This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Not in.strager wrote:
A former Mafia member had been exiled from his not-so-loving clan... Now a ghost, she travels eerily across the country in search of an accepting home.
Gender confused.JInxyjem wrote:
strager wrote:
A former Mafia member had been exiled from his not-so-loving clan... Now a ghost, shetravels eerily across the country in search of an accepting home.
strager wrote:
Crazy Mafia is a short Mafia game for veteran players.
Uhh watkuwarudo wrote:
Let me try this atleast once
strager wrote:
You may only sign up and play if you have played at least one Mafia or Warewolf game before.
Rules wrote:
- Do not end the game yourselves. You may discuss the game after the Mafia die(s), but the game may not end.
Peppy's trying to still fix stuff. Bancho was down for 10 hours earlier.Lucidity wrote:
/confirm
Btw, is it just me or have the forums been down like the whole day?
Explanation:Echo wrote:
pasonia and lucidity's reasons are overly defensive, +1 for mafia
It's your first post in the game. No matter who you voted, it would have been easy to pass off as a random vote. There was no need for such a long-winded, defensive reason. Unless I missed sarcasm?Lucidity wrote:
Vote: Derekku Chan, because blah blah blah long explanation
Everyone knew it was a joke, there was no need to point it out. You got twitchy when I put the finger on you, while a normal townie would not have reacted with such impatience. However this is different from above - the "(...)" clearly indicates that sarcasm was not involved in this post.Pasonia wrote:
That's a joke? (...)
Ah I only saw this now. I'm tempted to vote for you now as well citing lamenessPasonia wrote:
Confirm.... firm... irm...
Correction. Suspicion *without* reason.Echo wrote:
Sigh pasonia, always so defensive. I'm trying to spark discussion here, that's all.
Note that pasonia nearly always omgus's whenever someone puts the slightest suspicion on him.
When someone is dead.Derekku Chan wrote:
Hey strager, when is the deadline?
He uses the word "still" to say that he has said that he was a vanilla ghostie before, which he clearly hasn't.Pasonia wrote:
Otherwise, I'm still a vanilla ghostie.
What is there to explain? Vanilla Ghosties are just that, Vanilla Ghosties.adam2046 wrote:
He uses the word "still" to say that he has said that he was a vanilla ghostie before, which he clearly hasn't.Pasonia wrote:
Otherwise, I'm still a vanilla ghostie.
Quick to claim vanilla ghostie right after me.
Yeah, there's actually no such role as Vanilla Ghostie, Pasonia, please explain. (Advise against voting Pasonia for now until he explains...seriously you guys are always way too quick to jump.)
What do you mean "fix"? Photoshop the osu cookie into the visor?strager wrote:
Fix your avatar, Echo.
If "still" doesn't mean "fuckshit", then why did you put it in there?Pasonia wrote:
What is there to explain? Vanilla Ghosties are just that, Vanilla Ghosties.adam2046 wrote:
He uses the word "still" to say that he has said that he was a vanilla ghostie before, which he clearly hasn't.Pasonia wrote:
Otherwise, I'm still a vanilla ghostie.
Quick to claim vanilla ghostie right after me.
Yeah, there's actually no such role as Vanilla Ghostie, Pasonia, please explain. (Advise against voting Pasonia for now until he explains...seriously you guys are always way too quick to jump.)
The usage of the word "still" doesn't mean fuckshit.
I sense a probing move; is it a Vanilla Ghostie probing move? I'd think it is.
The way you say "perfectly valid" makes it sound like "yes, this role could possibly exist, but it isn't really my role"Pasonia wrote:
There was no lying involved. The role of Vanilla Ghostie is perfectly valid.
So you think adam's a vanilla even though he admits to lying about the role claim? And along with that, he put suspicion on you with no "reason". But instead of voting (or FOS or whatever, since you might want to vote me over him), you instead clear him of suspicion? Admitting to lying is a pretty big thing, and I think more investigation should be done before you publicly pass any kind of verdict. I see inconsistency here with the way you claim to deal with people pointing fingers at you.Pasonia wrote:
adam's either a probing scum who got it real right, or he's a probing vanilla who got it all wrong. I'll put my money on the latter.
?strager wrote:
Fix you avatar, Echo.
He means make it less gay. We went over this.Echo wrote:
?strager wrote:
Fix you avatar, Echo.
Take it this way, Echo.Echo wrote:
The way you say "perfectly valid" makes it sound like "yes, this role could possibly exist, but it isn't really my role"Pasonia wrote:
There was no lying involved. The role of Vanilla Ghostie is perfectly valid.So you think adam's a vanilla even though he admits to lying about the role claim? And along with that, he put suspicion on you with no "reason". But instead of voting (or FOS or whatever, since you might want to vote me over him), you instead clear him of suspicion? Admitting to lying is a pretty big thing, and I think more investigation should be done before you publicly pass any kind of verdict. I see inconsistency here with the way you claim to deal with people pointing fingers at you.Pasonia wrote:
adam's either a probing scum who got it real right, or he's a probing vanilla who got it all wrong. I'll put my money on the latter.
starts with w, ends with mPasonia wrote:
Besides, why would I foolishly allow myself to be exposed if I were scum, hmm? If that was a lie back there I'd have backed down,
How did you know adam was lying to test you? That's one big assumption. From your past few games, you would have called him out on it. This stinks of Pasonia-adam pair (not necessarily scumpair, but paired anyway) to me. Either that or one of the two is buddying the other.Pasonia wrote:
but the problem was that adam is more likely probing as a Vanilla than not by claiming that it was a lie. It was a tactic to test if I would automatically back down and claim that the Vanilla Ghosties is an invalid role name, which would definitely make adam doubly sure that I am the scum. The scum is unlikely to know what the vanillas' unique names are (it changes every CM game depending on strager's libid... uhh, I mean, his mood and theme) but I know what it is.
One game not equal the other. Note that I correctly figured out that you were scum on Game 1 because of the wordplay, and nailed the scum on the second, both using widely varying tactics. WIFOM? That's the way I roll~Echo wrote:
starts with w, ends with mPasonia wrote:
Besides, why would I foolishly allow myself to be exposed if I were scum, hmm? If that was a lie back there I'd have backed down,How did you know adam was lying to test you? That's one big assumption. From your past few games, you would have called him out on it. This stinks of Pasonia-adam pair (not necessarily scumpair, but paired anyway) to me. Either that or one of the two is buddying the other.Pasonia wrote:
but the problem was that adam is more likely probing as a Vanilla than not by claiming that it was a lie. It was a tactic to test if I would automatically back down and claim that the Vanilla Ghosties is an invalid role name, which would definitely make adam doubly sure that I am the scum. The scum is unlikely to know what the vanillas' unique names are (it changes every CM game depending on strager's libid... uhh, I mean, his mood and theme) but I know what it is.
Uh... The mere fact that I labelled you as scum because of a cop investigation should have been more than enough to let you know I was scum in that game. That was unavoidable. Also 0_o was proven innocent from his first D1 post, so it had to be me.Pasonia wrote:
Note that I correctly figured out that you were scum on Game 1 because of the wordplay,