Wojjan wrote:

hey if a newbie wants in I'll gladly step aside
speaking of, Darkari, this is my world I can feel you in here

bmin11 wrote:

oh no

NoHItter wrote:

RQS:
1) What's your favorite role and alignment?
2) Would you lynch lurkers?
3) Would you rely on meta?
4) How often do you plan on posting?

NoHItter wrote:

RQS:
1) What's your favorite role and alignment?
2) Would you lynch lurkers?
3) Would you rely on meta?
4) How often do you plan on posting?

NoHItter wrote:

RQS:
1) What's your favorite role and alignment?
2) Would you lynch lurkers?
3) Would you rely on meta?
4) How often do you plan on posting?

Sync wrote:

Do you think RVS is useless and unnecessary? If so, why? If not, how can it be used to benefit town?

Sync wrote:

How many games of mafia have you played, Ekaru?

if it's more than 3 then those answers suck

NoHItter wrote:

RQS:
1) What's your favorite role and alignment? Mafia or Serial Killer
2) Would you lynch lurkers? Depending on the current suspicion list
3) Would you rely on meta? Large games, not really. Small games, as far as it can carry me
4) How often do you plan on posting? Once a day min

Ekaru wrote:

Sync wrote:

How many games of mafia have you played, Ekaru?

if it's more than 3 then those answers suck

I haven't actually completed a single game yet, actually.

Sync wrote:

Do you think RVS is useless and unnecessary? If so, why? If not, how can it be used to benefit town?

NoHItter wrote:

Also Ekaru, your answers to 3 and 4 are cop outs.
For 1, I can understand given that you haven't even finished a game, but not 3 or 4.

Backfire wrote:

Oh, I didn't notice till after I posted that there was.

NoHItter wrote:

Really. If you wanted the thread to not be quiet, instead of prodding other people to talk, you try to generate activity first.

Backfire wrote:

Oh, I didn't notice till after I posted that there was.

Then why didn't you post again after you saw it? You had to wait for someone to call you out before answering.

Drakari wrote:

I'm just here for the sake of being here. Never been particularly good at day 1.

Sync wrote:

Ekaru's vote actually isn't justified at all

Sync wrote:

D1 isn't all about RVS, you know...

in this case, it's you voting for Drakari giving not a single valid reason whatsoever

Sync wrote:

they aren't scum

also, are you claiming your vote for Drakari was a random vote?

Ekaru wrote:

I'm claiming it's semi-random, yes. The moment a better vote comes up I'll switch to it. Again, I only voted for Drakari for now because he said he wasn't posting just because he isn't confident in his day 1 abilities. It's not anywhere near a reliable read, of course, but neither is somebody voting without an explanation early on in the game.

Sync wrote:

it's past RVS now.

"semi-random" is worse than "random".

Also, your "semi-random" reasoning doesn't make sense -- how exactly did you interpret "I am not confident in my D1 abilities" as a scum-tell?

Ekaru wrote:

Sync wrote:

it's past RVS now.

And I'm supposed to know this... how?

"semi-random" is worse than "random".

Please explain. As I said, it's just a light vote until something better comes up.

Also, your "semi-random" reasoning doesn't make sense -- how exactly did you interpret "I am not confident in my D1 abilities" as a scum-tell?

As an excuse for lurking, of course.

Sync wrote:

Semi-random means that there is reasoning behind it, yet you claim it to be random which makes you look stupid.

Then half the people in this thread are scum for voting without giving a valid reason. That's what RVS is.

You don't see people randomly voting people, do you? When there is actual conversation about the game, that generally means RVS is over.

Ekaru wrote:

I'm claiming it's semi-random, yes.

NoHItter wrote:

RQS:
1) What's your favorite role and alignment? Any role, but investigative/with people. Basically whatever with more information then the common townie.
2) Would you lynch lurkers? Prod -> Find Replacements -> Lynch if none are found
3) Would you rely on meta? Sometimes, but I don't go out to collect meta and shit
4) How often do you plan on posting? Once a day

Sync wrote:

and then he denied that he said the vote was random

vote: Ekaru

Sync wrote:

and then he denied that he said the vote was random

vote: Ekaru

All I did was do what I have seen other people do in mafia games; vote without much explanation because the reasoning behind their vote is implied.

Ekaru wrote:

Sync wrote:

and then he denied that he said the vote was random

vote: Ekaru

I never said the vote was random. I already said this.

I said it was semi-random; as in, it was only partially random. As in, there was reasoning behind it but it's not that serious of a vote. Again, stop putting words into my mouth. That is how people use "semi-random" where I live; to mean that it was kinda random, but not really.

All I did was do what I have seen other people do in mafia games; vote without much explanation because the reasoning behind their vote is implied. Ex. What Rantai did just now, what I've seen other people do in other games, etc. Am I supposed to not do what I've seen others do? Because that really makes no sense.

Also, RVS votes are not truly random. The reasoning behind it is typically ridiculous, but there is still reasoning. If the votes were truly random then RVS would be pretty much useless.

P.S. The post above this one was accidental. Ignore that.

The meaning of semi-random is universal.

It's way past RVS and you should have known this.

I'm not putting any words into your mouth -- in fact, I'm taking words directly from your posts

RVS votes are random. That is the whole point. The reason behind it is tacked on for fun, not because it is a serious reason like yours.

Rantai's vote was not random.