Well, by default it would be so that you don't appear as anonymous. And I don't think there are that many people that actually care enough about their privacy to go through the trouble of toggling the option.theowest wrote:
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.reuben2011 wrote:
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statistics
so why botherreuben2011 wrote:
Well, by default it would be so that you don't appear as anonymous. And I don't think there are that many people that actually care enough about their privacy to go through the trouble of toggling the option.theowest wrote:
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.
timeTheVileOne wrote:
500 stars?
What's keeping this from being a reality?
Winshley wrote:
Let's deny this.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
How to even acquire more stars?
I've had 0 stars for what, 3 months.
Good question.BRBP wrote:
Being able to see which replay was watched sounds nice, but I'm not sure if it's necessary to be able to see who watched it. I'm not going to read the entire thread, but would these be public statistics in your profile, or only available to the person who's replay was watched?
Where to check it? Can't find it in my profile for nowpeppy wrote:
I've started to collect per-replay stats. Not sure about logging who watched, though.
I've been wondering, does this assign a view count value to a specific replay, or to the combination of user/map?peppy wrote:
I've started to collect per-replay stats. Not sure about logging who watched, though.
Who watched your replay - Like, who the hell cares about who watched his/her/or even my replays? which will cause a negative reflections on both sides and annoys a bitAmaiHachimitsu wrote:
Which replays were watched the most - OK This is a good idea and easy to implement
Who watched your replay - Like, who the hell cares about who watched his/her replay?
What is more, I can totally predict some players spamming pro players' replays as to be at the top of their lists, getting their attention and in some way distorting the actual RWBO.
I'm against the "who watched your replay" feature
peppy wrote:
I've started to collect per-replay stats. Not sure about logging who watched, though.
Nearly 15 months later....surely this will happen any day nowdeadbeat wrote:
he's started to collect the stats, not display them. give him some time >_<