1. 00:00:844 (1) - whistle
2. 00:04:001 (1) - ^
3. 00:06:765 (3) - ^ at tail
4. 00:10:317 (3) - ^ at head
   just to make sounds less empty in beginning ~
5. 00:22:949 (5) - i think NC should start here instead of next note
6. 01:54:922 (2) - NC

1. 00:54:330 (2) - i think it sounds better if you turn this into a single note ~ after that you can sort of fix the rest of the rhythm lol
2. 02:02:225 (3) - remove whistle
3. 02:05:383 (4) - imo whistle sounds more better on the tail..~
4. i think you can put some whistles from 02:33:015 - to 02:38:738 - x) like lunatic

• HP+1, 6 seems a bit low?

1. 00:32:422 (1) - finish sounds possible in these areas
2. 00:53:541 (4) - feels better to me when placed above the slider a little, rather than below if you know wat i mean...like placing it around where 00:51:765 (1) - is for example ><
3. 01:46:436 (5) - how about stack on the tail of 01:47:027 (2) -

meiikyuu wrote:

o/

Normal

1. 00:00:844 (1) - whistle
2. 00:04:001 (1) - ^
3. 00:06:765 (3) - ^ at tail
4. 00:10:317 (3) - ^ at head
   just to make sounds less empty in beginning ~
5. 00:22:949 (5) - i think NC should start here instead of next note
6. 01:54:922 (2) - NC it feels way too combo spam to me =.= dunno why so I leave it here ~

Hard

1. 00:54:330 (2) - i think it sounds better if you turn this into a single note ~ after that you can sort of fix the rest of the rhythm lol lol I fixed but dunno if it turned out better or not = ="
2. 02:02:225 (3) - remove whistle maybe it sounds with the vocal I guess O.o!!
3. 02:05:383 (4) - imo whistle sounds more better on the tail..~ ^
4. i think you can put some whistles from 02:33:015 - to 02:38:738 - x) like lunatic , added \xD/

Lunatic

• HP+1, 6 seems a bit low? <.<

1. 00:32:422 (1) - finish sounds possible in these areas a... it might be the area that has lower volume than such points like 00:35:580 (1) - I thinkk = =" so I hope this difference of finish will emphasize the song better o.oa"
2. 00:53:541 (4) - feels better to me when placed above the slider a little, rather than below if you know wat i mean...like placing it around where 00:51:765 (1) - is for example >< I think I don't know what I mean sorry -/\-"
3. 01:46:436 (5) - how about stack on the tail of 01:47:027 (2) -

lol its pretty nice, sry its just mostly hitsounds =^= good luck!!!

Kotone wrote:

T.T Yura!!!!!!!!!!!!!why dont tell me!!!!

yanlu wrote:

Hi Frost!!
Mod from myself~ lol

[General]

1. hmm...BG too big >~<?
   I cut a new one for you \:D/ free to use or not :3
   
   BG<-(1024*768)

   
   Thank you for the BG yanlu~~ but I think this size is fine for the full screen, not too big

[Lunatic]

1. 00:11:501 (4) - maybe this change to slider better >_< http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/706013 (same with 00:09:922 (4,1) - and 00:06:765 (2,1) - )
   
2. 00:25:613 (10) - this is little far with 00:25:317 (9) - ...cuz 00:24:528 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - is a small stream so I feel suddenly orz) put x272/y84 maybe.
   not that sudden I believe ._." , and what I think is they follow the specific sound in the music which I changed from following the guitar to this sound instead
3. 00:42:488 (1,2) - the flow is not good with 00:41:699 (1,2) - ...it's readable with hidden mod but i think put in x32/y160 or some where else flow more fit :3
   hehe, to hide all notes for the sake of difficulty with hidden mod is my job xD *joking* , I think it's interesting , not that bad flow I hope....
4. 00:44:067 (1) - i listen the music and see you do stack 00:43:475 (1,2) - ..so maybe 00:43:870 (3,1) - stack too better? (i perfer put x308/y324~)
   I don't think it's really needed, I mean, it can be something different lol so that the map won't be boring = =", anyways, I noted and I will change if someone point this out again
5. 00:50:186 (2) - more spacing? i perfer more then 0.6x~0.8x too far and a bit uncomfortable to go up in north direction = =
6. 00:52:159 (1,2,1) - i dunno...maybe this is NC spam lol LOL , it follows the pitching of vocal and jump xD
7. 00:53:541 (4) - try to arc a bit will more pretty http://puu.sh/2Awtg goooood , done xD
8. 01:00:843 (1) - a little close...cuz 01:00:251 (1,2,3) - is a jump >0< put x8/y284? I like making big jumps and suddenly change it closed spacing xD, that will emphasize sounding better I think
9. 01:29:462 (7,8,9) - too far with above stream >_<! maybe just about 2.0x? i perfer x188/y240.. I'm evil D:
10. 01:40:120 (4,5,6) - orz this over 5.0x...are you sure? TAT it's really peaking here so I think large like this is fine ! only here =.=" , other positions are unfitting for this spacing I believe
11. 01:59:561 (3,4) - why...why make this flow D;? D; , but that can go with 01:59:857 (1) - greatly I think
12. 02:11:107 (4) - ctrl+g? it's fit~ sorry.. I don't want to make a jump here (want to emphasize 02:11:501 (1,2) - so that I have to place normal spacing here)

[Hard]

1. 00:25:613 (3) - ctrl+g? I think it's fine xD, with ctrl+g might be too short to hit and get missed easier from the previous slider
2. 01:13:080 (5) - x96/y123 >.<? changed a bit for the whole pattern !
3. 02:19:396 (4,5) - change to a slider? I like notes ;_; !!
4. 02:45:054 - add clap~ you have it in Lunatic~ ok !

[Normal]

1. 02:45:054 - add clap~ added~

That's all. nice mappu~ヾ(･∀･*)ﾉ

GL<3

MMzz wrote:

[Lunatic]
00:14:857 (4) - This is a bit personal but I think this would look a lot nicer if you spread it out some. It won't effect the gameplay really. Maybe like this? http://puu.sh/2BY6H Sorry if this feels like a nazi suggestion.
nazi is fine lol, I think it fits much better with spacing like 00:20:580 (4,1) - so fixed
00:21:567 (1) - Is this NC necessary? If you look at the next bit 00:22:357 (2) - you didn't add new combos to these? So as far as I see this you should remove them, unless you have a reason.
removed , my mistake ._.
01:19:199 (4) - This part feels really empty! It would be a lot nicer if you got the downbeat kick on 01:19:396 emphasized. Changing this into a slider could be a nice solution. Example: http://puu.sh/2BYi1 I think another linear slider going the opposite direction and angel in a nice contrast to 01:18:607 (3) - 's shape. And this pattern has good flow leading into the next combo.
hmm, I do think this is nice but for the pattern here, I would like to keep it because after this point , some what like 01:19:791 (3,4,5,6) - have strange rhythms (not plain constant 1/2), 01:19:199 (4) - will fit clap much better without 01:19:396 (next white tick)
so that's why I want to introduce this part 01:19:791 (3,4,5) - better with just only a clap at red tick 01:19:199 which won't ruin and double clap with the next white tick
also it fits with the peaking of vocal too xD , maybe adding a clap on 01:18:607 (3) - 's tail will sound better imo so I added it and see if it's ok
01:29:462 (7) - Wouldn't it be a better idea to start the combo here instead of 01:29:857 (1) - ? It looks kinda off continuing that last combo into the kiai when you can start a new one.
the reason for this is 01:29:265 (6,7) - has very large spacing, it's hard to jump without followpoints for this (I tried and found that was quite sudden)
plus 01:29:857 (1) - starts the new phrase for the vocal , it sounds like what I have done so far (ex.01:31:633 (1) - (I am still not sure for some NC that won't follow this line but I do think I tried to follow as much as possible for the NC with vocal) it's quite strange but I hope it's fine = =" since it follows the logic of NC that I mostly use in this diff
01:58:870 (1,2) - This jump felt really uncomfortable. I'm not sure if it's the fact I'm pretty bad at jumps in general but if you take 01:58:672 (2,1) - and reverse them you have a smoother jump into 01:59:067 (2) - . http://puu.sh/2BYrd This also works well with 01:58:278 (1) - too because it sets you up for the wider jump into 01:58:672 (2) - . (in the picture)
much better, fixed ~
02:32:422 (5) - NC here? For better representation of the slowed down slider. And it's on the downbeat/new vocal line, so a combo fits nice.
yea, I think it's quite sudden and will be annoying for players = =" so I changed the rhythms a bit for this slider, hope it's better !~~

Other diffs are fine in my eyes. Cool map.

Pokie wrote:

Super short modding, no kds

[Lunatic]
02:31:041 - Rhythm suggestion: oo oo
02:32:422 (5) - Spacing error? There's a slow down section on this circle which caused an uneven spacing on this stream

1. Lunatic : 01:52:159 (3) - Would be better imo if it is moved lower a bit (~y:324) so it doesn't touch (2) while playing
2. Hard : 00:09:330 (1,2,3) - Try to move (2) to ~x:42 here?
3. Hard : 01:12:488 (3,4,5,6,7) - Is an arc like this intentional? Making it neater won't be hard at all though:
   
   SPOILER

   

   192,188,72488,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   34,63,72883,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   12,136,73080,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   51,202,73278,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   124,219,73475,1,0,0:0:0:0:

now you guys tell me please what is bf orz...................

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

now you guys tell me please what is bf orz...................

you need to fc challenge map first \x3/