Seems like you're purposely ignoring the ":3."Two wrote:
176769 strikes me as purposely ignorant
No comment.Two wrote:
178053 is trying to cast suspicion on other people in a way that benefits aliens
You're looking WAY into that post IMO.Two wrote:
178263 is, in my opinion, attempting to condition people to believe that he's (Sir Minelli) a human
Uh, sure.Two wrote:
178772 defends derekku for no reason
I'm interested in this conversation.Two wrote:
I also saw the conversation that Echo and Rolled had where they interrogated each other. The way Echo went about gathering information was also suspicious to me and tbh I think Rolled was too naive. Maybe I'm just reading too much into it, though.
You claim yourself that "maybe [you're] just reading too much into" a "conversation [which] trumps a single suspicious post." That is, you say the conversation should be taken lightly but say it's more incriminating than three "suspicious" posts.Two wrote:
Either way, 3 suspicious posts+a conversation trumps a single suspicious post, so vote Ech...
fuck it, Role Claim: Vigilante I'm shooting Echo ^_^
EDIT: Ival informed me I misread Two's original post. Woops. =X
With that kind of logic you'll probably never pull in my vote.Two wrote:
There's no way I could get all of you to agree with me
What if he is the Priest or Coroner? Also, although I haven't played a Warewolf game before, it seems to me that reviving based on an unconfirmed Coroner claim isn't the best of ideas. (E.g. Echo is the Coroner and an Alien claims Coroner tomorrow, naming him a Civilian. Seer confirms this.)Two wrote:
he can be revived by the priest anyway if it turns out that he's not an alien.
Also, I got fucking ninja'd. I thought actions have to be bolded to be official. Whatever, I still want my post commented on.
