Regou wrote:

啊對了
現在我有kudosu趕緊給一顆星你:D

十分感謝!

Verdisphena wrote:

Want to make a taiko diff, Can I?
Because I no idea to map these part with BPM change...
Ok, I didn't read the description x_x

ay6859 wrote:

趕緊射>___>

1. Everything's fine on the block. To the diffs.

1. 00:37:473 (2) - Remove Finish?

1. This feels like an Insane difficulty for me...
2. 00:58:456 (1) - Unstack this? Don't know why, but I frequently hit this too early and made a miss.

1. HP Drain -1?
2. 00:35:908 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is... uh... a bit hard to read.

Hinsvar wrote:

Hi. Mod here

*Note: Gold ones are a must-do. Everything in red are things that look awkward to me (subjective suggestions; you can follow my lead here or not); everything else are rants and minor suggestions to make things look cooler.

>General

1. Everything's fine on the block. To the diffs.

>Beginner

1. 00:37:473 (2) - Remove Finish? No change,It follow the music like other diff...

>Difficult

1. This feels like an Insane difficulty for me... Because the BPM
2. 00:58:456 (1) - Unstack this? Don't know why, but I frequently hit this too early and made a miss. Ok~

>Expert

1. HP Drain -1? No change because [Difficult] is use HP5.
2. 00:35:908 (1,2,3,4) - This pattern is... uh... a bit hard to read. I think player can read it If they can play [Difficult] well.

...Not really sure if I helped with anything. This beatmap's already great. This is worth a bubble, IMO.

Good luck on the way

Oh, and stars. Thank!

Frostmourne wrote:

hihi 7odoa ~

From modding queue

Beginner
fine~

Basic
01:16:508 (1) - new combo here , I like 1,2 1,2,3 1,3 and it's better for me :3 Ok~
01:17:326 (1) - I think it's better to new combo this and remove new combo next note because from their position and sound Ok~

Difficult
00:29:778 (1) - If you remove new combo here and add next note instead , I think next set of combo 1-5 will fit to thier position (half down) Currently is fine...

Expert
01:33:769 (1) - change this to repeat slider please ? from previous run , I think people can't stop his run by this anti jump , so using repeat slider at this point would be better. Ok~


Challenge
I suggest you to -1 HP drain , it's really hard to pass in last part from this hp drain and bpm ... HP6 not fit this song,and this is Challenge diff,so I do not want player easy to pass...
00:35:517 (3) - this can confuse people from last 00:34:734 (3) - I think this slider need to be moved to other position or move its tail
Okay...
00:51:365 (7) - this slider need to be new combo from decreasing slider velocity and because this slider placed near other slider but speed doesn't match with them Changed Sider Shape.
01:19:915 (2) - why don't use slow slider same as previous point like this ? 01:17:053 (3) - I think this single note cut your flow from its sound , slider will fit it more than this Good idea,Fixed!
01:20:463 (2) - ^ ^
01:21:690 (1) - use 1/6 snap divisor, end this slider at 01:22:053 (you use 1/4 and it doesn't match with sound I heard from 25% playback) Fixed,Thank you for point out!
01:31:923 (1) - nazi , move this slider's tail to x:278 y:211 this will be stacked completely with 01:31:115 (2) - Ok~


sorry for late modding =_=''


Star and Good luck for ranking !

1. I removed many useless green line And Changed Kiai time.

wcx19911123 wrote:

from my queue

[General]
timing不是每个难度都一样，红线太多了我懒得仔细看了，自己看看吧0.0
可能因为timing的关系，kiai也不一样了，可以试试弄一样来 Leorda都提出了,一難度的红线共有57條,如果要找出來的話,不知道要花上多少時間... (有工具便好了)

[Beginner]
01:21:008 (4,5) - 可以考虑换成slide，这个节奏对新人来说太难读了 有心無力,换成slider的話會是55BPM slider...

[Basic]
AR+1？ 在50BPM 的地方太快了
00:58:045 (2,3) - 换成slider？ 同上

[Difficult]
fine

[Expert]
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - 开25%仔细听的话，这里其实是1/4的4连 如果有留意IIDX的譜面的話,這裏是5连打
01:36:887 (1,2) - 这两个1.5x真心没必要。。 我看看他人的意見....

[Challenge]
AR+1？ 在50BPM 的地方太快了...
01:22:237 (1,2,3,4,5) - same 同上
01:36:887 (1,2) - same 同上

太鬼畜了QAQ
图虽然没啥问题，不过这难度，我不知道能rank不。。 我都不知道...

Nymph wrote:

Hi Nymph here and request from my queue.

[General]
红线错在这了 CHANLLENGE难度和其他难度不同 改成和其他难度一样吧
[attachment=1:72a5e]1111.png[/attachment:72a5e]
[attachment=0:72a5e]1111111111.png[/attachment:72a5e]


所以KIAI的不同也是差在那了 统一弄一下~ FIXED,十分感謝!


[Challenge]
Beatmap design/suggestion
基本没什么好提的 只有：...........
00:13:385 (4) - 这个slider减速1PC巨突然……完全反应不过来 NC一下提示下？
00:17:749 (4) - ^也是。。
00:51:365 (7) -
00:54:773 (4) -
00:58:045 (3) -
01:10:783 (3) -
01:13:101 (4) -
01:14:327 (6) -
01:15:145 (3) -
01:16:235 (4) -
01:17:053 (3) -
01:17:462 (4) -
01:18:143 (6) -
01:25:612 (4) -
01:29:477 (4) -
…………我感觉这歌就让我头脑一片混乱 我就完全不能判断哪个是减速slider了 如果可以的话 我倒真想推荐你单独用一个combo colour来标记每个减速的slider……弄个灰色什么的…………能让读图更容易一些..要不真是彻底懵了
這曲在IIDX和DDR都是無法判断哪裏減速,玩家只能記下哪裏减速,不然便無法pass了(Beatmania IIDX原影片)
因上的原因,所以我不打算改,加上不太喜歡大量NC.
不能判断减速是這圖的難度所在,因為這是[Challenge]

图本身没问题……关键我觉得这map要bubble得找有魄力的MAT或者BAT..... 這個我試試找多個MAT/Modder吧...

以上TAT

Expert

1. 這星數騙太大orz，我能想像玩家第一次玩的表情會是「OAO」
2. 01:28:157 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 超討厭的part...orz
3. 01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol
   以上是我的心得:3

Difficult

1. 總覺得難度名"Hyper"好點，因為beginner和expert，總合起來念得比較順xD
2. 這圖找BAT的話絕對不能找Odaril

Basic

1. Basic啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊(意義不明

Beginner

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - 我覺得把這兩個note換成slider比較好，以突然轉折的音來說，改成這樣對新手來的簡單許多

DarknessAngel wrote:

抱歉post兩次
由於代碼還有系統問題(它不給Edit...)
排版變得很奇怪希望別介意OAQ

DarknessAngel wrote:

request from All map will be modded

Challenge


我瞎了，對於這難度我不知道該如何評價才好，不科學啊 這有"孤高の創世"的難度~
00:13:385 (4) - 真心認為像這種變速很多的長條理應給它個NC，這是對玩家的一種照顧，比較好判斷而且有強調這part的效果
另外我看了你上一篇的回應，這圖已經非常難了(能pass的我想絕對很少)，在判斷上也增加難度也只是讓玩家徒增困擾而已
沒比較好，反而更差:< → 原作的譜面都是沒有暗示任何BPM變化 ,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...
01:12:009 (1) - 你看看你，可以給note加NC卻不給長條，你偏心 ! I removed this NC...
嘛，說那麼多你還是沒改的話，那盒子裡的東西就無視吧 ~
00:15:703 (1,2,3,4) - 這種其實就跟note組成的一直線差不多，因為呈現一個弧的關係大多數人打這種pattern多半會用鼠標"滑"過去，然而這樣又非常容易斷，像我就挺討厭這種排法的，不舒服啊lol 這是間距的難度吧~
box (click to toggle)
00:17:749 (4) - NC個，理由你知道
00:51:365 (7) - ^
00:54:773 (4) - ^
00:58:045 (3) - ^
01:10:783 (3) - ^
01:13:101 (4) - 長條說：「請給我NC吧QQ。」
01:14:327 (6) - ^
01:16:235 (4) - ^
01:16:644 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 這part只有(3)需要NC而已
01:25:612 (4) - NC
01:29:477 (4) - NC 先不改,看看其他Modder的意見~


01:30:077 - 非人領域，開始 ! 要毀滅世界了啊 OAQ
01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...


Expert


這星數騙太大orz，我能想像玩家第一次玩的表情會是「OAO」 這為何4.5*
01:28:157 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 超討厭的part...orz ...
01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...
以上是我的心得:3



Difficult


總覺得難度名"Hyper"好點，因為beginner和expert，總合起來念得比較順xD 這是DDRSN2的難度名稱,不可任意更改.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dance_Danc ... Difficulty)

這圖找BAT的話絕對不能找Odaril 他一定說:這一定不是hard的難度!



Basic


Basic啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊(意義不明



Beginner


01:21:008 (4,5) - 我覺得把這兩個note換成slider比較好，以突然轉折的音來說，改成這樣對新手來的簡單許多 這裏BPM=55 Orz...



恩，這圖真的滿好
只是放的某些跳讓圖打起來不是那麼的順
我期待這圖能ranked
玩家反應一定很大xD
加油gogo ~
S.T.A.R !! 十分感謝!

7odoa wrote:

01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...

DarknessAngel wrote:

7odoa wrote:

01:36:887 (1,2) - 這兩個slider速度太不科學啦orz 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...01:36:887 (1,2) - 我想在這兩個長條賺300都不行lol:arrow: 這兩個slider很好看,如果再有多一位Modder提出我便改了...

由於上面是綠色字所以只是吐槽用啦，沒要你改lol

Charles445 wrote:

Pretty sure using red timing sections merely to slow down sliders isn't rankable anymore, even if it is from the official timing.

those wrote:

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

7odoa wrote:

I just follow official timing,so I think it is fine.
I don't want to manipulate slider velocity with Timing Points,It is the song make me to do it.
This need more comment...

7odoa wrote:

No need Taiko diff for this song...

dialgadu77 wrote:

OH GOD AWESOME MAP one of the best map i've ever seen
but a little question:

7odoa wrote:

No need Taiko diff for this song...

why?

7odoa wrote:

Because this song have too many BPM change,
Ex: 01:09:146 ~ 01:21:690
When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

7odoa wrote:

When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

those wrote:

7odoa wrote:

When you map those part,It will became unreadable like osu! diff.

You just need to set inherited points to multiply the sv.

Rule wrote:

Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

7odoa wrote:

Rule wrote:

Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

I don't know this is rankable or not,but if I accept your taiko diff,I'll accept Verdi's and Ono's taiko diff too.(They are asked me taiko diff in before)
Anyway,I can put this diff on Creator's Words now if you want~

karenying wrote:

from M4M queue
以及我鬼畜圖mod不能.orz
給張不鬼畜的可以嗎/.\

1. Looks good.

1. 00:25:733 (4,1) - The pattern you have with these two sliders is pretty odd looking in my opinion. Try something like this that's more intuitive and better looking. They also blanket eachother very nicely.
2. 01:11:056 (2) - This slider is pretty odd looking if you ask me.
3. 01:36:443 (4) - Spacing between the previous slider and this note is a bit too large.

1. 00:11:885 (1) - Put the whistle on the end of this slider rather than the reverse to follow your whistle pattern.
2. 00:16:248 (1) - ^
3. 00:33:560 - You should add a note here because of the fact that there's an audible beat at this point. It also flows well. I suggest arranging it like this and adding a NC at 00:34:343 (5) to shorten up the combo.
4. 01:23:737 (4) - Move this up two grids to be symmetrical with the previous slider.

1. 00:22:995 (1) - Stack this on the bottom of the previous stream.
2. 00:34:734 (2,4) - Make it so that these don't overlap.

1. Looks good to me.

1. Holy crap. This difficulty is intense.
2. 00:13:385 (4) - Put a new combo on this slider and all other slowdown sliders like it.

Jacob wrote:

Hello, 7odoa! I really love the map and the song choice.

General

1. Looks good.

Beginner

1. 00:25:733 (4,1) - The pattern you have with these two sliders is pretty odd looking in my opinion. Try something like this that's more intuitive and better looking. They also blanket eachother very nicely.//It's fine to me
2. 01:11:056 (2) - This slider is pretty odd looking if you ask me.//Changed
3. 01:36:443 (4) - Spacing between the previous slider and this note is a bit too large.//Fixed

Basic

1. 00:11:885 (1) - Put the whistle on the end of this slider rather than the reverse to follow your whistle pattern.//No change
2. 00:16:248 (1) - ^//No change
3. 00:33:560 - You should add a note here because of the fact that there's an audible beat at this point. It also flows well. I suggest arranging it like this and adding a NC at 00:34:343 (5) to shorten up the combo.//OK
4. 01:23:737 (4) - Move this up two grids to be symmetrical with the previous slider.//...

Difficult

1. 00:22:995 (1) - Stack this on the bottom of the previous stream.//No change
2. 00:34:734 (2,4) - Make it so that these don't overlap.//I think it is fine...

Expert

1. Looks good to me.

Challenge

1. Holy crap. This difficulty is intense.
2. 00:13:385 (4) - Put a new combo on this slider and all other slowdown sliders like it.//OK,I add new combo colors for Slowdown.

Good luck!

1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.

Suzully wrote:

From my modding queue. Sorry for taking long time :< <<Never mind~

[Difficult]

1. 01:37:554 (1,2,3) - This is a hard diff. So please follow the consistent distance spacing here.<<Ok~

[Basic]

1. 01:21:008 (4,5) - Since it's too hard for beginner to read the timing, change these notes to a slider.<<I can't change it to slider,because the slider is too slow.

Please tell me your thought.

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

7odoa wrote:

Suzully wrote:

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.<<Okay,I think It is fine because it is from the official timing~

104,300,4,2,1,95,1,0
9704,272.727272727273,4,1,2,60,1,0
18431,260.869565217391,4,1,1,70,1,1
22539,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
22800,-100,4,1,1,70,0,0
22995,-100,4,1,1,70,0,1
26778,250,6,1,1,70,1,0
32778,260.869565217391,6,1,1,70,1,1
41438,300,4,1,2,60,1,0
48638,272.727272727273,4,1,1,70,1,0
58456,300,4,1,1,70,1,0
59056,-100,4,1,1,63,0,0
59656,-100,4,1,1,56,0,0
60256,-100,4,1,1,49,0,0
63106,-100,4,2,2,95,0,0
68056,272.727272727273,4,1,1,80,1,0
80260,-100,4,1,1,85,0,0
80806,-100,4,1,1,90,0,0
81351,-100,4,1,1,95,0,0
81624,-100,4,2,1,90,0,0
82237,250,4,1,2,65,1,0
90077,230.769230769231,4,1,1,75,1,1
93711,-100,4,2,1,95,0,1
94111,-100,4,1,1,80,0,1
94666,222.222222222222,4,1,1,80,1,1
95499,-100,4,1,1,85,0,1
96443,222.222222222222,5,1,1,85,1,1
96831,-66.6666666666667,5,1,1,85,0,1
97220,-100,5,1,1,85,0,0
97331,-100,5,1,1,70,0,0

1. I want to keep BPM:50~270,not BPM:200~270(as I said before,it is from the official timing)
2. If I use this timing,then I must Re-map those slow part.
3. I think using BPM:50x4=200 for slow part is not fit.

Twilight Sparkle wrote:

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

Rules wrote:

DarknessAngel wrote:

Rules wrote:

我在mod這張圖的時候就該說的...orz
沒辦法，要是你不改的話就不能ranked ;_;

7odoa wrote:

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...
rank不了便算吧,而且我不只是想這張圖rank~
(新圖求MOD XD)

I tired to get it ranked...

DarknessAngel wrote:

我個人很想看到這圖上架的說T.T<-我都是.
慢滑條的確很有梗，可是不用紅線就沒辦法達成...(綠線最少0.5倍速度還是快了些..)<-只是用的原作的timing而已,不是我想出來的梗.
還是說改成像Expert那樣1/1重疊？<2個難度用同一種寫法太沒有新意了
雖說捨棄變慢的梗讓人不爽但是至少能ranked ;w;<-以圖的質量為先,改了會令我對圖的質量不滿意,我不想rank了一些陣mapper自己都不滿意的圖

話說在這裡求MOD是哪招xD
sry我最近不接req =3=<不要緊,只是宣傳一下而已~

7odoa wrote:

我不想改了,改了只會令圖的質量變差...

Suzully wrote:

About red timing sections. I'll ask other members about this and I'll write a result here. Please wait a bit.

those wrote:

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
If you would like, you can delete all your bookmarks to decrease the size of your .osz file by a little since you won't be needing them by the time this gets put on the server.
You do not need the timing points at:
00:13:385
00:13:931
00:14:067
00:17:749
00:22:604
00:51:365
00:54:773
00:58:045
01:10:783
01:11:056
01:11:737
01:12:419
01:13:100
01:13:372
01:14:327
01:14:599
01:15:145
01:15:554
01:16:235
01:16:507
01:17:053
01:17:325
01:17:871
01:18:143
01:18:415
01:18:552
01:18:961
01:19:915
01:20:327
01:20:872
01:21:008
01:21:690
01:25:612
01:29:477
01:33:769
01:34:666
01:36:443

That's a lot of timing points you used there: at first I thought you were trying to stay on rhythm and to try to start each downbeat at the right place, but then I looked at your Challenge difficulty and realized that you were using the Timing points to manipulate your slider velocity, which is unfortunately UNRANKABLE. Let's delete these and fix your sliders before I come back to this. Feel free to PM me when that's fixed.

In addition, you also have inconsistent Kiai Times. You may want to fix those as well.

Good luck :3

7odoa wrote:

Twilight Sparkle wrote:

This feels entirely rankable.
Great job on the map :3

Thank You!~

No BAT going to rank this? orz...

nold_1702 wrote:

把sv轉做1.35 1.0part轉2.0 bpm 慢part轉0.5試試?

Baka Tenshi wrote:

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

Shiro wrote:

Hi.

I can confirm that the timing has been changed.
However, watch out for broken sliders. For example, in the Expert difficulty, 00:22:995 (1) -
while I'm at it, 01:21:556 (1,1) - (expert diff) this is quite a huge jump, and very surprising, given that the objects are a whole screen away from each other.

I'm happy to unnuke this - good luck on getting this ranked !

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...

Suzully wrote:

Thank you for understanding.
I'm glad that I can get a bubble back now. But there is still a few issues.

[Beginner]

1. 01:17:465 (3,1) - Incorrect spacing.<-Fixed
2. 01:30:077 (1,3) - Oh...<-Fixed......

7odoa wrote:

Baka Tenshi wrote:

01:09:146 (1) to 01:22:237 (1) - This part...I gotta be serious. Needs an experience from who can apply my idea, who knows? May work and may not, or w/e

It's fine,just like Expert.

BPM:50~270 Changed to 100~135

It's no problem for now?

rrtyui wrote:

Please Rank it !

Garven wrote:

Yo

[General]
Tick rate 4 to all difficulties since you have the BPM halved. I'd recommend you silence key ticks during the beginning and other quieter parts of the song.
Ok~

[Easy]
01:15:556 (1,2,3) - This part is pretty trick for an easy. You might want to simplify with it longer sliders like you've used before.
I have re-map this part,it is hard to map...

[Basic]
This is hardly what I would call a Basic. Call it Standard or Normal.
It is DDRSN2's Diff Name,Basic=Normal

[Difficult]
00:15:704 (4) - I'm not sure what this note is mapped to, but it is weird to play.
Fixed
00:32:778 (1) - Something that's really bugging me about this section is that you chose to do a slider -> circle -? slider -> circle progression when the music is grouped in fours. You're essentially grouping things in threes with this type of pattern and it's really really difficult to play it naturally. I recommend you rethink this part.
[Expert]No changed because it's not very hard in this diff...
01:27:917 (2,1) - This jump is egg a big pain too due to the direction change.
Changed some.

[Challenge]
01:26:237 (1) - I didn't like how this was the sole stacked note after a slow slider.
Fixed

Good stuff. Mainly worried about the simplification of the Easy.

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

Colin Hou wrote:

[General]

1. 01:37:220 - unsnapped KIAI section.

[Challenge]

1. 01:34:000 (2) - for consistence, new combo this instead of the note next.

~

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111

Colin Hou wrote:

[Challenge]

1. make sure all white combo color is used properly after 01:35:111