Naryuga wrote:

[Chocopikel]

1. 00:42:947 (3) - リバースの矢印にもfinish?
2. from 01:11:731 (4) - to 01:14:163 (5) - 各白tickにwhistle?
3. 01:20:243 (7) - リバースにwhistle? 01:26:730 (3) - も同じく
4. 02:34:028 (3) - end point ---> (x:312, y:136)? 02:33:015 (8) - に重ねる意味です、特にそれ以外は意味ありません
   

1. fine

1. fine

1. 00:05:244 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - これは恐らくRankableです、ですがHardとしては視認性に関して問題を持っています
   
   
2. 02:11:123 (4,2) - ^
   前のものほど問題はありませんが、それでも被らないようにするのがベストです

1. fine

NewRulerNA wrote:

as your error check request.

[General]

1. fine

[jam's Normal]

1. fine

[Hard]

1. 00:05:244 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - これは恐らくRankableです、ですがHardとしては視認性に関して問題を持っています
   
   
   かぶらないように配置と音取りを変更しました　Fixed
2. 02:11:123 (4,2) - ^　nochangeで!!
   前のものほど問題はありませんが、それでも被らないようにするのがベストです

[Chocopikel]

1. fine

ルール上は問題ありませんが、なぜこの難易度にはKIAIが他のそれと大きく異なっているのでしょうか？
他の難易度と違う短いKIAIのエフェクトが見難くなることもなく、ゲストなので問題となることはまずありませんが、単純にそうした理由が気になりました
当然ですがここに書いたからといって直す必要はありません


gl

1. Do not place anything before your first uninherited point, that is, move your offset to -25 and resnap all.
2. Inconsistent Tags in Chocopikel diff, please fix it.

1. 00:06:460 (3) - (nazi) adjust the shape for better blanket with 00:04:839 (1) - ?
2. 02:26:731 (6) - a 3/4 repeat slider may be better here~~ like what you chose before :>
   
3. 02:42:947 (6) - ^, and add a note at 02:43:758 - ? like this:
   

1. 00:06:460 (7,8) - i suppose a 1/1 repeat slider here is much better than current ~
   
2. 00:33:420 (7,8) - err....is it in purpose?
3. 00:36:866 - i'd like to add a note here for transition, hmm, you can stack it with the head of 00:36:055 (6) - and add a whistle sample
4. 01:05:852 (3,4) - add whistle? like what you did with 01:00:177 (7,8) -
5. 01:10:514 (3,4,5,6) - hmm...i may choose to make the beat here like this, but anyway, just my thought so up to u :>
   
6. 01:17:204 (4,5) - same as 00:33:420 (7,8), are you sure it's in purpose?
7. 01:20:852 - i'd like to add a note here , also for transition, heard better :>
8. 01:46:393 - also suggest to add a transition note
9. 01:53:285 - add a note here or make 01:53:082 (4) - to be a 1/2 slider for vocal?
10. 02:11:325 (1,2,3,4) - here, i know the beat of music here is 1/4 definitely, but i try to reduce 1 repeat from each and change them to 1/3 length, it performs better than flat 1/4, so have a try?
    
11. 02:16:190 (2) - reduce it to 3/2 then add a note at 02:17:001 - for vocal?
    
12. 02:29:568 - to myself, i would like to add a note here and 02:29:974 - , and make an anti-stream with 02:30:379 (1) - for the coming kiai, better sense? these images show what i thought about
    
    SPOILER

    
    
    
13. 02:32:204 - add a note here for consistent beat?
14. 02:43:352 (4) - same as prev kiai, suggest a 1/2 slider or add a note at 02:43:555 -

1. No kiai time?
2. 00:13:758 (3,1) - combine to a repeat slider for vocal?
   
3. 00:37:677 (2,3,4,5) - here, the beat is correct but i suppose the sliders are dislocated due to the vocal. the vocal verses are started from white ticks but not red tick, and since your first white tick is occupied by a slider end, i'd like to suggest you remove 00:37:677 (2) - , and move all sliders 1/2 tick prev, then change 00:38:690 (5) - to a slider also, like this:
   
4. 00:42:136 (6) - move next NC to here for vocal?
5. 01:04:332 (2,3) - i'd like to move them half tick prev to make triplet with 01:04:231 (1) - for smooth beat :>
   
6. 01:11:325 (9) - move next NC to here for consistent combo change?
7. 01:20:243 (7) - the shape here is weird a bit... make it more smooth? eg
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:32:812 (2) - ctrl+g for better flow?
9. 01:46:595 (2,3) - similar to prev kiai, move half tick prev to make triplet with 01:46:393 (1) - ?
   

Scorpiour wrote:

Hi there~~ mod for request~~

red - must be fixed
blue - highly recommend to consider
black - only suggestions

[General]

1. Do not place anything before your first uninherited point, that is, move your offset to -25 and resnap all.
2. Inconsistent Tags in Chocopikel diff, please fix it.

thanks!!

[Hard]

1. 00:06:460 (7,8) - i suppose a 1/1 repeat slider here is much better than current ~
   Fixed
2. 00:33:420 (7,8) - err....is it in purpose? stack Fixed
3. 00:36:866 - i'd like to add a note here for transition, hmm, you can stack it with the head of 00:36:055 (6) - and add a whistle sample ok Add! Fixed
4. 01:05:852 (3,4) - add whistle? like what you did with 01:00:177 (7,8) - Fixed
5. 01:10:514 (3,4,5,6) - hmm...i may choose to make the beat here like this, but anyway, just my thought so up to u :>
   Fixed
6. 01:17:204 (4,5) - same as 00:33:420 (7,8), are you sure it's in purpose? I cannot imagine his melodies
7. 01:20:852 - i'd like to add a note here , also for transition, heard better :> umm.. no change ok...?
8. 01:46:393 - also suggest to add a transition note sorry no change;^;
9. 01:53:285 - add a note here or make 01:53:082 (4) - to be a 1/2 slider for vocal? ok i think too but add note 02:11:326 (1) -
10. 02:11:325 (1,2,3,4) - here, i know the beat of music here is 1/4 definitely, but i try to reduce 1 repeat from each and change them to 1/3 length, it performs better than flat 1/4, so have a try? nice!!! Fixed
    
11. 02:16:190 (2) - reduce it to 3/2 then add a note at 02:17:001 - for vocal? Fixed
    
12. 02:29:568 - to myself, i would like to add a note here and 02:29:974 - , and make an anti-stream with 02:30:379 (1) - for the coming kiai, better sense? these images show what i thought about I thought the flow sorry ;^; no change plz
    
    SPOILER

    
    
    
13. 02:32:204 - add a note here for consistent beat? Fixed
14. 02:43:352 (4) - same as prev kiai, suggest a 1/2 slider or add a note at 02:43:555 - ok 02:43:556 - here note add Fixed

that's all~~ solid mapset~~ call me back to recheck when you're ready ~~ :>

Scorpiour wrote:

[Chocopikel]

1. No kiai time? It is momentarily. I want to keep it.
2. 00:13:758 (3,1) - combine to a repeat slider for vocal? no change sorry
   
3. 00:37:677 (2,3,4,5) - here, the beat is correct but i suppose the sliders are dislocated due to the vocal. the vocal verses are started from white ticks but not red tick, and since your first white tick is occupied by a slider end, i'd like to suggest you remove 00:37:677 (2) - , and move all sliders 1/2 tick prev, then change 00:38:690 (5) - to a slider also, like this: position of object was changed
   
4. 00:42:136 (6) - move next NC to here for vocal? Here is end of vocal. no change.
5. 01:04:332 (2,3) - i'd like to move them half tick prev to make triplet with 01:04:231 (1) - for smooth beat :> I don't think so...
   
6. 01:11:325 (9) - move next NC to here for consistent combo change? same comment as 00:42:136 (6)
7. 01:20:243 (7) - the shape here is weird a bit... make it more smooth? eg fixed
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:32:812 (2) - ctrl+g for better flow? done
9. 01:46:595 (2,3) - similar to prev kiai, move half tick prev to make triplet with 01:46:393 (1) - ? same comment as 01:04:332 (2,3)
   

• 
  00:54:704 (3) It would look nicer if you reversed the slider.
  00:57:947 (1) You might want to reverse the slider; probably more so if you didn't follow the first suggestion.
  01:00:177 (7,8,9) You could just stack them all together. It would look a bit neater.
  01:41:224 (4) This seems like an odd triplet. You may want to consider deleting this circle. You could stack it a bit nicer anyways.
  01:41:934 (6,7,8) You should stack these.
  01:45:583 (7,8,9) ^
  01:48:015 (3,4,5) ^
  01:52:880 You could add a circle here.
  02:27:542 (1) I think this is an odd slider with an odd slider velocity. You should probably replace it with a spinner like in your Normal difficulty.
  02:30:380 (1) It would make much more sense if this slider was cut off by 1/4 of a beat (making it a 1/2 beat slider).
  02:36:056 (2,3,4) see 0:1:41:934
  02:38:285 (3,4,5) ^
  02:43:150 See 01:52:880

• 
  00:12:947 (1,2,3,1) An odd place for a close distance place like this. If you are going to do it though, its best to bring 1 (slider) over to 3 to keep it consistent.
  00:38:691 (4,1,2,3,4) This flower-like pattern doesn't look very neat. You should make it look nicer like 00:41:326 (2,3,4,5,6)
  01:07:475 (4) I think this looks oddly placed.
  01:07:272 (3,5,6) These don't line up exactly.
  01:22:880 (2,3,4) I think this might play a bit better if you reversed 2 and 3, and then reverse 3 and 4.
  02:08:083 (5) New combo?
  02:27:643 (1) There's either no end hit sound or its too quiet to hear it. You should fix this.
  02:30:380 (1) Like above, its silent.

SpinsAlot wrote:

[Hard:]

• 
  00:54:704 (3) It would look nicer if you reversed the slider. no I think this Flow
  00:57:947 (1) You might want to reverse the slider; probably more so if you didn't follow the first suggestion. sorry
  01:00:177 (7,8,9) You could just stack them all together. It would look a bit neater. stack is deviation "deliberately"
  01:41:224 (4) This seems like an odd triplet. You may want to consider deleting this circle. You could stack it a bit nicer anyways. ^
  01:41:934 (6,7,8) You should stack these. ^
  01:45:583 (7,8,9) ^ ^
  01:48:015 (3,4,5) ^ ^
  01:52:880 You could add a circle here. "na ka ma da ro u" wa 01:52:677 - ma 01:53:083 (4,5,6) - da ro u 01:52:880 - here is no Song
  02:27:542 (1) I think this is an odd slider with an odd slider velocity. You should probably replace it with a spinner like in your Normal difficulty. sorry hold ;^;
  02:30:380 (1) It would make much more sense if this slider was cut off by 1/4 of a beat (making it a 1/2 beat slider). this music I have picked up from behind sorry
  02:36:056 (2,3,4) see 0:1:41:934 ^
  02:38:285 (3,4,5) ^ ^
  02:43:150 See 01:52:880 ^

I couldn't find anything in Normal, so I didn't mod it.

SpinsAlot wrote:

[Chocopikel:]

• 
  00:12:947 (1,2,3,1) An odd place for a close distance place like this. If you are going to do it though, its best to bring 1 (slider) over to 3 to keep it consistent.
  00:38:691 (4,1,2,3,4) This flower-like pattern doesn't look very neat. You should make it look nicer like 00:41:326 (2,3,4,5,6)
  01:07:475 (4) I think this looks oddly placed.
  01:07:272 (3,5,6) These don't line up exactly.
  01:22:880 (2,3,4) I think this might play a bit better if you reversed 2 and 3, and then reverse 3 and 4.
  02:08:083 (5) New combo?
  02:27:643 (1) There's either no end hit sound or its too quiet to hear it. You should fix this.
  02:30:380 (1) Like above, its silent.

1. 00:13:758 (4) - sorry i forget this one, change to a 3/4 repeat slider like others? also start spinner from white tick :>
2. 02:12:947 (1) - the NC here is designed?

Scorpiour wrote:

recheck, no KDs

[jam's Normal]

1. 00:13:758 (4) - sorry i forget this one, change to a 3/4 repeat slider like others? also start spinner from white tick :> ok
2. 02:12:947 (1) - the NC here is designed?yes,but either is fine to me.remove it.

nothing major, i thinik i can bubble it when you give me a reply

Quilt wrote:

go^^/

BeatofIke wrote:

Go GO GO!

Garven wrote:

[choco]
02:09:704 (1,2,3,4) - This plays better with one more 1/4 imo

02:21:056 - .75x maybe? .5x feels too slow here
02:35:650 (5) - This looks a lot better as a blanket.

SPOILER

Garven wrote:

Yo o/

[General]
Tick rate 2 fits this song best. Might make for some extra work in jam's Normal though. Also if you did this, try to silence every other tick during the slow part at 02:14:569 - i think tick rate1 is better... sorry ;^; no change plz ;;

[Normal]
00:42:137 (1) - Remove new combo Fixed
01:38:893 (1) - ^ Fixed
02:22:677 (1) - ^ Fixed
Good stuff
ps:NcだけなのでUpdateしておきました :)

[Hard]
00:38:893 (1) - Remove new combo Fixed
01:00:177 (7,8,9) - Kind of strange seeing 1/4 rhythms in a Hard like this. Feels like you're pushing too hard for difficulty instead of letting the map translate the song. There's a few of them throughout the map. 7 8 9 delete~ Fixed
01:16:191 (1) - Remove new combo Fixed
01:19:434 (1) - ^ Fixed
02:18:218 (1) - ^ Fixed
02:35:650 (1) - ^ Fixed

Garven wrote:

Ah, set this please

Garven wrote:

/o/

B2IN wrote:

gratz ~~

alacat wrote:

omedeto~

Guy wrote:

おめでとおお

Scorpiour wrote:

congrats~~