What about having it for rank 500? :v
Kyou-kun wrote:
YES
^theowest wrote:
for rank 500? :v
what this man (or woman) saidpeppy wrote:
I'm not sure if this would be worthwhile considering we have the graph for pp now. If changes in rank were added, they would be displayed once a day at the point of pp recalculation (as real-time pp updates can be inaccurate based on when people play throughout the day). It may work better to just remove the ranking system increase notifications altogether, and have it focus on individual difficulties/beatmaps instead.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯Kyou-kun wrote:
what this man (or woman) said
i can live with thispeppy wrote:
It may work better to just remove the ranking system increase notifications altogether, and have it focus on individual difficulties/beatmaps instead.
I disagree, 500 is perfect.Kyou-kun wrote:
Top 500 of normal beatmap rankings seems a little much. Top 100 was fine.
this feature request had nothing to do with spam in the recent activity. it was to change the score ranking increase messages to pp ranking increase messages.Kyou-kun wrote:
Top 500 of normal beatmap rankings seems a little much. I can get that in one play every time. Making it show top 500 will result in just as much spam as was occurring previously, which is what this feature request aimed to eradicate. Top 100 was fine.
Any player can get top 500 on pretty much any insane or hard in a single play. Recent activity will be pretty much the same as "recent plays (last 24 hours)" now, and the actually good (top 100) ranks will be pushed down every single time anyone plays a map for the first time.theowest wrote:
I disagree, 500 is perfect.Kyou-kun wrote:
Top 500 of normal beatmap rankings seems a little much. Top 100 was fine.
So do I.theowest wrote:
I guess I just play maps older than a few weeks then.
There's plenty of older maps with few ranks, actually. This is a great example. You can get C and misses and still land a top 500 score easily if you get a decent enough combo.theowest wrote:
I guess I just play maps older than a few weeks then.
I disagree. I think that even top 100 is still almost pushing it.theowest wrote:
how about 200? You have to take the massive increase in players into consideration.
I'd be perfectly ok with top 200 ranks displaying in recent actibity, but I still think top 100 would be the best. I don't share Kyou-kun's opinion about top 100 being "pushing it", considering some hard maps are quite contested (ie. Blue Night). Having a good balance is important.theowest wrote:
how about 200? You have to take the massive increase in players into consideration.
Blue Night easykoromo wrote:
I'd be perfectly ok with top 200 ranks displaying in recent actibity, but I still think top 100 would be the best. I don't share Kyou-kun's opinion about top 100 being "pushing it", considering some hard maps are quite contested (ie. Blue Night). Having a good balance is important.theowest wrote:
how about 200? You have to take the massive increase in players into consideration.
Go away Blue Night #1. ;w;Kyou-kun wrote:
Blue Night easy
This. No idea why it was changed, but I think it was perfect the way it used to be (top 100, I don't think I've ever seen anyone complaining about it, seriously).Saten wrote:
Or maybe no changes regarding this.
Please make a thread for thisbenguin wrote:
How about letting the player decide, there could be an option that says, "only show top [fill in blank] scores in recent activities." That way, people who play osu more as a casual game as well as new players cn set this number to 1000 and be proud of all their top 1000's, while a top tier player could set it to top 40 or something to avoidhaing their recent activities spammed. You guys say that ANYONE can get top 500 in a single play, well this surely isn't the cse since there are more than 500 people that have played any given map and they all can't be top 500 can they?