Always wondered who's watching my replays at Taiko. 1+
and probably standard osu too.
and probably standard osu too.
Sort by:[b] Map[/b] | User | Date
Map #1 [200 replays watched] [+]
Map #2 [150 replays watched] [+]
Map #3 [75 replays watched] [-]
User 1 [rank #5][+]
User 2 [rank #358][+]
User 3 [rank #2342][-]
//additional details here (like date or something, idk)
Person 4 [rank #23423409284] [+]
Map #4 [5 replays watched] [+]
Sort by: Map | [b]User[/b] | Date
User #1 [rank #6] [+]
User #2 [rank #75] [+]
User#3 [rank #1232] [-]
Map 1 [+]
Map 2 [+]
Map 3 [-]
//additional details here (like date or something, idk)
Person 4 [+]
User #4 [rank #9001] [+]
Sort by: Map | User | [b]Date[/b]
(bold denotes new replayed watched by others since last visiting your profile)
[b]Map #1 viewed by User #1 on Date #1
Map #2 viewed by User #2 on Date #2[/b]
Map #3 viewed by User #3 on Date #3
just don't watch the replay then ...asdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statisticsasdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.reuben2011 wrote:
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statisticsasdasdasd654456 wrote:
and if the ones who watch don't want them to know it?
Well, by default it would be so that you don't appear as anonymous. And I don't think there are that many people that actually care enough about their privacy to go through the trouble of toggling the option.theowest wrote:
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.reuben2011 wrote:
There could be an option to appear as anonymous in the replay statistics
so why botherreuben2011 wrote:
Well, by default it would be so that you don't appear as anonymous. And I don't think there are that many people that actually care enough about their privacy to go through the trouble of toggling the option.theowest wrote:
bah. then this feature request becomes pretty worthless.
timeTheVileOne wrote:
500 stars?
What's keeping this from being a reality?
Winshley wrote:
Let's deny this.
Static Noise Bird wrote:
How to even acquire more stars?
I've had 0 stars for what, 3 months.